|
|
||||||||
2 Domain of H-2Dd Restricts the Allelic Specificity of the Murine NK Cell Inhibitory Receptor Ly-49A1


,

*
Microbiology and Tumor Biology Center, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; Departments of
Microbiology and Immunology and
Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143; and Veterans Administration Medical Center, San Francisco, CA 94121
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1,
2, or
3
domains of the Ly-49A-binding allele H-2Dd were exchanged
for the corresponding domains of the nonbinding allele
H-2Db. Using the Ly-49A-transfected rat NK cell line,
RNK-mLy-49A.9, we demonstrated that the H-2Dd
2 domain alone accounts for allelic specificity in
protection of rat YB2/0 targets in vitro. We also showed that the
H-2Dd
2 domain is sufficient to account for
the allele-specific in vivo protection of H-2b mouse RBL-5
tumors from NK cell-mediated rejection in D8 mice. Thus, in striking
contrast to the
1 specificity of Ig-like killer
inhibitory receptors for human HLA, the lectin-like mouse Ly-49A
receptor is predominantly restricted by the H-2Dd
2 domain in vitro and in vivo. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Two distinct types of inhibitory receptors for MHC I have been identified on NK cells (3, 4). Members of the first type belong to a superfamily of lectin-like, type II integral membrane proteins that are expressed on the surface of NK cells as dimers. These receptors were first described in mice, where they include members of the Ly-49 family (7, 8, 9, 10, 11). Of these receptors, the first and most thoroughly characterized is Ly-49A, which is inhibited by certain alleles of H-2D, including Dd, Dk, and Dp, but not by Db, Ld, or Kd (7, 12). No homologues for the Ly-49 family of receptors have yet been found in humans, but other inhibitory lectin-like receptors are expressed on human NK cells, including the CD94/NKG2A heterodimeric complex (13).
Members of the second type of inhibitory MHC I receptor for type I
integral membrane proteins are the Ig-like killer inhibitory receptors
(KIRs)3 that were first
identified on human NK cells (14, 15). More than 20 Ig-like KIRs have
been cloned, and KIRs specific for subsets of HLA-A, -B, and -C have
been characterized (15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24). The binding specificities of these
receptors are influenced in particular by polymorphisms clustered
between amino acids 73 and 90 of the
1 domains of their
MHC ligands (15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24). Although other Ig-like inhibitory receptors are
expressed on mouse NK cells, these have not been shown to recognize MHC
I, and no direct KIR homologues have been defined on murine NK
cells (25, 26).
The marked structural differences between the lectin-like Ly-49
receptors and the Ig-like KIRs suggest that they may differ in their
requirements for interaction with class I MHC molecules. To date, MHC
I-mediated inhibition of murine NK cells has been mapped to a
determinant within the
1/
2 domains of the
MHC I molecule H-2Dd, but the fine specificity of binding
by Ly-49 molecules has not been defined (7, 27, 28). We, therefore,
constructed chimeric class I molecules between the Ly-49A ligand
H-2Dd and H-2Db (not recognized by Ly-49A) and
examined their ability to inhibit rodent NK cell function in vivo and
in vitro. Our results demonstrate that, in contrast to the dominant
role of the MHC I
1 domain in determining the binding
specificity of KIRs, the
2 domain of H-2Dd
plays a dominant role in defining the class I specificity of
Ly-49A.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
C57BL/6 and D8 mice, C57BL/6 mice transgenic for H-2Dd (29), were bred and maintained at the Microbiology and Tumor Biology Center, Karolinska Institute (Stockholm, Sweden).
Cell lines
RBL-5, a Raucher virus-induced T cell lymphoma from C57BL/6 mice, and RBL-5-Dd, a clone of RBL-5 transfected with the vector pDd-1 encoding genomic H-2Dd, were grown in RPMI 1640, 5% FCS, and penicillin/streptomycin (30). RNK-16, a spontaneous NK cell leukemia from F344 rats, was obtained from Craig Reynolds (National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD) (31). YB2/0 cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, MD). Parental cells were grown in RPMI 1640, 10% FCS, penicillin/streptomycin, L-glutamine, and 5 x 10-5 M 2-ME (complete RPMI). The mouse Ly-49A transfectant of RNK-16, RNK-mLy-49A.9, has been previously described and was grown in complete RPMI supplemented with 1 mg/ml of G418 (Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis, IN) (32). Transfected RNK-16 effectors and transfected YB2/0 targets were maintained in 1 mg/ml G418, but were grown in complete RPMI without G418 for at least 2 days before functional assays.
Vectors and chimeric H-2Dd/b constructs
pDd-1, an 8-kb EcoRI fragment of the
genomic H-2Dd in the plasmid pBR322, was a gift from David
H. Margulies (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD) (33, 34).
pSV2neoDd, an 8-kb EcoRI fragment of the genomic
H-2Dd in the plasmid pSV2neo, was a gift from Peter
Robinson (Clinical Research Center, Harrow, U.K.) (33).
pDbHd-, a pBR327 plasmid with a 10.2-kb HindIII
insert containing the genomic H-2Db, was a gift from Andrew
Mellor (National Institute for Medical Research, London, U.K.).
pSV2gptDb a 10.3-kb HindIII genomic
H-2Db insert in the plasmid pSV2gpt was a gift from Alain
Townsend (University of Oxford, Oxford, U.K.) (35). pCMVneoBam, a
pBR322 plasmid carrying the neomycin resistance and the CMV promoter
upstream of a multicloning site, was used for cotransfection with the
chimeric molecule
Dd
1,2Db
3 to
obtain G418-resistant RBL-5 cells (36). The cloning vector pBluescript
II KS+ was purchased from Stratagene (La Jolla,
CA).
The chimeric molecules were made by exon shuffling between genomic
clones of H-2Dd and H-2Db using standard
methods (37). The chimeric molecule that we have termed
Dd
1,2Db
3 encodes
the
1 and
2 domains of H-2Dd
with the
3 domain of H-2Db. This was
constructed by digesting the vector pSV2neoDd with
NotI and SpeI, and then isolating the fragment
containing the
1 and
2 exons of
H-2Dd. This was then exchanged for the corresponding
NotI/SpeI
1/
2
H-2Db exon fragment in the vector
pDbHd-, producing the chimeric molecular
construct.
The chimeric molecule that we have termed
Db
1,2Dd
3 encodes
the
1 and
2 domains of H-2Db
with the
3 domain of H-2Dd. This was
constructed by digesting the vector pSV2gptDb with
NotI and SpeI. The resultant H-2Db
1/
2 exon fragment was isolated and
substituted for the corresponding NotI/SpeI
H-2Dd
1/
2 exon fragment in
pSV2neoDd.
The chimeric molecule that we have termed
Dd
1Db
2Dd
3
encodes the
1 and
3 domains of
H-2Dd, with the
2 domain of
H-2Db. This was constructed by first shuttling the
NotI/SpeI
1/
2 exon
fragment of H-2Dd into pBluescript II KS+. The
H-2Dd
2 exon was excised from the resulting
vector pBluescriptNot/SpeDd
1,2 using
AatII and SpeI and replaced with the
corresponding AatII/SpeI H-2Db
2 exon fragment from pSV2gptDb. The
H-2Dd
1Db
2 exon
fragment from this intermediate construct,
pBluescriptDd
1Db
2,
was then subcloned into the NotI/SpeI-prepared
vector pSV2neoDd.
The corresponding single domain shuffled chimeric molecule that we have
termed Db
1Dd
2,3
encodes the
2 and
3 domains of
H-2Dd, with the
1 domain of
H-2Db. This was constructed in a similar way. A
NotI/KpnI fragment consisting of the
H-2Dd
1 and
2 exons from
pDd-1 was subcloned into pBluescript II KS+.
The H-2Dd
1 exon was excised from the
resulting vector pBluescriptNot/KpnDd
1,2
using NotI and AatII and substituted with the
NotI/AatII-prepared fragment containing the
H-2Db
1 exon isolated from
pSV2gptDb. The
H-2Db
1Dd
2 exon
fragment was then excised from pBluescript using NotI and
KpnI and ligated into the
NotI/KpnI-prepared vector
pSV2neoDd.
The expression construct for the transfection of the H-2Dd cDNA into YB2/0 was prepared by subcloning the H-2Dd cDNA, a gift from Wayne Yokoyama (Washington University, St. Louis, MO), into the SalI (5') and blunted BamHI (3') sites of the eukaryotic expression vector pHßAP (38). The H-2Db cDNA, a gift from Alain Townsend (University of Oxford, Oxford, U.K.), was subcloned by blunt ligation into pHßAP, and the identities of the cDNA inserts were confirmed by DNA sequencing.
Transfection
YB2/0 cells were transfected using cesium-purified genomic plasmids or Qiagen-purified (Qiagen, Chatsworth, CA) cDNA plasmids using standard methods (32). Briefly, YB2/0 cells in exponential growth were transfected with 20 µg of EcoRI-linearized pHßAP-H-2Dd or pHßAP-H-2Db DNA using a BTX-600 Electro Cell Manipulator (BTX, Genetronics, San Diego, CA). For transfection of YB2/0 cells with H-2Dd/b chimeric genomic plasmids, 50 µg of genomic plasmid was cotransfected with 5 µg of pHßAP vector. Each transfection was performed using 3 to 6 x 106 cells/ml in 2-mm cuvettes in a total volume of 400 µl of complete RPMI at 115 V, 850 µF, and 129 ohms. Cuvettes were incubated on ice for 15 min after electroporation. Cells were then cultured overnight and plated in 96-well plates at a density of 2 to 5 x 103 cells/well in complete RPMI supplemented with 1 mg/ml active G418. G418-resistant cells grew out in 7 to 12 days in 10 to 40% of wells. Transfectants were subcloned and characterized by flow cytometry.
RBL-5 cells used for in vivo studies were transfected with PvuI-linearized genomic plasmids using either a Bio-Rad Gene Pulser (Bio-Rad, Richmond, CA) or lipofectamine (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD). Electroporation was performed according to the protocol supplied by Bio-Rad. Briefly, 5 x 106 cells were washed and resuspended in 0.8 ml of PBS, and 8 µg of plasmid DNA was added. The transfection mixture was incubated on ice for 10 min, then electroporated in 4-mm cuvettes at 250 V and 960 µF. After electroporation, the cells were incubated at room temperature for 10 min, then transferred to RPMI 1640 with 10% FCS and penicillin/streptomycin. RBL-5 transfection using lipofectamine was performed according to the manufacturers protocol. Briefly, 1.5 µg of DNA was mixed with 100 µl Opti-MEM (Life Technologies), and 5 µl of lipofectamine was mixed with 100 µl of Opti-MEM. Both solutions were mixed and incubated for 20 min at room temperature. Cells (106) were washed, then diluted in 0.8 ml of Opti-MEM. Cells were incubated with the DNA/lipofectamine mixture at 37°C for 4 h. After incubation, cells were transferred to 9 ml of RPMI 1640, 5% FCS, and penicillin/streptomycin. Following both transfection strategies, the RBL-5 cells were transferred to RPMI 1640, 5% FCS, penicillin/streptomycin, and 0.6 mg/ml G418 48 h after transfection.
mAbs and flow cytometry
The anti-H-2 mAbs used in these studies as well as their
reported domain specificities are presented in Table I
(33, 39, 40, 41). The mAb directed against
the
3 domain of H-2Db (28-14-8) was
purchased from PharMingen (San Diego, CA). The anti-Ly-49A (A1)
hybridoma was a gift from Wayne Yokoyama (Washington University). The
anti-NK1.1 hybridoma (PK.136) was a gift from Gloria Koo (Merck,
Piscataway, NJ). The anti-
1 H-2Db
hybridoma (22.249) was obtained from David Raulet (University of
California, Berkeley, CA). The anti-
1,2
H-2Dd hybridoma (34-5-8S), the anti-
1,2
H-2Dd (34-4-21S) hybridoma, and the
anti-
3 H-2Dd (34-2-12S) were obtained
from the American Type Culture Collection.
|
Cytotoxicity assays
Specific lysis of NK targets was determined by using a standard 4-h 51Cr release assay as previously described (32). Briefly, targets cells were harvested and labeled for 1 h at 37°C with 200 µCi of sodium 51Cr (Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL) in complete RPMI. Labeled target cells were washed and resuspended at 105 cells/ml, and 0.1 ml of this cell suspension was added to each well of 96-well plates containing 0.1 ml of effector cells at the indicated E:T cell ratios. Plates were incubated at 37°C for 4 h, then centrifuged for 5 min. One hundred microliters of supernatant was counted in a gamma counter, and the percent cytotoxicity was calculated as previously described (32). All assays were performed in triplicate. SEs for each point were always <2% (not shown). For Ab inhibition studies, effector cells were preincubated for 15 min at room temperature with mAb at a concentration of 20 µg/106 effectors before the addition of targets.
In vivo tumor outgrowth
Tumor cell lines used were grown as ascites before inoculation
into D8 transgenic mice. Mice were inoculated s.c. with
103 or 104 cells as described previously
(42). Tumor growth was followed by weekly palpation for up to 6 wk.
NK1.1-treated D8 mice were injected i.p. with 0.2 ml (
200 µg) of
anti-NK1.1 mAb (PK.136) ascites 1 day before inoculation.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To investigate the structural motif on H-2Dd
involved in mediating inhibitory signals to murine NK cells, we
constructed exon-shuffled H-2Dd/b chimeric molecules as
described in Materials and Methods. The single domain swap
chimeric molecules
Db
1Dd
2,3 and
Dd
1Db
2Dd
3
were produced to determine the specific NK cell inhibitory domain of
H-2Dd. The
Dd
1,2Db
3 and
Db
1,2Dd
3 chimeric
molecules were made as control constructs, since previous studies have
shown that the
3 domain of H-2 does not influence the
specificity in target cell protection against lysis by murine NK
cells (27, 28).
For in vitro cytotoxicity studies, the chimeric constructs were
transfected into rat YB2/0 targets, which are devoid of mouse H-2
molecules and are susceptible to lysis by rodent NK cells and by the
RNK-16 rat NK cell line (J. Ryan, unpublished preliminary results).
G418-resistant clones expressing high levels of the chimeric H-2
molecules were selected using flow cytometry. Staining with a panel of
mAbs reported to react against different domains of H-2Dd
and H-2Db confirmed the expression of chimeras on the
surface of YB2/0 as shown in Figure 1
.
YB2/0 cells transfected with H-2Dd (Fig. 1
, row
A) stained with anti-
1,2
H-2Dd (34-5-8S) and with anti-
3
H-2Dd (34-2-12S), but with neither of the
anti-H-2Db mAbs. Similarly, YB2/0-H-2Db
(Fig. 1
, row B) stained with
anti-
1 H-2Db (22.249) and with
anti-
3 H-2Db (28-14-8), but not with the
anti-H-2Dd mAbs. YB2/0 cells transfected with the
Dd
1,2Db
3 chimera
(Fig. 1
, row C) stained with the
anti-
1,2 H-2Dd (34-5-8S) and with the
anti-
3 H-2Db mAb (28-14-8), but not with
the anti-
1 H-2Db mAb (22.249) or with
the anti-
3 H-2Dd mAb (34-2-12S). YB2/0
cells transfected with the
Db
1,2Dd
3 chimera
(Fig. 1
, row D) stained with the
anti-
1 H-2Db mAb (22.249) and with the
anti-
3 H-2Dd mAb (34-2-12S), but not
with the anti-
1,2 H-2Dd (34-5-8S) or
with the anti-
3 H-2Db mAb (28-14-8).
YB2/0 cells transfected with the
Db
1Dd
2,3 chimera
(Fig. 1
, row E) stained with the
anti-
1 H-2Db mAb (22.249) as well as
with the anti-
3 H-2Dd mAb (34-2-12S) and
anti-
1,2 H-2Dd mAb (34-5-8S). Finally,
the YB2/0 cells transfected with the
Dd
1Db
2Dd
3
chimera (Fig. 1
, row F) stained with the
anti-
3 H-2Dd mAb (34-2-12S), but not
with the anti-
1 H-2Db (22.249) or with
the anti-
3 H-2Db mAb (28-14-8). Notably,
mAb 34-5-8S, reported to be specific for both the
1 and
2 domains of H-2Dd, did not stain the
Dd
1Db
2Dd
3
chimera, indicating that this mAb preferentially recognizes an
2 domain-encoded epitope on H-2Dd.
|
3
H-2Dd mAb 34-2-12S bound
RBL-5-Db
1,2Dd
3,
RBL-5-Dd
1Db
2Dd
3,
and RBL-5-Db
1
Dd
2,3 cells and, unexpectedly, also slightly
to RBL-5-Dd
1,2
Db
3. Although this mAb failed to stain the
corresponding
YB2/0-Dd
1,2Db
3
transfectant, these data suggest that the
1
2 domains of H-2Dd might
contribute slightly to 34-2-12S binding in cells that express the
chimera at high levels, as does the
RBL-5-Dd
1,2Db
3
transfectant. The anti-
1,2 H-2Dd mAbs
34-4-21S and 34-5-8S stained RBL-5 cells transfected with the
Dd
1,2Db
3
chimera, but not with the
Db
1,2Dd
3 chimera.
RBL-5-Dd
1Db
2Dd
3
cells, but not
RBL-5-Db
1Dd
2,3
cells, stained with 34-4-21S. In contrast, mAb 34-5-8S stained RBL-5
cells transfected with the
Db
1Dd
2,3 chimera,
but not those transfected with the
Dd
1Db
2Dd
3
chimera.
|
1Db
2Dd
3
cells is somewhat lower than that on
RBL-5-Dd
1,2Db
3,
RBL-5-Db
1,2Dd
3,
or
RBL-5-Db
1Dd
2,3. In vitro cytotoxicity by RNK-16 and RNK-mLy-49A.9
We analyzed the protective capacities of our chimeric molecules in vitro, using NK cell effectors that are uniform in murine Ly-49A expression. Mouse NK cells express overlapping subsets of diverse Ly-49 receptors (6). Since these Ly-49 receptors have different allelic specificities for MHC class I, nonclonal populations of mouse NK cells may be inhibited through multiple Ly-49 receptors by different target MHC I molecules (6). Thus, to analyze the selective effects of our chimeric H-2Dd/b molecules on Ly-49A-mediated inhibition, we used the rat NK-like cell line RNK-16, which has phenotypic and functional characteristics of rat NK cells and, naturally, expresses no mouse Ly-49 molecules (31). We have previously shown that mouse Ly-49A is fully functional when transfected into RNK-16, inhibiting lysis of targets expressing H-2Dd (32). Our clonal Ly-49A transfectant RNK-mLy-49A.9 fails to kill H-2Dd targets unless blocking quantities of mAb anti-Ly-49A are added to the killing assay (32). Since parental RNK-16 cells do not lyse RBL-5 targets, we used the rat myeloma YB2/0 target line for these in vitro studies.
The panel of YB2/0 transfectants was examined in cytotoxicity
assays using wild-type RNK-16 and RNK-mLy-49A.9 effectors (Fig. 3
). As expected, all YB2/0 transfectants
were readily killed by wild-type RNK-16 (Fig. 3
, AF,bottom). YB2/0-H-2Dd was not killed by
RNK-mLy-49A.9 unless anti-Ly-49A mAb was added to the killing assay
(Fig. 3
A, top). YB2/0-H-2Db
was readily killed by this effector (Fig. 3
B,top). Ly-49A expression on RNK-mLy-49A.9 inhibited lysis of
YB2/0-Dd
1,2Db
3
(Fig. 3
C, top) and of
YB2/0-Db
1Dd
2,3
transfectants (Fig. 3
E, top), indicating
that Ly-49A recognizes an
2-dependent determinant on
this chimeric molecule. This interpretation is further supported by the
observation that RNK-mLy-49A.9 cytotoxicity is not inhibited by the
chimeric molecule
Db
1,2Dd
3 (Fig. 3
D, top) or by
Dd
1Db
2Dd
3
(Fig. 3
F, top). Taken together, these data
indicate that the expression of at least one determinant contributing
to protection through Ly-49A is dependent on the
2
domain, but not the
1 domain, of H-2Dd in
these chimeric MHC I molecules.
|
To investigate the ability of H-2Dd/b chimeric
molecules to protect transfected RBL-5 cells from rejection by NK cells
in vivo, we inoculated the tumors into D8 mice, which are transgenic
for H-2Dd on a C57BL/6 (H-2b) background (29).
NK cells of D8 mice are known to reject H-2b tumor cells,
but not their H-2Dd transfectants (42). Challenging doses
of tumor cells were chosen on the basis of previous experiments so that
tumor outgrowth of H-2Dd negative cells would be prevented
by NK cells in the majority of mice (42). We focused on early rejection
vs outgrowth, rather than on late regression, which is usually mediated
by T cells. Such T cell-mediated rejection was an obvious possibility,
since the chimeric molecules must be regarded as allogeneic. Tumor
growth of the transfectants in D8 mice is presented in Table II
.
|
1,2Db
3 grew out
in the majority (
75%) of D8 mice. Most D8 mice, however, were able
to reject untransfected RBL-5 cells or RBL-5
Db
1,2Dd
3. Only 10
to 30% of mice inoculated with these lines developed palpable tumors,
confirming that the protective motif is not harbored within the
3 domain of H-2Dd. In contrast,
RBL-5Db
1Dd
2,3
cells grew out in the majority (6075%) of inoculated mice,
suggesting that expression of the
2 domain of
H-2Dd may be sufficient for protection against the natural
resistance of the host. Anti-NK1.1 mAb treatment abolished the
differences in natural resistance against early outgrowth observed
between the protected and nonprotected cell lines, supporting previous
reports that this natural resistance is dependent upon NK cells
(42).
Both RBL-5-Dd and
RBL-5-Db
1Dd
2,3
tumors eventually regressed in many mice. We interpret these late
rejections as a T cell response, since the
RBL-5-Db
1Dd
2,3
grew progressively in BALB/c nu/nu mice (data not
shown).
These results indicate that the
2 domain of
H-2Dd is sufficient for protection when expressed in the
context of the
1 domain of a nonprotective
H-2Db allele. The
1 domain of
H-2Dd did not protect
RBL-5-Dd
1Db
2Dd
3
cells from rejection. These cells behaved as parental RBL-5 after in
vivo transfer. The level of chimeric expression on unprotected
RBL-5-Dd
1Db
2Dd
3
cells was lower than that on the protected
RBL-5-Db
1Dd
2,3
cells, however, making it difficult to completely exclude a role for
the
Dd
1Db
2Dd
3
chimera in protection against natural resistance.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2 domain of
H-2Dd in the inhibition of natural killing in vitro and in
vivo. Specifically, the
2 domain of H-2Dd is
required for inhibition through the Ly-49A receptor. Our results from
two different experimental systems complement each other. The in vitro,
transfectant-based system allowed reductionistic analysis of the role
of a single receptor molecule. The tumor rejection system, on the other
hand, confirmed that the differences between different chimeric
molecules were maintained under in vivo conditions, excluding that the
specificity in the protective effect was merely the result of
overexpressed receptors or suboptimal activation levels in the RNK line
used in the in vitro assay.
Our studies failed to reveal a specific requirement for the
H-2Dd
1 domain in functional recognition by
Ly-49A. The simplest explanation for our results is that Ly-49A binds
to the
2 domain, but not the
1 domain, of
H-2Dd. There are, however, other possible interpretations.
The Ly-49A receptor may require binding to motifs in both domains: one
shared by H-2Dd and Db in the
1
domain, and one unique to H-2Dd in the
2
domain. The first motif would thus be present in all our chimeric
molecules, but it would not be sufficient for a functional interaction
in the absence of the second motif. Secondly, it is possible that a
unique putative Ly-49A binding determinant on the H-2Dd
1 domain may be dependent upon pairing with the
H-2Dd
2 domain or be prevented by pairing
with the H-2Db
2 domain. An additional
consideration is the possible role of a peptide associated with the
class I MHC molecules in recognition by Ly-49A. Studies by Raulet and
by Yokoyama have demonstrated that Ly-49A does not discriminate between
specific peptides containing H-2Dd anchor residues (44, 45). This may not, however, be true for peptides containing anchor
residues specific for our
Dd
1Db
2Dd
3
chimera.
For these reasons, our results do not strictly exclude a role for the
H-2Dd
1 domain in binding by Ly-49A. They
do, however, establish the importance of the
2 domain,
which alone can account for the ability of the receptor to discriminate
between H-2Dd and H-2Db. Previous studies of
Ly-49A binding to H-2Dd have primarily involved
anti-H-2Dd mAb blockade. Yokoyama and colleagues have
tested a series of anti-H-2Dd-specific mAb (7, 45).
Although several of these mAbs have been previously described as
specific for the
1/
2 domains of
H-2Dd, only mAb 34-5-8S blocks Ly-49A-mediated inhibition
of H-2Dd targets (45). In addition, Ly-49A-dependent
inhibition of NK cell activation as well as efficient expression of the
34-5-8S epitope on H-2Dd are dependent upon occupancy of
the peptide binding groove (45, 46). These data suggest that both
Ly-49A and mAb 34-5-8S may recognize a shared, peptide-dependent,
conformational determinant on H-2Dd (45). McCluskey and
colleagues, using H-2Dd/H-2Ld chimeric
molecules, found that 34-5-8S recognizes a predominantly
2 domain-specific epitope, but that this mAb also reacts
very weakly with an
1 domain-encoded structure (47). Our
finding that mAb 34-5-8S binds to the
2, but not the
1, domain of H-2Dd is consistent with
epitope analyses of Stroynowski using interdomain chimeric
H-2Dd/Qa-6 molecules (48). Our findings also support
studies by Abastado, who used a series of
H-2Kd/Dd intradomain recombinants to map the
mAb 34-5-8S epitope to a region contained between amino acids 92 and
116 in the NH2-terminal
2 domain of
H-2Dd (49). These studies also mapped the 34-4-21S epitope
within residues 57 and 91 in the carboxyl-terminal
1
domain of H-2Dd (49). Cells from the H-2Ddm1
mouse, which express a recombinant H-2
2 domain
containing the NH2-terminal H-2Dd and the
COOH-terminal H-2Ld, are rejected in a pattern similar to
cells expressing H-2Dd, rather than to that of cells
expressing H-2Ld (50). Thus, our H-2Dd/b
chimeric experiments, when considered in the context of mAb
blocking/epitope and H-2Ddm1 mouse studies, firmly
implicate the NH2-terminal part of the
2
domain, but not the
1 domain, of H-2Dd in
Ly-49-mediated NK cell inhibition.
The importance of the
2 domain in binding by
Ly-49A contrasts with the critical role of the
1 domain
in allelic specificity in recognition by the Ig-like KIRs on human NK
cells. It has been proposed that the lectin-like receptors preceded
KIRs in evolution, and that the rapid evolution of human MHC class I
molecules has forced the coevolution of KIRs (51, 52). The specificity
of binding by KIRs to human class I MHC molecules is dependent on
residues in the carboxyl-terminal
1 domain. The specific
residues vary with individual KIRs, but they include amino acids at
positions 73, 74, 76, 77, 80, 83, and 90 (15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24). These residues are
conserved across multiple (but not all) alleles and are thus expressed
as "public" specificities. In mouse class I MHC molecules, the
corresponding sites are highly polymorphic, suggesting that they may
not be subject to the same selection pressures (53). Consistent with
this hypothesis, no MHC-binding KIR homologues have been identified in
rodents. Similarly, although NK cells from both humans and rodents
share the expression of certain lectin-like inhibitory receptors,
notably CD94/NKG2 heterodimers, no human homologues for the Ly-49
receptors have been identified (13, 54, 55).
Previous studies have demonstrated additional differences between MHC I
recognition by human KIR and by rodent Ly-49. Some KIRs are sensitive
to alterations at certain positions of the peptide bound to MHC I,
mainly side chains at positions 7 and 8 (56). Although Ly-49A-mediated
inhibition requires occupancy of the H-2Dd peptide binding
groove, Ly-49A does not discriminate between individual
H-2Dd peptides (44, 45). KIR binding does not requireN-linked glycosylation of MHC I (16). In contrast, studies from
our laboratory and others have demonstrated a role for carbohydrate in
Ly-49 recognition (57, 58). Unlike human class I MHC molecules, each
mouse allelic variant contains an N-linked glycosylation
site at position 176 in the carboxyl-terminal
2 domain
(52, 53) in addition to the one at position 86 in the
1
domain. Our observations on a role for the
2 domain may
be related to the carbohydrate side chain in this domain. The
carbohydrate chain important for protection via Ly-49A is not known,
and it cannot be excluded that critical carbohydrate and protein
structures are separated in primary sequence, yet interact in the
tertiary structure. Studies by Takei and his colleagues have shown that
the divergent specificities of Ly-49A and Ly-49C are not determined by
polymorphisms within the carbohydrate recognition domain of Ly-49, but,
rather, in a membrane proximal stalk region of the extracellular domain
(59, 60). It is thus possible that Ly-49A recognizes both carbohydrate
and protein components of the H-2Dd
2
domain. Thus, although human KIR and rodent Ly-49 receptors share
similar cytoplasmic motifs and use similar inhibitory signaling
pathways in NK cells, it appears that these structurally divergent
receptors differ markedly in their requirements for ligand
recognition (32, 61).
These results are the first to directly implicate the
2
domain in Ly-49-dependent inhibition of NK cell cytotoxicity. As such,
they form the basis for future mutational and structural studies of
murine MHC I, ultimately defining the molecular basis for the allelic
specificities of Ly-49 receptors. They also support previous studies
indicating that Ly-49A indeed screens for global changes in the
conformation or expression of the H-2Dd heavy chain, in
accordance with the "missing self" hypothesis.
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Jonas Sundbäck, Microbiology and Tumor Biology Center, Box 280, Karolinska Institute, S-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden. E-mail address: ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: KIR, killer inhibitory receptor. ![]()
Received for publication September 8, 1997. Accepted for publication February 19, 1998.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1/
2 domain polymorphism and in vivo expression pattern in tumor resistance: studies with transgenic mice and lymphoma cell transfectants. J. Immunother. 14:175.
1/
2 domains. J. Immunol. 153:5482.[Abstract]
1 with
2 domain region in class I MHC proteins contributes determinants recognized by antibodies and cytotoxic T cells. J. Immunol. 135:2160.[Abstract]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Mitsuki, N. Matsumoto, and K. Yamamoto A species-specific determinant on {beta}2-microglobulin required for Ly49A recognition of its MHC class I ligand Int. Immunol., February 1, 2004; 16(2): 197 - 204. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Sundback, A. Achour, J. Michaelsson, H. Lindstrom, and K. Karre NK Cell Inhibitory Receptor Ly-49C Residues Involved in MHC Class I Binding J. Immunol., January 15, 2002; 168(2): 793 - 800. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Sjostrom, M. Eriksson, C. Cerboni, M. H. Johansson, C. L. Sentman, K. Karre, and P. Hoglund Acquisition of External Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Molecules by Natural Killer Cells Expressing Inhibitory Ly49 Receptors J. Exp. Med., November 19, 2001; 194(10): 1519 - 1530. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Zimmer, V. Ioannidis, and W. Held H-2D Ligand Expression by Ly49A+ Natural Killer (NK) Cells Precludes Ligand Uptake from Environmental Cells: Implications for NK Cell Function J. Exp. Med., November 19, 2001; 194(10): 1531 - 1539. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Matsumoto, M. Mitsuki, K. Tajima, W. M. Yokoyama, and K. Yamamoto The Functional Binding Site for the C-Type Lectin-Like Natural Killer Cell Receptor Ly49a Spans Three Domains of Its Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Ligand J. Exp. Med., January 15, 2001; 193(2): 147 - 158. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. H. Chung, K. Natarajan, L. F. Boyd, J. Tormo, R. A. Mariuzza, W. M. Yokoyama, and D. H. Margulies Mapping the Ligand of the NK Inhibitory Receptor Ly49A on Living Cells J. Immunol., December 15, 2000; 165(12): 6922 - 6932. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. T. Silver, D.-E. Gong, C. S. Chang, A. Amrani, P. Santamaria, and K. P. Kane Ly-49P Activates NK-Mediated Lysis by Recognizing H-2Dd 1 J. Immunol., August 15, 2000; 165(4): 1771 - 1781. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. Nakamura, S. Hayashi, E. C. Niemi, J. C. Ryan, and W. E. Seaman Activating Ly-49d and Inhibitory Ly-49a Natural Killer Cell Receptors Demonstrate Distinct Requirements for Interaction with H2-Dd J. Exp. Med., August 7, 2000; 192(3): 447 - 454. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. H. Mason, J. Willette-Brown, A. T. Mason, D. McVicar, and J. R. Ortaldo Interaction of Ly-49D+ NK Cells with H-2Dd Target Cells Leads to Dap-12 Phosphorylation and IFN-{gamma} Secretion J. Immunol., January 15, 2000; 164(2): 603 - 611. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R.-C. Su, S. K.-P. Kung, E. T. Silver, S. Lemieux, K. P. Kane, and R. G. Miller Ly-49CB6 NK Inhibitory Receptor Recognizes Peptide-Receptive H-2Kb 1 J. Immunol., November 15, 1999; 163(10): 5319 - 5330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Eriksson, G. Leitz, E. Fallman, O. Axner, J. C. Ryan, M. C. Nakamura, and C. L. Sentman Inhibitory Receptors Alter Natural Killer Cell Interactions with Target Cells Yet Allow Simultaneous Killing of Susceptible Targets J. Exp. Med., October 4, 1999; 190(7): 1005 - 1012. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q. R. Fan and D. C. Wiley Structure of Human Histocompatibility Leukocyte Antigen (Hla)-Cw4, a Ligand for the Kir2d Natural Killer Cell Inhibitory Receptor J. Exp. Med., July 1, 1999; 190(1): 113 - 124. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Y. Olsson-Alheim, J. Sundback, K. Karre, and C. L. Sentman The MHC Class I Molecule H-2Dp Inhibits Murine NK Cells via the Inhibitory Receptor Ly49A J. Immunol., June 15, 1999; 162(12): 7010 - 7014. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. Nakamura, P. A. Linnemeyer, E. C. Niemi, L. H. Mason, J. R. Ortaldo, J. C. Ryan, and W. E. Seaman Mouse Ly-49D Recognizes H-2Dd and Activates Natural Killer Cell Cytotoxicity J. Exp. Med., February 1, 1999; 189(3): 493 - 500. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Wang, M. C. Whitman, K. Natarajan, J. Tormo, R. A. Mariuzza, and D. H. Margulies Binding of the Natural Killer Cell Inhibitory Receptor Ly49A to Its Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Ligand. CRUCIAL CONTACTS INCLUDE BOTH H-2Dd AND beta 2-MICROGLOBULIN J. Biol. Chem., January 4, 2002; 277(2): 1433 - 1442. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |