|
|
||||||||


*
Department of Microbiology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY 10029;
Quality Biotech, Division of Virology, Camdem, NJ 08104;
Department of Immunobiology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY 10029; and
§
Department of Pathology and Kaplan Cancer Center, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
does not play a very important
role in this phenomenon, which is mainly mediated by the release of Pfp
from CD8+ T cells. We have used a Stat1 knockout mouse
model in which VSV infection is lethal. Infusion of staphylococcal
enterotoxin-activated B T cells and bispecific Ab significantly slowed
virus progression and prolonged the survival of VSV-infected Stat1
knockout mice in vivo. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Some viruses such as vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV),3 which replicate quickly and have a broad tropism would be lethal if cellular or humoral mechanisms are solely responsible for control. This is confirmed by experiments performed infecting Stat1 knockout (KO) mice with VSV (3). These mice are unable to respond to IFN and, thus, lack proper innate immunity. All Stat1 KO mice died from VSV infection in 48 h, before any cellular immunity could be generated (3).
Experimentally, the lapse between Ag presentation by professional APCs and the generation of CTLs can be overcome by the use of bispecific Abs (BsAbs) to redirect lysis of virus-infected cells by activated T cells in a non-MHC-restricted fashion (reviewed in 4 . In previous work, we have demonstrated that T cells activated by the superantigen, staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB), in the presence of a BsAb with virus and TCR specificity, can kill infected target cells (5, 6, 7). Thus, these BsAb-targeted T cells combine the specificity of an Ab with the intracellular attack capability of CTLs.
BsAbs can function without limitation as to the specificity of the T cell. Our group has previously shown that BsAbs with specificity for the Vß8 molecule on the TCR and for the influenza virus protein (hemagglutinin) redirect SEB-activated T cells to kill influenza virus-infected cells and inhibit influenza virus multicycle replication in tissue culture (6). Using this approach, we have targeted influenza virus-infected cells using BsAbs, which bind to viral Ags subject to evolutionary drift, such as the hemagglutinin (6, 7) as well as to highly conserved Ags such as the M2, which are found on the surface of virus-infected cells (5). Although we were able to demonstrate significant inhibition of virus replication, the influenza virus system was not optimal for the study of BsAbs for two reasons. First, in vitro productive infections can only be efficiently generated in xenogeneic cells (Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK)). This would make cytokines and/or adhesion molecules with restricted species specificity ineffective. Second, in vivo, influenza is believed to bud apically into the lumen of the lungs making it difficult to reach with BsAb and T cells infused into the blood stream (8).
To overcome these limitations we prepared a BsAb with specificity for VSV, which replicates productively in many cell types (9). We chose the mouse mastocytoma, P815, as our in vitro culture target cell line. P815 cells grow in suspension culture and therefore are not subject to budding polarity. This gave us a completely syngeneic system in which to study the mechanism by which inhibition of virus replication by non-virus-specific T cells takes place. In addition, recent work with Stat1 KO mice has demonstrated that VSV replicates efficiently and is lethal for these mice, thus providing an in vivo model to attempt to demonstrate efficacy of BsAb- and SEB-activated T cells (3).
The VSV specific BsAb, 526 was demonstrated to be specific for VSV
(Indiana) and could mediate killing of VSV-infected cells in the
presence of SEB-activated T cells. In addition, it was extremely potent
in inhibiting multicycle replication of VSV in vitro. The Ab alone was
incapable of neutralizing virus in the absence of activated
CD8+ T cells. Interestingly, inhibition of virus
replication was dependent on perforin (Pfp) mediated lysis and IFN-
did not seem to play an important role in it.
To test our system in vivo, we used VSV-infected Stat1 KO mice as a model. Infusion of BsAb and SEB T cells prolonged the life of animals that were given a lethal infection of virus. This is the first evidence that BsAb can be used in vivo as an immunotherapeutic agent to fight virus infection.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
VSV (Indiana and New Jersey) were expanded on baby hamster kidney (BHK) cells. Supernatants were collected and stored at -80°C. BHK and P815 cells were grown in DMEM (Bio-Whittaker, Walkersville, MD), 10% FCS (HyClone, Logan, UT), 1 mM sodium pyruvate (NaPy), 2 mM L-glutamine (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY), and 50 µg/ml gentamicin (Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis, IN) (tissue culture medium). EL4 cells were grown in RPMI 1640 (Life Technologies), 10% FCS (Life Technologies), 100 µg/ml penicillin/streptomycin (Life Technologies), 2 mM L-glutamine (Life Technologies), 1 mM NaPy, 20 mM nonessential amino acids (Life Technologies), and 20 mM HEPES, (Life Technologies) (T cell medium). All cells were grown at 37°C, 7% CO2. Infectivity titers were determined by CPE on crystal violet-stained monolayers of BHK cells using different dilutions of supernatants from VSV-infected P815 cells 48 h after infection with the virus. Endpoint virus titers were determined by the interpolation of the dilution that infected 50% of the wells by the method of Reed and Muench (10).
Mice
BALB/c mice and CD1 mice were purchased from Charles River Laboratories (Wilmington, MA). Stat1 KO mice were bred in the New York University Animal Facility (New York, NY) as described (3), Pfp KO C57BL/6 and C57BL/6 mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME.
BsAb generation
BALB/c mice were immunized with purified VSV (Indiana) and boosted with the same virus 3 wk later. Splenocytes from these mice were used for the fusion to generate the BsAbs.
F23.1 hybridomas (11) were grown and cloned in the presence of 0.33 M 8-azaguanine (Life Technologies) to select cells that cannot use the salvage pathway for DNA synthesis. F23.1 cells were grown in Iscoves medium (Life Technologies), 10% FCS (HyClone), 1 mM NaPy, 2 mM L-glutamine (Life Technologies), 20 mM nonessential amino acids (Life Technologies), and 50 µg/ml gentamicin (Boehringer Mannheim) (Iscoves medium).
Splenocytes from BALB/c mice immunized with VSV (Indiana) were removed and a single cell suspension was prepared. RBC were lysed with 0.17 M tris ammonium chloride. One hundred x 106 spleen cells were fused to 10 x 106 F23.1 cells by adding 1 ml of 50% polyethylene glycol (Sigma) in serum-free DMEM (Bio-Whitaker) dropwise during 1 min while gently agitating the tube. Cells were allowed to sit for 1 min and then 10 ml of serum-free DMEM were added dropwise for 1 min. Cells were then spun down and resuspended in Iscoves medium with 100 mM hypoxanthine (Sigma) and 1 mM thymidine (Sigma), (Iscoves HT) and were plated in 96-well flat-bottom plates (Falcon) at a concentration of 2.2 x 105 cells/well (in 100 µl) and incubated at 37°C, 7% CO2. Twenty-four hours after the fusion, 100 µl/well of 0.1% azaserine (Sigma) in Iscoves-HT were added. Cultures were incubated at 37°C, 7% CO2 for 12 to 14 days before the supernatants were screened.
Radioimmunoassay
For screening the hybridomas, 96-well flat-bottom micro Test III plates (Falcon) were coated with purified VSV at 10 mg/ml for 90 min at room temperature or overnight at 4°C. After washing, plates were blocked for 30 min with PBS-BSA (1%) and sodium azide (0.02%), (PBS-BSA-azide). Supernatants from hybridomas or purified Abs (5 µg/ml) were added and incubated at room temperature for 90 min. Na125I (NEN, Boston, MA)-labeled goat anti-mouse IgG Ab (50,000 cpm in 50 µl) was used for detection after washing away unbound Abs. After 90 min of incubation, plates were washed, dried, and counted in a gamma counter.
Monoclonal antibodies
F23.1 is an Ab specific for the Vß8 molecule in the TCR of T
cells (11), XMG1.2 (American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), Rockville,
MD) is a neutralizing anti-IFN-
Ab (12), GK1.5 (ATCC) binds
mouse CD4, and 2.43 (ATCC) recognizes mouse CD8. 3F12 is an
anti-influenza virus M2 protein + anti-Vß8 (TCR) BsAb
previously generated in our laboratory (5). The BsAb 526, as described
in this publication, is specific for the G protein of VSV and the
Vß8. BsAb 526 is not neutralizing by standard methods.
Purification of Abs
526 VSV BsAb was purified by passing the supernatant of the hybridoma through a protein A-agarose column (Boehringer Mannheim) using PBS at pH 7 as a buffer for washing. A 0.1 M citrate buffer, pH 3.5, was used for elution. Fractions were tested for their absorbance at 280 nm, and peak fractions were dialyzed against PBS, pH 7, for 24 h.
SEB activation of T cell cultures
Spleens from naive BALB/c, C57BL/6, or Pfp KO C57BL/6, or CD1 mice were removed, RBCs were lysed with 0.17 M tris ammonium chloride, and single cell suspensions were prepared in T cell medium. A total of 90 x 106 cells were treated with gamma irradiation for 5 min (1200 rad). The irradiated cells (stimulators) were exposed to 125 µg of SEB, (Toxin Technology, Sarasota, FL) for 30 min at 37°C, 7% CO2. Then 60 x 106 nonirradiated (responder) cells were added to the stimulator cells + SEB and the culture was brought up to 25 ml with T cell medium containing 50 mM 2-ME (Sigma), (final concentration of SEB 6 µg/ml), and incubated at 37°C, 7% CO2 for 36 h.
Cytotoxicity assay
Bneo or EL4 cells were infected with VSV (Indiana or New Jersey) at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 40 for 1 h in a 37°C water bath using DMEM with 0.35% bovine albumin (ICN), 0.12% NaCO3, 100 µg/ml penicillin/streptomycin (DMEM maintenance medium). The cells were washed and 2 x 106 cells were labeled with 100 mCi (51Cr) sodium chromate (NEN) for 60 min in a 37°C water bath. After washing, cells were incubated for 4 h in the presence of SEB-activated T cells at different E:T ratios and BsAbs (12 µg/ml), hybridoma supernatants, or medium. DMEM with 5% FCS was used as incubation medium (assay medium) in 96 V-bottom microtiter plates (Dynatech). Plates were spun down and supernatants were harvested to measure the 51Cr release in a gamma counter. Target cells incubated with 0.5% Nonidet P-40 (Sigma) were used to determine maximum release, and cells incubated with SEB-activated T cells and medium (routinely less than 10% of the maximum release) were used to calculate spontaneous release. The percentage of cytotoxicity was calculated by the formula (% cytotoxicity = test release - spontaneous release/maximum release - spontaneous release x 100).
Inhibition of multicycle virus replication
A total of 3 x 106 P815 cells were infected in suspension with VSV at an MOI = 0.1 using DMEM maintenance medium. One hour later, 3 x 104 VSV-infected P815 cells with either BsAb 526 (1 µg/ml), SEB-activated T cells (different E:T ratios), or a combination of both were added to each of triplicate wells. The cultures were incubated for 48 h in DMEM maintenance medium. Supernatants from each well were titrated on BHK cell monolayers plated in 96-well plates. BHK cells were incubated with the supernatants for 24 h and then stained with crystal violet for determination of CPE of the monolayers.
CD4-CD8 depletions
SEB-activated T cells were prepared as described above. At day 3 of incubation, cells were resuspended in fresh medium (5 x 106 cells/ml) and incubated with either anti-CD4 Ab (GK1.5), anti-CD8 Ab (2.43), both at 10 µg/ml, or medium alone for 30 min at 4°C. Abs were then washed away and cells were incubated with freshly washed anti-IgG-linked BioMag magnetic beads (PerSeptive Diagnostics, Cambridge, MA) (50 beads/cell) for 30 min at 4°C. The depletion of Ab-bearing cells was done by placing the flasks on a magnet (Advanced Magnetics) and collecting unbound cells after washing several times. CD8-depleted, CD4-depleted, and unseparated cells were then used for cytotoxicity and inhibition of virus replication.
FACS analysis
Samples from CD4-depleted, CD8-depleted and unseparated SEB T cells (3 x 105 cells/sample) were incubated with 100 ng/ml of anti-CD3-FITC, Life Technologies), anti-CD8-FITC plus anti-CD4-phycoerythrin (Boehringer Mannheim) (100 ng/ml each), anti-IgG2b isotype standard (PharMingen, San Diego, CA) (100 ng/ml), or medium alone for 30 min at 4°C. Abs were then washed away with T cell medium and each pelleted sample was incubated for 5 min at room temperature with 50 ml of 1% paraformaldehyde. Volume of each sample was raised to 0.5 ml with PBS-BSA-azide. Samples were kept at 4°C overnight and FACS analysis was performed in an EPICS Profile Analyzer (Coulter Corporation, Hialeah, FL). On average, 89% of the SEB-activated unseparated spleen cells were CD3+, out of which 44% were CD8+ and 53% were CD4+. After each depletion there were less than 2% residual cells in each case (i.e., after CD8 depletion less than 2% of the cells left were CD8+ and after CD4 depletion less than 2% of the remaining cells were CD4+).
Anti-IFN-
ELISA
Immulon-4 ELISA plates (Dynatech, Alexandria, VA) were coated
with XMG1.5 at 5 µg/ml. Control IFN-
(Boehringer Mannheim) was
incubated at 50 ng/ml together with different concentrations of XMG1.5
(0.0130 µg/ml). XMG1.5 competed the binding of 50 ng/ml IFN-
to
the coating plate at 0.3 µg/ml. Based on these results we used a
concentration of XMG1.2 three times higher than needed to block IFN-
in the SEB T cell cultures for inhibition of virus replication (see
Fig. 3
).
|
Stat1 KO mice (generated in David Levys laboratory) were
infected by i.p. injection with 1 to 5 LD50/mouse of VSV
(for each experiment a single LD50 was used) diluted in PBS
to a final volume of 1 ml/mouse. One hour after infection, mice were
injected i.p. again with either 95 x 106 SEB T
cells/mouse (prepared from CD1 mice) only, BsAb 526 only (50
µg/mouse), SEB T cells (95 x 106 cells/mouse) +
BsAb 526 (50 µg/mouse), or PBS, all injections in a final volume of 1
ml/mouse. Survival times were recorded in hours postinfection and
results are shown in Table I
.
|
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The BsAb 526 was produced by fusion of the HAT (hypoxanthine-aminopterin-thymidine)-sensitive F23.1 (anti-Vß8) hybridoma with spleen cells from a BALB/c mouse immunized with VSV (Indiana). Hybridomas producing BsAbs were identified by binding of supernatant to purified VSV (Indiana)-coated plates in a RIA. All bispecific hybridomas that bound the virus should also produce anti-Vß8 since F23.1 was the fusion partner. To ensure that we had a BsAb that could bind to Vß8 with one arm and to a VSV protein on the surface of infected cells with the other arm, we tested it for its ability to redirect SEB-activated T cells (SEB T cells) to kill VSV-infected cells in a 4-h chromium release assay. This insured that the VSV protein recognized by the BsAb 526 was expressed on the surface of the infected cells. The hybridoma 526 was positive in both RIA and chromium release assays and was cloned. After purification of culture supernatants through protein A, 526 was used for all subsequent assays. BsAb 526 was also tested by immunoprecipitation using lysates from VSV-infected cells and shown to bind to the G protein from VSV (Indiana) (data not shown).
Redirected lysis of virus-infected cells by BsAb 526
Cloned and purified BsAb 526 was then tested for its ability to
redirect SEB T cells to kill VSV-infected cells in a 4-h chromium
release (cytotoxicity) assay. Figure 1
A shows a typical
cytotoxicity assay with E:T ratios from 40:1 to 10:1. SEB T cells alone
or in the presence of another BsAb, 3F12, specific for Vß8 and
influenza A M2 protein (5), failed to lyse VSV-infected target
cells.
|
To determine whether 526 could inhibit multicycle replication of
VSV, we added it to VSV-infected P815 cells at concentrations ranging
from 2.5 µg/ml to 150 ng/ml with or without SEB T cells. The results
in Figure 1
B demonstrate that in the presence of 526, SEB T
cells can be redirected to inhibit virus replication at concentrations
of Abs as low as 600 ng/ml. An irrelevant BsAb (3F12), 526 alone, or
SEB alone has no effect on virus replication at any concentration
tested.
In the absence of inhibition, slightly higher titers of virus are observed when SEB T cells are present. This possibly results from infection of SEB T cells by VSV.
Cytotoxicity and inhibition of virus replication against an irrelevant VSV subtype
To verify the specificity of 526, we tested it for its ability to
lyse target cells infected with another VSV subtype. Cells were
infected with either VSV (Indiana) or VSV (New Jersey) and used in a
cytotoxicity assay as targets. 526 was only able to mediate lysis of
VSV (Indiana)-infected cells (data not shown). These results were
confirmed by the demonstration that 526 was able to inhibit multicycle
replication of P815 cells infected with VSV (Indiana) but not when the
cells were infected with VSV (New Jersey) (Fig. 2
).
|
release from SEB T cells responsible for inhibition of
multicycle virus replication?
IFN-
has been reported to play an important role in inhibition
of virus replication in some studies (12, 13). Our SEB T cell cultures
secrete very high levels of IFN-
(data not shown), thus we performed
an anti-IFN-
ELISA (see Materials and Methods) to
check how much of the Ab XMG1.2, which has been shown to inhibit the in
vivo function of IFN-
(12), was needed in our assay to bind all the
IFN-
present in our SEB T cell culture. Thus we analyzed what role,
if any, IFN-
might play in inhibition of virus replication by SEB T
cells and BsAb. Cultures of SEB T cells, BsAb, and infected P815 were
set up in the absence or presence of a neutralizing concentration of
anti-IFN-
Ab (XMG1.2 at 1 mg/ml, threefold in excess of that
needed to bind all the IFN-
present in our SEB T cell culture). The
results shown in Figure 3
indicate that
inhibition of IFN-
had no effect on the ability of SEB T cells and
BsAb to inhibit virus replication in P815 cells.
Are CD8+ T cells responsible for inhibition of virus replication?
SEB activation leads to maturation of both CD4+ and
CD8+ T cells, either of which can be targeted by our BsAb.
However, there is evidence that both CD4+ and
CD8+ T cells are capable of inhibiting virus replication in
vivo (14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19). Thus, either CD4+ or CD8+ T
cells or both could be responsible for inhibition of virus replication.
Therefore, we depleted SEB T cell cultures of either CD4+
cells or CD8+ cells and tested them in assays of both
cytotoxicity and inhibition of virus replication. Figure 4
shows that significant cytotoxicity is
only observed with unseparated cells or CD8+ T cells and
BsAb 526. When these different cell populations were mixed with 526 and
VSV-infected P815 cells and the release of virus progeny was measured
48 h later, only unseparated and CD8+ T cells (CD4
depleted) were able to inhibit multicycle virus replication as shown in
Figure 4
Inset.
|
Inhibition of virus replication did not seem to be mediated by
IFN-
release and was dependent on the presence of CD8+ T
cells. Thus, we set out to determine whether Pfp-mediated
cytotoxicity was essential for inhibition of virus replication. Spleen
cells from Pfp KO mice were cultured for 3 days with SEB and tested for
their ability to lyse target cells infected with VSV as well as to
inhibit multicycle virus replication. Figure 5
A shows that, as expected,
Pfp KO SEB T cells were unable to lyse the target cells in the presence
of BsAb in a cytotoxicity assay.
|
Test of the ability of SEB and BsAb to inhibit virus replication in vivo
VSV is not able to successfully infect normal mice unless
inoculated directly into the central nervous system (20). Recently, it
has been demonstrated that Stat1 KO mice, which are unable to react to
IFN, are extremely sensitive to VSV. These mice, given only a few
hundred infectious particles, die within 48 h (3). Therefore,
Stat1 KO mice were tested as a model to evaluate the ability of our
BsAb and SEB T cells to prolong the survival of mice infected with VSV.
Animals were infected by i.p. injection with VSV. Independent
experiments were performed using either 1, 2.5, or 5 LD50
per mouse. Mice received SEB T cells only, BsAb only, SEB T cells
+ BsAb, or PBS and survival was monitored. SEB T cells were prepared
from CD1 mice, which is the background strain for the Stat1 KO mice.
These effectors were tested in our standard assays and shown to be
efficient in inhibition of virus replication as other strains. The
results shown in Table I
demonstrate that virtually all infected
animals given SEB T cells or nothing died within 24 to 48 h after
infection. In contrast, infected animals receiving SEB T cells and BsAb
began to die only after 48 h. A
2 test showed that
the differences in survival rates were statistically significant
(p < 0.005). Some prolongation was observed
with BsAb alone, which is quite surprising since in no in vitro
experiments could we demonstrate any neutralizing ability by 526
itself. Thus, SEB T cells and 526 were able to prolong survival of mice
infected with a lethal dose of VSV, probably by reducing virus titers
and preventing spread to other tissues of the mouse.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
P815, a mouse mastocytoma (DBA/2) was used for VSV infection. Thus, we now had a completely syngeneic system to study inhibition of virus replication in vitro. The BsAb 526, which recognizes the TCR and the G protein of VSV, was tested for its ability to redirect SEB T cells to kill VSV-infected cells and to inhibit VSV replication in P815 cells. As expected, 526 could efficiently do both and, in fact, the inhibition of virus replication was greater in this model than with influenza virus. We proceeded to use this model to test the requirements for inhibition of virus replication in vitro and in vivo.
Many groups, using various systems, have shown that both
CD4+ and CD8+ T cells are able to clear virus
infections in vivo (14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19). Since SEB activates both subsets of T
cells we were able to compare the ability of each to inhibit virus
replication directly. This was particularly interesting since both
CD4+ and CD8+ T cells inhibited multicycle
replication of influenza virus in our system, and cytotoxicity did not
correlate with inhibition (6). Thus, we tried to manipulate the system
to test which T cell population was capable of inhibiting VSV
replication. In contrast to the influenza virus model, with VSV we
observed that inhibition of virus replication was mediated by
CD8+ T cells, dependent on Pfp-mediated cytotoxicity, and
IFN-
independent.
When we infected Stat1 KO mice with a lethal dose of VSV and treated them with a single injection of SEB T cells and 526, we prolonged the life of the mice for at least 48 h compared with controls. Although mice were not cured from our single injection (data not shown), the fact that we observed such a difference in survival suggests that BsAbs are able to inhibit virus replication in vivo. The fact that we were unable to completely cure the mice may result from the failure of Stat1 KO mice to generate a normal cell-mediated immune response. Even very small numbers of residual virus particles could lead to death since Stat1 KO mice infected with a nonlethal influenza virus fail to adequately generate a proinflammatory response, and demonstrate impaired virus clearance.4 In these Stat1 KO mice as little as 100 VSV infectious particles can be lethal.
It should be noted that BsAb alone also prolonged the lives of Stat1 KO
mice infected with VSV, although to a lower extent than in combination
with SEB T cells. As can be clearly seen in Figures 1
B, 3,
4B, and 5B, 526 alone, or when bound to
CD8+ depleted effector cells, is not able to inhibit virus
replication. Yet, in vivo it has some inhibitory activity. This may
result from the ability of the bifunctional Ab to activate the
complement cascade and its opsonizing and ADCC activity due to its
isotype (IgG2a). Effects of BsAbs alone have been observed by others in
an anti-tumor model (21, 22). Also, Stat1 KO mice infected with
influenza virus had good levels of Ab redirected cytotoxicity in P815
cells with an anti-TCR Ab,4 which may suggest that self
T cells from Stat1 KO mice could be bound by 526 and be responsible for
the inhibition of VSV replication in vivo. We are presently attempting
to determine which of these mechanisms may be responsible for this
effect.
Our view of BsAbs + SEB T cells is that they can efficiently inhibit virus replication, but probably will not remain active for a prolonged period. This may result from modulation of BsAb from the surface of the T cells or apoptosis of the SEB-activated cells (23). It is possible that repeated injections of cells might function to reduce the virus load and, in the presence of an intact immune system, protect animals from consequences of virus infection. It is also possible that BsAbs could redirect preexisting CTLs of different specificities (i.e., specific for existing latent viruses such as herpes viruses) to be used as effectors for redirected lysis of virus-infected cells. Fast spreading viruses like VSV will clearly kill infected animals in the absence of innate immunity. Thankfully, such viruses also seem exquisitely sensitive to the effects of innate immunity.
Another important aspect of this work is that it demonstrates that non-virus-specific T cells can inhibit virus replication when redirected by BsAbs in vitro and in vivo. It has been suggested that neither cytotoxic T cells, Pfp, nor fas ligand plays a role in recovery from VSV in normal animals (24). The fact that the virus would seem to be controlled by innate immune responses renders such cells unnecessary. Our results, however, demonstrate that CD8+ T cells using Pfp-mediated cytotoxicity are very efficient at inactivating this virus.
Tools such as BsAbs may prove to be of immunotherapeutic value to fight not only fast-spreading viruses, but more importantly, persistent infections (25, 26). It is possible to generate BsAbs against TCR and viral proteins expressed on virus-infected cells to be used against viruses that are inefficient inducers of specific CTL. This may result from either a failure to infect cells bearing costimulatory molecules or inhibition of the generation of immunity by elaboration of factors as has been shown for a number of herpes viruses or inhibition of MHC presentation (27, 28).
BsAbs can also be generated to redirect other cells of the immune system to act upon pathogens, i.e., complement-binding BsAbs (29), those which bind FcRs on cells of the immune system (29, 30, 31). Also, other groups have successfully used BsAbs to target the immune response against tumors in animal models and humans (32, 33, 34, 35, 36). The use of BsAbs in virus infections has been more limited, but there have been successful results as well against HIV (25, 26, 37, 38) and in targeted delivery of adenoviruses (39). Our in vivo results encourage further pursuit of their therapeutic use in experimental models of virus infection.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Thomas M. Moran, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, Department of Microbiology, 1 Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY, 10029. E-mail address: ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: VSV, vesicular stomatitis virus; KO, knockout; BsAb, bispecific Ab; SEB, staphylococcal enterotoxin-B; NaPy, sodium pyruvate; BHK, baby hamster kidney; Iscoves-HT, Iscoves medium with 100 mM hypoxanthine and 1 mM thymidine; Pfp, perforin; MOI, multiplicity of infection; SEB T cells, SEB-activated T cells; WT, wild-type; MDCK, Madin-Darby canine kidney; PBS-BSA-azide, PBS-BSA (1%) and sodium azide (0.02%); CPE, cytopathic effect. ![]()
4 J. E. Durbin, A. Fernandez-Sesma, A. Garcia-Sastre, T. D. Rao, A. B. Frey, T. M. Moran, and D. E. Levy. 1997. Essential role of STAT1 in repression of TH2-mediated response to influenza virus infection. Submitted for publication. ![]()
Received for publication September 5, 1997. Accepted for publication October 29, 1997.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
R on human phagocytes via bispecific antibodies reduces infectivity of HIV-1 to T cells. J. Leukocyte Biol. 55:385.[Abstract]
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |