The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MacAry, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kemeny, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MacAry, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kemeny, D. M.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*ALUMINUM SULFATE
*ALUM, POTASSIUM
Medline Plus Health Information
*Dietary Proteins
The Journal of Immunology, 1998, 160: 580-587.
Copyright © 1998 by The American Association of Immunologists

Ovalbumin-Specific, MHC Class I-Restricted, {alpha}ß-Positive, Tc1 and Tc0 CD8+ T Cell Clones Mediate the In Vivo Inhibition of Rat IgE1

Paul A. MacAry, Beverly J. Holmes and David M. Kemeny2

Department of Immunology, King’s College School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, United Kingdom


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In the following study, we demonstrate that medium responder PVG rats immunized i.p. with OVA complexed to the adjuvant aluminum hydroxide exhibit a moderate IgE response (400–1000 ng/ml). In these rats, we demonstrate that underlying the MHC class II-restricted CD4+ T cell response, there is an MHC class I-restricted CD8+ T cell component that plays an important role in restricting the magnitude and duration of the IgE response. We show that in vivo depletion of CD8+ T cells effects a massive increase in IgE (20-fold), and that they are MHC class I-restricted, OVA-specific, cytolytic cells that universally produce IFN-{gamma} (25–69 ng/ml) and IL-2 (7.6–22 U/ml), and occasionally secrete IL-4 (68–81 U/ml IL-4), and when adoptively transferred into CD8-depleted recipients, can effect a significant reduction in IgE (3- to 50-fold). We also demonstrate that this in vivo inhibition of IgE is dependent on the Ag-specific activation of the CD8+ T cells, and that the activated CD8+ T cells will suppress total/bystander IgE in an Ag-nonspecific manner. These data are consistent with a growing literature demonstrating sensitization of MHC class I-restricted CD8+ T cells by exogenous protein Ags delivered to mucosal sites, and may represent a mechanism whereby a selective pressure can be applied on the functional outcome of an immunoglobulin response to environmental allergens.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Effective T cell immunity is dependent on the clonal expansion of the small population of cells that express Ag receptors specific for the immunogen. A key event in the generation of a response is the display of antigenic fragments by MHC molecules at the surface of APCs. It is generally thought that exogenous Ags are processed and presented by MHC class II molecules and endogenously synthesized Ags by MHC class I molecules (1, 2, 3, 4). However, recent data have suggested that there is a degree of degeneracy in the processing pathways and that Ags in the extra cellular milieu can also be processed and presented in association with MHC class I (5). Such processes have been described recently for dendritic cells and macrophages following macropinocytosis of antigenic complexes (6, 7). The T cells that respond to Ag presented by MHC develop into functionally distinct subpopulations that effect cell-mediated immunity and regulate humoral immune responses through the secretion of specific cytokines. The generation of persistent IgE responses to environmental allergens has been attributed to the preferential expansion of allergen-specific, MHC class II-restricted, CD4+ Th2 cells producing IL-4, IL-5, and IL-10, but not IFN-{gamma}, TNF-ß, or IL-2. These cells support IgE production and effect eosinophilia (8).

We have reported previously that the i.p. immunization of Lister Hooded rats with the nonreplicating Ag OVA complexed to aluminum hydroxide results in the activation of a population of CD8+ T cells in the localized lymphoid tissue that suppress IgE when adoptively transferred to syngeneic animals (9). Moreover, in vivo depletion of CD8+ T cells at specific time points results in a marked increase in IgE (>46-fold). To further investigate these cells, we have developed a strategy for cloning OVA-specific CD8+ T cells that has made it possible to determine their precursor frequency, cell surface marker expression, cytokine profiles, cytotoxicity, and ability to regulate IgE in vivo.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Animals and materials

Female PVG rats (125–150 g) were purchased from Harlan-Olac (Bicester, U.K.). RPMI 1640 medium, anti-rat IFN-{gamma} mAb (DB1) were purchased from Life Technologies (Paisley, U.K.), and tissue culture flasks and microtiter plates from Nunc (Roskilde, Denmark). DOTAP3 (N-[1-(2, 3-dioleoxyloxy) propyl] N,N,N-trimethyl ammonium methylsulfate) transfection reagent was obtained from Boehringer Mannheim Corp. (Manneheim, Germany). Rodent lymphoprep 1.077 was purchased from Nycomed (Denmark). Human rIL-2 was purchased from Euro-Cetus (Harefield, U.K.). Rat rIL-4 was obtained as a supernatant from an IL-4-treated Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell line (kind gift from Dr. N. Barclay, MRC Cellular Immunology Unit, Oxford, U.K.). Dynabeads M450 sheep anti-mouse IgG were purchased from Dynal (Wirral, U.K.), and phycoerythrin (PE)-labeled OX35 mAb (anti-rat CD4), G4.18 (anti-rat CD3), and FITC-labeled OX-39 (anti-rat CD25) were from AMS Biotechnology (Whitney, U.K.). OX-81 anti-rat IL-4 was a kind gift from Dr. D. W. Mason (MRC Cellular Immunology Unit, Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, Oxford, U.K.). DB-1 anti-rat IFN-{gamma} was a kind gift from Dr. P. Van der Meide (Leiden University, The Netherlands); OX8 anti-rat CD8 ascites fluid, anti-{alpha}ß TCR PE (R73), anti-{gamma}{delta} TCR PE, anti-CD25 PE, and OX8 FITC were purchased from Serotec (Oxford, U.K.). [3H]thymidine and 51Cr were purchased from Amersham International (Amersham, U.K.). FCS was purchased from Globepharm (Surrey, U.K.). All other reagents were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (Poole, Dorset, U.K.).

Immunization procedures

Age-, sex-, and batch-matched rats were separated into groups of four animals. Rats were immunized with alum-precipitated Ag prepared as follows. The Ag was made up to a concentration of 10 mg/ml in sterile saline. To 10 ml of the protein solution, 4.5 ml of 1 M NaHCO3 was added at 20°C for 20 min and then centrifuged at 3000 x g for 10 min. The precipitate was washed three times with sterile PBS before use and was stored with 0.01% thiomersal preservative. Rats were immunized with 100 µg of alum-precipitated Ag on day 0 and subsequently boosted on days 14, 21, and 35. CD8- depletion was achieved by one injection of 0.5 mg of OX-8 mAb on either days 10, 12, 14, or 16. Rats were bled from the tail at weekly intervals starting at day 0. The success of OX-8 depletion was determined cytofluorometrically by staining PBL and splenocytes.

Isolation of rat LN-derived CD8+ and CD4+ T cells

Rats were euthanized by a procedure approved by the United Kingdom Home Office, and their parathymic/posterior mediastinal LN were excised. Leukocytes were obtained by pressing tissue through 70-µm nylon filters (Becton Dickinson, Cowley, U.K.) into chilled HBSS. Mononuclear splenocytes/LN cells were purified on Ficoll-Hypaque. The mononuclear cells were then immediately washed twice in HBSS, and viable cell numbers were determined by trypan blue exclusion. CD8+ cells were purified by positive selection using magnetic beads. Anti-mouse IgG Dynabeads were coated overnight with OX8 (anti-CD8) or OX35 (anti-CD4) at a 1/50 dilution in PBS/0.1% BSA at 4°C. The beads were washed four times in PBS/0.1% BSA, and 4.8 x 107 beads were added to 1.5 x 108 washed mononuclear cells that had been resuspended in 2 ml of PBS/0.1% BSA and incubated at 4°C on a rolling mixer for 45 min. The attached CD8+/CD4+ T cells were collected using a magnetic particle concentrator (Dynal), and washed in culture medium. Aliquots of the CD8+/CD4+ T cells were retained and allowed to detach from the magnetic beads in RPMI/10% FCS overnight. The purity of these cells was then assessed by FACScan (Becton Dickinson). The CD8+ T cells were consistently greater than 95% pure, as assessed by staining with FITC-labeled OX8 (anti-CD8), displayed >95% staining with the anti-T cell marker OX19-FITC (anti-CD5) and less than 1% staining with anti-CD4 (OX35-PE), and are hereafter referred to as CD8+ T cells. CD4+ T cells were purified to an equivalent level.

Preparation of syngeneic APCs

Osmotic loading of target APCs with OVA or KLH was conducted as previously described (10). Briefly, the Ag was dissolved in serum-free sterile PBS and mixed with the cationic lipid transfection reagent, DOTAP, to a final concentration of 200 to 400 µg/ml in a total volume of 800 to 1000 µl for 20 min at room temperature. This mixture was then added to naive syngeneic splenocytes in rat growth medium at a concentration of 2 x 106/ml in a total volume of 30 ml, and incubated overnight at 37°C/5% CO2. OVA-pulsed splenocytes were then removed and washed twice in PBS before being irradiated at 4000 rad. Following irradiation, the splenocytes were then suspended in growth medium to a concentration of 2 x 106/ml, and used as APC syngeneic feeder cells. Trypsinization of OVA and KLH was conducted using 5 U of enzyme activity/µg of protein at 37°C for 2 h. The trypsin was inactivated following incubation of mixture at 56°C for 2 h. The trypsinated OVA/KLH was then layered onto syngeneic splenocytes in growth medium at a concentration of 100 µg/ml and incubated overnight at 37°C/5% CO2. Following irradiation, these cells were used as syngeneic APCs, as above.

Culture of rat-purified CD8+ T cells and generation of clones

Purified rat LN-derived CD8+ T cells were cultured at 5 x 105/ml in complete medium (RPMI adjusted to 310 mOsm + 2.2 g/L sodium carbonate, 0.3 g/L L-glutamine, 110 mg/L sodium pyruvate, 0.05 mM 2-ME, anti-mycotic/anti-biotic soln (100 U penicillin/100 µg streptomycin/0.25 µg ampotericin B), 1% nonessential amino acids, and 10% FCS) in 25-cm2 culture flasks at 37°C, 5% CO2. For proliferation assays, 200 µl of 5 x 105/ml CD8+ T cells were cultured in flat-bottom microtiter plates for 4 days with 2 x 106/ml of OVA-DOTAP-treated or trypsin-OVA-pulsed, syngeneic splenic feeders before addition of 0.5 µCi of [3H]thymidine per well. Eighteen hours later, the CD8+ T cells were harvested and tritium incorporation was measured using a Canberra Packard Matrix 96 direct beta counter. In cloning experiments investigating the precursor frequency of OVA-specific CD8+ T cells, the purified CD8+ T cells were placed in culture at a range of concentrations from 1000 to 0.1 cells/well in 20 µl of growth medium with 2 x 104/well OVA-DOTAP-treated feeder cells in Terasaki plates. The wells were scored for clonal growth 8 days later. All other clones were generated by culturing the purified CD8+ T cells initially at 1 x 106/ml with 2 x 106/ml OVA-DOTAP-treated feeder cells. These cells were subjected to three cycles of OVA stimulation before being placed at limiting dilution. The growth medium was changed every 5 days, and IL-2 at a concentration of 50 U/ml was given in between OVA stimulations. After the third OVA stimulation, these cells were placed in 200-µl cultures in microtiter plates at limiting dilution of 3, 1, 0.3, and 0.1 cells/well with 2 x 106/ml OVA-DOTAP-pulsed feeder cells. After 5 days of culture, the growth medium was changed and 50 U of rIL-2 was added. The wells were scored for clonal growth 8 to 10 days later. Positive wells at concentrations of 3 and 1 were discarded. Positive wells at limiting dilution concentrations of 0.3 and 0.1 were expanded by repeated stimulation in 8-day cycles with OVA-DOTAP-treated feeders plus fresh growth medium and 50 U/ml of IL-2.

IFN-{gamma}, IL-4, and IL-2 secretion and cytolytic activity

IFN-{gamma} was measured in supernatants from cells stimulated for 48 h with OVA-DOTAP-treated APCs by ELISA. Nunc MaxiSorp microtiter plates were coated overnight with anti-rat IFN-{gamma} mAb (3 µg/ml in 0.1 M carbonate/bicarbonate buffer, pH 9.6). Plates were washed in PBS/0.05% Tween-20, and samples were added for 2 h at room temperature. Rabbit anti-IFN-{gamma} antiserum was added at 1/1000 in PBS/1.5% rat serum, 0.5% Tween for 1 h, followed by anti-rabbit IgG mAb-ALP (1/10,000) in the same diluent for 1 h. Color was developed using 0.5 mg/ml p-nitrophenyl phosphate substrate in 0.05 M diethanolamine buffer, pH 9.8. IFN-{gamma} levels were calculated by reference to commercial IFN-{gamma} standards. The limit of detection of the assay was 0.25 ng/ml. IL-4 activity in the 48-h supernatants was assayed using an in-house bioassay (32). The bioassay utilizes the co-mitogenic effect that IL-4 has on naive PMA-stimulated rat CD8+ T cells. Rat rIL-4 CHO cell supernatant was used as a standard. The specificity of this assay was confirmed by the ability of anti-rat IL-4 Ab supernatant (OX-81) to block proliferation of CD8+ T cells stimulated with 10 ng/ml of PMA and positive control rIL-4 CHO cell supernatants by greater than 90%. Briefly, unprimed purified PVG splenocytes were placed in triplicate culture for 48 h at a concentration of 5 x 104/ml with 50, 25, and 12.5 µl of sample supernatant +/- OX-81 (anti-rat IL-4 supernatant) at a 1/100 dilution + 10 ng/ml of PMA. rIL-4 CHO cell supernatant was used as a positive control. Cells were pulsed with 0.5 µCi of [3H]thymidine per well after 48 h, and the plates were harvested and counted 18 h later. The difference in mean proliferation - OX-81 was used to express IL-4 activity as an IL-4-induced proliferative index.

IL-2 activity was measured in supernatants from cells using a CTLL cell line (ECACC 87031904). Human rIL-2 was used as a standard. The lower detection limit was 0.2 U/ml. The specificity of this assay was confirmed by the failure of rat rIL-4 to stimulate the CTLL cells at any concentration, and the ability of anti-mouse IL-2R Ab to block proliferation by more than 85%. Overall homology between rat and mouse IL-4 protein sequences is relatively low (61%), and there is no reported functional homology.

The cytolytic activity of the clones was tested by 51Cr release. OVA-DOTAP-pulsed target cells were radiolabeled with 200 µCi (7.4 MBq) of Na251CrO4 at 37°C for 1 to 2 h and washed four times in rat growth medium. Triplicate microtiter cultures at various CD8+ T cell E:T ratios were set up in round-bottom microtiter plates using 1 x 105 51Cr-labeled targets/well in 200 µl of rat growth medium. Following incubation of targets with effectors for 4 h at 37°C, 5% CO2, the plates were centrifuged at 200 x g for 5 min. Fifty microliters of supernatant were removed from each well, and 51Cr release was determined according to standard methods (11).

Serum IgE ELISA

Serum IgE was measured by ELISA. Throughout, 50-µl volumes were used, and the assay temperature was 4°C. Microtiter plates were coated with anti-rat IgE (MARE-1) at 0.5 µg/ml in carbonate/bicarbonate (pH 9.6, 0.1 M) coating buffer overnight at 4°C, and washed three times with PBS/0.05% Tween-20, and duplicate serum samples diluted 1/10 or greater in assay diluent (PBS/0.5% horse serum/0.05% Tween-20) were added. After 2 h at room temperature, the plates were washed as before, and labeled anti-rat Ig {kappa} light chain (MARK-1-peroxidase) Ab at 0.5 µg/ml in assay diluent was added. After 2 h at room temperature, the plates were washed as before, and TMB (3,3',5,5'-tetramethyl benzidine) substrate (ImmunoPure Microwell peroxidase substrate kit Pierce & Warriner, Chester, U.K.) was added according to the manufacturer’s instructions at 25°C. The absorbance was read at 450 nm in a Titertek Multiskan plate reader (ICN Flow, High Wycombe, U.K.), and the results were expressed as ng/ml by reference to the standard curve constructed using dilutions of rat IgE myeloma protein IR162 from 250 to 1 ng/ml. The interassay coefficient of variation was 4.94% over 32 separate assays.

Ag-IgG ELISA

Specific IgG Ab to OVA was determined by ELISA. Microtiter plates were coated with Ag at 30 µg/ml in coating buffer overnight at 4°C and washed three times, as above. Test and control serum samples diluted at 1/100 or greater in assay diluent were added in duplicate. After 2 h at 4°C, the plates were washed three times, as above, and alkaline phosphatase-conjugated rabbit anti-rat IgG diluted at 1/300 was added. After 1 h, the plates were again washed three times, as above, and a 1 mg/ml solution of p-NPP in diethanolamine buffer (pH 9.8, 0.1 M) was added at 100 µl/well and incubated at 25°C for 1 h. Absorbance was read at 405 nm, and the results were expressed as arbitrary U/ml by reference to a standard curve constructed using a positive serum pool at dilutions of 1/30 to 1/30,000. The interassay coefficient of variation was 6.9% over 32 separate assays.

Statistical analysis

All results were expressed as means ± SD from cohorts of four rats. All analyses have been conducted on an Apple Macintosh computer using the statistical package Stat view 512+, using the Mann-Whitney U test.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Effect of CD8 depletion on the primary IgE response in PVG rats

To determine whether CD8+ T cells are important during the early part of the immune response to OVA-alum, PVG rats were depleted of CD8+ T cells by a single injection of 0.5 mg OX-8 mAb at different times during the primary immune response that coincided with the appearance of CD25-positive CD8+ T cells (data not shown) in the lymph nodes (parathymic/mediastinal) that drain the peritoneal cavity (days 10, 12, 14, and 16). Control animals were given isotype-matched IgG. The percentage of CD8+ T cells, CD4+ T cells, and NK cells was determined by double labeling of the cells for CD3/CD8, CD3/CD4, and CD3/NKRP.1. In OX-8-treated animals, the proportion of CD8+ T cells in the peripheral blood was reduced significantly (0.24 ± 0.2%) as compared with control animals (17.36 ± 3.2%). In the spleen, the proportion of CD8+ T cells remaining was 1.3 ± 0.6% as compared with the control animals (14.3 ± 2.1%) corresponding to more than 92% depletion. The proportion of CD4+ T cells in the spleen and peripheral blood was increased in the OX-8-treated rats, as predicted by the loss of the CD8+ T cells. Total IgE was monitored until day 28. All rats depleted after day 10 showed a massive enhancement in total IgE (Fig. 1Go); the maximal response was seen in day 16 depleted rats, in which titers of 16,480 ng/ml were found, as compared with undepleted controls of 220 ng/ml, representing a 46-fold increase. OVA-specific IgG Abs increased in all immunized animals, but were unaffected by CD8 depletion.



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. IgE and OVA-specific IgG production in CD8-depleted and undepleted controls. Groups of rats were immunized i.p. with 100 µg of OVA-alum and bled days 0 and 28. CD8+ T cells were depleted on day 10, 12, 14, and 16 postimmunization with 0.5 mg of OX-8 mAb. IgE (ng/ml) and OVA-specific IgG (U/ml) were measured by ELISA and expressed as means ± SD (n = 6).

 
Proliferation of purified day 14 immune CD8+ T cells cultured with OVA-DOTAP-treated APCs vs trypsinized and whole OVA-treated APCs

The optimum stimulus for inducing OVA-specific proliferation of the day 14 LN-derived CD8+ T cells purified to >95% (see Materials and Methods) was determined. Figure 2Go illustrates the proliferation of purified lymph node-derived CD8+ T cells cultured with irradiated APCs treated with DOTAP-OVA complexes (see Materials and Methods) compared with cells cultured with trypsinized OVA-pulsed APCs or whole OVA-pulsed APCs. The stimulator cells were prepared as above and used at a concentration of 1 x 106/ml. KLH was used under identical conditions as irrelevant Ag controls. The CD8+ T cells were purified as above from the posterior mediastinal/parathymic LN on day 14 postimmunization. These cells were used at a concentration of 1 x 106/ml cells and proliferated vigorously (27,000 cpm) compared with control cultures of purified cells with OVA-peptide-pulsed APCs (2000 cpm) or with whole OVA-pulsed APCs (800 cpm). The KLH-irrelevant Ag controls were significantly lower than the OVA-DOTAP cultures (2,900 cpm), but were not significantly lower in either the peptide or whole OVA cultures.



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. OVA-specific proliferation of day 14 LN-derived CD8+ T cells was assessed using APCs treated overnight with 100 µg/ml of OVA complexed to DOTAP, with APCs pulsed overnight with 100 µg of trypsinized OVA peptides, or 100 µg of natural grade V OVA. Day 14 purified CD8+ T cells (>98%) were cultured at a concentration of 1 x 106/ml for 5 days with the above stimuli (open bars). KLH-irrelevant Ag controls were used to assess the levels of nonspecific proliferation (closed bars). Proliferation was assessed by [3H]thymidine incorporation. Results expressed as mean of quadruplet cultures ± SD.

 
Precursor responder frequencies of OVA-specific parathymic/posterior mediastinal LN CD8+ T cells from OVA-alum-immunized PVG rats

The responder frequency of OVA-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells was determined at limiting dilution utilizing Taswell’s algorithm (12). The cells were removed from the posterior mediastinal and parathymic LN, purified as above, and cultured at various concentrations (1000–0.1 cells/well) with irradiated OVA-DOTAP-treated syngeneic spleen cells at a concentration of 2 x 106 cells/ml in a total volume of 20 µl in Terasaki plates. The wells were scored for clonal growth 8 days later, and the number of positive/negative wells compared with the cell concentration and the responder frequency was calculated. The frequency of responders shows good linearity for both CD8+ and CD4+ T cells, with a mean precursor frequency of OVA-specific CD8+ T cells in cloning experiments of 1 cell in 3371 ± 611, which compares with an OVA-specific CD4+ T cell responder frequency of 1 cell in 526 ± 158.5.

Proliferation of CD8+ T cell clones with OVA-DOTAP-treated APC stimulators vs KLH-DOTAP APC-irrelevant Ag controls

The antigenicity of the CD8+ T cell clones was tested by culturing 1 x 105 clonal cells with an equal number of OVA-DOTAP (black bars)- or KLH-DOTAP (white bars)-treated APCs (see Materials and Methods) for 48 h, and the proliferation was tested by [3H]thymidine incorporation. All of the six clones tested proliferated at a significantly higher rate with the OVA-treated APCs than with the KLH-treated APCs, with clone OACD8:24 proliferating at the highest level (12,900 cpm ± 3,600 cpm in OVA cultures vs 2,300 ± 760 cpm in KLH cultures). This suggests that these cells are OVA specific (see Fig. 3Go).



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Six CD8+ T cell clones were tested for OVA specificity using OVA-treated APCs. The clones were used at a concentration of 5 x 105/ml and cultured with OVA APCs at a concentration of 1 x 106/ml (closed bars). KLH-treated APCs were used as irrelevant Ag controls to assess the levels of nonspecific proliferation (open bars).

 
Effect of anti-MHC I and anti-MHC II Ab on OVA-specific CD8+ T cell proliferation

The MHC restriction of the OVA-specific CD8+ T cells was determined using anti-MHC class I and II blocking Abs. CD8+ T cell clones were placed in culture with increasing concentrations of anti-MHC I RT1A (0.01–1 m/ml), which is targeted to a monomorphic determinant on rat MHC class I molecules (Fig. 4Goa), and anti-MHC II RT1B (0.01–10 mg/ml), which is directed to a monomorphic determinant on rat MHC class II (Fig. 4Gob). The anti-MHC I significantly reduced the OVA-specific proliferation of all of the responder CD8+ T cells (approximately 57% inhibition over six clones tested) at the highest concentration. The addition of anti-MHC II mAb had no significant effect on the DOTAP-OVA-treated APC-induced CD8+ T cell clonal proliferation.



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. a and b, The effect of adding blocking mAbs on OVA-specific proliferation of six CD8+ T cell clones placed in culture for 3 days with irradiated APCs treated overnight with 100 µg of OVA complexed to DOTAP. Closed circles (OACD 8.45), open circles (OACD8.53), closed triangles (OACD 8.24), open triangles (OACD 8.40), closed squares (OACD 8.32), and open squares (OACD 8.16). Proliferation was assessed by [3H]thymidine incorporation. Results expressed as mean of quadruplet cultures ± SD.

 
Expression of CD3, CD4, CD8, TCR-{alpha}ß, and TCR-{gamma}{delta}; production of IL-2, IL-4, and IFN-{gamma}; and levels of cytotoxicity of OVA-specific CD8+ T cell clones

Cell surface expression of CD8, CD4, CD3, TCR-{alpha}ß, and TCR-{gamma}{delta} was determined by FACS using 1 x 106 cells from each of the six CD8+ T cell clones. The cloned cells were labeled with OX8 FITC (anti-CD8), OX35 PE (anti-CD4), anti-CD3 FITC, anti-{alpha}ß TCR FITC, and anti-{gamma}{delta} TCR FITC. All clones expressed CD8, CD3, and TCR-{alpha}ß to varying degrees, and all clones tested were found to be CD4 negative, TCR-{gamma}{delta} negative. Hence, the OVA-specific CD8+ T cell clones generated in this system are CD8+CD3+{alpha}ß TCR+. To assess the capacity of the CD8+ T cell clones to produce Th1 and Th2 cytokines, the secretion of IL-4 and IFN-{gamma} from the OVA-specific CD8+ T cell clones was determined following stimulation for 48 h by OVA-pulsed APCs. Supernatants were removed and stored at -20°C until use. IL-4 and IL-2 were measured by bioassay (33), and IFN-{gamma} by ELISA. All of the CD8+ T cell clones secreted IFN-{gamma} (range 25.42–69.05 ng/ml) and IL-2 (range 22–37 U/ml), and four also made IL-4 (range 68–81 U/ml). These six clones were tested for their ability to lyse 51Cr-labeled OVA-pulsed splenocyte targets. The efficiency of killing was assessed using a 51Cr release assay. Clones were rested in growth medium supplemented with 50 U/IL-2 for 14 days. Five of the six CD8+ T cell clones tested displayed cytolytic activity over a range of target APCs:CD8+ T cell effector ratios. Peak activity was seen at an E:T ratio of 1:500, and it is the percentage lysis at this E:T ratio that is shown above (Table IGo).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I. Cell surface marker expression and cytokine profile of IgE inhibitory OVA-specific CD8+ T cell clones determined by cytofluorometric analysis

 
IgE immunoregulatory activity of OVA-specific CD8+ T cell clones

The ability of the six OVA-specific CD8+ T cell clones to regulate IgE in vivo was tested (Fig. 5Go). A substantial IgE response was induced in syngeneic PVG rats by the day 14 CD8+ T cell depletion method described above. On day 21 postimmunization, 1 x 106 cloned CD8+ T cells in sterile saline solution were adoptively transferred i.v. to recipient rats. Control animals received a similar volume of sterile saline. All clones tested significantly reduced the resulting IgE response when compared with saline-treated animals (range 3- to 50-fold). OVA-specific IgG was also increased following OVA-alum immunization. However, the magnitude and duration of this response were unaffected by CD8 depletion or by the adoptive transfer of the CD8+ T cell clones (data not shown). The SE bars have been removed for clarity, with the maximum variation being no greater than 21% for each sample tested.



View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. In vivo immunomodulatory effects of OVA-specific CD8+ T cell clones were determined by depleting CD8+ T cells from groups of OVA-alum-immunized animals (n = 4) on day 14, as described above, and reconstituting these animals on day 21 with 1 x 106 cloned OVA-specific CD8+ T cells. Animals were bled on day 14, 28, and 35 postimmunization. Open circles and triangles (CD8-depleted animals), and closed circles and triangles (CD8-depleted and reconstituted animals); IgE levels were measured by ELISA, as detailed above.

 
Titration of immunoregulatory activity of OVA-specific CD8+ T cell clones

We titrated the in vivo IgE-inhibitory effects of clones OACD8.45 and OACD8.53 by adoptively transferring these clones at a range of concentrations into CD8-depleted recipients (Fig. 6Go, a and b) on day 21 postimmunization. The resulting effects on the OVA-alum-induced IgE response are expressed as serum total IgE from day 35 postimmunization; KLH-alum was used as the irrelevant Ag control. Clone OACD8.45 displayed significant IgE immunoregulatory activity at concentrations of 1 x 106 cells down to 1 x 104 cells (15- to 2-fold inhibition) per animal (Fig. 6Goa); it also significantly reduced the response to KLH-alum when 1 x 106 cells were transferred, but not at lower concentrations. The IgE immunoregulatory activity of clone OACD8.53 on OVA-alum-induced IgE was lost at concentrations of less than 1 x 106 cells per animal (3- to 2-fold) (Fig. 6Gob). The response to KLH-alum was unaffected by the adoptive transfer of this clone at all concentrations tested. The IFN-{gamma} secretion and cytolytic activity of these two clones are comparable.



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6. In vivo titration of immunoregulatory effects of the clones was determined by adoptively transferring 1 x 106 to 1 x 102 cells of clones OACD8.45 (a) and OACD8.53 (b) into CD8-depleted recipients. The closed bars represent OVA-alum-induced responses, and the open bars KLH-alum-induced responses. *Represents significant differences when compared with controls. IgE levels were measured by ELISA, as detailed above.

 
Suppression of KLH-alum-induced IgE response by OVA-activated CD8+ T cell clones in vivo

We tested the effect of OVA-specific CD8+ T cell clones on a bystander IgE response in vivo. This was achieved by adoptively transferring 1 x 106 cells of clones OACD8.45 and OACD8.53 into animals immunized i.p. with OVA-alum, KLH-alum, or both OVA-alum and KLH-alum following CD8 depletion, as above (Fig. 7Go). In animals given OVA-alum only, the IgE response was reduced by the adoptive transfer of both of the clones (17-fold for clone OACD8.45 and 5-fold for OACD8.53 in this experiment). As before, clone OACD8.45 induced a significant decrease in KLH-alum-induced IgE in animals given KLH-alum only, but the effect was reduced greatly when compared with the OVA-alum-induced response (3-fold reduction). Clone OACD8.53, as before, had no effect on the animals given KLH-alum only. Both of the clones tested induced a significant reduction in total IgE in animals given both KLH-alum and OVA-alum, which was comparable with that of OVA-alum alone (14-fold for clone OACD8.45 and 4-fold for OACD8.53).



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 7. The effects of in vivo triggering on the specificity of the IgE-inhibitory effects of the clones were tested by the adoptive transfer of 1 x 106 cells from clones OACD8.45 and OACD8.53 into CD8-depleted recipients immunized i.p. with OVA-alum, KLH-alum, or OVA and KLH-alum. Black bars are CD8-depleted controls, dark grey bars are animals that received clone OACD8.45, and open bars for OACD8.53. *Represents significant differences when compared with controls.

 
In vivo effect of anti-rat IFN-{gamma} on OVA-alum-induced IgE responses

All six clones tested produced IFN-{gamma} on in vitro Ag stimulation. A blockade of IFN-{gamma} by the administration of 0.5 mg of the mAb DB.1 (anti-rat IFN-{gamma}) was effected on day 21 post-OVA-alum immunization (Fig. 8Go). The study groups included animals that were CD8 depleted on day 14, and animals that were CD8 depleted on day 14 postimmunization, then reconstituted on day 21. The anti-IFN-{gamma} was introduced i.p. at the same time as 1 x 106 cells of the IgE-inhibitory clone OACD8.45 were administered i.v. The blockade of IFN-{gamma} significantly increased the production of IgE in all of the subject groups tested, including naive unimmunized control animals (23 ± 16 ng/ml to 3980 ± 551 ng/ml). The anti-IFN-{gamma} also greatly reduced IgE-inhibitory activity of clone OACD8.45 (5-fold to 1-fold). The only group not significantly affected by the administration of anti-IFN-{gamma} was the OVA-alum-immunized group CD8+ depleted on day 14.



View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 8. The effects of administration of anti-IFN-{gamma} in vivo on unimmunized naive subjects (open bars), OVA-alum-immunized and CD8-undepleted subjects (black bars), and OVA-alum-immunized, CD8-depleted subjects (grey bars). *Denotes subjects that received 1 x 106 cells of clone OACD8.45.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The maintenance of IgE-specific immunologic homeostasis at mucosal sites challenged with nonreplicating protein Ags is dependent on the induction of Ag-Th2 hyporesponsiveness, and the breakdown of this process has been associated with the development of allergic disease (13). This inducible Th2 hyporesponsiveness to environmental allergens has been attributed to elimination of responders or APCs (14, 15, 16), to functional inactivation (anergy) dependent on the route of Ag entry (17, 18, 19, 20), to direct or bystander suppression of Ag-CD4+ T cells by CD8+ T cells or macrophages (21, 22), and more recently to immune deviation based on IFN-{gamma} secretion by MHC I-restricted CD8+ T cells, resulting in a cytokine milieu in the lymphoid microenvironment unfavorable to Th2 T cell development (23).

It was proposed previously that rat CD8+ T cells were important in IgE regulation in studies of airway responses to OVA (24). An investigation into castor bean sensitization provided further evidence for the importance of CD8+ T cells in controlling the magnitude and duration of IgE responses (25). However, the mechanisms by which these CD8+ T cells are recruited and activated, the way in which they interact with accessory cells and recognize Ag, as well as the way that they mediate their effects remained unclear. The present study sought to define the nature of these CD8+ T cells by generating CD8+ T cell clones from the posterior mediastinal and parathymic lymph nodes of day 14 OVA-alum-immunized PVG RT7b rats. At this time point, in vivo CD8 depletion is known to enhance the IgE response, and an activated population of CD3+ T cells could be distinguished that were CD8high and CD25high (data not shown). When purified, these cells exhibited a moderate proliferative response to trypsinized OVA-pulsed APCs and a strong proliferative response to OVA-DOTAP-treated APCs. Following three cycles of Ag stimulation, the responding CD8+ T cells were placed in culture at limiting dilution with irradiated OVA-pulsed APCs. This approach facilitated the single cell analysis of the CD8+ T cells of interest.

The responding CD8+ T cells were MHC class I restricted: a mAb specific for a monomorphic determinant on MHC class I effected a significant decrease in the OVA-specific proliferative response of the purified CD8+ T cells. A mAb specific for a monomorphic determinant on MHC class II had no effect, even at 10-fold higher concentration.

Inherent in our understanding of these data is the concept that the exogenous OVA introduced into the peritoneal cavity is able to activate CD8+ T cells in the context of MHC class I. The production of most peptides destined for the presentation by MHC class I begins in the cytosol with the limited hydrolysis of antigenic proteins. Until recently, it was thought that this pathway was reserved solely for endogenously synthesized Ag. However, it is now clear from studies of murine macrophage and dendritic cells that exogenous protein Ags can gain entry to the cytosol of potential APCs, viz the MHC class I pathway (26), and that this occurs quite naturally in vivo as part of an important immunologic defense against pathogens that reside in the phagosomal intracellular compartment (27). There are also additional reports that suggest that CD8+CTLs can be primed by exogenous Ags (28, 29, 30) and of in vivo activation of CD8+ T cells to soluble OVA that mediate the adoptive transfer of oral and nasal tolerance (31, 32).

The frequency of OVA-specific CD8+ T cells was much lower than for the corresponding CD4+ T cells purified at the same time and cultured under comparable conditions (approximately 1:6 responding CD4:CD8 cells). This suggests that most of the exogenous OVA introduced into the peritoneum is directed via the conventional MHC class II pathway, to OVA-specific CD4+ T cells. The OVA-specific CD8+ T cell clones generated could be separated into two groups based upon their cytokine secretion following Ag stimulation. All of the clones secreted IFN-{gamma} and IL-2, and a small number also secreted IL-4. The existence of functionally distinct subsets within the CD8+ T cell pool is well recognized, with evidence from transgenic mouse and rat systems (33, 34, 35). It has been proposed from Mycobacterium leprae studies that noncytotoxic human CD8+ T cell clones secrete IL-4 (36). However, when the cytolytic potential of six of the OVA-specific clones was tested with OVA-treated splenocyte targets, there was no correlation between IL-4 secretion and a lack of cytotoxic activity, with five of the six clones tested displaying efficient killing of targets. Thus, the relationship between cytokine secretion and functional heterogeneity remains ill defined.

The OVA-specific CD8+ T cell clones generated following the peritoneal introduction of OVA-alum were TCR-{alpha}ß+, {gamma}{delta} TCR-, CD8+, CD4-, and CD3+. This is in contrast to models based on the inhalation of Ag, in which there is evidence to suggest that IgE immunoregulatory CD8+ T cells produced following inhalation of soluble OVA express the TCR-{gamma}{delta} chains (37). The IgE immunoregulatory potential of six of the clones was tested by adoptive transfer of 1 x 106 cells into CD8-depleted syngeneic recipients. All of the clones transferred effected a significant decrease in OVA-alum-induced IgE in vivo without affecting the levels of OVA-specific IgG, and in the case of clone OACD8.45, this effect could be titrated down to as few as 1 x 104 cells. This clone also displayed some nonspecific inhibition of KLH-alum-induced IgE in control animals, but this effect was only evident at the highest concentration of cells used (1 x 106), suggesting that there may be both Ag specific and Ag-nonspecific aspects to the inhibitory mechanisms displayed by these clones. Additional experiments have suggested that the in vivo inhibition of IgE by OVA-specific CD8+ T cell clones may require the activation of these cells in vivo by OVA. However, following triggering by OVA, the clones inhibit IgE in an Ag-nonspecific manner, as displayed by their reduction of KLH-alum-induced IgE in animals given both KLH and OVA. Several studies have shown similar effects with Ags delivered via the oral route (38), and hence, this could be a general mechanism associated with the delivery of Ags to mucosal sites. We looked for a correlation between the cytolytic activity of the clones and their immunoregulatory potential, as several recent reports have intimated that cytotoxic lymphocytes elicited during an ongoing immune response against a soluble Ag may reduce the magnitude of the antigenic stimulus by killing APC targets (14, 39). However, we could find no significant correlation between IgE levels and cytotoxicity. We also determined whether there were direct links between in vitro IFN-{gamma} production and IgE immunoregulatory potential, as there have been precedents for this thesis in recent reports detailing immune deviation of the atopic T cell response away from the pathogenic Th2 phenotype (23). Neutralizing anti-rat IFN-{gamma} monoclonal administered i.p. increased IgE in animals that received OVA-specific CD8+ T cell clones, but also increased IgE to a great extent in control animals. This demonstrates that IFN-{gamma} is an extremely important mediator of IgE responses in vivo. However, these data are inconclusive with respect to the CD8+ T cell clones, as the IFN-{gamma} monoclonal did not completely ablate the IgE-inhibitory activity and would of course block CD4+ and NK cell-derived IFN-{gamma}. Hence, it seems likely that the mechanisms underlying the IgE-specific immunoregulatory activity of CD8+ T cells involve several factors, such as cytokine secretion, cytotoxicity, cell motility, and survival, and could combine to mediate the in vivo effect. These mechanisms are currently under investigation in our laboratory.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work is supported by a grant from Wellcome Trust. Back

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. D. M. Kemeny, Department of Immunology, King’s College School of Medicine and Dentistry, Bessemer Road, London SE5 9PJ, U.K. Back

3 Abbreviations used in this paper: DOTAP, N-[1-(2, 3-dioleoxyloxy) propyl] N,N,N-trimethyl ammonium methylsulfate; CHO, Chinese hamster ovary; KLH, keyhole limpet hemocyanin; LN, lymph node; PE, phycoerythrin. Back

Received for publication December 19, 1996. Accepted for publication September 24, 1997.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Attaya, M., S. Jameson, C. K. Martinez, E. Hermel, C. Aldrich, J. Forman, K. F. Lindahl, M. J. Bevan, J. J. Monaco. 1992. Ham-2 corrects the class I antigen-processing defect in RMA-S cells. Nature 355:647.[Medline]
  2. Van-Endert, P. M., D. Riganelli, G. Greco, K. Fleischhauer, J. Sidney, A. Sette, J. F. Bach. 1995. The peptide-binding motif for the human transporter associated with antigen processing. J. Exp. Med. 182:1883.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Streicher, H. Z., I. J. Berkower, M. Busch, F. R. Gurd, J. A. Berzofsky. 1984. Antigen conformation determines processing requirements for T-cell activation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81:6831.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Elliott, T., A. Willis, V. Cerundolo, A. Townsend. 1995. Processing of major histocompatibility class I-restricted antigens in the endoplasmic reticulum. J. Exp. Med. 181:1481.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Ishioka, G. Y., S. Colon, C. Miles, H. M. Grey, R. W. Chesnut. 1989. Induction of class I MHC-restricted, peptide-specific cytolytic T lymphocytes by peptide priming in vivo. J. Immunol. 143:1094.[Abstract]
  6. Kovacsovics-Bankowski, M., K. Clark, B. Benacerraf, K. L. Rock. 1993. Efficient major histocompatibility complex class I presentation of exogenous antigen upon phagocytosis by macrophages. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:4942.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Norbury, C. C., L. J. Hewlett, A. R. Prestcott, N. Shastri, C. Watts. 1996. Class I MHC presentation of exogenous soluble antigen via macropinocytosis in bone marrow derived macrophage. Immunity 3:783.
  8. Mosmann, T. R., J. H. Schumacher, N. F. Street, R. Budd, A. O’Garra, T. A. Fong, M. Bond, K. W. Moore, A. Sher, D. F. Fiorentino. 1991. Diversity of cytokine synthesis and function of mouse CD4+ T cells. Immunol. Rev. 123:209.[Medline]
  9. Holmes, B. J., P. A. MacAry, D. M. Kemeny. 1997. In vivo depletion of CD8+ T cells following the primary immune response results in a high and persistent IgE response in IgE hyporesponsive rats. Eur. J. Immunol. 27:2657.[Medline]
  10. Chen, W., F. R. Carbone, J. McCluskey. 1993. :. Electroporation and commercial liposomes efficiently deliver soluble protein into the MHC class I presentation pathway. J. Immunol. Methods 160:49.[Medline]
  11. Brunner, K. T., J. Mauel, J. C. Cerottini, B. Chapuis. 1968. Quantitative assay of the lytic action of immune lymphoid cells on 51-Cr-labelled allogeneic target cells in vitro; inhibition by isoantibody and by drugs. Immunology 14:181.[Medline]
  12. Taswell, C.. 1981. Limiting dilution analysis for the determination of immunocompetent cell frequencies. I. Data analysis. J. Immunol. 126:1614.[Abstract]
  13. Holt, P. G., C. McMenamin. 1989. Defense against allergic sensitization in the healthy lung: the role of inhalation tolerance. Clin. Exp. Allergy 19:255.[Medline]
  14. Critchfield, J. M., M. K. Racke, J. C. Zuniga-Pflucker, B. Cannella, C. S. Raine, J. Goverman, M. J. Lenardo. 1994. T cell deletion in high antigen dose therapy of autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Science 263:1139.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Rock, K. L., L. Rothstein, C. Fleishcracker, S. Gamble. 1992. Inhibition of class I and class II MHC-restricted antigen presentation by cytotoxic T lymphocytes specific for an exogenous antigen. J. Immunol. 148:3028.[Abstract]
  16. Wood, P. J., S. Socarras, W. Streilein. 1987. Modification of the cytotoxic T cell repertoire in neonatal tolerance. J. Immunol. 139:3236.[Abstract]
  17. Mueller, D. L., M. K. Jenkins. 1995. Molecular mechanisms underlying functional T-cell unresponsiveness. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 7:375.[Medline]
  18. Racke, M. K., J. M. Critchfield, L. Quigley, B. Cannella, C. S. Raine, H. F. McFarland, M. J. Lenardo. 1996. Intravenous antigen administration as a therapy for autoimmune demyelinating disease. Ann. Neurol. 39:46.[Medline]
  19. Hammerling, G. J., G. Schonrich, F. Momburg, N. Auphan, M. Malissen, B. Malissen, A. M. Schmitt-Verhulst, B. Arnold. 1991. Non-deletional mechanisms of peripheral and central tolerance: studies with transgenic mice with tissue-specific expression of a foreign MHC class I antigen. Immunol. Rev. 122:47.[Medline]
  20. Kearney, E. R., K. A. Pape, D. Y. Loh, M. K. Jenkins. 1994. Visualization of peptide-specific T cell immunity and peripheral tolerance induction in vivo. Immunity 1:327.[Medline]
  21. Diaz-Sanchez, D., T. H. Lee, D. M. Kemeny. 1993. Ricin enhances IgE responses by inhibiting a subpopulation of early-activated IgE regulatory CD8+ T cells. Immunology 78:226.[Medline]
  22. Holt, P. G., J. Oliver, N. Bilyk, C. McMenamin, P. G. McMenamin, G. Kraal, T. Thepen. 1993. Down-regulation of the antigen presenting cell function(s) of pulmonary dendritic cells in vivo by resident alveolar macrophages. J. Exp. Med. 177:397.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. McMenamin, C., P. G. Holt. 1993. The natural immune response to inhaled soluble protein antigens involves major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I-restricted CD8+ T cell-mediated but MHC class II-restricted CD4+ T cell-dependent immune deviation resulting in selective suppression of immunoglobulin E production. J. Exp. Med. 178:889.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Sedgwick, J. D., P. G. Holt. 1985. Induction of IgE-secreting cells and IgE isotype-specific suppressor T cells in the respiratory lymph nodes of rats in response to antigen inhalation. Cell. Immunol. 94:182.[Medline]
  25. Kemeny, D. M., D. Diaz-Sanchez. 1993. The role of CD8+ T cells in the regulation of IgE. Clin. Exp. Allergy 23:466.[Medline]
  26. McCormack, J. M., D. Sun, W. S. Walker. 1991. A subset of mouse splenic macrophages can constitutively present alloantigen directly to CD8+ T cells. J. Immunol. 147:421.[Abstract]
  27. Brown, M. L., P. E. Fields, R. J. Kurlander. 1992. Metabolic requirements for macrophage presentation of Listeria monocytogenes to immune CD8 T cells. J. Immunol. 148:555.[Abstract]
  28. Staerz, U. D., H. Karasuyama, A. M. Garner. 1987. Cytotoxic T lymphocytes against a soluble protein. Nature 329:449.[Medline]
  29. Yefenof, E., R. Zehavi-Feferman, R. Guy. 1990. Control of primary and secondary antibody responses by cytotoxic T lymphocytes specific for a soluble antigen. Eur. J. Immunol. 20:1849.[Medline]
  30. Renz, H., G. Lack, J. Saloga, R. Schwinzer, K. Bradley, J. Loader, A. Kupfer, G. L. Larsen, E. W. Gelfand. 1994. Inhibition of IgE production and normalization of airways responsiveness by sensitized CD8+ T cells in a mouse model of allergen-induced sensitization. J. Immunol. 152:351.[Abstract]
  31. Miller, A., O. Lider, A. B. Roberts, M. B. Sporn, H. L. Weiner. 1992. Suppressor T cells generated by oral tolerization to myelin basic protein suppress both in vitro and in vivo immune responses by the release of transforming growth factor beta after antigen-specific triggering. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89:421.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. McMenamin, C., C. Pimm, M. McKersey, P. G. Holt. 1994. Regulation of IgE responses to inhaled antigen in mice by antigen-specific {gamma}{delta} T cells. Science 265:1869.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Noble, A., P. A. Macary, D. M. Kemeny. 1995. IFN-{gamma} and IL-4 regulate the growth and differentiation of CD8+ T cells into subpopulations with distinct cytokine profiles. J. Immunol. 155:2928.[Abstract]
  34. Sad, S., R. Marcotte, T. R. Mosmann. 1995. Cytokine-induced differentiation of precursor mouse CD8+ T cells into cytotoxic CD8+ T cells secreting Th1 or Th2 cytokines. Immunity 2:271.[Medline]
  35. Kemeny, D. M., A. Noble, B. J. Holmes, D. Diaz-Sanchez. 1994. Immune regulation: a new role for the CD8+ T cell. Immunol. Today 15:107.[Medline]
  36. Salgame, P., M. Yamamura, B. R. Bloom, R. L. Modlin. 1992. Evidence for functional subsets of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in human disease: lymphokine patterns in leprosy. Chem. Immunol. 54:44.[Medline]
  37. McMenamin, C., M. McKersey, P. Kuhnlein, T. Hunig, P. G. Holt. 1995. {gamma}{delta} T cells down-regulate primary IgE responses in rats to inhaled soluble protein antigens. J. Immunol. 154:4390.[Abstract]
  38. Miller, A., O. Lider, H. L. Weiner. 1991. Antigen-driven bystander suppression after oral administration of antigens. J. Exp. Med. 174:791.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Simpson, E.. 1988. Suppression of the immune response by cytotoxic T cells. Nature 336:426.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
K. L. Wong, L. F. M. Tang, F. C. Lew, H. S. K. Wong, Y. L. Chua, P. A. MacAry, and D. M. Kemeny
CD44high Memory CD8 T Cells Synergize with CpG DNA to Activate Dendritic Cell IL-12p70 Production
J. Immunol., July 1, 2009; 183(1): 41 - 50.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. Salagianni, W. K. Loon, M. J. Thomas, A. Noble, and D. M. Kemeny
An Essential Role for IL-18 in CD8 T Cell-Mediated Suppression of IgE Responses
J. Immunol., April 15, 2007; 178(8): 4771 - 4778.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
N. Miyahara, K. Takeda, T. Kodama, A. Joetham, C. Taube, J.-W. Park, S. Miyahara, A. Balhorn, A. Dakhama, and E. W. Gelfand
Contribution of Antigen-Primed CD8+ T Cells to the Development of Airway Hyperresponsiveness and Inflammation Is Associated with IL-13
J. Immunol., February 15, 2004; 172(4): 2549 - 2558.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
A. C. Cooper, A. Mikhail, M. W. Lethbridge, D. M. Kemeny, and I. C. Macdougall
Increased Expression of Erythropoiesis Inhibiting Cytokines (IFN-{gamma}, TNF-{alpha}, IL-10, and IL-13) by T Cells in Patients Exhibiting a Poor Response to Erythropoietin Therapy
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., July 1, 2003; 14(7): 1776 - 1784.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. Taneichi, S. Naito, H. Kato, Y. Tanaka, M. Mori, Y. Nakano, H. Yamamura, H. Ishida, K. Komuro, and T. Uchida
T Cell-Independent Regulation of IgE Antibody Production Induced by Surface-Linked Liposomal Antigen
J. Immunol., October 15, 2002; 169(8): 4246 - 4252.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. J. Thomas, A. Noble, E. Sawicka, P. W. Askenase, and D. M. Kemeny
CD8 T Cells Inhibit IgE Via Dendritic Cell IL-12 Induction That Promotes Th1 T Cell Counter-Regulation
J. Immunol., January 1, 2002; 168(1): 216 - 223.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JEMHome page
M. A. C. de Lafaille, S. Muriglan, M.-J. Sunshine, Y. Lei, N. Kutchukhidze, G. C. Furtado, A. K. Wensky, D. Olivares-Villagomez, and J. J. Lafaille
Hyper Immunoglobulin E Response in Mice with Monoclonal Populations of B and T Lymphocytes""
J. Exp. Med., November 5, 2001; 194(9): 1349 - 1360.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
P. A. MacAry, M. Lindsay, M. A. Scott, J. I. O. Craig, J. P. Luzio, and P. J. Lehner
Mobilization of MHC class I molecules from late endosomes to the cell surface following activation of CD34-derived human Langerhans cells
PNAS, March 27, 2001; 98(7): 3982 - 3987.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
R. Ishimitsu, H. Nishimura, T. Yajima, T. Watase, H. Kawauchi, and Y. Yoshikai
Overexpression of IL-15 In Vivo Enhances Tc1 Response, Which Inhibits Allergic Inflammation in a Murine Model of Asthma
J. Immunol., February 1, 2001; 166(3): 1991 - 2001.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
T.-J. Huang, P. A. MacAry, P. Eynott, A. Moussavi, K. C. Daniel, P. W. Askenase, D. M. Kemeny, and K. F. Chung
Allergen-Specific Th1 Cells Counteract Efferent Th2 Cell-Dependent Bronchial Hyperresponsiveness and Eosinophilic Inflammation Partly Via IFN-{{gamma}}
J. Immunol., January 1, 2001; 166(1): 207 - 217.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
M. Vukmanovic-Stejic, B. Vyas, P. Gorak-Stolinska, A. Noble, and D. M. Kemeny
Human Tc1 and Tc2/Tc0 CD8 T-cell clones display distinct cell surface and functional phenotypes
Blood, January 1, 2000; 95(1): 231 - 240.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. Suzuki, R. Taha, D. Ihaku, Q. Hamid, and J. G. Martin
CD8+ T Cells Modulate Late Allergic Airway Responses in Brown Norway Rats
J. Immunol., November 15, 1999; 163(10): 5574 - 5581.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
D. M. KEMENY, B. VYAS, M. VUKMANOVIC-STEJIC, M. J. THOMAS, A. NOBLE, L.-C. LOH, and B. J. O'CONNOR
CD8+ T Cell Subsets and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., November 1, 1999; 160(5): S33 - 37.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MacAry, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kemeny, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MacAry, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kemeny, D. M.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*ALUMINUM SULFATE
*ALUM, POTASSIUM
Medline Plus Health Information
*Dietary Proteins


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS