The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hatzivassiliou, E.
Right arrow Articles by Mosialos, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hatzivassiliou, E.
Right arrow Articles by Mosialos, G.
The Journal of Immunology, 1998, 160: 1116-1121.
Copyright © 1998 by The American Association of Immunologists

A Fusion of the EBV Latent Membrane Protein-1 (LMP1) Transmembrane Domains to the CD40 Cytoplasmic Domain Is Similar to LMP1 in Constitutive Activation of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Expression, Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B, and Stress-Activated Protein Kinase1

Eudoxia Hatzivassiliou*, William E. Miller{dagger}, Nancy Raab-Traub{dagger}, Elliott Kieff* and George Mosialos2,*

* Departments of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics and Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA 02115; and {dagger} Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The EBV latent infection transforming protein, LMP1, has six hydrophobic transmembrane domains that enable it to aggregate in the plasma membrane and a 200-amino acid carboxyl-terminal cytoplasmic domain (CT) that activates nuclear factor-{kappa}B and induces many of the phenotypic changes in B lymphocytes that accompany CD40 activation. Since the phenotypic effects of LMP1 are similar to those of activated CD40, we now compare signaling from the LMP1 CT with that from the CD40 CT fused to the LMP1 transmembrane domains. The LMPCD40 chimera was similar to LMP1 in nuclear factor-{kappa}B activation and in up-regulation of epidermal growth factor receptor expression. CD40 ligation was known to activate the stress-activated protein kinase, and both LMPCD40 and LMP1 are now shown to induce stress-activated protein kinase activity in the absence of ligand. Deletion of the first four transmembrane domains of LMP1 abrogated LMP1 aggregation in the plasma membrane and nearly abolished signaling from LMP1 or the LMPCD40 chimera. These results highlight the role of LMP1 as a constitutively active receptor similar to CD40 and provide a novel approach for the generation of ligand-independent receptors.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The EBV latent infection-associated membrane protein 1 (LMP1)3 is central to the oncogenic effects of the virus. LMP1 is expressed in most human malignancies associated with EBV infection (1). Recombinant EBV-based molecular genetic analyses indicate that LMP1 is essential for primary human B lymphocyte transformation into long term growing lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs) (2). LMP1 can also transform established rodent fibroblast cells, as defined by loss of contact inhibition, anchorage independence, reduced serum dependence, and tumor formation in nude mice (3, 4). In non-EBV-infected B lymphoma cells, LMP1 can up-regulate the expression of activation markers, anti-apoptotic proteins such as A20 and Bcl-2 (5, 6), and cell adhesion molecules and can functionally activate adhesion. These phenotypic features are characteristic of LCLs or of lymphocytes proliferating in response to Ag and T cell help (7, 8). In epithelial cells, LMP1 can up-regulate epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression (9). Many of the effects of LMP1 in up-regulating cell gene expression are mediated by NF-{kappa}B activation (5, 10, 11).

Genetic and biochemical studies are compatible with the hypothesis that LMP1 mimics an activated TNF receptor (TNFR) similar to CD40 (12, 13, 14). The LMP1 N-terminal 24 amino acids are in the cytoplasm, and their function in growth transformation appears to be as an anchor for the first transmembrane domain (15). The six hydrophobic transmembrane domains of LMP1, separated by short reverse turns, are critical for lymphocyte growth transformation, and their activity is linked to their ability to confer aggregation in a patch in the plasma membrane (2). The LMP1 200-amino acid cytoplasmic carboxyl terminus (CT) is also essential for lymphocyte growth transformation (16). A membrane-proximal CT domain (amino acids 187–231) is sufficient for transformation in its natural linkage to the multiple transmembrane domains, although the outgrowth of the transformed cells is compromised compared with that of cells transformed by wild-type virus (16). In EBV-transformed LCLs this domain is constitutively associated with TNFR-associated factors (TRAFs) (12, 13, 14). Deletion of LMP1 codons 185 to 211, which encode the core LMP1 TRAF binding domain, results in EBV recombinants that are unable to transform primary B lymphocytes (17). This is consistent with the working hypothesis that TRAF interactions mediate most of LMP1’s transforming effects. TRAFs have been implicated in signal transduction from TNFRs, such as type I and II TNFRs, CD40, and CD30 (18, 19, 20, 21, 22). Unlike LMP1 association with TRAFs, which is constitutive, TNFRs associate with TRAFs only in response to ligand (23, 24, 25). Many of the LMP1-mediated phenotypic effects in B lymphocytes are similar to the effects of activated CD40 (7, 8).

In transient 293 cell transfection assays, the TRAF-interacting domain of LMP1 contributes only approximately 25% of the total LMP1-mediated NF-{kappa}B activation (Fig. 1Go) (10, 11, 12, 13, 14). A second LMP1 domain (amino acids 333–386) at the carboxyl terminus of the CT mediates approximately 75% of the NF-{kappa}B activation (Fig. 1Go) (10, 11). Surprisingly, only the TRAF-interacting domain can induce EGFR expression in epithelial cells (26), consistent with the idea that this domain mediates signaling processes other than NF-{kappa}B activation that are important for transformation and EGFR expression.



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. Structural organization of the LMP1 and LMP1-CD40 chimeric constructs. The plasma membrane is designated by the two horizontal lines. The amino-terminal (N) and CT (C) ends of LMP1 are in the cytoplasm. The two NF-{kappa}B-activating domains (plasma membrane proximal and distal) in the LMP1 CT are designated by the open and closed boxes, respectively. The cytoplasmic domain of CD40 (CD40CD) is shown by the gray box.

 
To further test the hypothesis that LMP1 is a constitutively activated, CD40-like TNF receptor in which the transmembrane domains substitute for ligand-mediated aggregation, we have constructed and tested a chimeric gene that encodes the LMP1 transmembrane domains (amino acids 1–187) fused in-frame with amino acids 216 to 277 of the CD40 cytoplasmic domain (Fig. 1Go). The LMP1 transmembrane domains should enable the fusion protein to aggregate in the plasma membrane. The locally high concentration of CD40 cytoplasmic domains should have effects similar to those mediated by LMP1 or ligand-activated CD40.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Cell lines and transfections

293 is a human embryonic kidney cell line, and C33 is a human cervical carcinoma cell line. The cells were grown in DMEM with 10% FBS (D10). 293 cells were transfected by electroporation. Briefly, 5 x 106 cells were trypsinized, washed twice in RPMI 1640 medium with 10% FBS (R10), and electroporated in 400 µl of R10 at 200 V and 960 µF in a 0.4-cm cuvette using a GenePulser electroporator (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Richmond, CA). The cells were then cultured in D10 at 37°C. C33 cells were transfected with calcium phosphate (27). Cells transfected with pCDNA3-based vectors (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA) were selected in D10 with 600 µg/ml G418 (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY).

Plasmid construction

Constructs made from pSG5 (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) use the SV40 early promoter and are designated pS. Constructs made from pCDNA3 (Invitrogen) use the CMV immediate early promoter/enhancer and are designated pC. PSLMP{Delta}194–386 lacks LMP1 codons 194 to 386; it was a gift from Dr. Martin Rowe (University of Cardiff, Cardiff, U.K.) (10). The LMP1 transmembrane domain and CD40 cytoplasmic domain fusion protein expression construct was made by PCR amplification of codons 216 to 277 from a human CD40 cDNA (a gift from Dr. Hitoshi Kikutani) with primers CD40N1 (5'-AAAAGGCCTTGAAAAAGGTGGCCAAGAAGCC-3') and CD40C1 (5'-AAAAGGCCTCACTGTCTCTCCTGCACTGAG-3'). The PCR product was digested with StuI and cloned into the T4 DNA polymerase blunt-ended NcoI site in pUCLMP1 (pUC with the LMP1 cDNA cloned into the EcoRI site) to make pUCLMPCD40. The sequence of the cloned CD40 cDNA fragment was identical with that of the wild type. The chimeric cDNA was then subcloned into the EcoRI site of pSG5 to make pSLMPCD40. The pSD1LMPCD40 was made by subcloning the XhoII fragment of pSLMPCD40 into the BamHI site of pSG5. PSG5FLAGLMP1 has been previously described (17). PSG5FLAGLMPCD40 was constructed by subcloning the XhoI fragment of B220LMPCD40 into the XhoI site of pSG5FLAGLMP1. B220LMPCD40 was constructed by subcloning the MamI to Bpu1102 fragment of pSLMPCD40 into B220 (13). The pCLMP1 has been previously described (9). PCLMPCD40 was made by cloning the EcoRI insert from pUCLMPCD40 into the EcoRI site of pCDNA3. PCD1LMPCD40 was made by cloning the XhoII fragment from pSLMPCD40 into the BamHI site of pCDNA3. PCLMP{Delta}194–386 was made by subcloning the EcoRI insert from pSLMP{Delta}194–386 into the EcoRI site of pCDNA3. The human CD40 expression vector pEFBOSCD40 was a gift from Dr. Hitoshi Kikutani.

Luciferase reporter assays

Briefly, 293 cells in log phase growth at 50% confluence were electroporated with the NF-{kappa}B reporter construct 3x-{kappa}B-L (11), an expression plasmid, and a control phosphoglucokinase promoter-driven ß-galactosidase expression plasmid (GKßgal) to normalize for transfection efficiency. Twenty-four or forty-eight hours posttransfection, the cells were harvested in PBS and lysed in luciferase lysis buffer (Promega, Madison, WI). Luciferase and ß-galactosidase activities were measured with an OPTOCOMP I (MGM, Norwalk, CT) luminometer as previously described (13).

Antibodies

EGFR was detected with a rabbit polyclonal Ab (EGFR-1005, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA). LMP1 was detected with mAb S12. The LMPCD40 chimera was detected with a rabbit polyclonal Ab against amino acids 258 to 277 of the CD40 precursor (CD40C20, Santa Cruz Biotechnology). FLAG-tagged proteins were detected with the M5 mouse mAb (Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY). c-Rel was detected with a rabbit polyclonal Ab (cREL(C), Santa Cruz Biotechnology).

Stress-activated protein kinase (SAPK) assay

To determine the effect of LMP1 or LMPCD40 chimeric constructs on the activity of SAPK, 293 cells were electroporated with an expression vector for one of these constructs and with an expression vector (pEBG-SAPK-p54ß) (28) for a GST fusion of SAPK-p54ß (GSTSAPK) (29). The cotransfected cells were grown for several hours in D10. Following attachment of the cells to the tissue culture flask, the culture media were changed to DMEM with 0.1% FBS. After incubation for approximately 16 to 18 h, the cells were washed in PBS and lysed in 25 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100, 10% glycerol, 10 mM ß-glycerophosphate, 1 mM DTT, 10 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 1 mM PMSF, and 18 µg/ml aprotinin. A fraction of each cell lysate was analyzed by immunoblot to determine the level of expression of GSTSAPK using a rabbit polyclonal antiserum against GST. Two equal aliquots of each cell extract were adsorbed to glutathione-Sepharose beads (Pharmacia, Piscataway, NJ) for 1 h at 4°C, and the beads were washed three times with 1 ml of lysis buffer. One aliquot of SAPK bound to beads was analyzed by immunoblot for GSTSAPK expression, while the second was washed twice with 1x kinase buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) and 8 mM MgCl2) and assayed for GSTJUN (a GST fusion of c-Jun amino acids 1–79) phosphorylating activity in 20 µl of a reaction mix containing 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 8 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM ATP, and 0.5 µCi of [{gamma}-32P]ATP at 30°C for 15 min.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
CD40 codons 216 to 277 were fused in-frame to the carboxyl terminus of LMP1 codons 1 to 187 to evaluate whether the six LMP1 transmembrane domains enable constitutive signaling from the CD40 cytoplasmic domain (Fig. 1Go). As a control, CD40 codons 216 to 277 were fused in-frame to LMP1 codons 129 to 187. LMP1 codons 129 to 187 encode the last two LMP1 transmembrane domains and constitute the membrane-anchoring domain of D1LMP1, a protein that is expressed from an internal promoter of the LMP1 gene in lytic EBV infection. D1LMP1 consists of LMP1 amino acids 129 to 386 (Fig. 1Go). Unlike LMP1, D1LMP1 accumulates diffusely in all cytoplasmic membranes and has no transforming or activating effects when expressed in immortalized rodent fibroblasts or human B lymphoblasts (30, 31). LMPCD40 and D1LMPCD40 were tested for their ability to activate NF-{kappa}B and compared with wild-type LMP1 and LMP1{Delta}194–386, which lacks the LMP1 CT.

In 293 cells, LMP1 with an amino-terminal FLAG tag activated NF-{kappa}B in a standard reporter plasmid assay (Fig. 2GoA). Activation was dependent on the LMP1 CT, since deletion of the CT resulted in minimal or no activation (LMP{Delta}194–386 in Fig. 2Go) as previously reported (10, 11). Replacement of the LMP1 CT with the CD40 cytoplasmic domain resulted in NF-{kappa}B activation, similar to that obtained with LMP1 (FLAGLMPCD40 in Fig. 2GoA). Western blot analysis with an anti-FLAG Ab (M5 mouse monoclonal, Kodak) demonstrated that FLAGLMPCD40 was expressed at levels similar to FLAGLMP1 (Fig. 2GoC). NF-{kappa}B activation by LMPCD40 was also compared with activation obtained by overexpression of CD40 alone in 293. When CD40 was expressed at levels similar to or higher than those of LMPCD40, it generated only 12% of the NF-{kappa}B activation obtained with LMPCD40 (mean values were calculated from three independent experiments; data not shown). NF-{kappa}B activation by LMPCD40 was largely dependent on the LMP1 multiple hydrophobic transmembrane domains, since D1LMPCD40 expression resulted in minimal NF-{kappa}B activation (D1LMPCD40 in Fig. 2GoB). D1LMPCD40 expression levels in 293 cells were similar to or higher than those of FLAGLMPCD40 as revealed by immunoblot analysis with an Ab (CD40C20, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) raised against part of the cytoplasmic tail of CD40 (Fig. 2GoD). Activation of the NF-{kappa}B reporter construct by LMPCD40 was also dependent on the integrity of the NF-{kappa}B sites, since a similar reporter construct with mutated NF-{kappa}B sites (3x-mut{kappa}-L) (11) was only minimally activated by LMPCD40 (the activation of 3x-mut{kappa}-L by LMPCD40 was <3% of the activation obtained with wild-type 3x-{kappa}B-L reporter; data not shown). Therefore, high level NF-{kappa}B activation by LMPCD40 is probably due to the ability of the multiple hydrophobic transmembrane domains to enable signaling by causing aggregation in the plasma membrane.



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. A and B, Luciferase reporter assay. 293 cells were electroporated with a luciferase reporter gene controlled by three NF-{kappa}B sites (3x-{kappa}B-L), a ß-galactosidase expression construct (GKßgal), and pSG5-based expression plasmids for FLAGLMP1 (6 µg), LMP1{Delta}194–386 (10 µg), FLAGLMPCD40 (6 µg in A and 2.5 µg in B), or D1LMPCD40 (40 µg) indicated by (+). The total amount of transfected DNA for all transfections was equalized with the addition of empty pSG5 plasmid. Luciferase activity was normalized for the activity of cotransfected ß-galactosidase. Mean values of relative luciferase activity (±SD) are shown for six independent experiments. C, Western blot analysis of FLAGLMP1 and FLAGLMPCD40 expression in the corresponding 293 transfectants presented in A. Whole cell extracts with approximately equal protein contents were analyzed by Western blot with the M5 monoclonal anti-FLAG Ab. Results from one representative transfection are shown. The positions of FLAGLMP1 and FLAGLMPCD40 proteins are shown by arrows. D, Western blot analysis of FLAGLMPCD40 and D1LMPCD40 expression in the corresponding 293 transfectants presented in B. Whole cell extracts with approximately equal protein contents were analyzed by Western blot with the CD40C20 Ab. Results from one representative transfection are shown. The positions of FLAGLMPCD40 and D1LMPCD40 proteins are shown by arrows.

 
To confirm that LMPCD40 aggregates at a site in the plasma membrane, and D1LMPCD40 is diffusely distributed in all cytoplasmic membranes, LMPCD40 and D1LMPCD40 were expressed in Jurkat T cells (which do not express CD40), and their subcellular distribution was determined by indirect immunofluorescence with the CD40C20 Ab. LMPCD40 was localized in tight plasma membrane patches, whereas D1LMPCD40 was distributed throughout the cytoplasm and immediate perinuclear region (Fig. 3Go). Thus, high level NF-{kappa}B activation by LMPCD40, as opposed to low level NF-{kappa}B activation by D1LMPCD40, correlates with LMP1CD40 aggregation in the plasma membrane.



View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Subcellular localization of LMPCD40 and D1LMPCD40. Jurkat cells were electroporated with pSLMPCD40 (A and B) and pSD1LMPCD40 (C and D). One day posttransfection the cells were subjected to indirect immunofluorescence using a rabbit polyclonal Ab (2 µg/ml) that recognizes the cytoplasmic tail of CD40 (CD40C20, Santa Cruz Biotechonology) and a fluorescein-conjugated anti-rabbit secondary Ab (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA). Immunofluorescence (A and C) and phase contrast (B and D) pictures are shown. Representative cells of each transfected population are shown in A and C. LMPCD40 primarily localizes in a single region of the plasma membrane, where it aggregates in patches (A). D1LMPCD40 is distributed throughout the cytoplasm and can be found in the immediate perinuclear region (compare the immunofluorescence and phase contrast pictures on the left of C and D).

 
To further investigate the ability of the LMP1 transmembrane domains to constitutively activate CD40 signaling, we tested the ability of the LMPCD40 chimera to induce EGFR expression in epithelial cells. In the C33 cervical carcinoma cell line, LMP1 expression or CD40 activation up-regulates EGFR expression (26). LMPCD40 was similar to LMP1 and up-regulated EGFR expression in both polyclonal and cloned C33 transfectants (Fig. 4Go).



View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. Induction of EGFR by LMP1 and LMPCD40. C33 cells were transfected with pCDNA3 (lanes 1, 2, 3, and 10), pCLMP1 (lanes 4,5, 6, and 11), or pCLMPCD40 (lanes 7, 8, 9, and12). Transfectants were selected in the presence of G418 and selected clones (left panels), or polyclonal populations (right panels) of cells were analyzed by Western blotting for the expression of EGFR (A), LMP1 (B), LMPCD40 (C), and c-Rel (D). c-Rel was used as a protein loading control.

 
Since CD40 ligand can induce CD40-mediated activation of stress-activated protein kinases (SAPKs or JNKs) (32, 33), we investigated whether LMPCD40 or even LMP1 can constitutively activate SAPK-p54ß (29). LMPCD40, LMP1, D1LMPCD40, and LMP{Delta}194–386 were transiently expressed in 293 cells along with a GSTSAPK fusion protein (pEBG-SAPK-p54ß) (28). GSTSAPK was then isolated from transfected cell lysates using glutathione-coupled Sepharose beads, and SAPK activity was measured using an Escherichia coli-expressed GSTJUN fusion protein as a substrate. LMPCD40 and LMP1 activated SAPK severalfold over the background of vector-transfected cells (Fig. 5GoA, compare lane 1 with lanes 2 and 3). The activation ranged from two- to fivefold in three independent experiments. LMPCD40 consistently activated SAPK slightly more than LMP1. The activation of SAPK by LMP1 and LMPCD40 is also evident in the slower mobility of the GSTSAPK band (Fig. 5GoB, lanes 2 and 3), which has previously been associated with SAPK phosphorylation and activation (34). This is the first demonstration of SAPK activation by LMP1, and it implicates this protein kinase in the LMP1 signaling process. Activation of SAPK by LMPCD40 and LMP1 was dependent on the multiple hydrophobic transmembrane domains of LMP1 and on the LMP1 or CD40 cytoplasmic domains, since neither the hydrophobic transmembrane domains alone (pCLMP{Delta}194–386) nor the last two LMP1 transmembrane domains fused in-frame to the CD40 cytoplasmic domain (pCD1LMPCD40) activated SAPK (Fig. 5Go). LMPCD40 and D1LMPCD40 were expressed at similar levels, as indicated by immunoblot analysis with the CD40C20 Ab (data not shown). Therefore, the failure of D1LMPCD40 to signal activation of SAPK is most likely due to the inability of this protein to aggregate in the plasma membrane, a property that requires all six LMP1 transmembrane domains of LMP1 (Fig. 3Go) (2, 30, 35).



View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. Activation of SAPK by LMP1 and LMPCD40. 293 cells were transfected with a GSTSAPK expression vector (pEBG-SAPK-p54ß) (28) and empty expression vector (lane 1), pSLMP1 (lane 2), pSLMPCD40 (lane 3), pCD1LMPCD40 (lane 4), or pCLMP{Delta}194–386 (lane 5). One day posttransfection GSTSAPK was affinity purified on glutathione-Sepharose beads, and its kinase activity was determined with GSTJUN as a substrate (A). The amount of GSTSAPK expressed was determined by Western blotting using an anti-GST polyclonal Ab (B). SAPK* denotes the position of the slowly migrating activated form of SAPK. In lane 3 most of the SAPK is retarded in its migration.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
These experiments separate two functional components of LMP1. One component is the short amino terminus and six transmembrane sequences. The second component is the CT. The first component enables constant aggregation of the cytoplasmic domains of LMP1 or CD40 as if they were aggregated by the continuous presence of a cross-linking ligand. While CD40 cross-linking is ordinarily necessary for CD40 signal transduction, the LMP1 six transmembrane domains enable constitutive CD40 signaling. The LMP1 CT is functionally similar to the CD40 cytoplasmic domain. Fusion of the LMP1 CT or CD40 cytoplasmic domain to the LMP1 transmembrane domains can activate NF-{kappa}B and SAPK, and up-regulate EGFR expression.

LMP1 transmembrane-domain mediated plasma membrane aggregation could be a general mechanism for constitutive, ligand-independent, receptor aggregation. For receptors such as TNFRs that exhibit sustained activation with continued ligand-induced aggregation, the LMP1 transmembrane domains could confer ligand-independent activation. Similar chimeric molecules expressed in specific tissues at specific stages of development may be of use in delineating the pure effects of cell type-restricted receptor activation in the absence of potential effects of ligand on surrounding cells or of countersignaling from the receptor to the ligand-expressing cell. Not all receptors exhibit sustained activation in response to ligand. Some, like surface Ig, that signal through nonreceptor tyrosine kinase pathways transmit transient activation and are desensitized to continuous signaling (36, 37). Interestingly, EBV encodes another multiple membrane-spanning integral membrane protein, LMP2, which also has an intrinsic ability to aggregate in the plasma membrane. LMP2 constitutively associates with Lyn and Syk protein tyrosine kinases and induces sustained desensitization to Lyn- and Syk-mediated signal transduction (38).

These experiments highlight the similarities between LMP1 and CD40 signal transduction. CD40 and the membrane proximal domain of the LMP1 CT have similar primary amino acid sequences through which they engage TRAFs (13, 19). Both activate NF-{kappa}B through TRAF2 (13, 20, 25). The major NF-{kappa}B-activating domain of LMP1 is located at the distal end of the CT. Despite its lower NF-{kappa}B-activating capability, only the membrane-proximal LMP1 CT domain, and not the distal domain, can directly engage TRAFs and up-regulate EGFR expression. Thus, EGFR up-regulation requires a pathway distinct from general NF-{kappa}B activation and appears to correlate with direct TRAF engagement by the LMP1 membrane-proximal CT or the CD40 cytoplasmic domain.

CD40 has been known to activate SAPK, and we now show that LMP1 is similar to CD40 in SAPK activation. SAPK-mediated phosphorylation potentiates the trans-activating properties of certain transcription factors such as c-Jun and activating transcription factor-2 (39, 40). These factors have been implicated in trans-activation of growth regulatory genes, and they may be used by CD40 or LMP1 to promote cell growth, transformation, or EGFR induction (41). TRAF2 has recently been shown to mediate SAPK activation by TNF through a NF-{kappa}B-independent pathway (42, 43). Since both the LMP1 CT and the cytoplasmic tail of CD40 engage TRAF2, TRAF2 probably mediates SAPK activation from both cytoplasmic domains.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Jamie McCabe for technical assistance and Bruce Mayer, E. D. S. Silberman, Nick Grammatikakis, and Kenneth Izumi for reagents and helpful advice.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by U.S. Public Health Service Grants CA19014, CA32979, and CA52406 (to N.R.-T.); CA47006 (to E.K.); and CA71705 (to G.M.) and by a postdoctoral fellowship from the Leukemia Society of America (to G.M.). Back

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. George Mosialos, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 181 Longwood Ave., Boston, MA 02115. E-mail address: Back

3 Abbreviations used in this paper: LMP1, latent membrane protein-1; LCLs, lymphoblastoid cell lines; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; NF-{kappa}B, nuclear factor-{kappa}B; TNFR, tumor necrosis factor receptor; CT, carboxyl terminus; TRAF, tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor; SAPK, stress-activated protein kinase; GST, glutathione-S-transferase. Back

Received for publication June 12, 1997. Accepted for publication October 14, 1997.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Rickinson, A. B., E. Kieff. 1996. Epstein-Barr virus. B. N. Fields, and D. M. Knipe, and P. M. Howley, eds. Virology 2397. Raven Press, New York.
  2. Kaye, K. M., K. M. Izumi, E. Kieff. 1993. Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein 1 is essential for B-lymphocyte growth transformation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:9150.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Wang, D., D. Liebowitz, E. Kieff. 1985. An EBV membrane protein expressed in immortalized lymphocytes transforms established rodent cells. Cell 43:831.[Medline]
  4. Baichwal, V. R., B. Sugden. 1988. Transformation of BALB/3T3 cells by the BNLF-1 gene of Epstein-Barr virus. Oncogene 4:67.
  5. Laherty, C. D., H. M. Hu, A. W. Opipari, F. Wang, V. M. Dixit. 1992. The Epstein-Barr virus LMP1 gene product induces A20 zinc finger protein expression by activating nuclear factor {kappa}B. J Biol. Chem. 267:24157.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Henderson, S., M. Rowe, C. Gregory, D. Croom-Carter, F. Wang, R. Longnecker, E. Kieff, A. Rickinson. 1991. Induction of bcl-2 expression by Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein 1 protects infected B cells from programmed cell death. Cell 65:1107.[Medline]
  7. Wang, F., C. Gregory, C. Sample, M. Rowe, D. Liebowitz, R. Murray, A. Rickinson, E. Kieff. 1990. Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein (LMP1) and nuclear proteins 2 and 3C are effectors of phenotypic changes in B lymphocytes: EBNA-2 and LMP1 cooperatively induce CD23. J. Virol. 64:2309.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Banchereau, J., F. Bazan, D. Blanchard, F. Briere, J. P. Galizzi, C. van Kooten, Y. J. Liu, F. Rousset, S. Saeland. 1994. The CD40 antigen and its ligand. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 12:881.[Medline]
  9. Miller, W. E., H. S. Earp, N. Raab-Traub. 1995. The Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein 1 induces expression of the epidermal growth factor receptor. J. Virol. 69:4390.[Abstract]
  10. Huen, D. S., S. A. Henderson, D. Croom-Carter, M. Rowe. 1995. The Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein-1 (LMP1) mediates activation of NF-{kappa}B and cell surface phenotype via two effector regions in its carboxy-terminal cytoplasmic domain. Oncogene 10:549.[Medline]
  11. Mitchell, T., B. Sugden. 1995. Stimulation of NF-{kappa}B-mediated transcription by mutant derivatives of the latent membrane protein of Epstein-Barr virus. J. Virol. 69:2968.[Abstract]
  12. Mosialos, G., M. Birkenbach, R. Yalamanchili, T. VanArsdale, C. Ware, E. Kieff. 1995. The Epstein-Barr virus transforming protein LMP1 engages signaling proteins for the tumor necrosis factor receptor family. Cell 80:389.[Medline]
  13. Devergne, O., E. Hatzivassiliou, K. M. Izumi, K. M. Kaye, M. F. Kleijnen, E. Kieff, G. Mosialos. 1996. Association of TRAF1, TRAF2, and TRAF3 with an Epstein-Barr virus LMP1 domain important for B-lymphocyte transformation: role in NF-{kappa}B activation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:7098.[Abstract]
  14. Kaye, K. M., O. Devergne, J. N. Harada, K. M. Izumi, R. Yalamanchili, E. Kieff, G. Mosialos. 1996. Tumor necrosis factor receptor associated factor 2 is a mediator of NF-{kappa}B activation by latent infection membrane protein 1, the Epstein-Barr virus transforming protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:11085.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Izumi, K., K. Kaye, E. Kieff. 1994. Epstein-Barr virus recombinant molecular genetic analysis of the LMP1 amino-terminal cytoplasmic domain reveals a probable structural role, with no component essential for primary B-lymphocyte growth transformation. J. Virol. 68:4369.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Kaye, K. M., K. M. Izumi, G. Mosialos, E. Kieff. 1995. The Epstein-Barr virus LMP1 cytoplasmic carboxy terminus is essential for B-lymphocyte transformation; fibroblast cocultivation complements a critical function within the terminal 155 residues. J. Virol. 69:675.[Abstract]
  17. Izumi, K. M., K. M. Kaye, E. D. Kieff. 1997. The Epstein-Barr virus LMP1 amino acid sequence that engages tumor necrosis factor receptor associated factors is critical for primary B lymphocyte growth transformation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:1447.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Cheng, G., A. M. Cleary, Z. S. Ye, D. I. Hong, S. Lederman, D. Baltimore. 1995. Involvement of CRAF1, a relative of TRAF, in CD40 signaling. Science 267:1494.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Hu, H. M., K. O’Rourke, M. S. Boguski, V. M. Dixit. 1994. A novel RING finger protein interacts with the cytoplasmic domain of CD40. J. Biol. Chem. 269:30069.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Rothe, M., V. Sarma, V. M. Dixit, D. V. Goeddel. 1995. TRAF2-mediated activation of NF-{kappa}B by TNF receptor 2 and CD40. Science 269:1424.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Hsu, H., H. B. Shu, M. G. Pan, D. V. Goeddel. 1996. TRADD-TRAF2 and TRADD-FADD interactions define two distinct TNF receptor 1 signal transduction pathways. Cell 84:299.[Medline]
  22. Lee, S. Y., S. Y. Lee, G. Kandala, M. L. Liou, H. C. Liou, Y. Choi. 1996. CD30/TNF receptor-associated factor interaction: NF-{kappa}B activation and binding specificity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:9699.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Shu, H. B., M. Takeuchi, D. V. Goeddel. 1996. The tumor necrosis factor receptor 2 signal transducers TRAF2 and c-IAP1 are components of the tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 signaling complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:13973.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. VanArsdale, T. L., S. L. VanArsdale, W. R. Force, B. N. Walter, G. Mosialos, E. Kieff, J. C. Reed, C. F. Ware. 1997. Lymphotoxin-ß receptor signaling complex: the role of tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 3 recruitment in cell death and activation of nuclear factor {kappa}B. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:2460.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Kuhne, M. R., M. Robbins, J. E. Hambor, M. F. Mackey, Y. Kosaka, T. Nishimura, J. P. Gigley, R. J. Noelle, D. M. Calderhead. 1997. Assembly and regulation of the CD40 receptor complex in human B cells. J. Exp. Med. 186:337.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Miller, W. E., G. Mosialos, E. Kieff, N. Raab-Traub. 1997. Epstein-Barr virus LMP1 induction of the epidermal growth factor receptor is mediated through a TRAF signaling pathway distinct from NF-{kappa}B activation. J. Virol. 71:586.[Abstract]
  27. Graham, F. L., A. J. Van Der Eb. 1973. A new technique for the assay of infectivity of human adenovirus 5 DNA. Virology 52:456.[Medline]
  28. Sanchez, I., R. T. Hughes, B. J. Mayer, K. Yee, J. R. Woodgett, J. Avruch, J. M. Kyriakis, L. I. Zon. 1994. Role of SAPK/ERK kinase-1 in the stress-activated pathway regulating transcription factor c-Jun. Nature 372:794.[Medline]
  29. Kyriakis, J. M., P. Banerjee, E. Nikolakaki, T. Dai, E. A. Rubie, M. F. Ahmad, J. Avruch, J. R. Woodgett. 1994. The stress-activated protein kinase subfamily of c-Jun kinases. Nature 369:156.[Medline]
  30. Wang, D., D. Liebowitz, E. Kieff. 1988. The truncated form of the Epstein-Barr virus latent-infection membrane protein expressed in virus replication does not transform rodent fibroblasts. J. Virol. 62:2337.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Wang, D., D. Liebowitz, F. Wang, C. Gregory, A. Rickinson, R. Larson, T. Springer, E. Kieff. 1988. Epstein-Barr virus latent infection membrane protein alters the human B-lymphocyte phenotype: deletion of the amino terminus abolishes activity. J. Virol. 62:4173.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Sakata, N., H. R. Patel, N. Terada, A. Aruffo, G. L. Johnson, E. W. Gelfand. 1995. Selective activation of c-Jun kinase mitogen-activated protein kinase by CD40 on human B cells. J. Biol. Chem. 270:30823.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Berberich, I., G. Shu, F. Siebelt, J. R. Woodgett, J. M. Kyriakis, E. A. Clark. 1996. Cross-linking CD40 on B cells preferentially induces stress-activated protein kinases rather than mitogen-activated protein kinases. EMBO J. 15:92.[Medline]
  34. Yan, M., T. Dai, J. C. Deak, J. Kyriakis, L. I. Zon, J. R. Woodgett, D. J. Templeton. 1994. Activation of stress-activated protein kinase by MEKK1 phosphorylation of its activator SEK1. Nature 372:798.[Medline]
  35. Liebowitz, D., J. Mannick, K. Takada, E. Kieff. 1992. Phenotypes of Epstein-Barr virus LMP1 deletion mutants indicate transmembrane and amino-terminal cytoplasmic domains necessary for effects in B-lymphoma cells. J. Virol. 66:4612.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. DeFranco, A. L.. 1993. Structure and function of the B cell antigen receptor. Annu. Rev. Cell Biol. 9:377.
  37. Weiss, A., D. R. Littman. 1994. Signal transduction by lymphocyte antigen receptors. Cell 76:263.[Medline]
  38. Miller, C. L., A. L. Burkhardt, J. H. Lee, B. Stealey, R. Longnecker, J. B. Bolen, E. Kieff. 1995. Integral membrane protein 2 of Epstein-Barr virus regulates reactivation from latency through dominant negative effects on protein-tyrosine kinases. Immunity 2:155.[Medline]
  39. Gupta, S., D. Campbell, B. Derijard, R. J. Davis. 1995. Transcription factor ATF2 regulation by the JNK signal transduction pathway. Science 267:389.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Karin, M.. 1995. The regulation of AP-1 activity by mitogen-activated protein kinases. J. Biol. Chem. 270:16483.[Free Full Text]
  41. VanDam, H., M. Duyndam, R. Rottier, A. Bosch, L. DeVries-Smits, P. Herrlich, A. Zantema, P. Angel, A. J. VanDerEb. 1993. Heterodimer formation of cJun and ATF-2 is responsible for induction of c-jun by the 243 amino acid adenovirus E1A protein. EMBO J. 12:479.[Medline]
  42. Liu, Z. G., H. Hsu, D. V. Goeddel, M. Karin. 1996. Dissection of TNF receptor 1 effector functions: JNK activation is not linked to apoptosis while NF-{kappa}B activation prevents cell death. Cell 87:565.[Medline]
  43. Natoli, G., A. Constanzo, A. Ianni, D. J. Templeton, J. R. Woodgett, C. Balsano, M. Levrero. 1997. Activation of SAPK/JNK by TNF receptor 1 through a noncytotoxic TRAF2-dependent pathway. Science 275:200.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
G. Gatto, A. Rossi, D. Rossi, S. Kroening, S. Bonatti, and M. Mallardo
Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein 1 trans-activates miR-155 transcription through the NF-{kappa}B pathway
Nucleic Acids Res., November 1, 2008; 36(20): 6608 - 6619.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JEMHome page
C. Homig-Holzel, C. Hojer, J. Rastelli, S. Casola, L. J. Strobl, W. Muller, L. Quintanilla-Martinez, A. Gewies, J. Ruland, K. Rajewsky, et al.
Constitutive CD40 signaling in B cells selectively activates the noncanonical NF-{kappa}B pathway and promotes lymphomagenesis
J. Exp. Med., June 9, 2008; 205(6): 1317 - 1329.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GutHome page
K. C. Bagley
Genetic adjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer and other solid tumours
Gut, March 1, 2008; 57(3): 289 - 291.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
J. E. Cameron, Q. Yin, C. Fewell, M. Lacey, J. McBride, X. Wang, Z. Lin, B. C. Schaefer, and E. K. Flemington
Epstein-Barr Virus Latent Membrane Protein 1 Induces Cellular MicroRNA miR-146a, a Modulator of Lymphocyte Signaling Pathways
J. Virol., February 15, 2008; 82(4): 1946 - 1958.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
M. Rovedo and R. Longnecker
Epstein-Barr Virus Latent Membrane Protein 2B (LMP2B) Modulates LMP2A Activity
J. Virol., January 1, 2007; 81(1): 84 - 94.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Gen. Virol.Home page
M. M. Brinkmann and T. F. Schulz
Regulation of intracellular signalling by the terminal membrane proteins of members of the Gammaherpesvirinae.
J. Gen. Virol., May 1, 2006; 87(Pt 5): 1047 - 1074.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
Y.-J. Song, K.-Y. Jen, V. Soni, E. Kieff, and E. Cahir-McFarland
IL-1 receptor-associated kinase 1 is critical for latent membrane protein 1-induced p65/RelA serine 536 phosphorylation and NF-{kappa}B activation
PNAS, February 21, 2006; 103(8): 2689 - 2694.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
D. N. Everly Jr., B. A. Mainou, and N. Raab-Traub
Induction of Id1 and Id3 by Latent Membrane Protein 1 of Epstein-Barr Virus and Regulation of p27/Kip and Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 2 in Rodent Fibroblast Transformation
J. Virol., December 15, 2004; 78(24): 13470 - 13478.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
D. Panagopoulos, P. Victoratos, M. Alexiou, G. Kollias, and G. Mosialos
Comparative Analysis of Signal Transduction by CD40 and the Epstein-Barr Virus Oncoprotein LMP1 In Vivo
J. Virol., December 1, 2004; 78(23): 13253 - 13261.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
E. D. Cahir-McFarland, K. Carter, A. Rosenwald, J. M. Giltnane, S. E. Henrickson, L. M. Staudt, and E. Kieff
Role of NF-{kappa}B in Cell Survival and Transcription of Latent Membrane Protein 1-Expressing or Epstein-Barr Virus Latency III-Infected Cells
J. Virol., April 15, 2004; 78(8): 4108 - 4119.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
B. N. D'Souza, L. C. Edelstein, P. M. Pegman, S. M. Smith, S. T. Loughran, A. Clarke, A. Mehl, M. Rowe, C. Gelinas, and D. Walls
Nuclear Factor {kappa}B-Dependent Activation of the Antiapoptotic bfl-1 Gene by the Epstein-Barr Virus Latent Membrane Protein 1 and Activated CD40 Receptor
J. Virol., February 15, 2004; 78(4): 1800 - 1816.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
T. Yasui, M. Luftig, V. Soni, and E. Kieff
Latent infection membrane protein transmembrane FWLY is critical for intermolecular interaction, raft localization, and signaling
PNAS, January 6, 2004; 101(1): 278 - 283.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
J. Wan, L. Sun, J. W. Mendoza, Y. L. Chui, D. P. Huang, Z. J. Chen, N. Suzuki, S. Suzuki, W.-C. Yeh, S. Akira, et al.
Elucidation of the c-Jun N-Terminal Kinase Pathway Mediated by Epstein-Barr Virus-Encoded Latent Membrane Protein 1
Mol. Cell. Biol., January 1, 2004; 24(1): 192 - 199.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
N. Saito, G. Courtois, A. Chiba, N. Yamamoto, T. Nitta, N. Hironaka, M. Rowe, N. Yamamoto, and S. Yamaoka
Two Carboxyl-terminal Activation Regions of Epstein-Barr Virus Latent Membrane Protein 1 Activate NF-{kappa}B through Distinct Signaling Pathways in Fibroblast Cell Lines
J. Biol. Chem., November 21, 2003; 278(47): 46565 - 46575.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
D. Dudziak, A. Kieser, U. Dirmeier, F. Nimmerjahn, S. Berchtold, A. Steinkasserer, G. Marschall, W. Hammerschmidt, G. Laux, and G. W. Bornkamm
Latent Membrane Protein 1 of Epstein-Barr Virus Induces CD83 by the NF-{kappa}B Signaling Pathway
J. Virol., August 1, 2003; 77(15): 8290 - 8298.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
H. Chen, L. Hutt-Fletcher, L. Cao, and S. D. Hayward
A Positive Autoregulatory Loop of LMP1 Expression and STAT Activation in Epithelial Cells Latently Infected with Epstein-Barr Virus
J. Virol., April 1, 2003; 77(7): 4139 - 4148.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
W. F. Coffin III, T. R. Geiger, and J. M. Martin
Transmembrane Domains 1 and 2 of the Latent Membrane Protein 1 of Epstein-Barr Virus Contain a Lipid Raft Targeting Signal and Play a Critical Role in Cytostasis
J. Virol., March 15, 2003; 77(6): 3749 - 3758.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
A. G. Eliopoulos, E. R. Waites, S. M. S. Blake, C. Davies, P. Murray, and L. S. Young
TRAF1 Is a Critical Regulator of JNK Signaling by the TRAF-Binding Domain of the Epstein-Barr Virus-Encoded Latent Infection Membrane Protein 1 but Not CD40
J. Virol., December 20, 2002; 77(2): 1316 - 1328.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
A. Kaykas, K. Worringer, and B. Sugden
LMP-1's Transmembrane Domains Encode Multiple Functions Required for LMP-1's Efficient Signaling
J. Virol., October 11, 2002; 76(22): 11551 - 11560.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
K. L. Carter, E. Cahir-McFarland, and E. Kieff
Epstein-Barr Virus-Induced Changes in B-Lymphocyte Gene Expression
J. Virol., September 11, 2002; 76(20): 10427 - 10436.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
J. Xu, A. Ahmad, and J. Menezes
Preferential Localization of the Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) Oncoprotein LMP-1 to Nuclei in Human T Cells: Implications for Its Role in the Development of EBV Genome-Positive T-Cell Lymphomas
J. Virol., March 19, 2002; 76(8): 4080 - 4086.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
V. Prokova, G. Mosialos, and D. Kardassis
Inhibition of Transforming Growth Factor beta Signaling and Smad-dependent Activation of Transcription by the Latent Membrane Protein 1 of Epstein-Barr Virus
J. Biol. Chem., March 8, 2002; 277(11): 9342 - 9350.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
M. Higuchi, E. Kieff, and K. M. Izumi
The Epstein-Barr Virus Latent Membrane Protein 1 Putative Janus Kinase 3 (JAK3) Binding Domain Does Not Mediate JAK3 Association or Activation in B-Lymphoma or Lymphoblastoid Cell Lines
J. Virol., January 1, 2002; 76(1): 455 - 459.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JEMHome page
K. D. Brown, B. S. Hostager, and G. A. Bishop
Differential Signaling and Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor-Associated Factor (Traf) Degradation Mediated by Cd40 and the Epstein-Barr Virus Oncoprotein Latent Membrane Protein 1 (Lmp1)
J. Exp. Med., April 16, 2001; 193(8): 943 - 954.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. Higuchi, K. M. Izumi, and E. Kieff
Epstein-Barr virus latent-infection membrane proteins are palmitoylated and raft-associated: Protein 1 binds to the cytoskeleton through TNF receptor cytoplasmic factors
PNAS, April 10, 2001; 98(8): 4675 - 4680.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
H. Chen, J. M. Lee, Y. Zong, M. Borowitz, M. H. Ng, R. F. Ambinder, and S. D. Hayward
Linkage between STAT Regulation and Epstein-Barr Virus Gene Expression in Tumors
J. Virol., March 15, 2001; 75(6): 2929 - 2937.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
J.-K. Choi, S. Ishido, and J. U. Jung
The Collagen Repeat Sequence Is a Determinant of the Degree of Herpesvirus Saimiri STP Transforming Activity
J. Virol., September 1, 2000; 74(17): 8102 - 8110.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
BloodHome page
J. Feuillard, M. Schuhmacher, S. Kohanna, M. Asso-Bonnet, F. Ledeur, R. Joubert-Caron, P. Bissieres, A. Polack, G. W. Bornkamm, and M. Raphael
Inducible loss of NF-kappa B activity is associated with apoptosis and Bcl-2 down-regulation in Epstein-Barr virus-transformed B lymphocytes
Blood, March 15, 2000; 95(6): 2068 - 2075.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
B. Damania, J.-K. Choi, and J. U. Jung
Signaling Activities of Gammaherpesvirus Membrane Proteins
J. Virol., February 15, 2000; 74(4): 1593 - 1601.
[Full Text]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
K. M. Izumi, E. C. McFarland, E. A. Riley, D. Rizzo, Y. Chen, and E. Kieff
The Residues between the Two Transformation Effector Sites of Epstein-Barr Virus Latent Membrane Protein 1 Are Not Critical for B-Lymphocyte Growth Transformation
J. Virol., December 1, 1999; 73(12): 9908 - 9916.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
K. M. Kaye, K. M. Izumi, H. Li, E. Johannsen, D. Davidson, R. Longnecker, and E. Kieff
An Epstein-Barr Virus That Expresses Only the First 231 LMP1 Amino Acids Efficiently Initiates Primary B-Lymphocyte Growth Transformation
J. Virol., December 1, 1999; 73(12): 10525 - 10530.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
M. Fenton and A. J. Sinclair
Divergent Requirements for the MAPKERK Signal Transduction Pathway during Initial Virus Infection of Quiescent Primary B Cells and Disruption of Epstein-Barr Virus Latency by Phorbol Esters
J. Virol., October 1, 1999; 73(10): 8913 - 8916.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
K. M. Izumi, E. C. McFarland, A. T. Ting, E. A. Riley, B. Seed, and E. D. Kieff
The Epstein-Barr Virus Oncoprotein Latent Membrane Protein 1 Engages the Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor-Associated Proteins TRADD and Receptor-Interacting Protein (RIP) but Does Not Induce Apoptosis or Require RIP for NF-kappa B Activation
Mol. Cell. Biol., August 1, 1999; 19(8): 5759 - 5767.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
H. Takeshita, T. Yoshizaki, W. E. Miller, H. Sato, M. Furukawa, J. S. Pagano, and N. Raab-Traub
Matrix Metalloproteinase 9 Expression Is Induced by Epstein-Barr Virus Latent Membrane Protein 1 C-Terminal Activation Regions 1 and 2
J. Virol., July 1, 1999; 73(7): 5548 - 5555.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. G. Eliopoulos, N. J. Gallagher, S. M. S. Blake, C. W. Dawson, and L. S. Young
Activation of the p38 Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase Pathway by Epstein-Barr Virus-encoded Latent Membrane Protein 1 Coregulates Interleukin-6 and Interleukin-8 Production
J. Biol. Chem., June 4, 1999; 274(23): 16085 - 16096.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
M. P. Peppelenbosch, M. DeSmedt, T. ten Hove, S. J.H. van Deventer, and J. Grooten
Lipopolysaccharide Regulates Macrophage Fluid Phase Pinocytosis Via CD14-Dependent and CD14-Independent Pathways
Blood, June 1, 1999; 93(11): 4011 - 4018.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
L. K. Busch and G. A. Bishop
The EBV Transforming Protein, Latent Membrane Protein 1, Mimics and Cooperates with CD40 Signaling in B Lymphocytes
J. Immunol., March 1, 1999; 162(5): 2555 - 2561.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
A. G. Eliopoulos, S. M. S. Blake, J. E. Floettmann, M. Rowe, and L. S. Young
Epstein-Barr Virus-Encoded Latent Membrane Protein 1 Activates the JNK Pathway through Its Extreme C Terminus via a Mechanism Involving TRADD and TRAF2
J. Virol., February 1, 1999; 73(2): 1023 - 1035.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
P. G. Stevenson and P. C. Doherty
Non-Antigen-Specific B-Cell Activation following Murine Gammaherpesvirus Infection Is CD4 Independent In Vitro but CD4 Dependent In Vivo
J. Virol., February 1, 1999; 73(2): 1075 - 1079.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
O. Devergne, E. C. McFarland, G. Mosialos, K. M. Izumi, C. F. Ware, and E. Kieff
Role of the TRAF Binding Site and NF-kappa B Activation in Epstein-Barr Virus Latent Membrane Protein 1-Induced Cell Gene Expression
J. Virol., October 1, 1998; 72(10): 7900 - 7908.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
W. Kulwichit, R. H. Edwards, E. M. Davenport, J. F. Baskar, V. Godfrey, and N. Raab-Traub
Expression of the Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein 1 induces B cell lymphoma in transgenic mice
PNAS, September 29, 1998; 95(20): 11963 - 11968.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
B. S. Sylla, S. C. Hung, D. M. Davidson, E. Hatzivassiliou, N. L. Malinin, D. Wallach, T. D. Gilmore, E. Kieff, and G. Mosialos
Epstein-Barr virus-transforming protein latent infection membrane protein 1 activates transcription factor NF-kappa B through a pathway that includes the NF-kappa B-inducing kinase and the Ikappa B kinases IKKalpha and IKKbeta
PNAS, August 18, 1998; 95(17): 10106 - 10111.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
A. C. Grammer, J. L. Swantek, R. D. McFarland, Y. Miura, T. Geppert, and P. E. Lipsky
TNF Receptor-Associated Factor-3 Signaling Mediates Activation of p38 and Jun N-Terminal Kinase, Cytokine Secretion, and Ig Production Following Ligation of CD40 on Human B Cells
J. Immunol., August 1, 1998; 161(3): 1183 - 1193.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
W. E. Miller, J. L. Cheshire, and N. Raab-Traub
Interaction of Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor-Associated Factor Signaling Proteins with the Latent Membrane Protein 1 PXQXT Motif Is Essential for Induction of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Expression
Mol. Cell. Biol., May 1, 1998; 18(5): 2835 - 2844.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. A. Luftig, E. Cahir-McFarland, G. Mosialos, and E. Kieff
Effects of the NIK aly Mutation on NF-kappa B Activation by the Epstein-Barr Virus Latent Infection Membrane Protein, Lymphotoxin beta Receptor, and CD40
J. Biol. Chem., April 27, 2001; 276(18): 14602 - 14606.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
E. D. Cahir-McFarland, D. M. Davidson, S. L. Schauer, J. Duong, and E. Kieff
NF-kappa B inhibition causes spontaneous apoptosis in Epstein-Barr virus-transformed lymphoblastoid cells
PNAS, May 23, 2000; 97(11): 6055 - 6060.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hatzivassiliou, E.
Right arrow Articles by Mosialos, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hatzivassiliou, E.
Right arrow Articles by Mosialos, G.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS