|
|
||||||||


*
Program in Immunology and
Department of Medicine, Division of Immunology and Rheumatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
CD4 is an adhesion molecule that interacts with MHC class II and, by binding to a nonpolymorphic region of class II (14, 15), can also engage in coreceptor signaling (16, 17). Coreceptor signaling is the synergy that results (18) from CD4 and TCR binding the same MHC ligand and the concomitant juxtaposition of Lck with the CD3 signaling complex. Lck is a nonreceptor protein tyrosine kinase that binds to the cytoplasmic domain of CD4 (19). CD4 plays a crucial role in the development of class II-restricted Th cells in great part due to its ability to boost the avidity of the interaction between thymocyte and stromal cell during selection. Neonatal injection of anti-CD4 mAb blocked the development of CD4 single positive (SP) thymocytes (20) as it did in fetuses of pregnant mice treated until birth (21). CD4 can also function independently of its association with Lck, albeit less efficiently than CD4 with Lck. This was revealed in experiments with mice expressing a CD4 transgene (tg) that lacks the cytoplasmic tail, on a CD4 knockout (CD40) background (22). Strikingly, there was a direct correlation between the proportion of CD4-lineage cells and the level of cell surface expression of the tailless CD4 molecule. The greater the overexpression of the tg, the more CD4 T cells. Thus, a tailless CD4 expressed at physiologic levels results in a reduction in CD4 T cells, but this inability to coreceptor signal can be compensated for by gross overexpression. Interestingly, mice that lack CD4 altogether have a small population of double-negative (DN), i.e., CD8- peripheral T cells with helper function (23, 24). Interpreted in the context of the differential avidity model, coreceptors increase the avidity of T cells engaged in selection, and their associated protein tyrosine kinases actively take part in the TCR signaling pathway. CD4 is not essential for the development of class II-restricted Th cells, but greatly enhances this process.
To study the role of CD4 in positive and negative selection, we set out to replace the exons that encode the transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains of CD4 with those of CD8. To do this, we used homologous recombination (25, 26) in embryonic stem (ES) cells. However, instead of the intended integration, we inserted the neomycin resistance gene (neo) into the 3' untranslated region (UTR) of CD4. The resulting mice (CD4low), after blastocyst injection and breeding for homozygosity of the mutant CD4 gene, have a reduced level of CD4 protein on the surface of their T cells throughout development. In the CD4low mutant mice we found a decrease in the proportion of CD4 cells in the thymus with a concomitant increase in CD8 cells and a significant skewing of the TCR repertoire with respect to several V region gene products. To study the fate of individual TCRs with reduced CD4, we bred two different class II-restricted TCR tg onto the CD4low mutant background. In these TCR tg/CD4low mutant mice we saw a reduction in the percentage of T cells being selected into the CD4 compartment. Our data are consistent with, and interpretable in the context of, the differential avidity model of T cell selection.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The 10.5-kb 3' EcoRI fragment of mouse genomic CD4
(27) containing exons 5 to 10 in the pBluescript vector (Stratagene, La
Jolla, CA) was used to generate the targeting vector. The 3.5-kb
BglII fragment was excised and inserted into a modified
Bluescript vector that contained no polylinker and only a
BglII site for cloning. The following manipulations were
performed on this BglII cassette. The
SacI-PvuII fragment (exons 8 and 9 and part of
exon 10, representing the region coding for the transmembrane and
cytoplasmic domains) was removed, and the
SacI-BglII/blunt fragment of genomic mouse CD8
(representing exons 3 and 4 and part of exon 5) was cloned in its
place. The SphI site in the 3' UTR (exon 10) was converted
into an XhoI site with linkers. The 1.3-kb
EcoRI-BamHI fragment of neo under
control of the PGK promoter (28) was cloned into this site with
XhoI linkers. The BglII cassette was then
inserted back into the BglII site of the 10.5-kb
EcoRI fragment of genomic CD4. The
ClaI-NotI/blunt (polylinker sites) fragment of
this construct was cloned into the
ClaI-HindIII/blunt site of pHSV-106 (TV5tk; Fig. 1
B). Twenty micrograms of this final targeting vector
was linearized with ClaI for transfection. All DNA
manipulations were performed as previously described (29) with enzymes
from New England BioLabs (Beverly, MA).
|
The linearized targeting vector (20 µg) was electroporated at 275 V and 200 µF, with a BTX 300 electroporator (BTX, Inc., San Diego, CA) into ES-D3 C-12, a subclone of D3 ES cells (30). Cells were subjected to G418 (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD; 400 µg/ml) and 1-[2-deoxy-2-fluoro-ß-D-arabinofuranosyl]-5-iodouracil (fiayluridine (FIAU)) for 10 days. Single-colony wells were expanded for DNA isolation and Southern blot analysis. Chimeric mice were generated by microinjection of the targeted ES cell into the blastocoel cavity of 3.5-day-old C57BL/6 blastocysts (31). Chimeric males were mated with C57BL/6 females, and agouti-colored offspring were screened for germ-line transmission by Southern blot analysis.
Generation of inbred strains
Heterozygous offspring were backcrossed onto C57BL/6 or B10.BR mice for a minimum of six generations. At each generation, tail DNA was isolated, and Southern blot analysis was performed to track the mutant gene. For experimental mice, heterozygous mice were intercrossed to generate wild-type, mutant, and heterozygous offspring. Wild-type and mutant offspring from the same litter (littermates) were used for experiments. For double-mutant mice, CD4low homozygous mutant mice (CD4low mutant) were crossed to ß2m-deficient mice (ß2m0). Double-heterozygous littermates were intercrossed to obtain CD4low het/ß2m0 mice, which were then intercrossed to get CD4low mutant/ß2m0 and CD4 WT/ß2m0 littermates for experimentation. The 5C.C7 TCR tg mice, a gift from Dr. Mark M. Davis (Stanford University School of Medicine), were maintained on the B10.BR background. The AND TCR tg mice, a gift from Dr. Stephen M. Hedrick (University of California, San Diego, CA) (32) were maintained on the C57BL/6 background. For experiments with tg/CD4low mutant mice, tg+/CD4low het mice were intercrossed with tg-/CD4low het mice to obtain tg+/CD4 WT, tg+/CD4low mutant, and tg-/CD4 WT littermates. All mice used for breeding were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). TCR tg mice were identified by cell surface staining with fluorochrome-labeled Abs and flow cytometry, while the CD4 gene was tracked by Southern blotting of tail DNA.
Abs and flow cytometry
Anti-CD8
(clone 53.67.2, American Type Culture Collection,
Rockville, MD) and anti-Vß8.1, 8.2, 8.3 (clone F23.1) were
purified from culture supernatant by protein G-Sepharose (Pharmacia,
Uppsala, Sweden) chromatography and conjugated to FITC (Molecular
Probes, Eugene, OR) or biotin (Pierce Chemical Co., Rockford, IL). The
following Ab were purchased from PharMingen (San Diego, CA):
PE-conjugated anti-CD4 (clone RM45), biotinylated anti-CD5
(clone 537.3), biotinylated anti-CD3
(clone 1452C11),
biotinylated anti-CD69 (clone H1.2F3), biotinylated anti-CD24
(HSA; clone M1/69), FITC-conjugated anti-Vß3 (clone KJ25),
FITC-conjugated anti-Vß8.1, 8.2 (clone MR52), biotinylated
anti-V
2 (clone B20.1), and biotinylated anti-V
11 (clone
RR81). The following Ab were used as culture supernatant:
anti-V
3.2 (clone RR316; a gift from Dr. Osami Kanagawa,
Washington University, St. Louis, MO) detected with FITC-conjugated
mouse anti-rat Fc (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove,
PA) and anti-Vß14 (clone 14.2; a gift from Dr. David Raulet,
University of California, Berkeley, CA) detected with FITC-conjugated
goat anti-rat IgM (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories).
Anti-V
3, a rabbit antiserum, was a gift from Drs. Bee-Cheng Sim and
Nicholas R. J. Gascoigne (The Scripps Research Institute, La
Jolla, CA) and was detected with FITC-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit
(Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories). Ab were used at predetermined
optimal concentrations. Spleens and thymi were prepared for flow
cytometry by making a single-cell suspension with the sintered ends of
two glass slides. One million cells were stained and washed in PBS/2%
FCS/0.05% azide. Three-color flow cytometry was performed with a
FACScan cytometer (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA), and data were
analyzed using FACS-DESK software and displayed as density plots or as
5% probability contour plots. FITC-labeled, PE-labeled, and
biotinylated mAb, with PerCP (BD, San Jose, CA) secondary reagent, were
used throughout. PBL from transgenic mice were isolated using
Lympholyte-M (Cedarlane Laboratories Ltd., Hornby, Canada) and stained
as described above.
Southern blotting
Tail biopsy was incubated with proteinase K (Life Technologies)
at 56°C overnight in serum separator tubes (Vacutainer, Becton
Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ). The genomic DNA was extracted with
phenol/chloroform, then with chloroform, in the same tubes. DNA was
precipitated in microfuge tubes with sodium acetate and isopropanol,
then washed with ethanol. Five micrograms of DNA was digested overnight
at 37°C with BamHI (New England BioLabs, Beverly, MA). Gel
electrophoresis was performed as previously described (29). Transfer to
a nylon membrane, probe labeling, hybridization, washing, and detection
were performed with the Genius System (Boehringer Mannheim,
Indianapolis, IN) according to the manufacturers instructions. The
probe was a 630-bp EcoRI fragment of genomic CD4 from the 3'
flanking region immediately outside the targeting vector (Fig 1
C).
Northern blotting
Total RNA was isolated from thymus using RNAzol (Tel-Test, Inc., Friendswood, TX) according to the manufacturers instructions. mRNA was then purified using Oligotex (Qiagen, Chatsworth, CA). Twenty micrograms of total RNA or 0.2 µg of mRNA were electrophoresed, transferred to a nylon membrane (Boehringer Mannheim), hybridized, and washed as previously described (33). The EcoRI-BamHI fragment of neo or the 414-bp SacI-KpnI (exons 25) fragment of the mouse CD4 cDNA was labeled with 32P by random hexamer priming and used as a hybridization probe.
Immunoprecipitation and immunoblot analysis
Thymocytes were surfaced labeled with sulfo-NHS-biotin (Pierce)
(34). Total cell lysates were made by incubating cells in lysis buffer
containing 1.0% Triton X-100 (Sigma) and protease inhibitors
(Boehringer Mannheim) on ice for 30 min. Nuclei and cytoskeletal
components were removed by microcentrifugation at maximum speed for 15
min in the cold room. Lysates were frozen at -80°C or used
immediately. Immunoprecipitation with anti-CD4 (CT CD4, Caltag) or
anti-CD8
(53.67.2, American Type Culture Collection, Rockville,
MD) mAb preincubated with protein G-Sepharose (Pharmacia; 5 µg of mAb
plus 30 µl of protein G slurry) was performed at 4°C using a rotary
mixer. Lysates were precleared with nonspecific isotype-matched control
Ab, preincubated with protein G-Sepharose, for 1 h at 4°C. The
samples were washed five times, resuspended in loading buffer
containing 1% 2-ME, and electrophoresed on a 10% SDS-polyacrylamide
gel. The gels were electroblotted onto nitrocellulose (Schleicher and
Schuell, Keene, NH). Western blotting was performed with
peroxidase-conjugated streptavidin (Jackson ImmunoResearch
Laboratories) in PBS/0.1% Tween (Sigma)/5% nonfat dry milk powder
(Carnation, Los Angeles, CA) followed by ECL (Amersham, Arlington
Heights, IL) and exposure to Hyperfilm (Amersham).
cDNA library construction, screening, and sequencing
Total RNA was isolated from CD4low mutant thymi as described above. mRNA was purified using the Poly(A) Quick mRNA Isolation Kit from Stratagene (La Jolla, CA). The library was constructed using the ZAP-cDNA Gigapack II Gold Cloning Kit from Stratagene and screened according to the manufacturers instructions using the same CD4 probe as that used for Northern analysis. Six individual clones were isolated, then sequenced in both directions using the dideoxy chain termination method. The numbering for the cDNA sequence shown is taken from the mouse CD4 cDNA sequence in GenBank (accession no. X04836).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
CD4low mice were generated by standard techniques
using the 129/sv embryonic cell line D3 (31). A targeting vector was
constructed to introduce an expressible neo into the 3' UTR
of CD4 by homologous recombination. The targeting vector is shown in
Figure 1
B. Genomic CD4
spanning intron 5 through the 3' flanking region was used to generate
the targeting vector. The neo gene was inserted in the 3'
UTR at the SphI site using XhoI linkers. This
neo gene was driven by the PGK promoter (28) and used the
poly(A) signal of the CD4 gene for expression after integration. The
HSV-tk gene driven by the PGK promoter was inserted at the 3' end of
the targeting vector to allow negative selection (35) against random
integrants by plating on FIAU. The targeting vector was linearized with
ClaI and electroporated into ES-D3 cells (30). These cells
were subjected to both positive (G418) and negative (FIAU) selection.
G418-resistant clones were analyzed by Southern blot (Fig. 2
) and used for blastocyst injection.
Although we originally intended to introduce exons encoding the
transmembrane region and cytoplasmic domain of CD8 into the CD4 locus
(Fig. 1
B, gray exon boxes), homologous recombination
occurred such that only neo was introduced. The remainder of
the CD4 gene remained intact. Two clones were selected for
microinjection into blastocysts and gave germ-line transmission. One
line was interbred to generate homozygous mice. The mutation was
backcrossed onto two different inbred mouse strains, C57BL/6 and
B10.BR, for at least six generations. The mice were viable and healthy
and displayed no overt abnormalities. In-depth characterization of the
CD4 gene and flanking regions by Southern blot analysis was performed
using a variety of restriction digests and probes (data not shown).
This analysis revealed that a single copy of neo was
introduced, and the sites flanking this integration were intact. Based
on tail DNA analyses of hundreds of progeny generated by intercrossing
heterozygous mice, the ratio of birth of wild-type (wt), heterozygous,
and mutant (CD4low) mice was approximately 1:2:1.
|
Placing neo into the 3' UTR of CD4 resulted in a lower
level of CD4 surface protein on all T cells that normally express CD4.
This is revealed by flow cytometric analysis in Figure 3
. The difference is most obvious in the
DP population in the thymus, where the level of CD4 in the mutant is
50% that in the wt. In the SP thymocyte population and on splenic T
cells, the level of CD4 in the mutant is 80% that in the wt.
Immunoprecipitation of CD4 from thymocytes (Fig. 4
) revealed about a twofold difference in
the amount of protein from mutant vs. wt cells. Whole
thymocyte suspensions were surfaced labeled with biotin, and total cell
lysates from equal numbers of cells were subjected to
immunoprecipitation with anti-CD4 mAb and protein G-Sepharose. The
immunoprecipitations were resolved by PAGE, and the biotinylated
proteins were detected by ECL and x-ray film exposure. Densitometry
(data not shown) revealed a twofold difference in CD4 protein from
mutant vs. wt cells when corrected for immunoprecipitation
of the control protein, CD8 (Fig. 4
). To try to understand the cause of
the lower level of CD4 protein in mutant cells, we performed Northern
blot analysis of RNA from mutant and wt thymi (data not shown). Not so
unexpectedly, we found two species of CD4 RNA in the mutant mouse. The
predominant species is larger than wt CD4. Its size suggests that it
represents complete read-through of the CD4 gene including
neo. This conclusion is substantiated by the finding that
parallel blots hybridized with a neo probe revealed the same
size band (data not shown). A minor species on the CD4-hybridized blot
is smaller and results from utilization of an alternate, yet
inefficient, polyadenylation signal. This was verified by the isolation
and sequencing of clones from a cDNA library constructed from mutant
thymus RNA (data not shown). The sequence of this poly(A) signal is
AATGAA. Sheets et al. (36) have shown that a motif with this sequence
can direct polyadenylation, albeit to an extent far less than the
canonical AATAAA.
|
|
We were interested to see what effect this reduced level of CD4
surface protein would have on the development of T cells. Two-color
flow cytometry revealed an increase in the CD8 compartment and a
decrease in the CD4 compartment of thymocytes stained with
FITC-conjugated anti-CD8 and PE-conjugated anti-CD4 (Fig. 5
A). The number of cells in
the mutant thymus was equivalent to that in the wt thymus. The
reduction in the CD4 compartment was consistent and averaged 19.1%
over 12 pairs of mice tested. This reduction in CD4+
cells and increase in CD8+ cells persisted in peripheral T
cells, although to a lesser extent than in thymocytes, as indicated by
a similar staining of splenocytes (Fig. 5
B). This pattern in
splenocytes was also consistent over 12 pairs of mice tested (data not
shown). Most notable in the thymus was a consistent increase in the CD8
compartment, which averaged 67.1% over 12 pairs of mice tested. To
characterize this phenotypic change in greater depth, we performed
three-color staining of thymocytes with a panel of Abs in conjunction
with CD4/CD8 staining. This analysis revealed that the increase in
CD8+ cells in the thymus of mutant mice is predominantly
(>70%) due to cells that are CD3low/med,
CD5low, CD69low, and HSAhigh (Table I
). This phenotype is indicative of
CD8+ cells in transition from DN to DP as they are immature
in character. Our interpretation of these results is that CD4 mRNA has
been destabilized by insertion of neo into the 3' UTR, and
this has retarded the surface expression of CD4 protein during this DN
to DP transition. The mutant mice have a greater percentage of DN
cells, which also supports this interpretation.
|
|
Reduced CD4 level affects the selection of class II-restricted TCR
We hypothesized that the reduction in the CD4 SP thymocytes
was due to the lower level of CD4 surface protein, and that this lower
level reduced the avidity of cells engaged in positive selection and
hence rendered the selection of CD4+ class
II-restricted T cells less efficient than that in wt littermates. To
test this, we mated the CD4low mutant mice to two different
class II-restricted TCR transgenic mice. One group of mice we tested
expressed the 5C.C7 TCR tg. These mice express a TCR that recognizes a
peptide of pigeon cytochrome c (PCC) (88104) in the
context of I-Ek and selects almost exclusively to the CD4
lineage (32, 37). The difference in CD4+ cells in the
thymus of these tg+/CD4low mutant animals
compared with those in tg+/CD4 wt animals was modest (Fig. 6
). The
tg+/CD4low mutant mice had slightly fewer (12%
fewer than tg+/CD4 wt; Fig. 6
) CD4+ SP cells in
the thymus. However, when the AND TCR tg was mated onto the
CD4low mutant background, a much more glaring effect was
seen. The AND mice express a TCR tg that recognizes the same
peptide of PCC in the context of I-Ek (32, 38), but because
we maintain these mice on the C57BL/6 background the TCR is positively
selected by I-Ab. Positive selection can occur on
I-Ek or I-Ab. This TCR is also almost
exclusively selected to the CD4 lineage. As can be seen in Figure 7
A, the
tg+/CD4low mutant thymus had a 58% reduction
in CD4 SP thymocytes compared with littermates expressing the tg alone
(tg+/CD4 wt). In four experiments, the average reduction in
CD4 SP thymocytes in the tg+/CD4low mutant
compared with the tg+/CD4 wt was 52% (57, 58, 76, and
16%). In all experiments comparing tg+/CD4 wt mice with
tg+/CD4low mutants using either TCR tg, the
thymi in the tg+/CD4low mutant mice had more
cells, moderately more in the 5C.C7 mice (21 and 30%), but
considerably more in the AND mice (70, 110, 113, and 33%). The final
pair of this latter group (33%) did not consist of littermates, and
the mice were not age matched.
|
|
To study how the reduced CD4 level affects the TCR repertoire in a
more global fashion, three-color staining analysis of thymocytes was
undertaken using Abs to CD4, CD8, and a panel of TCR V
and Vß gene
products. We analyzed CD4low mutant mice that had been
backcrossed a minimum of six generations onto either C57BL/6 or B10.BR.
The data in Table II
show the statistical
analysis of the percentage of cells that are
CD4+CD8- and express a particular TCR V region
gene product in wild-type vs mutant mice. On the C57BL/6 background,
the reduced CD4 protein resulted in statistically significant reduction
in four of the TCR V region gene products in the CD4 SP thymocyte
population (V
2, V
3.2, Vß8, and Vß13). However, on the B10.BR
background, the reduced CD4 level affected only one of the TCR V gene
products in a statistically significant fashion (Vß13).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In normal mice the level of CD4 is higher in SP thymocytes and spleen
than in DP thymocytes. Our mutant mice are no exception. Interestingly,
the difference in the level of CD4 between mutant and wt is greater in
DP thymocytes (where mutant is 50% of wt) than in SP thymocytes (where
mutant is 80% of wt; Fig. 3
). We believe that this reflects the
process of positive selection and supports a differential avidity model
and the idea that the majority of thymocytes fail positive selection
(43). Most TCRs, which are generated by the random recombination of
gene segments, have little or no affinity for MHC. Cells bearing these
receptors die by neglect (43); they are unable to generate a signal
through the TCR to rescue them from PCD. Even though we have generated
mice with a reduced level of CD4, there is still a normal distribution
of the level of CD4 protein on developing thymocytes. Thus, the cells
passing positive selection do so with the highest level of CD4.
However, this level is still lower, on the average, in the mutant
thymocytes than in the wt thymocytes.
The mating of the CD4low mutant to the two individual TCR
tg mice presents us with some interesting data. These experiments open
a window into the affinity of the individual TCRs. TCRs that are
positively selected and not negatively selected will fall into a
certain window of affinity. Because we are limited in the number of tg
mice we use with differing affinity TCRs, it is hard to get a feel for
this window or where in this range each individual TCR lies. Several
groups have expressed tg coreceptors that increase positive selection
(44, 45) or tip the balance on a TCR tg from positive selection to
negative selection (9, 10, 46) or vice versa (47, 48). Our system
provides a similar, yet more subtle, result. In the AND
tg/CD4low mutant, the positive selection of TCR tg to the
CD4 lineage is significantly reduced (58%) compared with that in tg/wt
littermates (Fig. 7
). That would place the affinity of this TCR for its
ligand near the lower limit, as a reduction in the CD4 level leads to
failure of positive selection. The genes encoding this TCR were
originally isolated from a T cell clone that recognizes the C-terminal
peptide of PCC in the context of I-Ek (32). Both the AND
and 5C.C7 TCRs are very similar, incorporating V
11 and Vß3 gene
segments. However, they do incorporate different J
segments and have
distinct junctional sequences (49). Despite this, Yelon and Berg (50)
recently showed data indicating that AND and 5C.C7 were about as
strongly selected as each other on I-Ek, with AND being
slightly more efficient than 5C.C7. Since we bred the AND tg onto the
C57BL/6 strain, the TCR is being positively selected by the
I-Ab molecule because these mice do not express I-E. This
positive selection is by cross-reactivity to I-Ab, since
PCC-specific helper T cells are restricted by I-E and not I-A (37, 51).
It seems logical, then, that the TCR is being positively selected with
a lower affinity, by cross-reactivity, to I-Ab than it
would if it were being selected by I-Ek, its restricting
MHC. In agreement with this interpretation, Matechak et al. (52)
recently found that H-2k AND TCR mice have small thymi with
a reduced compartment of DP thymocytes and an increased proportion of
DN thymocytes, while H-2b AND TCR mice have large thymi and
mature cells predominantly in the CD4 lineage. Their interpretation is
that homozygous expression of Ek induces some clonal
deletion of AND TCR-expressing cells. By reducing the amount of CD4
available during positive selection, we believe that a significant
portion of T cells that would have been positively selected fail to be
so, supporting the idea that a minimum avidity threshold exists for
positive selection. Having a TCR with some affinity for MHC (AND) may
not insure escape from PCD without a minimum overall avidity. Thus, CD4
plays a critical role in determining overall avidity of cells
undergoing selection and whether they can escape death by neglect. In
the 5C.C7 tg/CD4low mutant, on the other hand, selection to
the CD4 lineage is reduced only slightly (Fig. 6
). We interpret these
data to mean that the affinity of this TCR for its ligand (peptide plus
Ek) is in the upper range of the affinity window. In
agreement with these data, Yelon and Berg (50) found that 5C.C7
thymocytes can mature with maximum efficiency even when the level of
I-Ek is reduced. The reduced level of CD4 affects selection
of the 5C.C7 tg to a lesser degree than that of the AND tg.
We noted that the introduction of either TCR transgene (AND or 5C.C7) onto the CD4low mutant background results in thymi of greater cellularity, a phenomenon that is common in TCR tg mice when thymic selection is compromised. Several possibilities exist. 1) In the case of a relatively high affinity TCR (5C.C7), the selecting MHC may induce deletion as well. By reducing the level of CD4, i.e., weakening the TCR/MHC interaction, this deletion might be attenuated, resulting in increased cellularity. 2) The average lifespan of the DP thymocytes may be increased, resulting in increased cellularity. In the AND line, the cells undergoing selection may be receiving a signal through their TCR that is sufficient to protect them from PCD for a short time but insufficient to positively select them. Thus, they would "stall" in the DP stage for a time, resulting in increased cellularity. The DP stage is one of great expansion in the thymus. Removal of cells from this pool by positive selection could result in a decrease in overall cellularity. However, in a case of reduced positive selection (CD4low), the average lifespan of DP thymocytes may be lengthened because cells are not transitioning into the SP stage.
Other groups have shown that particular TCR V gene products are
preferentially selected into either the CD4 or CD8 lineage (53, 54, 55, 56, 57).
Here we show that a reduced level of CD4 influences the extent to which
particular TCR V region gene products can be selected into the CD4
lineage (Table II
). Interestingly, for the panel of Abs we used with
specificities for TCR V
or Vß domains, we found that four were
significantly affected when CD4 was reduced on the C57BL/6 background,
while only one was significantly affected in B10.BR mice. This supports
the idea that specific TCR V regions are selected by MHC class (I or
II) (55) as well as MHC allele.
In conclusion, our data support the idea that CD4 plays a crucial role in determining the avidity of the thymocyte-stromal cell interaction and whether the developing T cell has the avidity necessary to escape PCD. Further studies will be required to place quantitative limits on the window of avidity that exists for positive selection.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Jane R. Parnes, Department of Medicine, Division of Immunology and Rheumatology, Medical School Laboratory Surge Building P-306, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA 943055487. ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: DP, double-positive; PCD, programmed cell death; SP, single-positive; tg, transgene/transgenic; CD40, CD4 knockout; DN, double-negative; ES, embryonic stem; neo, neomycin resistance gene; UTR, untranslated region; low, low level; HSV, herpes simplex virus; tk, thymidine kinase; PGK, phosphoglycerate kinase-1; FIAU, 1-[2-deoxy-2-fluoro-ß-D-arabinofuranosyl]-5-iodouracil; ß2m0, ß2-microglobulin-deficient; PE, phycoerythrin; wt, wild-type; med, medium level; high, high level; PCC, pigeon cytochrome c. ![]()
Received for publication July 24, 1997. Accepted for publication September 30, 1997.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
ß T-cell receptor determine the CD4/CD8 phenotype of T cells. Nature 335:229.[Medline]
2+ CD8+ T cells in mouse strains expressing both H-2k and T cell receptor V
haplotypes: determination with a V
2-specific monoclonal antibody. Eur. J. Immunol. 22:399.[Medline]
region selectively expressed in CD4+ cells. J. Immunol. 145:1324.[Abstract]
CDR1 and CDR2. Science 273:963.[Abstract]
-chain variable region (V
3) of the mouse T cell antigen receptor. J. Immunol. 143:2602.[Abstract]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
O. Boyer, G. Marodon, J. L. Cohen, L. Lejeune, T. Irinopoulou, R. Liblau, P. Bruneval, and D. Klatzmann Human CD4 Expression at the Late Single-Positive Stage of Thymic Development Supports T Cell Maturation and Peripheral Export in CD4-Deficient Mice J. Immunol., October 15, 2002; 169(8): 4347 - 4353. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. G. Singer, D. A. Fox, T. M. Haqqi, L. Beretta, J. S. Endres, S. Prohaska, J. R. Parnes, J. Bromberg, and R. M. Sramkoski CD6: expression during development, apoptosis and selection of human and mouse thymocytes Int. Immunol., June 1, 2002; 14(6): 585 - 597. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. J. Wiegers, I. E. M. Stec, W. E. F. Klinkert, and J. M. H. M. Reul Glucocorticoids Regulate TCR-Induced Elevation of CD4: Functional Implications J. Immunol., June 15, 2000; 164(12): 6213 - 6220. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. A. Mostaghel, J. M. Riberdy, D. A. Steeber, and C. Doyle Coreceptor-Independent T Cell Activation in Mice Expressing MHC Class II Molecules Mutated in the CD4 Binding Domain J. Immunol., December 15, 1998; 161(12): 6559 - 6566. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |