|
|
||||||||
and TGF-ß1 Expression in Human Eosinophils1



*
Division of Oral Pathology, Department of Oral Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, and
Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston MA 02215; and
Department of Biochemistry, Iwate Medical University School of Dentistry, Iwate, Japan
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and TGF-ß1.
Eosinophils infiltrating hamster cutaneous wounds were found to express
TGFs sequentially. In this study, we examined the biologic mediators
that may regulate the expression of TGF-
and -ß1 by eosinophils.
Eosinophils were isolated from the peripheral blood of healthy donors
and cultured in the absence or presence of IL-3, IL-4, and IL-5. Cells
were analyzed by in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry.
Supernatants from these cultures were assayed for secreted TGF-
and
TGF-ß1 using TGF-specific ELISAs. IL-3, IL-4, and IL-5 independently
up-regulated TGF-ß1 mRNA and product expression by eosinophils in all
donors. Interestingly, TGF-
production by eosinophils was
up-regulated by IL-3 and IL-5 but was down-regulated by IL-4.
Consistent with the ability of IL-4 to regulate eosinophil responses,
IL-4 signaling molecules are present in human eosinophils. The
observation that IL-4 can differentially regulate the expression of
TGF-
and TGF-ß1 suggests that IL-4 may serve as a physiologic
molecular switch of TGF expression by the infiltrating eosinophils in
wound healing and carcinogenesis. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We have demonstrated that eosinophils in oral carcinomas can synthesize
TGF-
(1, 2). We also showed that eosinophils from the peripheral
blood of patients with idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome produce
TGF-
as well as TGF-ß1, whereas eosinophils from the peripheral
blood of healthy donors contain little or no detectable TGFs (2, 3). We
have further shown that eosinophils infiltrating hamster cutaneous
wounds express TGFs sequentially; eosinophils express TGF-
in the
early stages of wound healing, while eosinophil-derived TGF-ß1 is
more pronounced during the postacute phase of this process (4). Thus,
it is conceivable that specific mediators released within the
microenvironment of normal and diseased tissues can regulate the
production of TGFs by eosinophils.
TGFs are multifunctional cytokines with various biologic and pathologic actions, such as stimulatory and inhibitory effects on epithelial cell growth, induction of angiogenesis, extracellular matrix remodeling, and regulation of inflammatory processes (5, 6, 7, 8). TGF production by eosinophils, therefore, may be important in carcinogenesis as well as inflammatory disorders and wound healing. The ability to control TGF production by eosinophils may therefore have therapeutic benefits. However, little is known about the mechanisms that activate and regulate the production of TGFs by eosinophils.
The present study demonstrates that the basal level of TGF expression
by peripheral blood eosinophils can be enhanced by IL-3 and IL-5. Even
more interesting is the finding that IL-4 can inhibit the synthesis of
TGF-
and concurrently up-regulate the synthesis of TGF-ß1 by
peripheral blood eosinophils.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Blood (200 ml) was obtained from healthy volunteers (2834 years old). These subjects had no evidence by history and physical examination of asthma or other allergic diseases.
Human eosinophil isolation
Eosinophils were isolated from the peripheral blood of six healthy donors. Whole blood was subjected to dextran sedimentation (Macrodex, Pharmacia, Piscataway, NJ), centrifugation through Ficoll-Paque (Pharmacia), and hypotonic lysis of erythrocytes as described previously (2). Eosinophils were enriched from granulocytes and passage via the MACS system by sequential incubation at 4°C with anti-CD16 mAb magnetic beads (Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, CA) to deplete CD16+ neutrophils as described by Lim and Weller (9).
Cytokine treatments
Eosinophils with purities of 95 to 99% were cultured for 18 h at 37°C in 24-well plates at 2 x 106 cells/ml in complete medium (RPMI 1640 with 5% dialyzed FBS) in the absence and presence of the following cytokines: IL-3 at 10-10 M (Genzyme, Cambridge, MA); IL-4 at 10-9 M (Genzyme); and IL-5 at 10-9 M (Amgen Biologicals, Thousand Oaks, CA). Following incubation, eosinophils were collected and mixed into 1% agar in 1x PBS and then fixed in 4% freshly prepared paraformaldehyde, processed, and embedded in paraffin as previously described (2). Five-micrometer sections were mounted on gelatin-coated slides for in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry. Supernatants from incubations were collected and stored at -80°C for ELISA analysis.
In situ hybridization
Our in situ hybridization procedures using the antisense and
sense human TGF-
and TGF-ß1 35S-labeled
riboprobes have been described in detail (1, 2).
Immunohistochemistry
To detect human TGF-
, we used a mAb directed against the C
terminus of the human TGF-
mature peptide (amino acids 3450)
(TGF-
:Ab-2; GF-10; Oncogene Science, Cambridge, MA). A mAb to the
bacterial protein trp-E was used at the same concentration
as the negative control. To detect TGF-ß1, we used a rabbit
anti-human TGF-ß1 polyclonal Ab at 1:100 dilution (AB-20-PB; R&D
Systems, Minneapolis, MN). An IgG fraction from a nonimmune normal
rabbit (I-5006; Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, MO) was used at the same
concentration as a negative control. Immunohistochemistry was performed
using an alkaline phosphatase detection system. All sections were
counterstained with 0.4% aniline blue (CI 42755) for 10 min to permit
identification of eosinophils by UV fluorescence microscopy (2, 3).
Quantitative analysis of in situ hybridization data
In situ hybridization results were quantified using a computer imaging analysis system (MetaMorph, Universal Imaging, West Chester, PA). Slides with sections of eosinophils from the different treatment conditions were subjected to in situ hybridization. Following autoradiographic exposure for 3 days and counterstaining with Giemsa, slides were blindly coded and numbered in random order. Slides were imaged on a Nikon Microphot-FXA microscope with a 40 x 0.95 objective using Koehler illumination. Images of 50 cells from each condition were acquired from a Sony CCD/RGB color video camera DXC 151. Images were stored and analyzed using an Universal Imaging 46 PC computer running the MetaMorph Imaging System. At least 50 cells were quantified on each slide.
Statistical analysis
The differences between the experimental and control groups was analyzed by Students t test.
Assessment of TGF protein release
TGF-
and TGF-ß1 proteins released into culture
supernatants were assessed by ELISA kits from Oncogene Science and R&D
Systems, respectively. Each sample was tested in triplicate.
Flow cytometry
For flow cytometry, 2 x 105
purified eosinophils were incubated with 100 µl of mouse
anti-human IL-4R
-chain mAb (Immunotech, Westbrook, ME) at a
final concentration of 30 µg/ml (diluted in FACS buffer (HBSS without
Ca/Mg + 0.5% BSA + 0.1% azide)) for 30 min on ice. Isotype
control, myeloma protein (MOPC 21), was used at the same concentration.
Cells were then washed twice in ice-cold FACS buffer and resuspended in
100 µl of 1/32 dilution FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse (Sigma
Chemical). After 30 min on ice, cells were washed twice in cold FACS
buffer and fixed in 1% paraformaldehyde. FACS analysis (Becton
Dickinson, Mountain View, CA) was performed on at least 10,000
cells.
Western blotting
Western blotting was performed according to the protocol of Harlow and Lane (10). Cells (1 x 108) were lysed with 1 ml of RIPA buffer in the presence of PMSF (100 µg/ml) and aprotinin (1 µg/ml) for 30 min on ice. The protein content of each lysate was determined by a Bio-Rad (Richmond, CA) DC protein assay. The rabbit polyclonal Ab to STAT6 was obtained from Transduction Laboratories (Lexington, KY), while the 4PS/IRS2 Ab was a kind gift from Dr. Morris White, Harvard Medical School, Boston MA. Signal detection was performed with the Kodak Chemiluminescent Detection System and BioMax MR film (both from Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Since our initial report, which demonstrated that eosinophils from
the peripheral blood of healthy donors showed no detectable levels of
TGF-
or TGF-ß1 mRNA and protein, we have modified our procedure
for eosinophil isolation by adding an incubation step with
anti-CD16 magnetic beads to achieve an enriched population of 97 to
99% eosinophils (9). In the present study, in situ hybridization
results using 35S-labeled TGF-
and TGF-ß1
antisense riboprobes showed that eosinophils harvested in this manner
expressed a basal level of TGF-
and TGF-ß1 mRNA (Figs. 1
A and
2A).
|
Marked changes in the TGF mRNA expression were observed in
peripheral blood eosinophils incubated in the presence of IL-3, -4, and
-5 (Figs. 1
and 2
). To quantify these differences, a computer-assisted
analysis was used that allowed us to quantify the relative changes in
TGF mRNA levels. IL-3-, IL-4-, and IL-5-treated eosinophils were
obtained from six normal donors, subjected to in situ hybridization,
and analyzed blindly as described in Materials and Methods.
The results are summarized in Tables I
and II. All of the cytokines used
significantly increased TGF-ß1 mRNA expression in all of the donors
(Table II
). IL-3 and IL-5, respectively, up-regulated the expression of
TGF-
mRNA in five of the six donors. IL-4, however, significantly
down-regulated the expression of TGF-
in all six donors.
|
|
Immunohistochemistry was used on adjacent sections to evaluate
intracellular immunoreactivity for TGF-
and TGF-ß1. Similar to the
in situ hybridization results, eosinophils incubated in the absence of
any of the exogenous cytokines demonstrated a basal level staining for
TGF-
and TGF-ß1 (Figs. 1
B and 2B).
Differences were observed in the intensity and numbers of eosinophils
staining for both TGFs, depending on the cytokine used (Figs. 1
and 2
).
Since the intensity of immunoreactivity is difficult to quantify, the
effect of each exogenous cytokine on the cellular levels of TGF-
and
TGF-ß1 proteins were quantified by comparing the percentage of cells
stained for TGF-
and TGF-ß1, examining 100 cells in each slide.
The results are summarized in Tables III
and IV. Consistent with our in situ
hybridization results, eosinophils incubated with IL-3 and IL-5
demonstrated an increase in the percentages of cells that stained for
TGF-ß1 in all donors. IL-4-treated eosinophils demonstrated an
increase in the percentage of cells stained for TGF-ß1 in five of the
six donors. Eosinophils incubated with IL-3 and IL-5 demonstrated an
increase in the number of cells that stained for TGF-
; however,
eosinophils incubated with IL-4 consistently showed a decrease in the
intensities of staining as well as a decrease in the number of cells
that stained for TGF-
in all six donors.
These results demonstrate that IL-4 increased the level of TGF-ß1
protein in eosinophils from five of the six donors, while it
consistently decreased the expression of TGF-
protein in eosinophils
from all donors examined.
Effect of IL-3, IL-4, and IL-5 on TGF protein release by eosinophils
Human peripheral blood eosinophils from three donors were
incubated in the absence and presence of IL-3, IL-4, and IL-5 for
18 h. Cell-free supernatants from these cultures were assayed for
TGF-
and TGF-ß1 protein release by specific ELISAs. The results
demonstrated that IL-3 significantly enhanced TGF-
release by
eosinophils in all three donors by 3.7- to 5.5-fold above the
nonstimulated controls. IL-5 also induced an increase in TGF-
release in all three donors by 2.3- to 3-fold above control levels
(Fig. 3
A). IL-4
treatment led to a slight decrease of TGF-
release compared to
nonstimulated control. The effects of IL-4 and IL-5 on TGF-
release
by the treated eosinophils were not significant. IL-3, IL-4, and IL-5
treatment of human eosinophils led to a significant increase in
TGF-ß1 release in all donors examined (Fig. 3
B).
|
Our observations demonstrated that eosinophils are responsive to
IL-4 and therefore should express cell surface IL-4R. To determine
whether human eosinophils express receptors to IL-4, peripheral blood
human eosinophils were phenotyped for IL-4R by RT-PCR and flow
cytometry. Figure 4
A shows
that when using human IL-4R PCR primers (Clontech, Palo Alto, CA) to
amplify total RNA isolated from two normal donors, the expected 526-bp
IL-4R PCR product was detected in both donors. For flow cytometry,
2 x 105 purified eosinophils were incubated with
mouse anti-human IL-4R
-chain mAb (Immunotech). Compared with
the control (black line), cells stained with anti-IL-4R
-chain
mAb showed a unimodal increase in fluorescence, indicating that human
eosinophils constitutively express IL-4R
-chain (Fig. 4
B).
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and TGF-ß1, whereas eosinophils from the peripheral blood of normal
donors do not (2, 3, 11, 12). Furthermore, a sequential expression of
TGF-
followed by TGF-ß1 by eosinophils was demonstrated in
cutaneous wound healing in the hamster (4). These observations led us
to hypothesize that biologic mediators in the tissue can regulate the
expression of eosinophil-derived TGFs. The results shown in this paper
indicate that IL-3 and IL-5 can stimulate the expression of both
TGF-
and TGF-ß1 by normal peripheral blood eosinophils, whereas
IL-4 up-regulates eosinophil synthesis of TGF-ß1 but suppresses
TGF-
expression at both the mRNA and protein level. Since the number of eosinophils is relatively small in the circulating blood, it is often a challenge to obtain sufficient numbers of purified cells to conduct studies both on the mRNA and protein levels. To overcome this difficulty, in situ techniques were employed enabling us to work with a small number of cells and facilitating specific identification of positive cells. The inability to accurately quantify the immunohistochemical staining intensities precluded a direct comparison with the more quantitative mRNA labeling results generated by computer-assisted analysis. Nevertheless, we noted differences in the percentage of cells that stained for both TGFs, which correlated with the in situ hybridization results.
The inhibitory effect of IL-4 on the expression of TGF-
was
initially shown by in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry,
later confirmed by TGF-
-specific ELISA. Although the amount of
TGF-
released by the IL-4-treated eosinophils did not show a
significant reduction by ELISA, a slight decrease was observed. While
the mechanism responsible for this apparent discrepancy is not clear,
potential reasons for the observed finding include the sensitivity of
the assays and increased stability of secreted TGF-
protein when
treated with IL-4. In the cytokine-treated human eosinophils, IL-4
consistently up-regulated expression of TGF-ß1, as shown by in situ
hybridization, immunohistochemistry, and ELISA.
The activation of eosinophils and their accumulation in tissue sites is
believed to be mediated by mechanisms that involve T cell-derived
cytokines (13). In particular, a subset of helper T cells, Th2,
secretes IL-5, which like IL-3 and GM-CSF is released by both Th1 and
Th2 cells, influences eosinophil growth, maturation, and
differentiation, and appears to be critical in prolonging the survival
of eosinophils in tissues and allowing their movement into the tissues
(14). Although these lymphokines have been shown to activate
eosinophils and prime them for several other effector functions (15, 16), only a few studies have evaluated the effects of cytokines such as
IL-3 or IL-5 on expression levels of eosinophil-derived cytokines. In
agreement with our study, Brach et al. have shown that treatment with
both IL-3 and IL-5 resulted in a severalfold increase of TGF-
mRNA
expression and in protein release by eosinophils (17).
IL-4, originally defined as a B cell growth factor (18), has been
demonstrated to be a pleiotropic cytokine with both stimulatory as well
as inhibitory effects on monocytes. The regulation of mononuclear cells
by IL-4 has been widely studied. IL-4 was shown to inhibit the
production of cytokines such as IL-1, TNF-
, and IL-6, but to enhance
the production of the IL-1 receptor antagonist, IL-1RA (19). Until now,
however, the effect of IL-4 on the regulation of eosinophil-derived
cytokines has not been examined. IL-4 may indirectly effect eosinophils
accumulation in tissue by promoting the adherence of eosinophils but
not neutrophils to endothelium (20). In this study, we have
demonstrated that IL-4 can affect eosinophils directly and that it can
differentially regulate the synthesis of TGF by eosinophil.
Consistent with the theory that IL-4 acts to regulate eosinophil
function, we have shown by RT-PCR and flow cytometry that normal human
eosinophils express IL-4R. Since IL-4 is known to mediate its
pleiotropic effects on cellular responses via 4PS or STAT6 signal
pathways, we have further demonstrated the presence of these signaling
proteins in lysates obtained from peripheral blood eosinophils (Fig. 5
). This is consistent with the recent results of Baskar et al. (26)
and Dubois et al. (27), which demonstrated that mature eosinophils do
respond to IL-4. In future studies, we plan to use these findings to
further elucidate the molecular mechanisms involved in the regulation
of TGF genes expression.
The findings described above may have important implications in the
context of our in vivo wound-healing studies. We previously
demonstrated a wound-healing model in the hamster in which eosinophils
infiltrate into cutaneous healing wounds and elaborate both TGF-
and
TGF-ß1, with the expression of TGF-
preceding that of TGF-ß1
(4). Our results in this study suggest that IL-4 may act as an in situ
regulator of TGF expression by eosinophils. In the postacute phase of
healing, IL-4 may shut off TGF-
production and concurrently enhance
TGF-ß1 production, which may promote extracellular remodeling and
inhibit epithelial proliferation. Future investigations will be aimed
at determining whether local expression of IL-4 in the healing wound
correlates with the switching of TGF expression by the infiltrating
eosinophils. In support of IL-4 as a facilitator of wound healing,
Kucukcelebi et al. reported that exogenous application of IL-4
accelerated healing and improved the breaking strength of a wound
(21).
In other studies, we have demonstrated that eosinophils infiltrating
hamster and human squamous carcinomas represent a source of TGF-
(1, 2). In addition to its mitogenic effect on epithelial cells and its
implication in malignant transformation, TGF-
has also been shown to
be a potent angiogenic factor (8). Since eosinophils can express the
inhibitory cytokine TGF-ß1 as well, it is possible that in situ
mediators such as IL-4 can induce eosinophils to produce TGF-ß1 and
not TGF-
, leading to inhibition of tumor cell growth. This
hypothesis is interesting in light of recent reports by Tepper et al.
(22, 23) describing an eosinophil-dependent mechanism for the
anti-tumor effect of IL-4 (24).
In recent years, eosinophils have been shown to synthesize a wide array
of cytokines, suggesting a functional versatility of these
granulocytes. Little is known, however, about the control and
regulation of eosinophil-derived cytokine production. In this study, we
demonstrate that IL-4 can simultaneously up-regulate the synthesis of
TGF-ß1 and inhibit the synthesis of eosinophil-derived TGF-
,
implying that the expression of cytokines by eosinophils can be
differentially regulated. The expression of TGFs by eosinophils may be
modulated in a selective manner by particular cytokines present in the
microenvironment of various pathologic and physiologic processes, which
may significantly affect eosinophil function in vivo (25). A better
understanding of TGF regulation by these cells may have therapeutic
implications for processes involving eosinophils such as wound healing,
carcinogenesis, and allergic inflammation.
|
|
|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. D. T. W. Wong, Division of Oral Pathology, Department of Oral Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, 188 Longwood Avenue, Boston MA 02115. ![]()
Received for publication February 7, 1996. Accepted for publication December 11, 1997.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and TGF-ß1 by eosinophils during cutaneous wound healing in the hamster. Am. J. Pathol. 143:130.[Abstract]
and epidermal growth factor. Cell 50:1131.[Medline]
: a more potent angiogenic mediator than epidermal growth factor. Science 232:1250.
and TGF-ß1 mRNA and product by eosinophils in nasal polyps. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 93:864.[Medline]
production. J. Exp. Med. 181:537.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Yang, Q. Chen, S. B. Su, P. Zhang, K. Kurosaka, R. R. Caspi, S. M. Michalek, H. F. Rosenberg, N. Zhang, and J. J. Oppenheim Eosinophil-derived neurotoxin acts as an alarmin to activate the TLR2-MyD88 signal pathway in dendritic cells and enhances Th2 immune responses J. Exp. Med., January 21, 2008; 205(1): 79 - 90. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Nakagome, M. Dohi, K. Okunishi, R. Tanaka, T. Kouro, M. R. Kano, K. Miyazono, J.-i. Miyazaki, K. Takatsu, and K. Yamamoto IL-5-Induced Hypereosinophilia Suppresses the Antigen-Induced Immune Response via a TGF-beta-Dependent Mechanism J. Immunol., July 1, 2007; 179(1): 284 - 294. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. A. Spencer, R. C. N. Melo, S. A. C. Perez, S. P. Bafford, A. M. Dvorak, and P. F. Weller Cytokine receptor-mediated trafficking of preformed IL-4 in eosinophils identifies an innate immune mechanism of cytokine secretion PNAS, February 28, 2006; 103(9): 3333 - 3338. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Akiho, P. Lovato, Y. Deng, P. J. M. Ceponis, P. Blennerhassett, and S. M. Collins Interleukin-4- and -13-induced hypercontractility of human intestinal muscle cells-implication for motility changes in Crohn's disease Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, April 1, 2005; 288(4): G609 - G615. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Huaux, T. Liu, B. McGarry, M. Ullenbruch, and S. H. Phan Dual Roles of IL-4 in Lung Injury and Fibrosis J. Immunol., February 15, 2003; 170(4): 2083 - 2092. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Phipps, S. Ying, A. Wangoo, Y.-E. Ong, F. Levi-Schaffer, and A. B. Kay The Relationship Between Allergen-Induced Tissue Eosinophilia and Markers of Repair and Remodeling in Human Atopic Skin J. Immunol., October 15, 2002; 169(8): 4604 - 4612. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Kobayashi, G. J. Gleich, J. H. Butterfield, and H. Kita Human eosinophils produce neurotrophins and secrete nerve growth factor on immunologic stimuli Blood, March 15, 2002; 99(6): 2214 - 2220. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Akiho, P. Blennerhassett, Y. Deng, and S. M. Collins Role of IL-4, IL-13, and STAT6 in inflammation-induced hypercontractility of murine smooth muscle cells Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, February 1, 2002; 282(2): G226 - G232. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P.-R. Burgel, S. C. Lazarus, D. C.-W. Tam, I. F. Ueki, K. Atabai, M. Birch, and J. A. Nadel Human Eosinophils Induce Mucin Production in Airway Epithelial Cells Via Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Activation J. Immunol., November 15, 2001; 167(10): 5948 - 5954. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Ensminger, B. M. Spriewald, H. V. Sorensen, O. Witzke, E. G. Flashman, A. Bushell, P. J. Morris, M. L. Rose, A. Rahemtulla, and K. J. Wood Critical Role for IL-4 in the Development of Transplant Arteriosclerosis in the Absence of CD40-CD154 Costimulation J. Immunol., July 1, 2001; 167(1): 532 - 541. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Ohkawara, G. Tamura, T. Iwasaki, A. Tanaka, T. Kikuchi, and K. Shirato Activation and Transforming Growth Factor-beta Production in Eosinophils by Hyaluronan Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., October 1, 2000; 23(4): 444 - 451. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. Ali, J. Kaur, and K. D. Patel Intercellular Cell Adhesion Molecule-1, Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule-1, and Regulated on Activation Normal T Cell Expressed and Secreted Are Expressed by Human Breast Carcinoma Cells and Support Eosinophil Adhesion and Activation Am. J. Pathol., July 1, 2000; 157(1): 313 - 321. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Levi-Schaffer, E. Garbuzenko, A. Rubin, R. Reich, D. Pickholz, P. Gillery, H. Emonard, A. Nagler, and F. A. X. Maquart Human eosinophils regulate human lung- and skin-derived fibroblast properties in vitro: A role for transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta ) PNAS, August 17, 1999; 96(17): 9660 - 9665. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Giembycz and M. A. Lindsay Pharmacology of the Eosinophil Pharmacol. Rev., June 1, 1999; 51(2): 213 - 340. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |