The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wen, L.
Right arrow Articles by Hayday, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wen, L.
Right arrow Articles by Hayday, A.
The Journal of Immunology, 1998, 160: 1965-1974.
Copyright © 1998 by The American Association of Immunologists

Primary {gamma}{delta} Cell Clones Can Be Defined Phenotypically and Functionally as Th1/Th2 Cells and Illustrate the Association of CD4 with Th2 Differentiation1

Li Wen2,*, Domingo F. Barber3,*, William Pao3,*, F. Susan Wong3,{dagger}, Michael J. Owen{ddagger} and Adrian Hayday4,*,{dagger}

* Department of Biology and {dagger} Section of Immunobiology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511; {ddagger} Imperial Cancer Research Fund Laboratories, London, United Kingdom


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The division of CD4+ {alpha}ß T cells into Th1 and Th2 subsets has become an established and important paradigm. The respective activities of these subsets appear to have profound effects on the course of infectious and autoimmune diseases. It is believed that specific programs of differentiation induce the commitment of an uncommitted Th0 precursor cell to Th1 or Th2. A component of these programs is hypothesized to be the nature of MHC-peptide antigen presentation to the {alpha}ß T cell. It has heretofore remained uncertain whether a Th1/Th2 classification likewise defines, at the clonal level, {gamma}{delta} T cells. Such cells do not, as a general rule, express either CD4 or CD8{alpha}ß, and they do not commonly recognize peptide-MHC. In this report, {gamma}{delta} cell clones are described that conform strikingly to the Th1/Th2 classification, both by cytokine expression and by functional activities of the clones in vitro and in vivo. Provocatively, both the {gamma}{delta} cell clones and primary {gamma}{delta} cells in vivo showed a strong association of the Th2 phenotype with CD4 expression. These results are discussed with regard to the immunoregulatory role that is increasingly emerging for {gamma}{delta} cells.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
All mammalian and avian species examined to date harbor two distinct types of T cell that, on the basis of their heterodimeric TCR expression, are classified as {alpha}ß and {gamma}{delta} T cells (1, 2). These two lineages of T cells share some common characteristics, such as the association of the TCR chains with CD3 molecules (3), the expression of certain other surface molecules (4), and cell functions, such as cytotoxicity (5, 6, 7). However, they differ significantly in their anatomical distribution, ontogeny, and immunobiologic roles (3, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15).

Over the past few years, a classification of CD4+ {alpha}ß T cells has been established, primarily according to the cells’ pattern of cytokine production and consequent physiologic function (16). Th1 cells produce IFN-{gamma} and IL-2, which activate T cells and macrophages to attack intracellular pathogens and promote, through B cell help, the synthesis of particular Ig isotypes (e.g., murine IgG2a). Th2 cells, conversely, produce IL-4, IL-5, and IL-10, which help B cells synthesize other Ig isotypes (e.g., murine IgG1 and IgE) commonly associated with the attack on extracellular pathogens. The analysis of numerous infection systems and autoimmune diseases indicates that the skewing of the response to either Th1 or Th2 activation, respectively, has significant consequences for clearance of pathogen and/or characteristics of lymphoid infiltration (17, 18, 19, 20). In addition, Th2 cells may prove to be major physiologic down-regulators of Th1 responses (21).

How {gamma}{delta} T cells might fit into the Th1/Th2 pattern has not been clearly elucidated. First, most {gamma}{delta} T cells are not CD4+; thus, if CD4 expression were an important component of Th1/Th2 differentiation, one might expect that {gamma}{delta} T cells would not conform to this paradigm. Furthermore, several experiments using mice congenitally deficient in the synthesis of {alpha}ß T cells have demonstrated that {gamma}{delta} cells, unlike {alpha}ß T cells, are either incapable of or at best inefficient in providing Ag-specific responses of the kind responsible for pathogen clearance or for Ag-specific autoimmunity (14, 15, 22, 23, 24).

This notwithstanding, human and murine {gamma}{delta} cells have been demonstrated to provide B cell help (25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31) and, in association with this, were clearly shown to produce IL-4 (26, 29), a signatory Th2-type cytokine. Likewise, mice and humans infected with bacteria, viruses, or protozoa have demonstrated increases in lymphoid or intraepithelial {gamma}{delta} cells, suggesting an involvement of {gamma}{delta} cells in the nature of the host response (32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39). Indeed, when the intracellular expression of cytokines by such responding {gamma}{delta} cells was examined, it revealed Th1- and Th2-type patterns that paralleled the prevailing Th1 and Th2 {alpha}ß T cell responses (40). Since then, additional studies have demonstrated the production of Th1 and Th2 cytokines by populations of {gamma}{delta} cells (41). These data have provoked the question of how closely the production of cytokines by {gamma}{delta} cells might conform at the clonal level to the Th1/Th2 paradigm defined for {alpha}ß cells.

In this study, cellular, molecular, and functional evidence is provided for the classification of {gamma}{delta} T cell clones as Th1 or Th2. We discuss the potential relevance of this to emerging bioassays for {gamma}{delta} cells (15, 24, 42, 43, 44, 45) and to the idea that Th1/Th2 determination results from the mode of presentation of peptide-MHC by a professional APC to a responding CD4+ T cell (46, 47).


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Mice

Mice were bred and maintained in specific pathogen-free animal facilities at Yale University (New Haven, CT). TCR{alpha}-/- mice (H-2b/d) were generated by gene targeting (48). TCRßx{delta}-/- mice were generated locally by breeding TCRß-/- mice (H-2b) (49) with TCR{delta}-/- (H-2b) mice (50). CB17.SCID mice (H-2d) were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME).

Establishment of {gamma}{delta} cell lines

TCR{alpha}-/- splenocytes (2 x 106/ml) were cultured in Click’s medium plus 5 U/ml IL-2 (supernatant of EL4), 5% heat-inactivated FCS (HyClone, Logan, UT), and antibiotics (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY). The cultures were replenished with medium every 3 to 4 days. Irradiated (3000 rad) feeder cells (BALB/c splenocytes, 106/ml) were added 2 wk after the initial culture and weekly thereafter for 4 wk. Once a line was established, it was weaned off feeders.

Establishment of {gamma}{delta} cell clones

Limiting dilution of {gamma}{delta} cell lines was performed on irradiated feeder cells in 96-well microtiter plates at n <= 1 cell/well. Medium was replenished every 3 to 4 days, and irradiated (3000 rad) feeder cells were provided weekly for the first few weeks and at 2-wk intervals subsequently until the establishment of clones, after which the supply of feeder cells was gradually stopped. All experiments presented in this study were performed with established clones (free of APC).

Monoclonal Abs

The following directly conjugated mAbs were purchased from PharMingen (San Diego, CA): PE-conjugated anti-CD3 (2C11), anti-TCR{gamma}{delta} (GL3), and anti-CD8 (53-6.7); FITC-conjugated anti-TCR{alpha}ß (H57) and anti-CD4 (RM4-5); and biotin-conjugated anti-Thy1.2 (53-2.1), anti-CD45R (B220, RA3-6B2), and anti-CD40 ligand (CD40L, MRL). Hybridoma culture supernatants were either maintained in this laboratory (2C11, H57, and GL3) or provided by Dr. C. Janeway, Jr. (Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Yale University: 2.4G2, anti-Fc receptor; 212A.1, anti-I-Ab/d), or Dr. Albert Bendelac (Princeton University, Princeton, NJ; anti-CD1).

Cell staining and FACS analysis, sorting, and activation

Single cell suspensions (~106 cells/ml) were incubated with PE- or FITC-conjugated Abs at pretitrated dilutions on ice for 30 min, followed by washing three times with PBS-1% FCS and 0.02% sodium azide. Biotin-conjugated mAbs were further incubated with fluorescence-conjugated streptavidin. Stained cells were fixed in PBS-1% paraformaldehyde and analyzed on a FACScan (Becton Dickinson, Mountain View, CA). Dead cells and nonlymphoid cells were excluded by selective gating on forward and side scatter. For sorting, splenocytes (108/ml) were stained with PE-conjugated anti-TCR{gamma}{delta} (GL3) and FITC-conjugated anti-CD4 (RM4-5). After washing, cells were resuspended at 2 x 107/ml in PBS-2% FCS for sorting on a FACStar (Becton Dickinson), after which they were either used directly as a source of RNA (ex vivo sample) or activated in Click’s medium, 5% FCS, and 2.5 µg/ml Con A for 48 h before being used as a source of RNA (activated sample). In the latter case, the viability of cells was confirmed before and after harvest by trypan blue exclusion.

RT-PCR for cytokine, Fas, and Fas ligand (FasL) mRNA

RNA was prepared from {gamma}{delta} cell clones (~2.5 x 106 cells) by RNAzol (Biotecx Laboratories, Inc., Houston, TX) and reverse transcribed into single strand cDNA using an oligo(dT) primer (Pharmacia, Piscataway, NJ) and Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase (Life Technologies) at 37°C (neutral pH) for 60 min. Two microliters of the cDNA (100 µl) was amplified with primers specific for IL-4, IL-5, IL-10, IFN-{gamma}, TGF-ß, Fas, and FasL together with hypoxanthine phoshoribosyl transferase (HPRT; as a control) in the presence of 100 ng of the 5' and 3' primers, 1 µl of dNTPs (10 mM), 1.5 mM MgCl2, and 1 U of Taq polymerase (Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis, IN). The PCR reactions were denatured at 94°C for 3 min followed by 35 cycles of 94°C for 20 s, 60°C for 20 s, and 72°C for 40 s and a final extension at 72°C for 7 min. PCR products were analyzed on 1.5% agarose gels. Primers were synthesized in the Keck Facility of Yale University, and the primer sequences for cytokines were adopted from the report by Reiner et al. (51) with corrections: IL-4, 5'-CATCGGCATTTTGAACGAGGTCA-3' and 5'-CTTATCGATGAATCCAGGCATCG-3'; IL-5, 5'-GAAAGAGACCTTGACACAGCTG-3' and 5'-GAACTCTTGCAGGTAATCCAGG-3'; IL-10, 5'-CCAGTTTTACCTGGTAGAAGTGATG-3' and 5'-TGTCTAGGTCCTGGAGTCCAGCAGACTCAA-3'; IFN-{gamma}, 5'-CATTGAAAGCCTAGAAAGTCTG-3' and 5'-CTCATGAATGCATCCTTTTTCG-3'; HPRT, 5'-GTTGGATACAGGCCAGACTTTGTTG-3' and 5'-GAGGGTAGGCTGGCCTATGGCT-3'; and additionally, Fas, 5'-ATCCGAGCTCTGAGGAGGCGGGTTCATGAAAC-3' and 5'-GGAGGTTCTAGATTCAGGGTCATCCTG-3'; and FasL, 5'-CAGCTCTTCCACCTGCAGAAGG-3' and 5'-AGATTCCTCAAAATTGATCAGAGAGAG-3'.

Quantitative RT-PCR

Cytokine mRNA was quantitated by competitive PCR (51), employing the simultaneous amplification by the same primers of known quantities of competitor DNA fragments. The competitor (provided by Dr. Richard Locksley, University of California, San Francisco, CA) differs from the cDNA of interest by an insert that allows the relative amounts of the two amplification products to be distinguished by gel electrophoresis.

To establish comparable amounts of cDNA template for subsequent analysis of cytokine gene expression, the cDNA was used as a template for the amplification of the HPRT housekeeping gene in the presence of varying amounts of HPRT competitor fragment (see Fig. 6GoB and accompanying text in Results; numbers at the top of the lanes refer to fold dilutions of the competitor HPRT fragment used). At each dilution of competitor, the ratio of the product derived from the cellular cDNA to the product derived from the competitor was assessed on a Bio-Rad Laboratory Densitometer (Richmond, CA), using photographic negatives from ethidium-stained agarose gels. These ratios were plotted against competitor concentration, and the linear ranges established and compared by determination of regression (Fig. 6Go, C and D, and accompanying text in Results). This allowed us to compare the competitor concentrations required to obtain specific ratios of cell product to competitor product for each of the cDNAs, from which we could determine the relative operational concentrations of the cDNAs under study. Dilutions of those equivalent concentrations of cDNAs were then used as substrates for amplification of cytokine genes in the presence of a range of competitor concentrations. The ratios of cDNA product to competitor product were likewise plotted against the competitor concentration. When these plots were compared, it was possible to assess the relative abundance of cytokine cDNA in the different samples (see Fig. 6Go, E–I, in Results).



View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6. Analysis of activated and nonactivated (ex vivo ) {gamma}{delta}+/CD4- and {gamma}{delta}+/CD4+ T cells from TCR{alpha}-/- mice. A, Freshly isolated splenocytes from TCR{alpha}-/- mice were stained for {gamma}{delta} (PE-FL2) and CD4 (FITC-FL1) and sorted for {gamma}{delta}+/CD4- (R2) and {gamma}{delta}+/CD4+ (R3) cells. B, HPRT amplification using cDNA from activated CD4+ and CD4- {gamma}{delta} cells, respectively, mixed with a competitor fragment of the HPRT gene at a range of dilutions (noted above the lanes: 1, undiluted competitor; 16, competitor used at 1/16th concentration, etc.). C and D, Plots of the ratio of PCR product derived from cDNA to that derived from the competitor (y), against competitor dilution (x), for activated CD4+ {gamma}{delta} cells (C) and activated CD4- {gamma}{delta} cells (D). E andF, IL-4 amplification using cDNA from activated CD4+ and CD4- {gamma}{delta} cells, respectively, mixed with a competitor fragment of the IL-4 gene at a range of dilutions (noted above the lanes). In F, greater dilutions of the competitor were used with the activated CD4- sample to find the linear range. G, IL-4 amplification using cDNA from nonactivated ex vivo CD4+ and CD4- {gamma}{delta} cells, respectively, mixed with a competitor fragment of the IL-4 gene at a range of dilutions (noted above the lane). H andI, Plots of the ratio of IL-4 PCR product derived from cDNA to that derived from the competitor (y), against competitor dilution (x), for activated CD4+ {gamma}{delta} cells (H) and activated CD4- {gamma}{delta} cells (I). A visual comparison indicates that to obtain an IL-4 product ratio of 2 for the CD4+ sample, approximately 16-fold more competitor would be required compared with that necessary to obtain the same ratio with the CD4- sample. Calculation showed the value to be 17.4.

 
Sequence analysis of TCR gene rearrangements in {gamma}{delta} T cell clones

TCR {gamma} and {delta} gene rearrangements of {gamma}{delta} clones were independently amplified by RT-PCR using "hot start" (denaturing at 94°C for 5 min) followed by 38 cycles of 94°C for 1 min, 58°C for 40 s, and 72°C for 1 min in a DNA thermal cycler 480 (Perkin-Elmer/Cetus, Emeryville, CA). The amplified products were purified (Qiagen, Chatsworth, CA), ligated, and transformed into Escherichia coli using the TA method (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA). Sequencing analysis was performed using Sequenase (52), [35S]dATP, and SP6-, T7-, or TCR-specific oligonucleotides as primers, as previously described (28).

Adoptive cell transfer and cell tracing

Splenocytes (10–15 x 106) from TCRßx{delta}-/- mice (10–16 wk old) mixed with 3 to 5 x 106 cloned {gamma}{delta} cells were injected i.v. into CB17.SCID mice (6–8 wk-old). Cloned {gamma}{delta} cells (3–5 x 106) were also i.v. transferred to TCRßx{delta}-/- mice. For cell tracing, {gamma}{delta} clones and splenocytes from a TCRßx{delta}-/- mouse were labeled with the fluorescent dye DiI (Molecular Probes, Inc., Eugene, OR) at 37°C for 30 min before adoptive transfer. Transferred cells that were labeled could be observed in frozen spleen sections by fluorescence microscopy, as previously described (27).

ELISA quantitation of Ig and cytokine levels

For Ig quantitation, recipients were bled, and individual serum samples were collected every 2 wk postreconstitution. Total levels of serum IgM, IgG1, IgG2a, IgG2b, IgG3, and IgA were determined by ELISA as described previously (26, 27), using reagents from Southern Biotechnology Associates, Inc. (Birmingham, AL). Briefly, microtiter ELISA plates (Dynatech Laboratory, Inc., Chantilly, VA) were coated with goat anti-mouse IgH+L (5 µg/ml) in coating buffer (carbonate buffer, pH 9.6). After blocking the plates with 1% BSA (PBS containing 1% BSA), diluted serum samples (1/100 in blocking buffer) were added in duplicate. For standards, serial dilutions of mouse IgM, IgG1, IgG2a, IgG2b, IgG3, and IgA (Southern Biotechnology Associates) were also added in duplicate, starting at 1 µg/ml. After incubation and washing, alkaline phosphatase-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgM, IgG1, IgG2a, IgG2b, IgG3, and IgA were added individually. The enzymatic reaction was developed by adding substrate p-nitrophenyl phosphate and was stopped by adding 1 N NaOH. The plates were read at an absorbance of 405 nm on an microplate reader (Dynatech). The concentrations of Ig isotypes were determined by referring to standard curves performed in the same assay with known concentrations of various mouse Ig isotypes using the equation y = intercept + slope x log(x); the actual serum concentrations were obtained by y x the serum dilution (i.e., 100). Note that the concentrations quoted in the figures in this paper are for the sera and are calculated from the concentrations of serum dilutions that were experimentally determined and compared with concentrations of standards in the same ranges as the serum dilutions. Secreted cytokines (IL-4 and IFN-{gamma}) in culture supernatants were also measured by ELISA using mAbs against murine IL-4 or IFN-{gamma} (PharMingen) together with different concentrations of rIFN-{gamma} and IL-4 (Life Technologies) as standards. The concentrations of IL-4 and IFN-{gamma} in the culture supernatants were converted as described for Ig isotypes.

Detection of germinal centers (GC)

GC formation was examined in the spleens of reconstituted SCID mice and TCRßx{delta}-/- mice, respectively, using immunohistochemistry as reported previously (27, 28).

Histologic examination

Liver, kidney, intestine, and lung from the reconstituted SCID or TCRßx{delta}-/- mice were fixed in 10% buffered formalin, paraffin embedded, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. The sections were examined microscopically for lymphocytic infiltration to evaluate the presence of graft-vs-host-disease.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Cell surface phenotype of {gamma}{delta} cell clones derived from TCR{alpha}-/- mice

Two {gamma}{delta} cell lines were derived from splenocytes of two TCR{alpha}-/- mice (H-2b). They were CD4+ and CD4-CD8- (double negative, DN), respectively. From these, a total of five {gamma}{delta} cell clones were obtained by limiting dilution. Two (G5 and H4) were CD4+; three were CD4-,CD8- (A3, F6, and H2; Fig. 1GoA). Also studied was the expression on the clones of adhesion molecules (ICAM-1, LFA-1, and lymphocyte Peyers patch adhesion molecule-1 (LPAM)), costimulatory molecules (CD28 and CD40 ligand), and CD1 that are either known or speculated to play important roles in T cell function. Examples of the range of expression levels are provided in Figure 1GoB, and the data are summarized in Table IGo. All five {gamma}{delta} cell clones expressed LFA-1, ICAM-1, and CD28 similarly, while the expressions of CD40L and {alpha}4 integrin (LPAM) were more heterogeneous. The data are consistent with previous studies of {gamma}{delta} cell populations (4, 53, 54), in that expression of CD28 is more variable than is generally the case for {alpha}ß cells. Interestingly, CD1 was clearly expressed by all the clones in which it was tested, consistent with the recent report that CD1 is expressed by various hemopoietic cells (55).



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. FACS profiles of {gamma}{delta} T cell clones derived from TCR{alpha}-/- mice. A, Expression of CD4 or CD8 coreceptor. a, Clone H4; b and c, clone F6. The x-axis represents FITC-conjugated anti-TCR{delta} (GL3) for a and b, and FITC-conjugated anti-CD8 (53-6.7) for c. The y-axis represents PE-conjugated anti-CD4 (H129.19) for a and b, and PE-conjugated anti-TCR{delta} (GL3) for c. Clone G5 and clones A3 and H2, also used in this study, have the same phenotype as clone H4 and clone F6, respectively, as indicated in the figure. B, Examples of expression of adhesion and costimulatory molecules. a, b, and c represent the actual staining of clone H2 with anti-LFA-1 (2D7), anti-ICAM-1 (3E2), and anti-LPAM-1 (R1-2). The anti-ICAM was directly conjugated (FITC) mAb; the others were unconjugated mAbs detected by use of FITC-conjugated goat anti-rat IgG (Life Technologies) or anti-hamster IgG (Life Technologies) as secondary Abs. The x-axis represents FL-1 (FITC), and the y-axis indicates cell numbers.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I. Surface expression of molecules on {gamma}{delta} T cell clonesa

 
Th1/Th2 cytokine and Fas/FasL gene expression by {gamma}{delta} cell clones

Cytokine mRNA expression by {gamma}{delta} clones was determined by RT-PCR. Both CD4+ {gamma}{delta} T cell clones (H4 and G5) conformed strikingly to a typical Th2 phenotype: high levels of IL-4, IL-5, and IL-10 and undetectable levels of IFN-{gamma} (Fig. 2GoA) or IL-2 (data not shown). By contrast, all DN {gamma}{delta} T cell clones conformed to a typical Th1 phenotype, displaying high levels of IFN-{gamma} (Fig. 2GoA) and IL-2, against undetectable IL-4, IL-5, and IL-10 (Fig. 2GoA).



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. A, The cytokine RNA profile of clones G5 and H2. Expression of cytokine mRNA was assessed by RT-PCR, as shown in the ethidium bromide-stained gel against a 100-bp m.w. marker (100bp). Amplifications specific for IL-4, IL-5, IL-10, IFN-{gamma}, or HPRT (control housekeeping gene) cDNA are indicated. The negative control (ctrl) represents attempted amplification using HPRT-specific primers in the absence of template. B, Expression of Fas/Fas ligand mRNA in {gamma}{delta} T cell clones. Expression of Fas/FasL mRNA assessed by RT-PCR is shown in the ethidium-bromide stained gel. The PCR reaction was performed in the same experiment as that in A; hence, HPRT was not duplicated. D10 is a Th2 {alpha}ß clone (provided by Dr. C. Janeway, Jr.). Clone B3B3 is a Th0 {alpha}ß clone (S. F. Wong, unpublished observation). Clone A7 is another DN {gamma}{delta} T cell clone, the further characterization of which was not investigated in this study. C, Secreted cytokine. Supernatants were measured for IFN-{gamma} and IL-4 production by ELISA (see Materials and Methods) after harvesting from the indicated T cell clones that had been grown in Click’s medium plus serum for 72 h, after stimulation with anti-CD3 (2C11).

 
It has been suggested that Fas/FasL interaction defines a differential regulatory capacity of CD4+ T cells (56, 57), with Th1 CD4+ {alpha}ß T cells expressing high ratios of FasL:fas, and Th2 CD4+ {alpha}ß T cells expressing higher ratios of fas:FasL (Th0 cells are reported to express Fas and FasL approximately equivalently) (57). To test the degree to which the {gamma}{delta} clones conformed to this Th1/Th2 dichotomy, RT-PCR was again applied. D10, a CD4+ {alpha}ß+ Th2 clone, and B3B3, a CD4+, {alpha}ß+ Th0 clone were included as positive controls. The data (Fig. 2GoB) show that the FasL:Fas expression ratios of the {gamma}{delta} cell clones conformed to their classification as Th2 and Th1 cells, respectively: G5 and H4 (Th2) expressed higher levels of Fas than of FasL, while A3, F6, and H2 (together with an additional IFN-{gamma}-expressing {gamma}{delta} clone, A7) showed significant levels of FasL, but negligible expression of Fas (Fig. 2GoB).

To examine whether gene expression patterns by the clones were representative of effector molecule production, the secretion of IL-4 and IFN-{gamma} was examined by ELISA. Consistent with the RT-PCR data, secreted IL-4 was detected only in the supernatants of H4 and G5, while secreted IFN-{gamma} was detected only in the supernatants of F6 and H2 (Fig. 2GoC) and A3 (data not shown).

Regulatory role of {gamma}{delta} cells in class switching of B cells in vitro

A series of experiments was undertaken to determine whether the functional capabilities of the clones likewise conformed to the Th1/Th2 classification. First, the {gamma}{delta} clones were activated in vitro with anti-CD3 and cocultured with naive, primary B cells derived from TCRßx{delta}-/- mice; such cells were uninfluenced by any prior exposure to T cells. Igs of different isotypes were measured in the culture supernatants (n = 3) harvested 7 days postincubation. All {gamma}{delta}+ clones elicited Ab secretion (Fig. 3Go), but in the absence of stimulation by anti-CD3, most of the Ig produced by B cells was IgM. Conversely, activation of all the {gamma}{delta}+ clones followed by coculture with naive B cells provoked IgG secretion. However, the putative Th2-{gamma}{delta}+ clones, G5 and H4, induced class switching primarily to IgG1, whereas the putative Th1 {gamma}{delta}+ clones induced class switching primarily to IgG2a. This conforms strikingly to the behavior of Th1 and Th2 {alpha}ß T cell clones (Fig. 3Go).



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Ig production, detected by ELISA in culture supernatants. Splenocytes (2 x 106) from TCRßx{delta}-/- mice were cultured alone (B cells alone) or with 5 x 105 cells of different {gamma}{delta} T cell clones (as indicated) with or without supplements of hamster IgG (as a control Ab) or anti-CD3 in Click’s medium with 5% FCS (HyClone) for 7 days. The culture supernatants were harvested, and Ig production was measured by ELISA. Supernatants were diluted (1/10) before use, and the actual concentrations of Igs of different isotypes were derived from the standard curves used in the same assays (see Materials and Methods). Amounts of IgG1 induced by stimulated {gamma}{delta} clones were within the range (<=350 ng/ml) previously described by Vitetta and colleagues for the secretion of IgG1 induced by purified IL-4 (75).

 
Reconstitution in vivo of class-switched isotypes

To test whether the Th1/Th2 classification applied to the {gamma}{delta}+ clones in vivo, CB17.SCID recipients (n = 3–4/group) were adoptively transferred with various {gamma}{delta} T cell clones, admixed with splenic B cells derived from TCRßx{delta}-/- mice. As controls, {gamma}{delta} clones alone or TCRßx{delta}-/- splenic B cells alone were also transferred to CB17.SCID recipients (n = 2–3/group). The engraftment of cells was confirmed in the short term by tracing, using fluorescent dye (DiI)-labeled {gamma}{delta} clones or B cells (as in our previous studies (27)) and in the longer term by FACS analysis at 4 wk postadoptive transfer (Fig. 4GoA).



View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. A, FACS analysis of gated splenic lymphocytes from a SCID recipient that received DiI-labeled H4 {gamma}{delta} T cells 4 wk before the analysis. The y-axis shows FITC-conjugated anti-CD4 (H129.19); the x-axis shows PE-conjugated anti-TCR{delta} (GL3). B, Germinal center formation in spleens of reconstituted mice. GCs (arrowed) detected with peanut agglutinin (PNA; red-brown) on sections that were double stained with anti-B220 (blue) were found in SCID mice reconstituted with splenocytes from TCRßx{delta}-/- mice (107) together with individual {gamma}{delta} T cell clones (4 x 106; e.g., DN clone F6). C, PNA+ GCs were not found in SCID mice reconstituted with TCRßx{delta}-/- splenocytes alone, in which aggregates of B220+ cells were detectable. Original magnification, x40.

 
GC formation, a defining signature of T-B collaboration (28, 58, 59), and the follicular development of memory B cells, were also examined in SCID mice receiving {gamma}{delta} T cell clones together with splenic B cells from TCRßx{delta}-/- mice. As shown in Figure 4GoB, the DN (Th1-like) {gamma}{delta} T cell clone, F6, induced GC formation by B cells from TCRßx{delta}-/- mice. GC reconstitution was previously shown using the Th2 clone, G5 (27). No GCs formed when splenocytes from TCRßx{delta}-/- mice were inoculated without {gamma}{delta} clones (Fig. 4GoC) (27). To extend this finding, DN and CD4+ {gamma}{delta} clones were transferred directly to TCRßx{delta}-/- mice, in which, in the congenital absence of T cells, most Ab production is IgM and in which GCs do not develop (28). Again, GC formation was induced by both putative Th1 and putative Th2 {gamma}{delta} clones (data not shown). Consistent with our earlier findings (28), no GCs were observed in the TCRßx{delta}-/- recipients that received PBS only.

At various time points post-transfer, the CB17.SCID recipients were also assessed for serum Ig. The data (Fig. 5Go) reveal that all {gamma}{delta}+ clones sustained the production of IgG by transferred B cells, albeit at low levels. Conversely, Abs in SCID mice receiving B cells alone were almost exclusively IgM. Strikingly, IgG1 production was reproducibly higher in mice receiving putative Th2 clones G5 and H4, whereas IgG2a production was higher in mice receiving putative Th1 {gamma}{delta} T cell clones, e.g. F6 (Fig. 5Go).



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. Serum Ig levels of reconstituted SCID mice. CB17.SCID mice were injected (i.v.) with splenocytes from TCRßx{delta}-/- mice (107) together with individual {gamma}{delta} T cell clones (3 x 106). Serum samples were taken from the mice before and after reconstitution (at different time points) and kept at -20°C until the last time point (9 wk postreconstitution). The samples were diluted 1/100 before ELISA assay, and the actual concentrations of Igs of different isotypes were converted vs the standard curves used in the same assays (example shown for IgG2a for the range 10-3-10-1 µg; serum concentrations presented were extrapolated by multiplication by 102).

 
Molecular characterization of Th1- and Th2-type {gamma}{delta} T cell clones

The TCR{gamma}/{delta} gene usage of the clones was defined by RT-PCR, cloning, and sequencing (Table IIGo). Both CD4+ Th2-type {gamma}{delta}+ T cell clones used V{gamma}7-J{gamma}1 gene segments, whereas the DN Th1-type {gamma}{delta}+ T cell clones used V{gamma}1-J{gamma}4 gene segments. All the {gamma}{delta}+ T cell clones used in this study expressed V{delta}6-J{delta}1 gene segments (Table IIGo). The two CD4+ Th2-type {gamma}{delta} T cell clones that were originally derived from the same line shared identical joining sequences for both V{gamma} and V{delta} gene segments, indicating that they are in all likelihood sister subclones of a single progenitor. The junctional sequences in two DN Th1-type {gamma}{delta} T cell clones (A3 and H2) were likewise identical. Thus, the stable retention of a uniform Th1 or Th2 phenotype by sibling clones over time (the clones have been maintained for >2 yr), which is a further criterion of Th1/Th2 differentiation in {alpha}ß cells, is likewise a characteristic of the {gamma}{delta}+ clones. A third clone, F6 (DN, Th1 type), expressed different V{gamma}1-J{gamma}4/V{delta}6-J{delta}1 rearrangements (Table IIGo). Strikingly, the V{gamma}1-J{gamma}4 rearrangement of this clone is identical with a monoclonal rearrangement (15.32) (28) microdissected from a GC of a different, infected TCR{alpha}-/- mouse in which there was marked IgG expression.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II. Sequence analysis of TCR{gamma} and - {delta} genes in {gamma}{delta} T cell clonesa

 
Expression of Th1/Th2 cytokines by {gamma}{delta} cells in vivo

The Th2 clones described here are CD4+. Compared with DN and CD8{alpha}{alpha} {gamma}{delta}+ cells, CD4+ {gamma}{delta} cells are rare, even in TCR{alpha}-/- mice (48, 60). It therefore seemed surprising that the exercise of cloning Th2 {gamma}{delta}+ clones yielded cells that were CD4+. In turn, this provoked the hypothesis that CD4 expression might be more strongly associated with Th2 differentiation than with Th1 differentiation. To examine this in vivo, an experiment was undertaken to compare the amount of IL-4 RNA expressed by CD4+ {gamma}{delta} cells and CD4- {gamma}{delta} cells. CD3+ TCR{gamma}{delta}+ cells were isolated directly from TCR{alpha}-/- spleens and sorted by FACS into CD4- or CD4+ subsets (windows R2 and R3 in Fig. 6GoA). In one experiment, the sorted CD4+ {gamma}{delta}+ cells and CD4- {gamma}{delta} cells were used immediately ex vivo to prepare RNA. In a second experiment, the CD4+ {gamma}{delta} cells and the CD4- {gamma}{delta} cells were each activated for 48 h in the presence of Con A (2.5 µg/ml) and then harvested for RNA. In each case, the extracted RNA was used as substrate for cDNA synthesis. To establish comparable levels of cDNA template for subsequent analysis of cytokine gene expression, the protocol described in Materials and Methods was applied. Briefly, cDNAs were compared for their capacity to act as templates for HPRT gene amplification in the presence of varying amounts of competitor HPRT fragment. Data for the activated CD4+ {gamma}{delta}+ and CD4- {gamma}{delta}+ samples are shown in Figure 6GoB (numbers at the top of the lanes refer to fold dilutions of the competitor HPRT fragment used). At each dilution of competitor, densitometry was used to determine the ratio of the product derived from the cellular cDNA to the product derived from the competitor; these ratios were then plotted against the competitor concentration, and the linear range was established (Fig. 6Go, C and D; equations for linear regression: activated CD4+ cells, y = -2.9583e-2 + 29.305x, R2 = 0.977; activated CD4- cells, y = 0.19125 + 30.626x, R2 = 0.983). From these plots, the relative operational concentrations of the cDNAs could be determined, allowing equal amounts of cell cDNA to be used for subsequent competitive amplification of cytokine genes. When this was attempted for IL-4, using a range of concentrations of competitor, it was immediately apparent that cDNA from the activated CD4+ cells competed much more effectively for the IL-4 primers than did cDNA from CD4- cells (Fig. 6GoE), in support of the stated hypothesis. The same was true for the nonactivated ex vivo samples (Fig. 6GoG). To calculate more precisely the difference in relative IL-4 cDNA concentrations, a broad range of competitor was used with each cDNA sample (Fig. 6GoF) to establish the range (in each case) over which the ratio of product derived from the cDNA compared with product derived from the competitor showed a linear relationship to input competitor (Fig. 6Go, H and I show the data for the activated CD4+ and CD4- samples). Comparison of these plots revealed IL-4 expression in activated CD4+ {gamma}{delta} cells to be 17.4 times more abundant than IL-4 expression in activated CD4- {gamma}{delta} cells (see Fig. 6Go). When the same approach was applied to the ex vivo samples, a similar excess of >10-fold IL-4 RNA was found in the CD4+ {gamma}{delta}+ sample (Fig. 6GoG; quantitation data not shown). The expression of IL-10 showed a similar pattern. These data demonstrate that the expression of Th2 cytokines is at least an order of magnitude greater in peripheral CD4+ {gamma}{delta}+ cells than in DN {gamma}{delta}+ cells. This did not apply to IFN-{gamma}, which was more highly expressed by CD4- {gamma}{delta} cells (data not shown).


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Clones of Th1 and Th2 {gamma}{delta} cells

Given that {gamma}{delta} cells are commonly involved in host responses to pathogens (32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40), it was important to establish the degree to which {gamma}{delta} cells conform to the Th1/Th2 paradigm. In this regard, Wen et al. (26) first showed that {gamma}{delta} cells could functionally help B cells in vivo by production of IL-4, whereafter Ferrick et al. (40) showed the production of IFN-{gamma} and IL-4, respectively, by peritoneal and spleen {gamma}{delta} T cells in response to Th1- and Th2-stimulating pathogens, respectively. Nonetheless, there was, to date, no demonstration that these results reflected the differentiated phenotype of distinct {gamma}{delta}+ clones, nor was there a demonstration of the degree to which various Th1 and Th2 phenotypic markers cosegregate in {gamma}{delta} clones. These issues are clarified by the findings presented here that cosegregation of Th1 and Th2 markers clearly occurs in at least some {gamma}{delta} clones, possibly to a greater degree than is the case in {alpha}ß T cell clones (61). This may reflect the fact that by comparison to {alpha}ß T cells a greater proportion of peripheral {gamma}{delta} cells may be preactivated, and hence no longer in a plastic differentiation state. This would be consistent with our capacity to readily measure Th1/Th2 cytokine expression by {gamma}{delta} cells without the need for prior activation (e.g., Fig. 6Go).

Development of Th1/Th2 {gamma}{delta} cell clones

The generation and maintenance of {alpha}ß T cell clones is exclusively dependent on Ag and APCs. Once established, the growth of the {gamma}{delta} clones reported in this study did not require the sustained presence of APCs (see Materials and Methods). This has now been observed in several independent instances. The specificity of the {gamma}{delta} clones described here is under investigation, but we have ruled out a requirement for conventional, professional APCs. This is consistent with >50 characterizations of human and murine {gamma}{delta} TCR specificity that collectively failed to demonstrate any response to conventional class I/II MHC-processed peptide (reviewed in 62 . Hence, the data most strongly suggest that a Th1/Th2 classification can be established in primary T cells in the absence of specific peptide presentation by conventional class I/II MHC.

Role for CD4 in the development of Th2 clones

The role of CD4 in the differentiation of Th1 and Th2 {alpha}ß cells in CD4-expressing mice has been difficult to assess because CD4 has an important role during {alpha}ß T cell development that is epistatic to the differentiation of peripheral Th1/Th2 cells. This is not the case for {gamma}{delta} cells, which mostly develop as DN cells. Indeed, recent data from our laboratory indicates that the rare, but reproducible, numbers of CD4+ {gamma}{delta} cells that are present in the periphery of mice (60) and humans (4) develop from CD4- CD8- thymocytes, not from the CD4+CD8+ (double positive) pool (63). Two sets of data in this report suggest that CD4 expression may be more involved in the differentiation of Th2 cells rather than Th1 cells. First, although CD4+ {gamma}{delta} cells are rare in vivo (48, 60), the Th2 clones (albeit only two sibling clones) were both CD4+, while the Th1 clones were DN. Second, Th2 cytokine RNA expression was enriched in polyclonal CD4+ {gamma}{delta} cells examined directly ex vivo, whereas IFN-{gamma} expression was not. The Ig isotype profiles of {alpha}ß T cell-deficient mice also implicate CD4 in Th2 responses; in TCR{alpha}-/- mice, some of the B cell help is provided by CD4+, TCR{alpha}ß+ cells (60, 64). Such T cells are easily detected in the GCs of this strain (64), and the prevalent Ig isotypes (e.g., IgG1) are primarily Th2 associated (26, 31). By contrast, in TCRß-/- mice, all help is provided by {gamma}{delta} cells (24, 28), most of which are DN. DN CD3+ cells are readily discernible in the GCs of such mice (28), and the prevalent Ig isotypes (e.g., IgG2a) are of the Th1 type (24, 28). In summary, the association of CD4 with Th2 differentiation can be taken to suggest that systemic {gamma}{delta} cells are more likely to be Th1-type cells than Th2 cells, consistent with which, IFN-{gamma} production is more commonly noted as a product of {gamma}{delta} cells. Nonetheless, there may be an important biologic role for Th2 {gamma}{delta} cells (see below).

The involvement of CD4 in Th2 differentiation/function may reflect engagement of an APC by CD4 as well as by TCR {gamma}{delta}, inducing higher levels of signaling in the responding T cell that are thought to favor Th2 differentiation (46). This would be consistent with several observations that CD4 expression is nonetheless not essential for {alpha}ß T cells to display a Th2 phenotype (65, 66, 67). Additionally, gut CD8+ {gamma}{delta} cells have been reported to show Th2-like activity. In all these instances, Th2 signaling may be induced by high dose Ag alone and/or by engagement of other molecules in addition to the TCR.

The only known ligand on APCs for CD4 is MHC class II. Resolving the specificities of the {gamma}{delta} clones described here will clarify whether CD4 engagement of MHC class II can augment signaling from a {gamma}{delta} TCR that is reactive to an MHC class II-independent ligand, or whether the augmentation only occurs when CD4 and TCR{gamma}{delta} coengage MHC class II, the latter most likely through a nonconventional mechanism, previously reviewed (2, 62).

We also note that all the clones tested expressed surface CD1. The role of CD1 in the immune system is not fully clarified, but there are data that the direction (Th1/Th2) of an {alpha}ß T cell response is in part influenced by the production of cytokines by CD1-reactive NK-T cells. The data provided here raise the intriguing possibility that {gamma}{delta} cells might themselves interact with T cells reactive to CD1. Consistent with this, CD1 was expressed on a subset(s) of {gamma}{delta} cells in vivo (data not shown), an issue currently under study.

Effector and regulatory functions of {gamma}{delta}+ Th cells in neonates

Collectively, numerous reports have indicated that the number of {gamma}{delta} cells can greatly increase in humans and/or mice infected with bacteria, parasites, or viruses, and thus may contribute to the immune responses to these challenges (32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40). This may be particularly true during the neonatal period, when {gamma}{delta} cells are relatively abundant, and {alpha}ß T cell-APC interactions may not be fully established. The {gamma}{delta} clones described here may thus be representative of Th1/Th2 effector cells (40, 41). Indeed, the recent analysis of CD1-/- mice (68) indicates that significant levels of IL-4 are produced in the absence of CD1-reactive, NK1.1+ {alpha}ß T cells, previously considered as the T cells that skewed {alpha}ß T cell responses toward Th2. Given our original findings with {gamma}{delta} cells (26), {gamma}{delta} Th2 cells might under some circumstances be an important initiator of Th responses to infection. An important role for Th1/Th2 {gamma}{delta} cells in the establishment of Th cell responses would be consistent with the impairment in IgA synthesis seen in TCR{delta}-/- mice (69).

At the same time, an increasingly noted phenotype of TCR{delta}-/- mice is one of dysregulated, hyperactive immune function toward either foreign or self Ags (15, 24, 42, 44). Thus, it has been inferred from these and other data (43, 45) that {gamma}{delta} cells ordinarily down-regulate {alpha}ß T cells of either Th1 (15, 24, 42, 44, 45) or Th2 (43) function, either directly and/or indirectly. Indeed, {gamma}{delta} T cells have been shown to regulate the activation of macrophages (70), NK cells (71), and {alpha}ß T cells (72). It is quite conceivable that such regulation is mediated by Th1 and Th2 cytokines. Since exposure to IL-4 of professional APCs, such as macrophages, reduces their capacity to stimulate Th1 {alpha}ß cells (reviewed in 21 , it is possible that a major physiologic function of Th2 {gamma}{delta} cells is to attenuate the responses of Th1 {alpha}ß cells. In this regard it is notable that although they can be rare, CD4+ {gamma}{delta} cells appear to be conserved in all vertebrates in which they have been sought. A converse regulatory role (acting on {alpha}ß Th2 responses) may prove true for Th1 {gamma}{delta} cells. This hypothesis, that Th1 and Th2 {gamma}{delta} clones play important regulatory roles, would be entirely consistent with the nonredundant function of {gamma}{delta} cells and {alpha}ß cells that is evident from several independent, recently reported analyses of TCR{delta}-/- mice (15, 24, 44).

Note. During the preparation of this manuscript, two analyses primarily of the CD4- mouse, indicated that CD4 is also a critical molecule in Th2 differentiation of {alpha}ß T cells (76, 77). Such studies would appear complementary to these studies of {gamma}{delta} cells in CD4-sufficient hosts.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank C. A. Janeway and J. Craft for review of the early forms of this manuscript, Adrian Smith for discussions, and C. A. Janeway and A. Bendelac for Abs.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported primarily by National Institutes of Health Grant AI38932 (to A.C.H.). D.F.B. was supported by a fellowship from the Spanish government (Ministerio de Educacion y Ciercia). Back

2 Present address: Section of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510. Back

3 These authors contributed equally to this study. Back

4 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Adrian Hayday, Department of Biology, Yale University, KBT 616, 219 Prospect Street, P.O. Box 208103, New Haven, CT 06511. Back

5 Abbreviations used in this paper: PE, phycoerythrin; FasL, Fas ligand; HPRT, hypoxanthine phoshoribosyl transferase; GC, germinal center; DN, double negative; ICAM-1, intercellular adhesion molecule-1; LPAM, lymphocyte Peyers patch adhesion molecule-1. Back

Received for publication July 28, 1997. Accepted for publication October 31, 1997.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Haas, W., P. Pereira, S. Tonegawa. 1993. {gamma}{delta} cells. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 11:637.[Medline]
  2. Hayday, A. C.. 1995. {gamma}{delta} T cell specificity and function: how much like who?. J. I. Bell, and M. J. Owen, and E. Simpson, eds. T Cell Receptors 70. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  3. Brenner, M. B., J. McLean, D. P. Dialynas, J. L. Strominger, J. A. Smith, F. L. Owen, J. G. Seidman, F. Rosen, M. S. Krangel. 1986. Identification of a putative second T cell receptor. Nature 322:145.[Medline]
  4. Spits, H., X. Paliard, Y. Vandekerckhove, P. van Vlasselaer, J. E. de Vries. 1991. Functional and phenotypic differences between CD4+ and CD4-T cell receptor-{gamma}{delta} clones from peripheral blood. J. Immunol. 147:1180.[Abstract]
  5. Brenner, M. B., J. McLean, H. Scheft, J. Riberdy, S.-L. Ang, J. G. Seidman, P. Devlin, M. S. Krangel. 1987. Two forms of the T-cell receptor {gamma} protein found on peripheral blood cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Nature 325:689.[Medline]
  6. Borst, J., R. J. van de Griend, J. W. van Oostveen, S.-L. Ang, C. J. Melief, J. G. Seidman, R. L. H. Bolhuis. 1987. A T cell receptor {gamma}/CD3 complex found on cloned functional lymphocytes. Nature 325:683.[Medline]
  7. Rivas, A., J. Koide, M. L. Cleary, E. G. Engleman. 1989. Evidence for involvement of the {gamma}{delta} T cell antigen receptor in cytotoxicity mediated by human alloantigen-specific T cell clones. J. Immunol. 142:1840.[Abstract]
  8. Jones, B., S. Carding, S. Kyes, S. Mjolsness, C. A. Janeway, A. C. Hayday. 1988. Molecular analysis of T cell receptor gamma gene expression in allo-activated splenic T cells of adult mice. Eur. J. Immunol. 18:1907.[Medline]
  9. Lefranc, M. P., M. Bonneville. 1990. {gamma}{delta} T cells: 33rd Forum in Immunology. Res. Immunol. 141:565.[Medline]
  10. Goodman, T., L. Lefrancois. 1988. Expression of the {gamma}{delta} T cell receptor on intestinal CD8+ intraepithelial lymphocytes. Nature 333:855.[Medline]
  11. Itohara, S., A. Farr, J. Lafaille, M. Bonneville, Y. Takagaki, W. Haas, S. Tonegawa. 1990. Homing of a {gamma}{delta} thymocyte subset with homogeneous T cell receptors to mucosal epithelia. Nature 343:754.[Medline]
  12. Bucy, P., C.-L. Chen, J. Cihak, U. Losch, M. D. Cooper. 1988. Avian T cells expressing {gamma}{delta} T cell receptors localize in the splenic sinusoids and the intestinal epithelium. J. Immunol. 141:2200.[Abstract]
  13. Ikuta, K., T. Kina, I. MacNeil, N. Uchida, B. Peault, Y.-H. Chien, I. Weissman. 1990. A developmental switch in thymic lymphocyte maturation potential occurs at the level of hematopoietic stem cells. Cell 62:864.
  14. Mombaerts, P., J. Arnoldi, F. Russ, S. Tonegawa, S. H. E. Kaufman. 1993. Different roles of {alpha}ß and {gamma}{delta} T cells in immunity against an intracellular pathogen. Nature 365:53.[Medline]
  15. Roberts, S. J., A. L. Smith, A. B. West, L. Wen, R. C. Findly, M. J. Owen, A. C. Hayday. 1996. T-cell {alpha}ß+ and {gamma}{delta}+ deficient mice display abnormal but distinct phenotypes toward a natural, widespread infection of the intestinal epithelium. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:11774.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Mosmann, T. R., R. L. Coffman. 1989. TH1 and TH2 cells: different patterns of lymphokine secretion lead to different functional properties. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 7:145.[Medline]
  17. Scott, P., T. Scharton. 1994. Interaction between the innate and the acquired immune system following infection of different mouse strains with Leishmania major. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 730:84.[Medline]
  18. Goldman, M., P. Druet, E. Gleichmann. 1991. TH2 cells in systemic autoimmunity: insights from allogeneic diseases and chemically-induced autoimmunity. Immunol. Today 12:223.[Medline]
  19. Clerici, M., G. M. Shearer. 1993. A TH1->TH2 switch is a critical step in the etiology of HIV infection. Immunol. Today 14:107.[Medline]
  20. Tian, J., M. Clare-Salzer, A. Herschenfeld, B. Middleton, D. Newman, R. Mueller, S. Arita, C. Evans, M. Atkinson, Y. Mullen, N. Sarvetnick, A. Tobin, P. V. Lehmann, D. L. Kaufman. 1996. Modulating autoimmune response to GAD inhibits disease progression and prolongs islet graft survival in diabetes-prone mice. Nat. Med. 2:1348.[Medline]
  21. Abbas, A. K., K. M. Murphy, A. Sher. 1996. Functional diversity of helper T lymphocytes. Nature 383:787.[Medline]
  22. Tsuji, M., P. Mombaerts, L. Lefrancois, R. S. Nussenzweig, F. Zavala, S. Tonegawa. 1994. Gamma delta T cells contribute to immunity against the liver stages of malaria in {alpha}ß T-cell-deficient mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:345.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Chantler, P., A. J. Frater, D. C. Doueck, J. L. Viney, G. Kay, M. J. Owen, A. C. Hayday, E. Simpson, D. M. Altmann. 1995. Immune responsiveness in mutant mice lacking T cell receptor {alpha}ß+ cells. Immunology 85:531.[Medline]
  24. Peng, S. L., M. P. Madaio, A. C. Hayday, J. Craft. 1996. Propagation and regulation of systemic autoimmunity by {gamma}{delta} T cells. J. Immunol. 157:5689.[Abstract]
  25. Rajagopalan, S., T. Zordan, G. C. Tsokos, S. K. Datta. 1990. Pathogenic anti-DNA autoantibody-inducing T helper cell lines from patients with active lupus nephritis: isolation of CD4–8-T helper cell lines that express the {gamma}{delta} T-cell antigen receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87:7020.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Wen, L., S. J. Roberts, J. Viney, F. S. Wong, C. Mallick, R. C. Findly, Q. Peng, J. E. Craft, M. J. Owen, A. C. Hayday. 1994. Immunoglobulin synthesis and generalized autoimmunity in mice congenitally deficient in {alpha}ß+ T cells. Nature 369:654.[Medline]
  27. Wen, L., W. Pao, S. F. Wong, Q. Peng, J. Craft, B. Zheng, G. Kelsoe, M. J. Owen, A. C. Hayday. 1996. Germinal center formation, immunoglobulin class switching and autoantibody production driven by "non {alpha}ß" T cells. J. Exp. Med. 183:2271.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Pao, W., L. Wen, A. L. Smith, A. Gulbranson-Judge, B. Zheng, G. Kelsoe, I. C. M. MacLennan, M. J. Owen, A. C. Hayday. 1996. {gamma}{delta} T cell help of B cells is induced by repeated parasitic infection in the absence of other T cells. Curr. Biol. 6:1317.[Medline]
  29. Horner, A. A., H. Jabara, N. Ramesch, R. S. Geha. 1995. {gamma}{delta} T lymphocytes express CD40 ligand and induce isotype switching in B lymphocytes. J. Exp. Med. 181:1239.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Munk, M. E., R. A. Fazioli, V. L. G. Calich, S. H. E. Kaufmann. 1995. Paracoccidioides brasiliensis-stimulated human {gamma}/{delta} T cells support antibody production by B cells. Infect. Immun. 63:1608.[Abstract]
  31. Peng, S. L., M. P. Madaio, D. P. Hughes, I. N. Crispe, M. J. Owen, L. Wen, A. C. Hayday, J. Craft. 1996. Murine lupus in the absence of alpha beta T cells. J. Immunol. 156:4041.[Abstract]
  32. Modlin, R. L., C. Pirmez, F. M. Hofman, V. Torigan, K. Uyemura, T. Rea, B. R. Bloom, M. B. Brenner. 1989. Lymphocytes bearing antigen specific {gamma}{delta} T cell receptors accumulate in human infectious disease lesions. Nature 339:544.[Medline]
  33. Maccario, R., M. G. Revello, P. Comoli, D. Montagna, F. Locatelli, G. Gerna. 1993. HLA-unrestricted killing of HSV-1 infected mononuclear cells. J. Immunol. 150:1437.[Abstract]
  34. Findly, R. C., S. J. Roberts, A. C. Hayday. 1993. Dynamic response of murine gut intraepithelial T cells after infection of Eimeria. Eur. J. Immunol. 23:2557.[Medline]
  35. Behr, C., P. Dubois. 1992. Preferential expansion of V{gamma}9V{delta}2 T cells following stimulation of peripheral blood lymphocytes with extracts of Plasmodium falciparum. Int. Immunol. 4:361.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Hara, T., Y. Mizuno, K. Takaki, H. Tadada, H. Akeda, T. Aoki, M. Nagata, K. Ueda, G. Matsuzaki, Y. Yoshikai, K. Nomoto. 1992. Predominant activation and expansion of V{gamma}9-bearing {gamma}{delta} T cells in vivo as well as in vitro in Salmonella infection. J. Clin. Invest. 90:204.
  37. Kimura, Y., S. Tomida, Y. Matsumoto, K. Hiromatsu, Y. Yoshikai. 1996. Evidence for the early recruitment of T-cell receptor {gamma}{delta}+ T cells during rat listeriosis. Immunology 87:21.[Medline]
  38. Roark, C. E., M. K. Vollmer, P. A. Campbell, W. K. Born, R. L. O’Brian. 1996. Response of a {gamma}{delta}+ T cell receptor invariant subset during bacterial infection. J. Immunol. 156:2214.[Abstract]
  39. Gennari, D., P. Martelli, G. Basaglia, M. Crovatto, S. Battistin. 1991. A subset of {gamma}{delta} lymphocytes is increased during HIV-1 infection. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 83:187.[Medline]
  40. Ferrick, D. A., M. D. Schrenzel, T. Mulvania. B. Hsieh, W. G. Ferlin, H. Lepper. 1995. Differential production of interferon-gamma and interleukin-4 in response to Th1- and Th2-stimulating pathogens by gamma delta T cells in vivo. Nature 373:255.[Medline]
  41. Hsieh, B., M. D. Schrenzel, T. Mulvania, H. D. Lepper. L. DiMolfetto-Landon, D. A. Ferrick. 1996. In vivo cytokine production in murine listeriosis: evidence for immunoregulation by {gamma}{delta}+ T cells. J. Immunol. 156:232.[Abstract]
  42. Szczepanik, M., L. R. Anderson, H. Ushio, W. Ptak, M. J. Owen, A. C. Hayday, P. A. Askenase. 1996. {gamma}{delta} T cells from tolerized {alpha}ß T cell deficient mice inhibit contact sensitivity effector T cells in vivo and their interferon {gamma} production in vitro. J. Exp. Med. 184:2129.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. McMenamin, C., C. Pimm, M. McKersey, P. G. Holt. 1994. Regulation of IgE responses to inhaled antigen by antigen-specific {gamma}{delta} T cells. Science 265:1869.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Shiohara, T., N. Moriya, J. Hayakawa, S. Itohara, I. Hiromichi. 1996. Resistance to cutaneous graft-vs.-host disease is not induced in T cell receptor {delta} gene mutant-mice. J. Exp. Med. 183:1483.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Mukasa, A., K. Hiromatsu, G. Matsuzaki, R. O’Brien, W. Born, K. Nomoto. 1995. Bacterial infection of the testis leading to autoaggressive immunity triggers apparently opposed responses of {alpha}ß and {gamma}{delta} T cells. J. Immunol. 155:2047.[Abstract]
  46. Hosken, N. A., K. Shibuya, A. W. Heath, K. M. Murphy, A. O’Garra. 1995. The effect of antigen dose on CD4+ T helper cell phenotype development in a T cell receptor-{alpha}ß-transgenic model. J. Exp. Med. 182:1579.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Constant, S., C. Pfeiffer, A. Woodard, T. Pasqualini, K. Bottomly. 1995. Extent of T cell receptor ligation can determine the functional differentiation of naive CD4+ T cells. J. Exp. Med. 182:1591.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Philpott, K. L., J. L. Viney, G. Kay, S. Rastan, E. M. Gardiner, S. Chae, A. C. Hayday, M. J. Owen. 1992. Lymphoid development in mice congenitally lacking T cell receptor {alpha}ß-expressing cells. Science 256:1448.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Mombaerts, P., A. R. Clarke, M. A. Rudnicki, J. Iacomini, S. Itohara, J. J. Lafaille, L. Wang, Y. Ichikwa, R. Jaenisch, M. L. Hooper, S. Tonegawa. 1992. Mutations in T-cell antigen receptor genes {alpha} and ß block thymocyte development at different stages. Nature 360:225.[Medline]
  50. Itohara, S., P. Mombaerts, J. Lafaille, J. Iacomini, A. Nelson, A. R. Clarke, M. L. Hooper, A. Farr, S. Tonegawa. 1993. T cell receptor {delta} gene mutant mice: independent generation of {alpha}ß T cells and programmed rearrangements of {gamma}{delta} TCR genes. Cell 72:337.[Medline]
  51. Reiner, S. L., S. Zheng, D. B. Corry, R. M. Locksley. 1993. Constructing polycompetitor cDNAs for quantitative PCR. J. Immunol. Methods 165:37.[Medline]
  52. Toneguzzo, F., S. Glynn, E. Levi, S. Mjolsness, A. Hayday. 1988. Use of a chemically-modified T7 DNA polymerase for manual and automated sequencing of supercolied DNA. BioTechniques 36:460.
  53. Takamizawa, M., F. Fagnoni, A. Mehta-Damani, A. Rivis, E. G. Engleman. 1995. Cellular and molecular basis of human {gamma}{delta} T cell activation. J. Clin. Invest. 95:296.
  54. Penninger, J. M., E. Timms, A. Shahinian, A. Jezo-Bremond, H. Nishina, J. Ionescu, S. M. Hedrick, T. W. Mak. 1995. Alloreactive {gamma}{delta} thymocytes utilize distinct costimulatory signals from peripheral T cells. J. Immunol. 155:3847.[Abstract]
  55. Brossay, L., D. Jullien, S. Cardell, B. C. Sydora, N. Burdin, R. L. Modlin, M. Kronenberg. 1997. Mouse CD1 is mainly expressed on hemopoietic-derived cells. J. Immunol. 159:1216.[Abstract]
  56. Ramsdell, F., M. S. Seaman, R. E. Miller, K. S. Picha, M. K. Kennedy, D. H. Lynch. 1994. Differential ability of Th1 and Th2 T cells to express Fas ligand and to undergo activation-induced cell death. Int. Immunol. 6:1545.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  57. Hahn, S., T. Stalder, M. Wernli, D. Burgin, J. Tschopp, S. Nagata, P. Erb. 1995. Down-modulation of CD4+ T helper type 2 and type 0 cells by T helper type 1 cells via Fas/Fas-ligand interaction. Eur. J. Immunol. 25:2679.[Medline]
  58. MacLennan, I. C. M.. 1994. Germinal centers. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 12:117.[Medline]
  59. Kelsoe, G.. 1995. In situ studies of the germinal center reaction. Adv. Immunol. 60:267.[Medline]
  60. Viney, J. L., L. Dianda, S. J. Roberts, L. Wen, C. A. Mallick, A. C. Hayday, M. J. Owen. 1994. Lymphocyte proliferation in mice congenitally deficient in T-cell receptor {alpha}ß+ cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:11948.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  61. Kelso, A., P. Groves, A. B. Troutt, K. Francis. 1995. Evidence for the stochastic acquisition of cytokine profile by CD4+ T cells activated in a T helper 2-like response in vivo. Eur. J. Immunol. 25:1168.[Medline]
  62. Hayday, A. C., and W. Pao. TCR{gamma}{delta}. 1998. The Encyclopedia of Immunology. I. Roitt and P. Delves, eds. Academic Press, New York, in press.
  63. Passoni, L., E. S. Hoffman, S. Kim, T. Crompton, W. Pao, M.-Q. Dong, M. J. Owen, A. C. Hayday. 1997. Intrathymic {delta} selection events in {gamma}{delta} cell development. Immunity 7:83.[Medline]
  64. Dianda, L., A. Gulbranson-Judge, W. Pao, A. C. Hayday, I. C. M. MacLennan, M. J. Owen. 1996. Germinal center formation in mice lacking {alpha}ß+ T cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 26:1603.[Medline]
  65. Maggi, E., M. G. Giudizi, R. Biagiotti, F. Annunziato, R. Manetti, M.-P. Piccinni, P. Parronchi, S. Sampognaro, L. Giannarini, G. Zuccati, S. Romagnani. 1994. Th2-like CD8+ T cells showing B cell helper function and reduced cytolytic activity in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection. J. Exp. Med. 180:489.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  66. Seder, R. A., G. G. Le Gros. 1995. The functional role of CD8+ T helper type 2 cells. J. Exp. Med. 181:5.[Free Full Text]
  67. Paganelli, R., E. Scala, I. J. Ansotegui, C. M. Ausiello, E. Halapi, E. Fanales-Belasio, G. D’Offizi, I. Mezzaroma, F. Pandolfi, M. Fiorilli, A. Cassone, A. Fernando. 1995. CD8+ T lymphocytes provide helper activity for IgE synthesis in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients with hyper-IgE. J. Exp. Med. 181:423.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  68. Smiley, S. T., M. H. Kaplan, M. J. Grusby. 1997. Immunoglobulin E production in the absence of interleukin 4-secreting CD1-dependent cells. Science 275:977.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  69. Fujihashi, K., J. R. McGhee, M. Yamamoto, T. Hiroi, H. Kiyono. 1996. Role of gamma delta T cells in the regulation of mucosal IgA response and oral tolerance. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 778:55.[Medline]
  70. Jones-Carson, J., A. Vazquez-Torres, H. C. van der Heyde, T. Warner, R. D. Wagner, E. Balish. 1995. {gamma}{delta}-T cell-induced nitric oxide production enhances resistance to mucosal candidiasis. Nat. Med. 1:552.[Medline]
  71. Ladel, C. H., C. Blum, S. H. E. Kaufmann. 1996. Control of natural killer cell-mediated innate resistance against the intracellular pathogen Listeria monocytogenes by {gamma}{delta} T lymphocytes. Infect. Immun. 64:1744.[Abstract]
  72. Kaufmann, S. H. E., C. Blum, S. Yamamoto. 1993. Crosstalk between alpha/beta T cells and gamma/delta T cells in vivo: activation of alpha/beta T-cell responses after gamma/delta T-cell modulation with the monoclonal antibody GL3. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:9620.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  73. Heilig, J. S., S. Tonegawa. 1986. Diversity of murine gamma genes and their expression in fetal and adult T lymphocytes. Nature 322:836.[Medline]
  74. Rock, E. P., P. R. Sibbald, M. M. Davis, Y.-H. Chien. 1994. CDR3 length in antigen-specific immune receptors. J. Exp. Med. 179:323.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  75. Vitetta, E. S., J. Ohara, C. D. Myers, J. E. Layton, P. H. Krammer, W. E. Paul. 1985. Serological, biochemical, and functional identity of B cell stimulatory factor 1 and B cell differentiation factor for IgG1. J. Exp. Med. 162:1726.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  76. Fowell, D. J., J. Magram, C. W. Turck, N. Killeen, R. M. Locksley. 1997. Impaired Th2 subset development in the absence of CD4. Immunity 6:559.[Medline]
  77. Brown, D. R., N. H. Moskowitz, N. Killeen, S. L. Reiner. 1997. A role for CD4 in peripheral T cell differentiation. J. Exp. Med. 186:101.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BloodHome page
G. Gruenbacher, H. Gander, A. Rahm, W. Nussbaumer, N. Romani, and M. Thurnher
CD56+ human blood dendritic cells effectively promote TH1-type {gamma}{delta} T-cell responses
Blood, November 12, 2009; 114(20): 4422 - 4431.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
Q. Qi, M. Xia, J. Hu, E. Hicks, A. Iyer, N. Xiong, and A. August
Enhanced development of CD4+ {gamma}{delta} T cells in the absence of Itk results in elevated IgE production
Blood, July 16, 2009; 114(3): 564 - 571.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. Felices, C. C. Yin, Y. Kosaka, J. Kang, and L. J. Berg
Tec kinase Itk in {gamma}{delta}T cells is pivotal for controlling IgE production in vivo
PNAS, May 19, 2009; 106(20): 8308 - 8313.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
J. Dodd, S. Riffault, J. S. Kodituwakku, A. C. Hayday, and P. J. M. Openshaw
Pulmonary V{gamma}4+ {gamma}{delta} T Cells Have Proinflammatory and Antiviral Effects in Viral Lung Disease
J. Immunol., January 15, 2009; 182(2): 1174 - 1181.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
M. N. Ajuebor, Y. Jin, G. L. Gremillion, R. M. Strieter, Q. Chen, and P. A. Adegboyega
{gamma}{delta}T Cells Initiate Acute Inflammation and Injury in Adenovirus-Infected Liver via Cytokine-Chemokine Cross Talk
J. Virol., October 1, 2008; 82(19): 9564 - 9576.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
D. Vermijlen, P. Ellis, C. Langford, A. Klein, R. Engel, K. Willimann, H. Jomaa, A. C. Hayday, and M. Eberl
Distinct Cytokine-Driven Responses of Activated Blood {gamma}{delta} T Cells: Insights into Unconventional T Cell Pleiotropy
J. Immunol., April 1, 2007; 178(7): 4304 - 4314.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
H. Wu, Y. M. Wang, Y. Wang, M. Hu, G. Y. Zhang, J. F. Knight, D. C.H. Harris, and S. I. Alexander
Depletion of {gamma}{delta} T Cells Exacerbates Murine Adriamycin Nephropathy
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., April 1, 2007; 18(4): 1180 - 1189.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
L. Chen, W. He, S. T. Kim, J. Tao, Y. Gao, H. Chi, A. M. Intlekofer, B. Harvey, S. L. Reiner, Z. Yin, et al.
Epigenetic and Transcriptional Programs Lead to Default IFN-{gamma} Production by {gamma}{delta} T Cells
J. Immunol., March 1, 2007; 178(5): 2730 - 2736.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
H. M. Ashour and J. Y. Niederkorn
{gamma}{delta} T Cells Promote Anterior Chamber-Associated Immune Deviation and Immune Privilege through Their Production of IL-10
J. Immunol., December 15, 2006; 177(12): 8331 - 8337.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
A. Odyniec, M. Szczepanik, M. P. Mycko, M. Stasiolek, C. S. Raine, and K. W. Selmaj
{gamma}{delta} T Cells Enhance the Expression of Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis by Promoting Antigen Presentation and IL-12 Production
J. Immunol., July 1, 2004; 173(1): 682 - 694.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JEMHome page
E. Ramsburg, R. Tigelaar, J. Craft, and A. Hayday
Age-dependent Requirement for {gamma}{delta} T Cells in the Primary but Not Secondary Protective Immune Response against an Intestinal Parasite
J. Exp. Med., November 3, 2003; 198(9): 1403 - 1414.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
M. A. Poles, S. Barsoum, W. Yu, J. Yu, P. Sun, J. Daly, T. He, S. Mehandru, A. Talal, M. Markowitz, et al.
Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Induces Persistent Changes in Mucosal and Blood {gamma}{delta} T Cells despite Suppressive Therapy
J. Virol., October 1, 2003; 77(19): 10456 - 10467.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
A. E. Cardona, P. A. Gonzalez, and J. M. Teale
CC Chemokines Mediate Leukocyte Trafficking into the Central Nervous System during Murine Neurocysticercosis: Role of {gamma}{delta} T Cells in Amplification of the Host Immune Response
Infect. Immun., May 1, 2003; 71(5): 2634 - 2642.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int ImmunolHome page
A. Mizoguchi, E. Mizoguchi, Y. P. d. Jong, H. Takedatsu, F. I. Preffer, C. Terhorst, and A. K. Bhan
Role of the CD5 molecule on TCR {gamma}{delta} T cell-mediated immune functions: development of germinal centers and chronic intestinal inflammation
Int. Immunol., January 1, 2003; 15(1): 97 - 108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
A. E. Cardona and J. M. Teale
{gamma}/{delta} T Cell-Deficient Mice Exhibit Reduced Disease Severity and Decreased Inflammatory Response in the Brain in Murine Neurocysticercosis
J. Immunol., September 15, 2002; 169(6): 3163 - 3171.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
A. Barakonyi, K. T. Kovacs, E. Miko, L. Szereday, P. Varga, and J. Szekeres-Bartho
Recognition of Nonclassical HLA Class I Antigens by {gamma}{delta} T Cells During Pregnancy
J. Immunol., March 15, 2002; 168(6): 2683 - 2688.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
Z. Yin, C. Chen, S. J. Szabo, L. H. Glimcher, A. Ray, and J. Craft
T-Bet Expression and Failure of GATA-3 Cross-Regulation Lead to Default Production of IFN-{gamma} by {gamma}{delta} T Cells
J. Immunol., February 15, 2002; 168(4): 1566 - 1571.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Bio.Home page
N. Krug, V. J. Erpenbeck, K. Balke, J. Petschallies, T. Tschernig, J. M. Hohlfeld, and H. Fabel
Cytokine Profile of Bronchoalveolar Lavage-Derived CD4+, CD8+, and gamma delta T Cells in People with Asthma after Segmental Allergen Challenge
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., July 1, 2001; 25(1): 125 - 131.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
A. C. HAYDAY, S. ROBERTS, and E. RAMSBURG
gamma delta Cells and the Regulation of Mucosal Immune Responses
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., October 1, 2000; 162(4): S161 - 163.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
T. A. Moore, B. B. Moore, M. W. Newstead, and T. J. Standiford
{gamma}{delta}-T Cells Are Critical for Survival and Early Proinflammatory Cytokine Gene Expression During Murine Klebsiella Pneumonia
J. Immunol., September 1, 2000; 165(5): 2643 - 2650.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
Z. Yin, D.-H. Zhang, T. Welte, G. Bahtiyar, S. Jung, L. Liu, X.-Y. Fu, A. Ray, and J. Craft
Dominance of IL-12 Over IL-4 in {gamma}{delta} T Cell Differentiation Leads to Default Production of IFN-{gamma}: Failure to Down-Regulate IL-12 Receptor {beta}2-Chain Expression
J. Immunol., March 15, 2000; 164(6): 3056 - 3064.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Bio.Home page
C. M. Schramm, L. Puddington, C. A. Yiamouyiannis, E. G. Lingenheld, H. E. Whiteley, W. W. Wolyniec, T. C. Noonan, and R. S. Thrall
Proinflammatory Roles of T-Cell Receptor (TCR)gamma delta and TCRalpha beta Lymphocytes in a Murine Model of Asthma
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., February 1, 2000; 22(2): 218 - 225.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
A. Wack, P. Corbella, N. Harker, K. Roderick, T. Norton, K. Williams, O. Williams, and D. Kioussis
Th Cells and Th2 Responses Can Develop in the Absence of MHC Class II-CD4 Interactions
J. Immunol., August 1, 1999; 163(3): 1162 - 1169.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
T. E. Boursalian and K. Bottomly
Survival of Naive CD4 T Cells: Roles of Restricting Versus Selecting MHC Class II and Cytokine Milieu
J. Immunol., April 1, 1999; 162(7): 3795 - 3801.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
F. Spinozzi, E. Agea, M. Fizzotti, G. Bassotti, A. Russano, S. Droetto, O. Bistoni, F. Grignani, and A. Bertotto
Role of T-helper type 2 cytokines in down-modulation of Fas mRNA and receptor on the surface of activated CD4+ T cells: molecular basis for the persistence of the allergic immune response
FASEB J, December 1, 1998; 12(15): 1747 - 1753.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
N. Seo, Y. Tokura, F. Furukawa, and M. Takigawa
Down-Regulation of Tumoricidal NK and NK T Cell Activities by MHC Kb Molecules Expressed on Th2-Type {gamma}{delta} T and {alpha}{beta} T Cells Coinfiltrating in Early B16 Melanoma Lesions
J. Immunol., October 15, 1998; 161(8): 4138 - 4145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GutHome page
E GRIFFITH, E RAMSBURG, and A HAYDAY
Recognition by human gut gamma delta cells of stress inducible major histocompatibility molecules on enterocytes
Gut, August 1, 1998; 43(2): 166 - 167.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
D. F. Barber, L. Passoni, L. Wen, L. Geng, and A. C. Hayday
Cutting Edge: The Expression In Vivo of a Second Isoform of pT{alpha}: Implications for the Mechanism of pT{alpha} Action
J. Immunol., July 1, 1998; 161(1): 11 - 16.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wen, L.
Right arrow Articles by Hayday, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wen, L.
Right arrow Articles by Hayday, A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS