The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yamaoka, K.
Right arrow Articles by Izuhara, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yamaoka, K.
Right arrow Articles by Izuhara, K.
The Journal of Immunology, 1998, 160: 838-845.
Copyright © 1998 by The American Association of Immunologists

Activation of STAT5 by Lipopolysaccharide Through Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor Production in Human Monocytes1

Kunihiro Yamaoka*,{dagger}, Takeshi Otsuka{dagger}, Hiroaki Niiro{dagger}, Yojiro Arinobu{dagger},{ddagger}, Yoshiyuki Niho{dagger}, Naotaka Hamasaki{ddagger} and Kenji Izuhara2,*,{ddagger}

* Department of Human Genetics, National Institute of Genetics, Yata, Mishima, Shizuoka; and {dagger} First Department of Internal Medicine and {ddagger} Department of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Kyushu University, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, Japan


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
LPS is a potent stimulator of monocytes, inducing many of their functions. Although the details of how LPS exerts such functions remain largely unknown, transcription factors such as nuclear factor-{kappa}B, nuclear factor-IL-6, and activator protein-1 have been shown to be involved in this process. However, to date it has been thought that no known STAT molecule plays a role in the activation of monocytes by LPS. In this study we examined whether some known STAT molecule is stimulated by LPS, based on the finding that a GAS motif sequence is conserved in the promoter regions of human, mouse, and rat cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2) genes. Consequently, LPS induced activation of STAT5 in human monocytes, and this STAT5 activation occurred in an indirect way via granulocyte-macrophage CSF (GM-CSF) secreted by LPS-stimulated monocytes. Expression of COX-2 protein was partially reduced by treatment of anti-human GM-CSF Ab. Activation of STAT5 was inhibited by either IL-10 or dexamethasone (Dex), but not by aspirin. IL-10 blocked activation of STAT5 indirectly by suppressing GM-CSF production, while Dex inhibited this activation both directly and indirectly. Taken together, these results suggest that in addition to other transcription factors, STAT5 plays an important role in activation of monocytes by LPS, and that STAT5 is another target for IL-10 and Dex to inhibit COX-2 expression in activated monocytes.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
LPS, a component of the cell wall of Gram-negative bacteria, is a potent activator of monocytes, promoting activation of intracellular hydrolysis; expression of surface proteins such as Fc receptors, complement receptors, and MHC class II Ags; and synthesis of various secretory proteins, including proteases, arachidonic acid metabolites, and monokines (1). These events subsequently result in the enhancement of various functions of monocytes, such as phagocytosis, Ag presentation, chemotaxis, and cytolysis of tumor cells. In addition, LPS has been identified as a major mediator of endotoxin shock (2).

Although the details of how this molecular mechanism works remain largely unknown, transcription factors such as nuclear factor-{kappa}B (NF-{kappa}B),3 NF-IL-6, and activator protein-1 (AP-1) have been previously shown to be involved in this process (3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8). Studies in mice of gene targeting of NF-{kappa}B, and NF-IL-6 have revealed that these mice are susceptible to some particular pathogens. However, production of monokines was not significantly impaired, although the promoter regions of their genes have binding elements to these transcription factors (9, 10). These results may indicate that other transcription factors are involved in the LPS-induced activation of monocytes, and that they may coordinate this process.

Latent cytoplasmic transcription factors, STATs, which were initially identified as activated transcriptional factors by IFN-{alpha} and IFN-{gamma}, are now believed to be involved in the signal pathways of many cytokines along with some growth factors (11). To date, it has been supposed that LPS does not induce activation of known STAT molecules in monocytes, but it has been noted that a STAT-like molecule, LPS-induced and IL-1-induced (LIL) STAT, is stimulated by LPS and binds to LPS and IL-1-responsive element (LILRE) of the human pro-IL-1ß gene (12, 13).

IL-10 and dexamethasone (Dex) are known to exhibit similar anti-inflammatory effects on activated monocytes. It has been previously shown that IL-10 and Dex inhibited cytokine production in LPS-stimulated monocytes at both transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels (14, 15, 16, 17). In addition, we and others have recently demonstrated that both IL-10 and Dex suppressed the expression of the inducible cyclo-oxygenase (COX-2), which is believed to provide substantial amounts of prostanoids at inflamed sites, in LPS-stimulated monocytes (18, 19). The inhibitory mechanism of IL-10 remains unclear; however, it has been shown that IL-10 evokes inactivation of NF-{kappa}B (20). Dex has been shown to repress activation of AP-1, NF-{kappa}B, NF-ATp, and Oct-1 through ligand-bound steroid receptors (21).

In the present study we demonstrate that LPS activates STAT5 through inducing GM-CSF production in human monocytes, and GM-CSF production affects the expression of COX-2. Furthermore, we demonstrate that IL-10 and Dex, but not aspirin, abrogate STAT5 activation. These results suggest that STAT5 is involved in LPS-induced activation of monocytes, and that IL-10 and Dex exert inhibitory effects on COX-2 expression through deactivation of STAT5.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Materials

LPS was purchased from Difco Laboratories (Detroit, MI). Dex, aspirin, and cyclohexamide were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO). Herbimycin A was purchased from Wako (Osaka, Japan). Anti-STAT1, -2, -3, and -6 Abs were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA). Anti-STAT4 Ab was given by Dr. Koh Yamamoto (Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan). Anti-STAT5 Ab and the oligonucleotide probe, GRR (5'-GTATTTCCCAGAAAAGGAAC-3'), were provided by Dr. Hiroshi Wakao (Tokyo University, Tokyo, Japan). Anti-COX-2 Ab was purchased from Transduction Laboratories (Lexington, KY). Anti-phosphotyrosine mAb (4G10) was purchased from Upstate Biotechnology, Inc. (Lake Placid, NY). Recombinant human GM-CSF (hGM-CSF) was a gift from Japan Schering-Plough Corp. (Osaka, Japan). Anti-hGM-CSF Abs were either given by Dr. Toshio Kitamura (DNAX Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA) or purchased from Genzyme (Cambridge, MA). Recombinant human IL-10 (hIL-10) was a gift from Dr. Satish Menon (DNAX Research Institute).

Isolation and culture of human monocytes

The procedures of isolation and culture of human monocytes were previously described (18). Briefly, buffy coats from healthy donors were provided by the Numazu Red Cross Center (Numazu, Japan). Mononuclear cells were separated over Ficoll-Hypaque. Subsequently, these mononuclear cells were adhered to culture dishes for 2 h with a culture medium composed of RPMI 1640 with 10% FCS, then washed three times vigorously with warmed PBS to remove nonadherent cells. The remaining adherent cells consisted of >90% nonspecific esterase positive and >99% viable, as determined by trypan blue exclusion. These cells were further cultured with the culture medium for the experiments described below.

Extraction of nuclear proteins and electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA)

The procedures of extraction of nuclear proteins and EMSA were previously described (22). Human monocytes were stimulated by 1 µg/ml LPS for the indicated times, by hGM-CSF at the indicated concentrations for 15 min, or by 10 ng/ml hIL-10 for 30 min and then lysed to extract nuclear proteins. In some experiments, monocytes were pretreated with 2 µg/ml herbimycin A for 2 h before the stimulation. In pretreatment experiments, 10 ng/ml hIL-10 for 30 min, 1.0 µM Dex for 2 h, 50 mM aspirin for 2 h, or 5 µg/ml cyclohexamide for 1 h was added before monocyte stimulation. Some experiments were performed in the presence of 10 µg/ml anti-hGM-CSF Ab. The amounts of loaded nuclear extracts were normalized before mixing.

Nuclear extract was mixed with binding buffer (20 mM HEPES-NaOH (pH 7.9), 2 mM EDTA, 100 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, and 0.2% Nonidet P-40), poly(dI-dC), and 32P-labeled oligonucleotide probe. The mixtures were incubated at room temperature for 30 min. To detect supershifted bands, anti-STAT Abs or anti-phosphotyrosine Ab were added on ice for 30 min to the assay mixtures. The reaction mixtures were loaded on a 4% polyacrylamide gel and run with a running buffer of 0.25x TBE. The gel was then dried onto Whatman 3MM paper (Whatman, Clifton, NJ). The DNA/protein complexes were visualized by autoradiography.

The oligonucleotide probes used were: COX-2-sp3 (5'-TCTCTTTCCAAGAAACAAG-3'), COX-2-sp4 (5'-ATTTCTTCTGTTGAAAGCAA-3'), and GRR.

Immunoprecipitation and Western blotting

The procedures of immunoprecipitation and Western blotting of STAT5 were previously described (22). Human monocytes were incubated with 1.0 µM Dex for 2 h, then lysed in the lysis buffer containing 1% Triton X-100, and the proteins were immunoprecipitated from clarified cell lysates by adding 30 µl of protein A-Sepharose preconjugated with anti-STAT5 Ab (5 µl) and incubated for at least 2 h at 4°C. Sepharose beads were washed four times with the same lysis buffer. Sepharose-bound proteins were then eluted by boiling with SDS-PAGE sample buffer, applied to SDS-PAGE, and transferred electrophoretically to nitrocellulose filters. Proteins were probed with anti-STAT5 Ab and visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL, Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL).

The procedures of Western blotting of COX-2 were previously described (18). Monocytes (1 x 107 cells) were incubated for 24 h with 1 µg/ml LPS in the presence or the absence of 10 µg/ml anti-hGM-CSF Ab. After incubation, cells were lysed in the solubilization buffer (1% Tween-20, 10 mM PMSF, and 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0). Cell lysates were then sonicated for 30 s. The clarified cell lysates were subjected to SDS-PAGE and transferred electrophoretically to a polyvinylidene fluoride membrane. Proteins were probed by anti-COX-2 Ab and visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Activation of STAT5 by LPS in human monocytes

The search for COX-2 genes has revealed that the promoter region of the human COX-2 gene has two GAS motif sequences (TTCNNN(N)GAA; COX-2-sp3 and COX-2-sp4), and that COX-2-sp3 was well conserved in both rat and mouse COX-2 genes (23, 24, 25) (Fig. 1Go). This prompted us to investigate whether some STAT molecule is activated by LPS in human monocytes, leading to binding to these sequences. To test this hypothesis, we performed EMSA using two kinds of probes, COX-2-sp3 and COX-2-sp4.



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. Alignment of the promoter region of human, mouse, and rat COX-2 genes. Two GAS motif sequences that exist in the promoter region of human COX-2 gene and two homologous sequences with one of these two sequences that exist in the promoter regions of mouse and rat COX-2 genes are depicted. The former two sequences are denoted as COX-2-sp3 and COX-2-sp4, respectively.

 
When monocytes were stimulated by LPS for 15 min, no band was detected. However, formation of the complex of some activated molecule with the COX-2-sp3 probe occurred 90 min after LPS stimulation (Fig. 2GoA, lanes 1–3). On the other hand, the COX-2-sp4 probe did not elicit any band in our system (data not shown). The appearance of this band was inhibited by adding an excess of cold COX-2-sp3, but not cold COX-2-sp4 (Fig. 2GoA, lanes 4 and5), demonstrating the specificity of the binding of this molecule to COX-2-sp3 probe. Pretreatment of monocytes with herbimycin A abrogated the band, and adding monoclonal anti-phosphotyrosine Ab to the mixture diminished the band, proving that this molecule was truly tyrosine phosphorylated (Fig. 2Go, B andC). The nuclear extracts of two human monocytic cell lines, THP-1 and U937, and mouse monocytic cell lines, Raw264.7 and J774.1, did not raise this band, suggesting that the formation of this band was observed only in human peripheral blood monocytes (data not shown).



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. Formation of the complex of LPS-stimulated nuclear extract with COX2-sp3 probe. Nuclear extracts were obtained from human monocytes stimulated without (A–C, lane 1) or with 1 µg/ml LPS for 15 min (A, lane 2) or for 90 min (A, lanes 3–5; B, laned 2 and 3; C, lanes 2 and 3), and then incubated with the 32P-labeled COX2-sp3 probe. In B, lane 3, monocytes were pretreated with 2 µg/ml herbimycin A (HA) for 2 h before adding LPS. An excess of the cold COX2-sp3 probe (A, lane 4), the cold COX2-sp4 probe (A, lane 5), or monoclonal anti-phosphotyrosine (PY) Ab (C, lane 3) were present in the assay mixtures. The arrow (+) indicates the position of the DNA/protein complex.

 
It was assumed that this activated molecule belongs to the STAT family, because the GAS motif sequence is known to bind to some STAT molecule (11). To explore this possibility, the Abs of known STAT molecules were added to the binding mixtures. All these Abs has been ascertained to work for the supershift assay (data not shown). Only anti-STAT5 Ab generated a supershifted band; however, the Abs against the other STAT molecules did not influence the band (Fig. 3Go, A and B). Nonspecific bands appeared in the presence of anti-STAT4 and anti-STAT5 Ab, which were observed even in the absence of the nuclear extracts (Fig. 3GoA, lanes 6–9). Furthermore, the mobility of the band induced by LPS was the same as that of hGM-CSF-induced STAT5 (Figs. 4Go and 5). These results showed that the molecule(s) activated by LPS in human monocytes contained STAT5.



View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Supershift of the LPS-induced band by anti-STAT Abs. Nuclear extracts were obtained from human monocytes stimulated without (A and B, lane 1) or with 1 µg/ml LPS for 90 min (A, lanes 2–7; B, lanes 2 and3), and then incubated with the 32P-labeled COX2-sp3 probe. In A, lanes 8 and 9, the probe was incubated with either anti-STAT4 Ab or anti-STAT5 Ab without nuclear extracts. The indicated anti-STAT Abs (A, lanes 3–9; B, lane 3) were present in the assay mixtures. The arrows (+, *, and #) indicate the positions of the DNA/protein complex, the supershifted STAT5, and nonspecific bands raised by anti-STAT4 Ab and anti-STAT5 Ab, respectively.

 


View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. Effects of cyclohexamide and anti-hGM-CSF Ab on activation of STAT5. A, Nuclear extracts were obtained from human monocytes stimulated without (lane 1) or with 1 µg/ml LPS for 90 min (lanes 2 and3), and then incubated with the 32P-labeled COX2-sp3 probe. The cells were pretreated with 5 µg/ml cyclohexamide for 2 h (lane 3). B, Nuclear extracts were obtained from human monocytes stimulated without (lane 1) or with either 10 ng/ml GM-CSF for 15 min (lanes 2 and 3) or 1 µg/ml LPS for 90 min (lanes 4–6), and then incubated with the 32P-labeled COX2-sp3 probe. Anti-STAT5 Ab was present in the assay mixture (lane 3). Either 10 µg/ml control Ab (lane 5) or 10 µg/ml anti-hGM-CSF Ab (lane 6) was present during the stimulation. The arrows (+, *, and #) indicate the positions of the DNA/protein complex, the supershifted STAT5, and nonspecific bands raised by anti-STAT5 Ab, respectively. C, Nuclear extracts were obtained from human monocytes stimulated without (lane 1) or with 10 ng/ml GM-CSF for 15 min (lanes 2 and 3), and then incubated with the 32P-labeled COX2-sp3 probe. The cells were pretreated with 5 µg/ml cyclohexamide for 2 h (lane 3).

 
Activation of STAT5 through GM-CSF production

Although activation of STAT5 was not detected 15 min after LPS stimulation, activation of STAT5 was observed 15 min after stimulation with hGM-CSF (Fig. 2GoA, lane 2, and Fig. 4GoB, lane 2). This delayed profile of STAT5 activation by LPS raised the possibility that LPS indirectly activates STAT5 by inducing some other molecules. To address this question, we assessed the effect of cyclohexamide on STAT5 activation by LPS. Treatment of LPS-stimulated monocytes with cyclohexamide resulted in complete abrogation of STAT5 activation, indicating that this activation is executed by some newly synthesized molecule (Fig. 4GoA).

It is known that LPS promotes generation of various kinds of cytokines, such as TNF-{alpha}, IL-1ß, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12, G-CSF, M-CSF, and GM-CSF, from human monocytes (26, 27, 28). It has been shown that among these cytokines, GM-CSF causes STAT5 activation in human monocytes (12, 29, 30). To investigate whether STAT5 is activated by LPS through GM-CSF production, we examined the effect of neutralizing anti-hGM-CSF Ab on LPS-induced STAT5 activation. When monocytes were incubated with hGM-CSF for 15 min, an activated molecule appeared, and this molecule was ascertained to be STAT5 by supershift assay (Fig. 4GoB, lanes 1–3). LPS stimulation caused the appearance of the same mobility band as STAT5, and this activation was attenuated by approximately 42% in the presence of anti-GM-CSF Ab as judged by image analyzer, compared with the presence of isotype control Ab (six donors were tested for the analysis; Fig. 4GoB, lanes 4–6). Two kinds of anti-hGM-CSF Abs equally inhibited the activation (data not shown). These results suggest that secreted GM-CSF contributes, at least in part, to STAT5 activation in LPS-stimulated monocytes. Treatment of GM-CSF-stimulated monocytes with cyclohexamide did not affect STAT5 activation, proving that STAT5 is activated directly by GM-CSF (Fig. 4GoC). Given that anti-hGM-CSF Ab did not completely prevent LPS-induced STAT5 activation, we could not exclude the possibility that some cytokine other than GM-CSF induced by LPS would also lead to STAT5 activation. Treatments of neither Abs against G-CSF or M-CSF, which have been shown to activate STAT5 in other cells, influenced LPS-induced STAT5 activation (31, 32) (data not shown).

Next, to evaluate the amount of secreted GM-CSF triggered by LPS, we compared the intensity of the STAT5 band induced by 1 µg/ml LPS with that of bands induced by various concentrations of hGM-CSF. Stimulation of monocytes with hGM-CSF at a concentration of 10 pg/ml up to 10 ng/ml showed STAT5 activation in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 4Go, lanes 3–6). The intensity of the LPS-induced band was less than that of 10 pg/ml hGM-CSF, indicating that the level of secreted GM-CSF induced by LPS is <10 pg/ml (Fig. 5Go). This idea is further supported by our findings that tyrosine phosphorylation of STAT5 could not be detected upon stimulation of either 1 µg/ml LPS or 10 pg/ml hGM-CSF by Western blotting (data not shown). In addition, GM-CSF in the supernatant of LPS-stimulated monocytes was below the lowest level detectable by ELISA (8 pg/ml; data not shown).



View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. Comparison of activation of STAT5 induced by LPS and GM-CSF. Nuclear extracts were obtained from human monocytes stimulated without (lane 1) or with either 1 µg/ml LPS for 90 min (lane 2) or GM-CSF at the indicated concentrations for 15 min (lanes 3–6) and then incubated with the 32P-labeled COX2-sp3 probe. The arrow (+) indicates the position of the DNA/protein complex.

 
Effect of GM-CSF on expression of COX-2 protein in human monocytes

The fact that STAT5 was activated by LPS through secretion of GM-CSF prompted us to test whether STAT5 activation by GM-CSF contributes to COX-2 expression. When monocytes were coincubated with anti-hGM-CSF Ab, LPS-induced COX-2 expression was decreased by approximately 60% compared with that after treatment with the isotype control Ab, as analyzed by the National Institutes of Health Image 1.55 program (four donors were tested for the analysis; Fig. 6Go). These results indicate that GM-CSF secretion contributes, at least in part, to LPS-induced COX-2 expression. Together with the results of STAT5 deactivation and COX-2 down-regulation by anti-hGM-CSF Ab, it is supposed that the regulation mechanisms of both STAT5 activation and COX-2 expression are parallel. However, stimulation of hGM-CSF alone did not cause any COX-2 expression (data not shown). Thus, these results raise the possibility that GM-CSF-stimulated STAT5, in concert with other transcription factors, such as NF-{kappa}B, NF-IL-6, and AP-1, might regulate COX-2 expression in LPS-stimulated monocytes.



View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6. Effect of anti-hGM-CSF Ab on expression of COX-2. Cell lysates were obtained from human monocytes stimulated without (lane 1) or with 1 µg/ml LPS for 24 h (lanes 2–4) in the absence (lanes 1 and 2) or the presence of control Ab (lane 3) or anti-GM-CSF Ab (lane 4) and then subjected to SDS-PAGE and blotted by anti-COX-2 Ab. The arrow indicates the position of COX-2.

 
Effects of IL-10 and Dex on STAT5 activation

It has been shown that IL-10 and Dex effectively abrogate PGE2 production in LPS-stimulated monocytes by suppressing the transcription of COX-2 gene (18, 19, 33, 34). To investigate whether IL-10 and Dex influence LPS-induced STAT5 activation, we pretreated monocytes with either hIL-10 or Dex before LPS stimulation. As a result, hIL-10 and Dex completely blocked STAT5 activation by LPS, whereas aspirin did not evoke any effect (Fig. 7GoA). In view of previous findings that both IL-10 and Dex significantly inhibited GM-CSF production in LPS-stimulated monocytes, it was assumed that abrogation of LPS-induced STAT5 activation by hIL-10 and Dex is, at least partly, ascribable to the suppression of GM-CSF production in LPS-stimulated monocytes (27, 35).



View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 7. Effects of IL-10, Dex, and aspirin on activation and expression of STAT5. A and B, Nuclear extracts were obtained from human monocytes stimulated without (A, lanes 1 and 4; B, lane 1) or with 1 µg/ml LPS for 90 min (A, lanes 2, 3, and 5–7) or 10 pg/ml GM-CSF for 15 min (B, lanes 2–4) and then incubated with the 32P-labeled COX2-sp3 probe. The cells were pretreated with 10 ng/ml hIL-10 for 30 min (A, lane 3; B, lane 3), 1.0 µM Dex for 2 h (A, lane 6; B, lane 4), or 50 mM aspirin for 2 h (A, lane 7). The arrow (+) indicates the position of the DNA/protein complex. C, Immunoprecipitates with anti-STAT5 Ab from human monocytes treated without (lane 1) or with 1.0 µM Dex for 2 h (lane 2) were probed with anti-STAT5 Ab.

 
Next, to test the possibility that either hIL-10 or Dex affects STAT5 activation by secreted GM-CSF, we pretreated the cells with either hIL-10 or Dex before hGM-CSF stimulation. Interestingly, pretreatment of Dex inhibited STAT5 activation by almost 50%, as judged by image analyzer, whereas pretreatment of hIL-10 was without effect (Fig. 7GoB). The expression levels of STAT5 and GM-CSF receptor were invariable by pretreatment with Dex, as estimated by Western blotting and flow cytometry, respectively (Fig. 7GoC and data not shown). The expression level of STAT5 was constant during treatment with hIL-10, as evaluated by Western blotting (data not shown). These results indicate that IL-10 indirectly inhibits STAT5 activation by abrogating GM-CSF production, whereas Dex inhibits this activation in both direct and indirect ways.

Specificity of binding of IL-10-activated STAT1

The finding that pretreatment of hIL-10 did not cause the appearance of any band using the COX-2-sp3 probe was unexpected, because it had been previously reported that IL-10 activates both STAT1 and STAT3 using the GRR probe (12, 36). To explore the possibility that this discrepancy was due to the difference in probes, we subjected both the COX-2-sp3 probe and the GRR probe to EMSA to detect IL-10-activated STAT molecules. The hIL-10-stimulated nuclear extract did not elicit any band using the COX2-sp3 probe, whereas the same extract did elicit a clear band using GRR (Fig. 8GoA, lanes 1–4). This band was strongly inhibited by adding an excess of the GRR probe rather than by adding an excess of the COX-2-sp3 probe (Fig. 8GoA, lanes 5–8). Anti-STAT1 Ab, but not anti-STAT3 and STAT6 Abs, supershifted this IL-10-induced band (Fig. 8GoB). To date, it is unclear why activation of STAT3 was not detected in our system. These results implied that a GAS motif-containing sequence preferentially binds to an activated STAT molecule, with the consequence that IL-10-activated STAT1 has higher affinity for the GRR sequence than for the COX-2-sp3 sequence.



View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 8. Formation of the complex of the IL-10-stimulated nuclear extract with COX2-sp3 probe and GRR probe. A, Nuclear extracts were obtained from human monocytes stimulated without (lanes 1 and 3) or with 10 ng/ml IL-10 for 30 min (lanes 2 and 4–8) and then incubated with the 32P-labeled COX2-sp3 probe (lanes 1 and 2) or the 32P-labeled GRR probe (lanes 3–8). The indicated excess of either the cold GRR probe (lanes 5 and 6), or the cold COX2-sp3 probe (lanes 7 and 8) was present in the assay mixtures. B, Nuclear extracts were obtained from human monocytes stimulated without (lane 1) or with 10 ng/ml IL-10 for 30 min (lanes 2–5) and then incubated with the 32P-labeled GRR probe. The indicated anti-STAT Abs were present in the assay mixtures (lanes 3–5). The arrow (+) indicates the position of the DNA/protein complex.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In the present study we have shown that activation of STAT5 was induced by LPS in human peripheral monocytes through secretion of GM-CSF. We ascertained that the activated molecule that forms the complex with COX-2-sp3 was STAT5, because only anti-STAT5 Ab elicited the supershifted band, and the mobility of the band was the same as that of STAT5 induced by exogenous GM-CSF ( Figs. 2–5GoGoGoGo). Our failure to detect either tyrosine phosphorylation of STAT5 by Western blotting or GM-CSF protein by ELISA suggests that for short periods of incubation (90 min), LPS-stimulated monocytes secrete very small amounts of GM-CSF. In this regard, our EMSA system is much more sensitive than the above two systems in detecting LPS-induced GM-CSF production via STAT5 activation in monocytes.

Previous studies suggested that no known STAT molecule was involved in LPS-induced monocyte activation (12, 13). Consistent with a previous report (12), we did not detect any STAT activation 15 min after LPS stimulation; however, during the longer period (90 min), STAT5 activation was clearly induced by secreted GM-CSF (Fig. 2Go). It has been reported that LPS induces formation of the oligonucleotide complex coding the LILRE of the human pro-IL-1ß gene with a STAT-like factor; this factor is referred to as LIL-STAT (13). However, it is thought that the LIL-STAT molecule is distinct from STAT5 because of the following differing characteristics. 1) The band of LIL-STAT was not supershifted by anti-STAT5 Ab. 2) LIL-STAT was activated 15 min after LPS stimulation, whereas STAT5 was not. 3) LIL-STAT activation was observed in a human monocytic cell line, THP-1, whereas STAT5 activation was not. 4) A G residue at position 8 of LILRE (TTCCTGAGA) was critical for binding to LIL-STAT, whereas COX-2-sp3 did not have a G residue at position 8. These results may suggest that LPS activates more than two STAT molecules, either directly or indirectly.

It has been shown that LPS induces the secretion of TNF-{alpha}, IL-1ß, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12, G-CSF, and GM-CSF from monocytes, and that IL-6, IL-10, IL-12, and G-CSF cause activation of STAT1, -3, and -4 among these cytokines (11, 26, 27). In addition, i.p. injection of LPS leads to STAT3 activation in mouse hepatocytes, probably by IL-6 secretion (37). However, we could not detect any activation of these STAT molecules in the present study (Fig. 3Go). This may have been due to the low level of secretion of these cytokines or to inappropriate probe selection. Further studies are needed to resolve this point.

STAT5 was initially purified from sheep mammary gland as a prolactin-induced transcription factor regulating expression of the ß-casein gene and was subsequently shown to be encoded by two distinct genes, STAT5A and STAT5B (29, 38). To date, STAT5 activation has been proved to be induced by IL-2, IL-3, IL-5, IL-7, IL-15, G-CSF, M-CSF, GM-CSF, erythropoietin, thrombopoietin, growth hormone, epidermal growth factor, platelet-derived growth factor, and engagement of B cell receptor (29, 31, 32, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43). Our present study revealed that in addition to these stimuli, LPS causes STAT5 activation indirectly. The role of STAT5 as a proliferation signal is still controversial; however, it has been verified that activation of STAT5 is essential for growth hormone-induced expression of hepatic serine protease inhibitor 2.1; oncostatin M expression stimulated by IL-2, IL-3, and erythropoietin; and IL-3-induced expression of cis, osm, and pim-1 (29, 44, 45, 46, 47). In the present study, we demonstrated that treatment of anti-hGM-CSF Ab partially reduced LPS-induced COX-2 expression (Fig. 6Go). This indicates that GM-CSF secretion contributes to COX-2 expression induced by LPS, and that it may be due to STAT5 activation induced by secreted GM-CSF. It has been shown that deletion of the GAS motif sequence of the human COX-2 gene does not influence the expression level of COX-2 induced by LPS using a transient transfection assay in bovine arterial endothelial cells (48). However, it may be that GM-CSF is not secreted from endothelial cells stimulated by LPS. These results suggest that STAT5 plays some role, such as expression of COX-2 in activated human monocytes.

The role of LPS-induced GM-CSF production in monocyte activation has been well investigated to date, demonstrating that GM-CSF leads to enhancement of proliferation, Ag presentation, killing of parasites, oxidative metabolism, and antitumor immunity of monocytes (49). In these biologic activities of GM-CSF, it is not known which signal pathway is transduced through STAT5. Studies of STAT5 gene-targeting mice and analyses of the dominant negative phenotype of STAT5 would be helpful in clarifying this point. Furthermore, the studies in gene-disrupted mice of GM-CSF or IL-3/GM-CSF/IL-5 ßc receptor have exhibited abnormal pulmonary pathologic features consisting of lymphocytic infiltration and areas resembling alveolar proteinosis in steady state, indicating that GM-CSF is essential for normal pulmonary physiology and resistance to local infection (50, 51, 52). However, it remains to be examined what LPS-induced signal pathway is triggered by secreted GM-CSF. Further studies aimed at analyses of the impaired function in monocytes of these mice in response to LPS would be useful in this regard.

IL-10 and Dex were previously shown to preferentially inhibit transcription of the COX-2 gene, resulting in remarkable suppression of PGE2 production in LPS-stimulated monocytes and neutrophils (18, 33, 34, 53). On the other hand, aspirin alleviates PGE2 production by acetylating the serine residue, followed by inactivation of both COX-1 and COX-2 (19). In the present study, hIL-10 and Dex significantly inhibited STAT5 activation in LPS-stimulated monocytes, while aspirin did not. At present, it is unclear how IL-10 and Dex regulate transcription in the COX-2 gene. It has been demonstrated that IL-10 selectively inhibits NF-{kappa}B activation in LPS-stimulated monocytes (20). On the other hand, Dex has been shown to inhibit activation of AP-1, NF-{kappa}B, NF-ATp, and Oct-1 through ligand-bound steroid receptors (21). In view of the finding that the promoter region of the human COX-2 gene contains the binding motifs of NF-{kappa}B, NF-IL-6, and AP-1, it is of interest to determine which of these transcription factors is a target for IL-10 and Dex. The present study offers the possibility that in addition to these transcription factors, STAT5 is another target for IL-10 and Dex to inhibit COX-2 expression in either a direct or an indirect way.

In this study we reported that IL-10-activated STAT1 has a higher affinity for the GRR probe than for the COX-2-sp3 probe (Fig. 8Go). Furthermore, we have confirmed that IFN-{gamma}-activated STAT1 and STAT5 can bind to the COX-2-sp3 probe (K. Yamaoka, unpublished observations). Thus, each STAT molecule may have its preference to bind to the specific nucleotide sequence containing the GAS motif. This idea is supported by recent findings that the interposed or adjacent sequence to the palindrome sequence plays a pivotal role in such a preference (54, 55). Based on our findings, we speculate that different stimuli cause different intramolecular modification of the same STAT molecule, or association of different molecules with the same STAT molecule, resulting in different abilities to form the DNA/protein complex. Further analyses have to be conducted to resolve this point. The fact that we could not detect the binding of IL-10-induced STAT1 to the COX-2-sp3 probe might suggest that STAT5 deactivation is more important than STAT1 activation for IL-10 to exert its anti-inflammatory effect. This idea is further supported by a study of STAT1 gene-disrupted mice, in which the signal pathway of IFN is impaired but the inhibitory effect of IL-10 on LPS-stimulated TNF production is not affected (56). Taken together, these results may provide a clue to elucidate the anti-inflammatory mechanism of IL-10.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Drs. H. Wakao, T. Tanabe, and H. Inoue for helpful comments and suggestions, and Dr. D. R. Wylie for critical review of this manuscript.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported in part by a grant-in-aid for scientific research (C) from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, and Culture of Japan and by grants from the Cell Science Research Foundation, the Asahi Glass Foundation, and the Japan Rheumatism Foundation. Back

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Kenji Izuhara, Department of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Kyushu University, 3–1–1, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812–82, Japan. E-mail address: Back

3 Abbreviations used in this paper: NF-{kappa}B, nuclear factor-{kappa}B; AP-1, activator protein-1; LIL, lipopolysaccharide-induced and interleukin-1-induced; LILRE, lipopolysaccharide- and IL-1-responsive element; Dex, dexamethasone; COX, cyclo-oxygenase; GM-CSF, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor; h, human; EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay. Back

Received for publication June 12, 1997. Accepted for publication September 30, 1997.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Adams, D. O., T. A. Hamilton. 1984. The cell biology of macrophage activation. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2:283.[Medline]
  2. Rietschel, E. T., T. Kirikae, F. U. Schade, U. Mamat, G. Schmidt, H. Loppnow, A. J. Ulmer, U. Zähringer, U. Seydel, F. D. Padowa, M. Schreier, H. Brade. 1994. Bacterial endotoxin: molecular relationships of structure to activity and function. FASEB J. 8:217.[Abstract]
  3. Shakhov, A. N., M. A. Collart, P. Vassalli, S. A. Nedospasov, C. V. Jongeneel. 1990. {kappa}B-type enhancers are involved in lipopolysaccharide-mediated transcriptional activation of the tumor necrosis factor {alpha} gene in primary macrophages. J. Exp. Med. 171:35.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Pomerantz, R. J., M. B. Feinberg, D. Trono, D. Baltimore. 1990. Lipopolysaccharide is a potent monocyte/macrophage-specific stimulator of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 expression. J. Exp. Med. 172:253.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Goldfeld, A. E., C. Doyle, T. Maniatis. 1990. Human tumor necrosis factor {alpha} gene regulation by virus and lipopolysaccharide. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87:9769.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Collart, M. A., P. Baeuerle, P. Vassalli. 1990. Regulation of tumor necrosis factor alpha transcription in macrophages: involvement of four {kappa}B-like motifs and of constitutive and inducible forms of NF-{kappa}B. Mol. Cell. Biol. 10:1498.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Mackman, N., K. Brand, T. S. Edgington. 1991. Lipopolysaccharide-mediated transcriptional activation of the human tissue factor gene in THP-1 monocytic cells requires both activator protein 1 and nuclear factor {kappa}B binding sites. J. Exp. Med. 174:1517.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Natsuka, S., S. Akira, Y. Nishio, S. Hashimoto, T. Sugita, H. Issiki, T. Kishimoto. 1992. Macrophage differentiation-specific expression of NF-IL6, a transcription factor for interleukin-6. Blood 79:460.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Sha, W. C., H.-C. Liou, E. Touomanen, D. Baltimore. 1995. Targeted disruption of the p50 subunit of NF-{kappa}B leads to multifocal defects in immune responses. Cell 80:321.[Medline]
  10. Tanaka, T., S. Akira, K. Yoshida, M. Umemoto, Y. Yoneda, N. Shirafuji, H. Fujiwara, S. Suematsu, N. Yoshida, T. Kishimoto. 1995. Taregeted disruption of the NF-IL6 gene discloses its essential role in bacteria killing and tumor cytotoxicity by macrophages. Cell 80:353.[Medline]
  11. Schindler, C., Jr J. E. Darnell. 1995. Transcriptional responses to polypeptide ligands: the JAK-STAT pathway. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 64:621.[Medline]
  12. Larner, A. C., M. David, G. M. Feldman, K. Igarashi, R. H. Hackett, D. S. A. Webb, S. M. Sweitzer, E. F. Petricoin III, D. S. Finbloom. 1993. Tyrosine phosphorylation of DNA binding proteins by multiple cytokines. Science 261:1730.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Tsukada, J., W. R. Waterman, Y. Koyama, A. C. Webb, P. E. Auron. 1996. A novel STAT-like factor mediates lipopolysaccharide, interleukin 1 (IL-1), and IL-6 signaling and recognizes a gamma interferon activation site-like element in the IL1B gene. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:2183.[Abstract]
  14. Kawahara, R. S., Z.-W. Deng, T. F. Deuel. 1991. Glucocorticoids inhibit the transcriptional induction of JE, a platelet-derived growth factor-inducible gene. J. Biol. Chem. 266:13261.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Poon, M., J. Megyesi, R. S. Green, H. Zhang, B. J. Rollins, R. Safirstein, M. B. Taubman. 1991. In vivo and in vitro inhibition of JE gene expression by glucocorticoids. J. Biol. Chem. 266:22375.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Wang, P., P. Wu, M. I. Siegel, R. W. Egan, M. M. Billah. 1994. IL-10 inhibits transcription of cytokine genes in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. J. Immunol. 153:811.[Abstract]
  17. Brown, C. Y., C. A. Lagnado, M. A. Vadas, G. J. Goodall. 1996. Differential regulation of the stability of cytokine mRNAs in lipopolysaccharide-activated blood monocytes in response to interleukin-10. J. Biol. Chem. 271:20108.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Niiro, H., T. Otsuka, T. Tanabe, S. Hara, S. Kuga, Y. Nemoto, Y. Tanaka, H. Nakashima, S. Kitajima, M. Abe, Y. Niho. 1995. Inhibition by interleukin-10 of inducible cyclooxygenase expression in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated monocytes: its underlying mechanism in comparison with interleukin-4. Blood 85:3736.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. O’Banion, M. K., V. D. Winn, D. A. Young. 1992. cDNA cloning and functional activity of a glucocorticoid-regulated inflammatory cyclooxygenase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89:4888.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Wang, P., P. Wu, M. I. Siegel, R. W. Egan, M. M. Billah. 1995. Interleukin (IL)-10 inhibits nuclear factor {kappa}B (NF{kappa}B) activation in human monocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 270:9558.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Saatcioglu, F., F.-X. Claret, M. Karin. 1994. Negative transcriptional regulation by nuclear receptors. Semin. Cancer Biol. 5:347.[Medline]
  22. Izuhara, K., T. Heike, T. Otsuka, K. Yamaoka, M. Mayumi, T. Imamura, Y. Niho, N. Harada. 1996. Signal transduction pathway of interleukin-4 and interleukin-13 in human B cells derived from X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency patients. J. Biol. Chem. 271:619.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Fletcher, B. S., D. A. Kujubu, D. M. Perrin, H. R. Herschman. 1992. Structure of the mitogen-inducible TIS10 gene and demonstration that the TIS10-encoded protein is a functional prostaglandin G/H synthase. J. Biol. Chem. 267:4338.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Sirois, J., L. O. Levy, D. L. Simmons, J. S. Richards. 1993. Characterization and hormonal regulation of the promoter of the rat prostaglandin endoperoxide synthase 2 gene in granulosa cells. J. Biol. Chem. 268:12199.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Kosaka, T., A. Miyata, H. Ihara, S. Hara, T. Sugimoto, O. Takeda, E. Takahashi, T. Tanabe. 1994. Characterization of the human gene (PTGS2) encoding prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2. Eur. J. Biochem. 221:889.[Medline]
  26. Lonnemann, G., S. Endres, J. W. M. Van der Meer, K. M. Koch, C. A. Dinarello. 1989. Differences in the synthesis and kinetics of interleukin 1{alpha}, interleukin 1ß and tumor necrosis factor from human mononuclear cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 19:1531.[Medline]
  27. de Waal Malefyt, R., J. Abrams, B. Bennett, C. G. Figdor, J. E. de Vries. 1991. Interleukin 10 (IL-10) inhibits cytokine synthesis by human monocytes: an autoregulatory role of IL-10 produced by monocytes. J. Exp. Med. 174:1209.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Hamilton, J. A.. 1994. Coordinate and noncoordinate colony stimulating factor formation by human monocytes. J. Leukocyte Biol. 55:355.[Abstract]
  29. Mui, A. L.-F., H. Wakao, A.-M. O’Farrell, N. Harada, A. Miyajima. 1995. Interleukin-3, granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor and interleukin-5 transduce signals through two STAT5 homologs. EMBO J. 14:1166.[Medline]
  30. Rosen, R. L., K. D. Winestock, G. Chen, X. Liu, L. Hennighausen, D. S. Finbloom. 1996. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor preferentially activates the 94-kD STAT5A and 80-kD STAT5A isoform in human peripheral blood monocytes. Blood 88:1206.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Lai, C.-F., J. Ripperger, K. K. Morella, Y. Wang, D. P. Gearing, N. D. Horseman, S. P. Campos, G. H. Fey, H. Baumann. 1995. STAT3 and STAT5B are targets of two different signal pathways activated by hematopoietin receptors and control transcription via separate cytokine response elements. J. Biol. Chem. 270:23254.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Novak, U., A. Mui, A. Miyajima, L. Paradiso. 1996. Formation of STAT5-containing DNA binding complexes in response to colony-stimulating factor-1 and platelet-derived growth factor. J. Biol. Chem. 271:18350.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Mertz, P. M., D. L. DeWitt, W. G. Stetler-Stevenson, L. M. Wahl. 1994. Interleukin-10 suppression of monocyte prostaglandin H synthase-2. J. Biol. Chem. 269:21322.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Kujubu, D. A., H. R. Herschman. 1992. Dexamethasone inhibits mitogen induction of the TIS10 prostaglandin synthase/cyclooxygenase gene. J. Biol. Chem. 267:7991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Thorens, B., J.-J. Mermod, P. Vassalli. 1987. Phagocytosis and inflammatory stimuli induce GM-CSF mRNA in macrophages through posttranscriptional regulation. Cell 48:671.[Medline]
  36. Finbloom, D. S., K. D. Winestock. 1995. IL-10 induces the tyrosine phosphorylation of tyk2 and Jak1 and the differential assembly of STAT1{alpha} and STAT3 complexes in human T cells and monocytes. J. Immunol. 155:1079.[Abstract]
  37. Ruff-Jamison, S., Z. Zhong, Z. Wen, K. Chen, Jr J. E. Darnell, S. Cohen. 1994. Epidermal growth factor and lipopolysaccharide activate Stat3 transcription factor in mouse liver. J. Biol. Chem. 269:21933.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Wakao, H., F. Gouilleux, B. Groner. 1994. Mammary gland factor (MGF) is a novel member of the cytokine regulated transcription factor gene family and confers the prolactin response. EMBO J. 13:2182.[Medline]
  39. Wakao, H., N. Harada, T. Kitamura, A. L.-F. Mui, A. Miyajima. 1995. Interleukin 2 and erythropoietin activate STAT5/MGF via distinct pathways. EMBO J. 14:2527.[Medline]
  40. Gouilleux, F., G. Pallard, I. Dusauter-Fourt, H. Wakao, L.-A. Haldosen, G. Norstedt, D. Levy, B. Groner. 1995. Prolactin, growth hormone, erythropoietin and granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor induce MGF-Stat5 DNA binding activity. EMBO J. 14:2005.[Medline]
  41. Pallard, C., F. Gouilleux, L. Benit, L. Cocault, M. Souyri, D. Levy, B. Groner, S. Gisselbrecht, I. Dusanter-Fourt. 1995. Thrombopoietin activates a STAT5-like factor in hematopoietic cells. EMBO J. 14:2847.[Medline]
  42. Ruff-Jamison, S., K. Chen, S. Cohen. 1995. Epidermal growth factor induces the tyrosine phosphorylation and nuclear translocation of STAT5 in mouse liver. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:4215.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Karras, J. G., Z. Wang, S. J. Coniglio, D. A. Frank, T. L. Rothstein. 1996. Antigen-receptor engagement in B cells induces nuclear expression of STAT5 and STAT6 proteins that bind and transactivate an IFN-{gamma} activation site. J. Immunol. 157:39.[Abstract]
  44. Fujii, H., Y. Nakagawa, U. Schindler, A. Kawahara, H. Mori, F. Gouilleux, B. Groner, J. N. Ihle, Y. Minami, T. Miyazaki, T. Taniguchi. 1995. Activation of STAT5 by interleukin 2 requires a carboxyl-terminal region of the interleukin 2 receptor ß chain but is not essential for the proliferative signal transmission. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:5482.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Bergad, P. L., H.-M. Shih, H. C. Towle, S. J. Schwarzenberg, S. A. Berry. 1995. Growth hormone induction of hepatic serine protease inhibitor 2.1 transcription is mediated by a Stat5-related factor binding synergistically to two {gamma}-activated sites. J. Biol. Chem. 270:24903.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Quelle, F. W., D. Wang, T. Nosaka, W. E. Thierfelder, D. Stravopodis, Y. Weinstein, J. N. Ihle. 1996. Erythropoietin induces activation of STAT5 through association with specific tyrosines on the receptor that are not required for a mitogenic response. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:1622.[Abstract]
  47. Yoshimura, A., M. Ichihara, I. Kinjyo, M. Moriyama, N. G. Copeland, D. J. Gilbert, N. A. Jenkins, T. Hara, A. Miyajima. 1996. Mouse oncostatin M: an immediate early gene induced by multiple cytokines through the JAK-STAT5 pathway. EMBO J. 15:1055.[Medline]
  48. Inoue, H., C. Yokoyama, S. Hara, Y. Tone, T. Tanabe. 1995. Transcriptional regulation of human prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase-2 gene by lipopolysaccharide and phorbol ester in vascular endothelial cells. J. Biol. Chem. 270:24965.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Gasson, J. C.. 1991. Molecular physiology of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor. Blood 77:1131.[Free Full Text]
  50. Dranoff, G., A. D. Crawford, M. Sadelain, B. Ream, A. Rashid, R. T. Bronson, G. R. Dickersin, C. J. Bachurski, E. L. Mark, J. A. Whitsett, R. C. Mulligan. 1994. Involvement of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in pulmonary homeostasis. Science 264:713.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Stanley, E., G. J. Lieschke, D. Grail, D. Metcalf, G. Hodgson, J. A. M. Gall, D. W. Maher, J. Cebon, V. Sinickas, A. R. Dunn. 1994. Granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor-deficient mice show no major perturbation of hematopoiesis but develop a characteristic pulmonary pathology. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:5592.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Nishinakamura, R., N. Nakayama, Y. Hirabayashi, T. Inoue, D. Aud, T. McNeil, S. Azuma, S. Yoshida, Y. Toyoda, K. Arai, A. Miyajima, R. Murray. 1995. Mice deficient for the IL-3/GM-CSF/IL-5 ßc receptor exhibits lung pathology and impaired immune response, while ßIL-3 receptor-deficient mice are normal. Immunity 2:211.[Medline]
  53. Niiro, H., T. Otsuka, K. Izuhara, K. Yamaoka, K. Ohshima, T. Tanabe, S. Hara, Y. Nemoto, Y. Tanaka, H. Nakashima, Y. Niho. 1997. Regulation by interleukin-10 and interleukin-4 of cyclooxygenase-2 expression in human neutrophils. Blood 89:1621.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Seidel, H. M., L. H. Milocco, P. Lamb, Jr J. E. Darnell, R. B. Stein, J. Rosen. 1995. Spacing of palindromic half sites as a determinant of selective STAT (signal transducers and activators of transcription) DNA binding and transcriptional activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:3041.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  55. Xu, X., Y.-L. Sun, T. Hoey. 1996. Cooperative DNA binding and sequence-selective recognition conferred by the STAT amino-terminal domain. Science 273:794.[Abstract]
  56. Meraz, M. A., J. M. White, K. C. F. Sheehan, E. A. Bach, S. J. Rodig, A. S. Dighe, D. H. Kaplan, J. K. Riley, A. C. Greenlund, D. Campbell, K. Carver-Moore, R. N. DuBois, R. Clark, M. Aguet, R. D. Schreiber. 1996. Targeted disruption of the STAT1 gene in mice reveals unexpected physiologic specificity in the JAK-STAT signaling pathway. Cell 84:431.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BloodHome page
K. Uchida, K. Nakata, T. Suzuki, M. Luisetti, M. Watanabe, D. E. Koch, C. A. Stevens, D. C. Beck, L. A. Denson, B. C. Carey, et al.
Granulocyte/macrophage-colony-stimulating factor autoantibodies and myeloid cell immune functions in healthy subjects
Blood, March 12, 2009; 113(11): 2547 - 2556.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
H.-W. Koon, D. Zhao, Y. Zhan, S. H. Rhee, M. P. Moyer, and C. Pothoulakis
Substance P Stimulates Cyclooxygenase-2 and Prostaglandin E2 Expression through JAK-STAT Activation in Human Colonic Epithelial Cells.
J. Immunol., April 15, 2006; 176(8): 5050 - 5059.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
A. Mouihate, S. Ellis, E.-M. Harre, and Q. J. Pittman
Fever suppression in near-term pregnant rats is dissociated from LPS-activated signaling pathways
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, November 1, 2005; 289(5): R1265 - R1272.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
H. Kim, S. H. Rhee, E. Kokkotou, X. Na, T. Savidge, M. P. Moyer, C. Pothoulakis, and J. T. LaMont
Clostridium difficile Toxin A Regulates Inducible Cyclooxygenase-2 and Prostaglandin E2 Synthesis in Colonocytes via Reactive Oxygen Species and Activation of p38 MAPK
J. Biol. Chem., June 3, 2005; 280(22): 21237 - 21245.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
T. Matsuda, K. Ferreri, I. Todorov, Y. Kuroda, C. V. Smith, F. Kandeel, and Y. Mullen
Silymarin Protects Pancreatic {beta}-Cells against Cytokine-Mediated Toxicity: Implication of c-Jun NH2-Terminal Kinase and Janus Kinase/Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription Pathways
Endocrinology, January 1, 2005; 146(1): 175 - 185.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.Home page
M. Severgnini, S. Takahashi, L. M. Rozo, R. J. Homer, C. Kuhn, J. W. Jhung, G. Perides, M. Steer, P. M. Hassoun, B. L. Fanburg, et al.
Activation of the STAT pathway in acute lung injury
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, June 1, 2004; 286(6): L1282 - L1292.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
Y. Inoue, T. Otsuka, H. Niiro, S. Nagano, Y. Arinobu, E. Ogami, M. Akahoshi, K. Miyake, I. Ninomiya, S. Shimizu, et al.
Novel Regulatory Mechanisms of CD40-Induced Prostanoid Synthesis by IL-4 and IL-10 in Human Monocytes
J. Immunol., February 15, 2004; 172(4): 2147 - 2154.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
H. S. Kang, M. J. Lee, H. Song, S. H. Han, Y. M. Kim, J. Y. Im, and I. Choi
Molecular Identification of IgE-Dependent Histamine-Releasing Factor as a B Cell Growth Factor
J. Immunol., June 1, 2001; 166(11): 6545 - 6554.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Leukoc. Biol.Home page
Y. Ohmori and T. A. Hamilton
Requirement for STAT1 in LPS-induced gene expression in macrophages
J. Leukoc. Biol., April 1, 2001; 69(4): 598 - 604.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
D. S. Whittaker, K. S. Bahjat, L. L. Moldawer, and M. J. Clare-Salzler
Autoregulation of Human Monocyte-Derived Dendritic Cell Maturation and IL-12 Production by Cyclooxygenase- 2-Mediated Prostanoid Production
J. Immunol., October 15, 2000; 165(8): 4298 - 4304.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
M. Mutoh, M. Takahashi, K. Fukuda, Y. Matsushima-Hibiya, H. Mutoh, T. Sugimura, and K. Wakabayashi
Suppression of cyclooxygenase-2 promoter-dependent transcriptional activity in colon cancer cells by chemopreventive agents with a resorcin-type structure
Carcinogenesis, May 1, 2000; 21(5): 959 - 963.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. Barrios-Rodiles, G. Tiraloche, and K. Chadee
Lipopolysaccharide Modulates Cyclooxygenase-2 Transcriptionally and Posttranscriptionally in Human Macrophages Independently from Endogenous IL-1{beta} and TNF-{alpha}
J. Immunol., July 15, 1999; 163(2): 963 - 969.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. L. E. Dean, M. Brook, A. R. Clark, and J. Saklatvala
p38 Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase Regulates Cyclooxygenase-2 mRNA Stability and Transcription in Lipopolysaccharide-treated Human Monocytes
J. Biol. Chem., January 1, 1999; 274(1): 264 - 269.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
P. Delerive, P. Gervois, J.-C. Fruchart, and B. Staels
Induction of Ikappa Balpha Expression as a Mechanism Contributing to the Anti-inflammatory Activities of Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor-alpha Activators
J. Biol. Chem., November 17, 2000; 275(47): 36703 - 36707.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yamaoka, K.
Right arrow Articles by Izuhara, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yamaoka, K.
Right arrow Articles by Izuhara, K.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS