The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Su, X.
Right arrow Articles by Mountz, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Su, X.
Right arrow Articles by Mountz, J. D.
The Journal of Immunology, 1998, 160: 5288-5293.
Copyright © 1998 by The American Association of Immunologists

Autocrine and Paracrine Apoptosis Are Mediated by Differential Regulation of Fas Ligand Activity in Two Distinct Jurkat T Cell Populations1

Xiao Su*, Jianhua Cheng*, Weimin Liu*, Changdan Liu*, Zheng Wang*, PingAr Yang*, Tong Zhou* and John D. Mountz2,{dagger}

* Department of Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294; {dagger} Veterans Administration Medical Center, Birmingham, AL 35233


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Fas ligand (FasL) produced by activated T cells mediates autocrine-induced apoptosis to limit T cell expansion. To investigate the regulation of FasL activity, Jurkat cells were stably transfected with a 2.3-kb fragment of human FasL promoter that controlled the expression of a GFP reporter gene. Two populations of Jurkat cells with different levels of GFP expression were obtained. One population constitutively expressed high levels of GFP (GFP+), while the other population expressed low levels of GFP (GFP-). The level of GFP expression in the two populations correlated with their levels of FasL transcription and its functional activity. Autocrine regulation of apoptosis was demonstrated by increased FasL activity after stimulation of GFP- cells with anti-CD3, phorbyl myristyl acetate plus ionomycin, or Con A. Paracrine regulation of apoptosis was suggested by the induction of apoptosis of GFP- cells after coculture with unstimulated GFP+ cells. GFP+ cells exhibited a decreased sensitivity to FasL-mediated apoptosis compared with GFP- cells. Furthermore, the cell surface expression of Fas and CD4 was lower on GFP+ cells than GFP- cells, whereas the expression of CD45RO was higher. A decreased level of IL-2 was produced by GFP+ cells after phorbyl myristyl acetate and ionomycin stimulation. Our results indicate that a subpopulation of T cells that express low levels of FasL and IL-2, which are responsive to up-regulation of these molecules after activation, can undergo apoptosis either by suicide after activation or by a paracrine pathway mediated by T cells that constitutively express higher levels of FasL.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Homeostasis of a cell population is controlled not only by cell proliferation and differentiation, but also by cell death occurring through apoptosis (1, 2, 3, 4). Apoptosis has been proposed to be a critical mechanism in the clonal deletion of autoreactive T and B cells (5, 6), lysis of target cells by cytotoxic T cells (7), and corticosteroid-induced killing of immature lymphocytes (8, 9).

Fas/Apo-1 (CD95) Ag, a cell-surface protein expressed on a variety of human tissues and cell lines, belongs to the TNF/nerve growth factor (NGF)3 receptor family (10, 11). Cross-linking of Fas with anti-Fas Ab or binding of Fas with Fas ligand (FasL), a member of the TNF family, mediates apoptosis (12, 13, 14). Loss-of-function mutations of murine fas and fasL are associated with lymphoproliferation and a generalized lymphoproliferative disease in lpr and gld mice, respectively (15, 16, 17). Mutations of fas and fasL genes also have been found in patients with autoimmune lymphoproliferative disease (18, 19, 20, 21). Thus, Fas and FasL are important proapoptotic molecules involved in the regulation of T cell apoptosis.

Stimulation of T cells via their Ag receptors leads to cell proliferation and differentiation (22) as well as apoptosis (23, 24, 25, 26). Activation-induced cell death (AICD) has been proposed to be an important mechanism in the maintenance of T cell tolerance in the periphery (27). Activation of T cells causes coexpression of Fas and FasL on the cell surface, and the interaction of these two death-inducing proteins triggers autocrine apoptosis (28, 29).

We and others have shown that not all T cells are susceptible to Fas-mediated apoptosis and that the T cells that are resistant to Fas-mediated apoptosis express lower levels of Fas or have defective Fas signaling (12, 13, 30). Although the Fas-FasL system plays an important role in maintaining peripheral T cell tolerance, it is not clear if FasL activity is differentially regulated in the heterogeneous population of mature T cells. The present experiments utilized a 2.3-kb fragment of human FasL promoter capable of driving the expression of GFP to allow identification and analysis of FasL activity in Jurkat cells. Our results indicated that resting Jurkat T cells can be divided into two distinct populations according to FasL production and that these two populations display differences in susceptibility to Fas-mediated apoptosis. The interactions between Fas and FasL in these two populations determine whether apoptosis occurs by an autocrine or paracrine pathway in the susceptible population.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Generation of FasL reporter construct

The human fasL gene was isolated from two human placental genomic DNA libraries constructed in the Lambda FIXII vector (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) and in the EMBL-SP6/T7 vector (Clontech Laboratories, Palo Alto, CA) using 32P-labeled segments of human FasL cDNA (Su et al., manuscript in preparation). After the positive clones were identified, the inserts of these clones were analyzed by restriction mapping. The DNA fragment containing the exon I 5'-end cDNA sequence and upstream 5'-flanking region was prepared by BglII digestion and subcloned into the pBluescript vector (Stratagene). The human FasL reporter construct was generated by cloning the HindIII-flanked 2.3-kb human FasL 5'-flanking region upstream of the FasL translational start site into the pEGFP-1 reporter vector (Clontech Laboratories), which contains a neomycin resistance (neor) gene as a selection marker for stable transfectants.

Cell culture and stable transfection

The Jurkat human leukemic T cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA) and were maintained in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FCS, penicillin (100 U/ml), streptomycin (100 µg/ml), and glutamine (2 mM) in a humidified CO2 incubator at 37°C. For stable transfection, 5 x 106 Jurkat cells were incubated with 10 µg of DNA in 1 ml of RPMI 1640 medium and subjected to electroporation with a Gene Pulser (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA) at 250 V/960 µF. Forty-eight hours after transfection, cells were plated in a 24-well microtiter plate (Costar, Cambridge, MA) in medium containing 2 mg/mg of G418 (Clontech). Two weeks later, cells from different wells were transferred to corresponding 6-cm dishes for expansion. The level of GFP expression in individual cell culture was analyzed by fluorescent microscopy and flow cytometry with excitation and emission wavelengths of 485 nm and 510 nm, respectively. G418-resistant cells expressing higher levels of GFP (GFP+) and lower levels of GFP (GFP-) were separated by FACS and maintained in complete RPMI 1640 medium containing 2 mg/ml of G418. The levels of GFP expression in the two cell populations were stable as determined by flow cytometric analysis.

Abs and reagents

Anti-CD3 (clone: HIT3a), phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated anti-CD4 (clone: RPA-T4), PE-conjugated anti-CD45RO-PE (clone: UCHL1), and biotinylated anti-Fas (clone: DX2) mAbs were obtained from PharMingen (San Diego, CA). Phorbol myristyl acetate (PMA), ionomycin, and Con A were purchased from Sigma Chemical (St. Louis, MO). Fas fusion (Fas-Fc) protein was prepared as described previously (31).

RT-PCR

Total RNA was isolated from GFP+ and GFP- Jurkat cells by RNA STAT-60 (Tel-Test "B", Friendswood, TX) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Two micrograms of RNA was used as a template for cDNA synthesis in a reaction mixture with 50 ng of oligo(dT) primers and 50 U of reverse transcriptase (Promega, Madison, WI) in a 20-µl reaction volume. A 2-µl aliquot was used in 50 µl of PCR reaction mixture containing 20 pmol of the FasL primers (forward, 5'-GGAATTCCAGCTCTTCCACCTACAG-3'; reverse, 5'-ATTTGCGGCCGCTTAGAGCTTATATAAGCC-3'), GFP primers (forward, 5'-TGAAGTTCATCTGCACCACC-3'; reverse, 5'-ACGAACTCCAGCAGGACCA-3'), neor primers (forward, 5'-GAGGCTATTCGGCTATGACT-3'; reverse, 5'-GATATTCGGCAAGCAGGCAT-3'), or ß-actin primers (forward, 5'-GCGGGAAATCGTGCGTGACATT-3'; reverse, 5'-GTGGACTTGGGAGAGGACTGGG-3') in the presence of 2.5 U of Taq polymerase (Promega). The conditions for PCR were 1 min at 94°C, 1 min at 55°C, and 1 min at 72°C for 30 cycles. The samples were then subjected to electrophoresis on a 1% agarose gel and visualized with ethidium bromide staining and UV illumination.

FasL activity

The cell death of Fas-positive SKW6.4 cells was used as an assay of the FasL activity of GFP+ and GFP- cells. SKW6.4 cells were labeled with 700 µCi of [51Cr]sodium chromate (Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL) for 1 h at 37°C. After washing three times with RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% dialyzed FCS, 1 x 105 of 51Cr-labeled cells were incubated with GFP+ and GFP- cells in a 96-well plate (E:T ratio of 10:1). The supernatants were collected after 6 h and the amount of released 51Cr was measured using a gamma counter (Beckman Instruments, Fullerton, CA). For the GFP+ and GFP- cell mixing experiment, 1 x 105 of 51Cr-labeled GFP- and GFP+ cells were added to GFP+ cells at different E:T ratios in a 96-well plate. The percentage of specific 51Cr release was determined as described previously (32).

Fas-mediated cytotoxicity assay

The GFP+ and GFP- Jurkat cells were labeled with [51Cr]sodium chromate as described above. Then 1 x 105 of 51Cr-labeled cells were incubated with different concentrations of soluble FasL (Alexis, San Diego, CA) in a 96-well plate. The supernatant was collected after 12 h, and the percentage of specific 51Cr release was determined as described above.

Stimulation of GFP+ and GFP- Jurkat cells

GFP+ and GFP- Jurkat cells (1 x 106/ml) were incubated with anti-CD3 (5 µg/ml), PMA (100 ng/ml) plus ionomycin (500 ng/ml), or Con A (5 µg/ml) in a 24-well microtiter plate (Costar) with or without Fas-Fc protein (100 µg/ml) for different time periods. GFP expression was analyzed 12 h later by flow cytometric analysis, and cell viability was analyzed by flow cytometric analysis of 7-amino-actinomycin D (7-AAD) staining as described below.

Flow cytometric selection of viable cells

Flow cytometric selection of viable cells was conducted after staining with 7-AAD. Briefly, cells were stained with 10 µg/ml of 7-AAD (Calbiochem, San Diego, CA) in PBS on ice for 30 min. After washing twice with PBS, cells were fixed in 1% paraformaldehyde supplemented with 50 µg/ml actinomycin D. Nongated cells (10,000) were analyzed using FACScan (Becton Dickinson, Mountain View, CA). Nonapoptotic cells are 7-AAD negative (32).

Flow cytometric analysis

The GFP+ and GFP- Jurkat cells were stained with optimal concentrations of Abs in FACS buffer (PBS with 5% FCS and 0.1% sodium azide) as described previously (33). Biotinylated Abs were revealed by PE-streptavidin (Southern Biotechnology Associates, Birmingham, AL). Viable cells (10,000 per sample) were analyzed by flow cytometry on a FACScan (Becton Dickinson).

Hoechst 33342 (HO342) staining

GFP+ and GFP- cells (1 x 106/ml) were cocultured at the ratio of 1:1 in a 6-well plate (Costar) for 12 h. Cells were stained with HO342 (1 µg/ml in FACS buffer) on ice for 7 min. Cells were washed twice with FACS buffer and then fixed with 0.5% paraformaldehyde. Stained cells were analyzed by microscopy with UV illumination. Nonapoptotic cells are HO342 negative (34).

Measurement of IL-2 concentration by ELISA

GFP+ and GFP- Jurkat cells (1 x 106/ml) were incubated with PMA (100 ng/ml) and ionomycin (500 ng/ml) in a 24-well microtiter plate (Costar). Culture supernatants were harvested at different time points, and the IL-2 concentration was measured in duplicate supernatant samples using an ELISA assay kit according to the procedure recommended by the supplier (Endogen, Woburn, MA).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Establishment of hFasLpro/GFP stable transfectants of human Jurkat cells

A human FasL promoter (hFasLpro)/GFP reporter construct was generated by cloning a 2.3-kb human FasL 5'-flanking region upstream of the fasL translational start site into the pEGFP-1 reporter vector. Human Jurkat T cells were transfected with this hFasLpro/GFP construct, and the stable transfectants expressing neor gene were selected after short-time culture in a 24-well microtiter plate with G418. Interestingly, all the wells of the microtiter plate contained two populations of G418-resistant Jurkat cells with different levels of GFP expression (Fig. 1Go, A and B). Approximately 20% of Jurkat cells expressed higher levels of GFP. Cells were then separated by FACS based on their levels of GFP expression and maintained in culture medium containing G418. The levels of GFP expression were stable for at least 10 days in the two cell populations as determined by fluorescent microscopy and flow cytometric analysis. As observed by flow cytometric analysis, one population of Jurkat cells expressed high levels of GFP (GFP+), whereas the other expressed nearly undetectable levels of GFP (GFP-) (Fig. 1GoC). This was further demonstrated by fluorescent microscopy, which indicated that both GFP+ and GFP--cells existed in the G418-resistant Jurkat cells obtained after transfection (Fig. 1GoD).



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. Different levels of GFP expression in Jurkat cells transfected with the hFasLpro/GFP construct. Jurkat cells were transfected with the hFasLpro/GFP construct, and the stable transfectants were selected using G418. The level of GFP expression by G418-resistant Jurkat cells was analyzed by FACScan. The representative data obtained from different wells of cell cultures were presented in A and B. The percentage of cells expressing higher levels of GFP was indicated. Cells expressing higher levels of GFP (GFP+) and lower levels of GFP (GFP-) were then separated by FACS and maintained in culture medium containing G418. C, GFP expression was analyzed by FACScan in GFP+ and GFP- cells, and the histogram of GFP fluorescence density is presented. The shaded histogram represents the GFP fluorescence density in GFP+ cells. D, GFP expression was analyzed by fluorescent microscopy after HO342 staining in GFP- cells (left panel) and GFP+ cells (right panel).

 
To determine whether GFP expression correlated with FasL expression in GFP+ and GFP- Jurkat cells, we estimated the levels of GFP and FasL mRNA in these two cell populations by PCR analysis. GFP+ cells expressed higher levels of both GFP and FasL mRNA, whereas neither GFP nor FasL mRNA was detectable in GFP- cells (Fig. 2GoA). Furthermore, both GFP+ and GFP- Jurkat cells expressed equivalent level of neor mRNA, indicating that the failure of GFP- cells to express GFP mRNA was not due to the unsuccessful transfection of hFasLpro/GFP into these cells. The functional capacity of the FasL on the GFP+ and GFP- cells was further determined by evaluation of the ability of GFP+ and GFP- cells to lyse 51Cr-labeled SKW6.4 target cells. GFP+ cells exhibited greater cytotoxicity against SKW6.4 cells compared with GFP- cells, indicating that the GFP+ cells produce higher levels of functional FasL (Fig. 2GoB). These results indicated that Jurkat T cells can be divided into FasL-positive and FasL-negative subpopulations that can be separated based on their GFP expression.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. Correlation of the level of GFP expression with levels of transcription and functional activity of FasL. Total RNA was extracted from GFP+ and GFP- cells, and cDNA synthesized from RNA by reverse transcriptase was used as a template for RT-PCR using GFP, FasL, neor, or ß-actin primers. The PCR products were analyzed on a 1% agarose gel. FasL function was evaluated by measuring released 51Cr in the supernatant after incubation of GFP+ and GFP- cells with 51Cr-labeled Fas-positive SKW6.4 cells (E:T ratio = 10:1). A, Expression of GFP, FasL, neor, and ß-actin mRNA in GFP+ and GFP- cells. B, Specific lysis of SKW6.4 cells by GFP+ and GFP- cells.

 
Induction of FasL promoter activity in GFP- Jurkat cells

We then determined whether the FasL promoter activity in GFP- Jurkat cells could be induced by different stimuli. Stimulation of GFP- cells with anti-CD3, PMA plus ionomycin, or Con A for 1 and 2 days resulted in an increase in the percentage of GFP+ cells (Fig. 3GoA). The induction of GFP expression in GFP- cells was also demonstrated by increased GFP fluorescence density after PMA and ionomycin stimulation (Fig. 3GoB). Similar stimulation of GFP+ cells had no effect on GFP expression, which was consistent with constitutive expression of GFP by these cells. These results indicated that one population of Jurkat cells constitutively expressed high levels of FasL while the other population exhibited lower but inducible levels of FasL.



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Induction of GFP expression in GFP- cells. GFP- cells were stimulated with anti-CD3 (5 µg/ml), PMA (100 ng/ml) plus ionomycin (Ino, 500 ng/ml), or Con A (5 µg/ml), and GFP expression was analyzed by FACScan 1 day and 2 days after stimulation. A, Percentage of GFP+ cells after stimulation in GFP- cells. B, Histogram of GFP fluorescence density in GFP- cells 1 day after PMA and ionomycin stimulation. The solid line represents the GFP fluorescence density after stimulation.

 
Decreased sensitivity of GFP+ Jurkat cells to FasL and activation-induced apoptosis

The existence of a stable population of GFP+, FasL-positive Jurkat cells in the absence of exogenous stimulation suggests that these cells may exhibit decreased sensitivity to FasL-induced apoptosis. To explore this possibility, GFP+ and GFP- cells were labeled with 51Cr and incubated with different concentrations of soluble FasL. The sensitivity of cells to FasL-mediated apoptosis was determined by the specific lysis of GFP+ and GFP- cells after 12 h. GFP- cells exhibited a dose-dependent sensitivity to FasL-mediated apoptosis (Fig. 4GoA). In contrast, FasL did not induce significant apoptosis in GFP+ cells even at a higher concentration (200 ng/ml).



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. Decreased sensitivity of GFP+ cells to FasL and activation-induced apoptosis. GFP+ and GFP- cells were labeled with 51Cr and incubated with different concentrations of FasL. The susceptibility of the cells to FasL-induced cytotoxicity was analyzed by measuring released 51Cr in the supernatant 12 h after incubation. Activation-induced apoptosis was analyzed by 7-AAD staining after stimulation of GFP+ and GFP- cells with anti-CD3 (5 µg/ml), PMA (100 ng/ml) plus ionomycin (Ion, 500 ng/ml), or Con A (5 µg/ml) in the presence or absence of Fas-Fc protein (100 µg/ml) for 24 h. Viable cells not undergoing apoptosis were 7-AAD negative. A, Percentage of specific lysis of GFP+ and GFP- cells after treatment with different concentrations of FasL (25–200 ng/ml). B, Percentage of apoptotic cells in GFP+ and GFP- cells after stimulation with or without Fas-Fc protein.

 
Apoptosis was also analyzed by 7-AAD staining in GFP+ and GFP- cells stimulated with anti-CD3, PMA plus ionomycin, or Con A in the presence or absence of soluble Fas-Fc protein, which is capable of binding and neutralizing FasL. There was an increased percentage of apoptotic cells 24 h after stimulation of GFP- cells (Fig. 4GoB). PMA and ionomycin stimulation induced greater levels of apoptosis than Con A or anti-CD3 stimulation, which correlated with the relative ability of the agents to induce GFP expression in GFP- cells (Fig. 3GoA). The activation-induced apoptosis in GFP- cells was inhibited by coincubation with soluble Fas-Fc protein, indicating that AICD in GFP- cells was mediated by Fas-FasL interaction. In contrast, AICD was not observed in GFP+ cells. These results indicated that GFP+ cells exhibit a lower sensitivity to FasL and activation-induced apoptosis than GFP- cells.

Apoptosis mediated by a paracrine pathway in GFP- Jurkat cells

Since GFP+ cells expressed high levels of FasL, we determined whether unstimulated GFP+ cells can induce apoptosis in GFP- cells through interaction of FasL with Fas. GFP- cells were labeled with 51Cr and cocultured with GFP+ cells at different E:T ratios, and the cytotoxic activity of GFP+ cells against GFP- cells was determined by the specific lysis of GFP- cells 12 h after incubation. GFP+ cells induced paracrine apoptosis of nearly 30% of the GFP- target cells as the ratio of E:T was increased, but there was no detectable autocrine apoptosis of the GFP+ cells (Fig. 5GoA). The lysis of GFP- cells by GFP+ cells also was demonstrated by HO342 staining, since HO342-positive apoptotic cells in the coculture were GFP-negative (Fig. 5GoB). The killing of GFP- cells by GFP+ cells was inhibited by Fas-Fc protein (data not shown), further confirming that FasL interaction with Fas was required for the induction of apoptosis in GFP- cells. These results indicated that apoptosis of GFP- cells can be induced by GFP+ cells through a paracrine pathway.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. Paracrine induction of apoptosis in GFP- cells by GFP+ cells. GFP- cells were labeled with 51Cr and cocultured with GFP+ cells at different ratios. The cytotoxic activity of GFP+ against GFP- cells was analyzed by measuring released 51Cr in the supernatant 12 h after coculture. The apoptosis of GFP- cells after coculture was also measured by HO342 staining. A, Percentage of specific lysis of GFP+ and GFP- cells after coculture with GFP+ cells at different E:T ratios. B, Apoptotic GFP- cells analyzed by fluorescent microscopy after HO342 staining.

 
Decreased Fas expression in GFP+ Jurkat cells

GFP+ cells expressed lower levels of Fas Ag on the cell surface than GFP- cells (Fig. 6Go). GFP+ cells also expressed lower levels of CD4 than GFP- cells but expressed higher levels of CD45RO. There was no difference in the expression of CD3 in GFP+ and GFP- cells, and CD8 was undetectable in both populations (data not shown). These results suggested that the lower levels of Fas expression on GFP+ cells might account for the lower sensitivity of these cells to FasL-induced cytotoxicity. They also indicate that Fas-apoptosis-resistant GFP+ cells exhibit a phenotype that is similar to that of the CD3+CD4-CD8-B220+ T cells that accumulate in the periphery of lpr and gld mice, and exhibit an increased number in FasL transgenic mice (35).



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6. Expression of Fas, CD4, and CD45RO on GFP+ and GFP- cells. GFP+ and GFP- cells were stained with biotinylated anti-Fas Ab, PE-conjugated anti-CD4, anti-CD45RO Abs, and isotype-matched control Abs, and analyzed by FACScan. The histograms of Fas, CD4, and CD45RO expression are presented. The dotted lines represent the staining with control Abs showing no nonspecific binding. The shaded histograms represent the fluorescence density in GFP+ cells.

 
Decreased production of IL-2 in GFP+ Jurkat cells after stimulation

We then evaluated the response of GFP+ and GFP- cells to PMA and ionomycin stimulation. GFP+ and GFP- cells were stimulated with PMA and ionomycin for 12 h and 24 h, and the concentrations of IL-2 in the culture supernatants were measured as an indicator of T cell activation. After stimulation, lower quantities of IL-2 were secreted by GFP+ cells than GFP- cells, indicating that GFP+ cells exhibited a lower response to PMA and ionomycin activation than GFP- cells (Fig. 7Go). These results suggest that GFP+ cells are less responsive to PMA and ionomycin stimulation, which may result in decreased activation-induced apoptosis.



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 7. Decreased production of IL-2 after stimulation of GFP+ cells. GFP+ and GFP- cells were stimulated with PMA (100 ng/ml) and ionomycin (500 ng/ml) for 12 h and 24 h. Culture supernatants were harvested at each time point, and the concentration of IL-2 was determined in duplicates by ELISA.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Although the role of Fas and FasL in the maintenance of peripheral T cell tolerance has been studied extensively (28, 29), the regulation of FasL expression within the T cell population has not been determined. In the present experiments, we first demonstrated that T cells exhibit heterogeneity of FasL expression by utilizing a hFasLpro/GFP construct in which the expression of GFP reporter gene is driven by FasL promoter activity. Jurkat cells transfected with hFasLpro/GFP vector could be divided into two stable subpopulations. One population of Jurkat cells (GFP+) constitutively expressed higher levels of FasL, while the other population of cells (GFP-) exhibited low levels of expression of FasL but were sensitive to induction of higher levels of FasL expression. The correlation of FasL expression with GFP expression in these two populations of transfected Jurkat cells also indicated that GFP is a useful marker for FasL promoter activity in T cells.

Our functional analyses of GFP+ and GFP- cells have clarified the previous observations that regulation of T cell growth by apoptosis can occur by both autocrine and paracrine pathways. It is known that stimulation of T cells with excessive levels of Ags leads to up-regulation of FasL. FasL may be cleaved from the cell surface and act as a soluble factor on neighboring cells in a paracrine fashion. Alternatively, in either the cleaved or uncleaved form, the FasL can act in an autocrine fashion on the same cell that generates it. (23, 36, 37, 38, 39). Our finding, that GFP- cells were sensitive to FasL cytotoxicity produced by GFP+ cells, suggests that T cells can regulate apoptosis of other T cells by a paracrine mechanism and that T cell apoptosis can be regulated by an autocrine pathway in AICD and by paracrine pathways involving other T cells as well other cell types.

The FasL-negative and FasL-positive Jurkat cells are phenotypically distinct, in that the FasL-positive cells express lower levels of Fas and CD4 but increased levels of CD45RO. Jurkat cells constitutively expressing FasL may be derived from Jurkat cells that have been activated to express a higher level of FasL but fail to undergo apoptosis due to down-regulation of Fas expression or defective Fas apoptosis signaling. This is consistent with the lower level of IL-2 produced by GFP+ cells after PMA and ionomycin stimulation. A second possibility is that, during the development of Jurkat cells, certain cells undergo a differentiation step that results in constitutive expression of higher levels of FasL. Down-regulation of expression of Fas and CD4 and up-regulation of CD45RO expression is also associated with this differentiation step. Other Jurkat cells differentiate to express a lower level of FasL but a higher level of Fas on the cell surface. Upon activation, these FasL-negative cells are capable of expressing increased levels of FasL and undergo apoptosis. We favor this second mechanism, since it is consistent with a previous study showing that FasL expression in T cells is regulated by TCR-mediated signaling events and that the transcription factor NF-AT, a key element in the regulation of IL-2 expression (40), is involved in this TCR-mediated FasL expression (41). On the other hand, Jurkat cells that constitutively express higher levels of FasL may have defective TCR signaling, which is suggested by decreased activation-induced apoptosis. Thus, it is possible that FasL expression is regulated by different regulatory factors during different stages of cell differentiation in Jurkat cells. Future characterization of the factors that regulate FasL expression in Jurkat cells will certainly aid in elucidating the mechanisms by which FasL is differentially expressed in T cells.

A stable proportion of FasL-positive and FasL-negative Jurkat cells was maintained in the mixed cell cultures, despite the fact that FasL-positive cells have the ability to induce apoptosis in FasL-negative cells. The FasL-negative cells may regenerate in the mixed cultures. The balance between the populations also may be regulated and maintained by factors in addition to FasL. This concept is supported by our preliminary data, which show that FasL-positive cells are more sensitive to TNF-{alpha}-induced apoptosis than FasL-negative cells (Su et al., unpublished observation). The balance between the two cell populations may be dictated by a complex interaction of factors acting through autocrine and paracrine regulation to regulate the numbers of cells that are sensitive to Fas/FasL-mediated and TNF-{alpha}-mediated apoptosis.

The coexistence of two functionally different populations of T cells supports the notion that there is a social control of cell survival and cell death in the immune system (2). FasL-negative cells express an inducible level of FasL after stimulation and are highly susceptible to FasL-mediated apoptosis induced by both autocrine and paracrine pathways. In contrast, FasL-positive T cells, which are resistant to FasL-mediated apoptosis, induce apoptosis of FasL-negative cells in a paracrine fashion. We propose that FasL-negative T cells are the primary effector cells during an immune response, whereas FasL-positive T cells play an important regulatory role in maintaining the steady state or equilibrium of cell number within a mixed population by inducing apoptosis of FasL-negative cells. Therefore, FasL-mediated apoptosis induced by autocrine and paracrine fashion is a critical mechanism for down-regulation of the effector T cell subpopulation and the maintenance of homeostasis of the immune system.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Dr. Fiona Hunter for her critical review of the manuscript.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported in part by a Veterans Affairs Career Development and Merit Review Award; National Institutes of Health Grants NIH R01 AR 42547 and N01-AR-6-2224 and a grant from Sankyo Co., Ltd. X.S. is the recipient of a National Research Service Award from the National Institutes of Health. Back

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. John D. Mountz, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, 701 South 19th Street, LHRB 473, Birmingham, AL 35294. E-mail address: Back

3 Abbreviations used in this paper: NGF, nerve growth factor; GFP+, green fluorescence protein positive; GFP-, green fluorescence protein negative; PMA, phorbyl myristyl acetate; AICD, activation-induced cell death; FasL, Fas ligand; 7-AAD, 7-amino-actinomycin D; neor, neomycin resistant; HO342, Hoechst 33342; PE, phycoerythrin; Fas-Fc, Fas-Fc fusion protein. Back

Received for publication October 31, 1997. Accepted for publication January 30, 1998.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Wyllie, A. H., J. F. Kerr, A. R. Currie. 1980. Cell death: the significance of apoptosis. Int. Rev. Cytol. 68:251.[Medline]
  2. Raff, M. C.. 1992. Social controls on cell survival and cell death. Nature 356:397.[Medline]
  3. Ellis, R. E., J. Y. Yuan, H. R. Horvitz. 1991. Mechanisms and functions of cell death. Annu. Rev. Cell Biol. 7:663.
  4. Osborne, B. A.. 1996. Apoptosis and the maintenance of homeostasis in the immune system. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 8:245.[Medline]
  5. Golstein, P., D. M. Ojcius, J. D. Young. 1991. Cell death mechanism and the immune system. Immunol. Rev. 121:29.[Medline]
  6. Cohen, J. J., R. C. Duke, V. A. Fadok, K. S. Sellins. 1992. Apoptosis and programmed cell death in immunity. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 10:267.[Medline]
  7. Kagi, D., F. Vignaux, B. Ledermann, K. Burki, V. Depraetere, S. Nagata, H. Hengartner, P. Golstein. 1994. Fas and perforin pathways as major mechanisms of T cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Science 265:528.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Wyllie, A. H.. 1980. Glucocorticoid-induced thymocyte apoptosis is associated with endogenous endonuclease activation. Nature 284:555.[Medline]
  9. Ucker, D. S.. 1987. Cytotoxic T lymphocytes and glucocorticoids activate an endogenous suicide process in target cells. Nature 327:62.[Medline]
  10. Itoh, N., S. Yonehara, A. Ishii, M. Yonehara, S. Mizushima, M. Sameshima, A. Hase, Y. Seto, S. Nagata. 1991. The polypeptide encoded by the cDNA for human cell surface antigen Fas can mediate apoptosis. Cell 66:233.[Medline]
  11. Oehm, A., I. Behrmann, W. Falk, M. Pawlita, G. Maier, C. Klas, M. Li-Weber, S. Richards, J. Dhein, B. C. Trauth, H. Ponstingl, P. H. Krammer. 1992. Purification and molecular cloning of the APO-1 cell surface antigen, a member of the tumor necrosis factor/nerve growth factor receptor superfamily. J. Biol. Chem. 267:10709.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Yonehara, S., A. Ishii, M. Yonehara. 1989. A cell-killing monoclonal antibody (anti-Fas) to a cell surface antigen co-down-regulated with the receptor of tumor necrosis factor. J. Exp. Med. 169:1747.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Trauth, B. C., C. Klas, A. M. J. Peters, S. Matzku, P. Moller, W. Falk, K.-M. Debatin, P. H. Krammer. 1989. Monoclonal antibody-mediated tumor regression by induction of apoptosis. Science 245:301.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Suda, T., T. Takahashi, P. Golstein, S. Nagata. 1993. Molecular cloning and expression of the Fas ligand, a novel member of the tumor necrosis factor family. Cell 75:1169.[Medline]
  15. Watanabe-Fukunaga, R., C. I. Brannan, N. G. Copeland, N. A. Jenkins, S. Nagata. 1992. Lymphoproliferation disorder in mice explained by defects in Fas antigen that mediates apoptosis. Nature 356:314.[Medline]
  16. Takahashi, T., M. Tanaka, C. I. Brannan, N. A. Jenkins, N. G. Copeland, T. Suda, S. Nagata. 1994. Generalized lymphoproliferative disease in mice, caused by a point mutation in the Fas ligand. Cell 76:969.[Medline]
  17. Cohen, P. L., R. A. Eisenberg. 1991. Lpr and gld: single gene models of systemic autoimmunity and lymphoproliferative disease. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 9:243.[Medline]
  18. Fisher, G. H., F. J. Rosenberg, S. E. Straus, J. K. Dale, L. A. Middleton, A. Y. Lin, W. Strober, M. J. Lenardo, J. M. Puck. 1995. Dominant interfering Fas gene mutations impair apoptosis in a human autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome. Cell 81:935.[Medline]
  19. Rieux-Laucat, F., F. Le Deist, C. Hivroz, I. A. Roberts, K. M. Debatin, A. Fischer, J. P. de Villartay. 1995. Mutations in Fas associated with human lymphoproliferative syndrome and autoimmunity. Science 268:1347.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Wu, J., J. Wilson, J. He, L. Xiang, P. H. Schur, J. D. Mountz. 1996. Fas ligand mutation in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus and lymphoproliferative disease. J. Clin. Invest. 98:1107.[Medline]
  21. Drappa, J., A. K. Vaishnaw, K. E. Sullivan, J. L. Chu, K. B. Elkon. 1996. Fas gene mutations in the Canale-Smith syndrome, an inherited lymphoproliferative disorder associated with autoimmunity. N. Engl. J. Med. 335:1643.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Weiss, A., D. R. Littman. 1994. Signal transduction by lymphocyte antigen receptor. Cell 76:263.[Medline]
  23. Dhein, J., H. Walczak, C. Baumler, K. M. Debatin, P. H. Krammer. 1995. Autocrine T-cell suicide mediated by APO-1/(Fas/CD95). Nature 373:438.[Medline]
  24. Brunner, T., R. J. Mogil, D. LaFace, N. J. Yoo, A. Mahboubi, F. Echeverri, S. J. Martin, W. R. Force, D. H. Lynch, C. F. Ware, D. R. Green. 1995. Cell-autonomous Fas (CD95)/Fas-ligand interaction mediates activation-induced apoptosis in T-cell hybridomas. Nature 373:441.[Medline]
  25. Ju, S. T., D. J. Panka, H. Cui, R. Ettinger, M. el-Khatib, D. H. Sherr, B. Z. Stanger, A. Marshak-Rothstein. 1995. Fas(CD95)/FasL interactions required for programmed cell death after T-cell activation. Nature 373:444.[Medline]
  26. Alderson, M. R., T. W. Tough, T. Davis-Smith, S. Braddy, B. Falk, K. A. Schooley, R. G. Goodwin, C. A. Smith, F. Ramsdell, D. H. Lynch. 1995. Fas ligand mediates activation-induced cell death in human T lymphocytes. J. Exp. Med. 181:71.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Russell, J. H.. 1995. Activation-induced death of mature T cells in the regulation of immune responses. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 7:382.[Medline]
  28. Lenardo, M. J., S. Boehme, L. Chen, B. Combadiere, G. Fisher, M. Freedman, H. McFarland, C. Pelfrey, L. Zheng. 1995. Autocrine feedback death and the regulation of mature T lymphocyte antigen responses. Int. Rev. Immunol. 13:115.[Medline]
  29. Lynch, D. H., F. Ramsdell, M. R. Alderson. 1996. Fas and FasL in the homeostasis regulation of immune responses. Immunol. Today 16:569.
  30. Su, X., T. Zhou, Z. Wang, P. Yang, R. S. Jope, J. D. Mountz. 1995. Defective expression of hematopoietic cell protein tyrosine phosphatase (HCP) in lymphoid cells blocks Fas-mediated apoptosis. Immunity 2:353.[Medline]
  31. Cheng, J., T. Zhou, C. Liu, J. P. Shapiro, M. J. Brauer, M. C. Kiefer, P. J. Barr, J. D. Mountz. 1994. Protection from Fas-mediated apoptosis by a soluble form of the Fas molecule. Science 263:1759.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Su, X., T. Zhou, P. Yang, Z. Wang, J. D. Mountz. 1996. HCP-deficient motheaten mice exhibit T cell apoptosis defect. J. Immunol. 156:4198.[Abstract]
  33. Zhou, T., H. Bluethmann, J. Eldridge, K. Berry, J. D. Mountz. 1993. Origin of CD4-CD8-B220+ T cells in MRL-lpr/lpr mice: clues from a TCR-ß transgenic mouse. J. Immunol. 150:3651.[Abstract]
  34. Dive, C., C. D. Gregory, D. J. Phipps, D. J. Evans, A. E. Milner, A. H. Wyllie. 1992. Analysis and discrimination of necrosis and apoptosis (programmed cell death) by multiparameter flow cytometry. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1133:275.[Medline]
  35. Cheng, J., C. Liu, P. Yang, T. Zhou, J. D. Mountz. 1997. Increased lymphocyte apoptosis in Fas ligand transgenic mice. J. Immunol. 159:674.[Abstract]
  36. Vignaux, F., P. Golstein. 1994. Fas-based lymphocyte-mediated cytotoxicity against syngeneic activated lymphocytes: a regulatory pathway?. Eur. J. Immunol. 24:923.[Medline]
  37. Russell, J. H., B. Rush, C. Weaver, R. Wang. 1993. Mature T cells of autoimmune lpr/lpr mice have a defect in antigen-stimulated suicide. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:4409.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Tanaka, M., T. Suda, T. Takahashi, S. Nagata. 1995. Expression of the functional soluble form of human fas ligand in activated lymphocytes. EMBO J. 14:1129.[Medline]
  39. Kayagaki, N., A. Kawasaki, T. Ebata, H. Ohmoto, S. Ikeda, S. Inoue, K. Yoshino, K. Okumura, H. Yagita. 1995. Metalloproteinase-mediated release of human Fas ligand. J. Exp. Med. 182:1777.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Rao, A.. 1994. NF-ATp: a transcription factor required for the co-ordinate induction of several cytokine genes. Immunol. Today 15:274.[Medline]
  41. Latinis, K. M., L. L Carr, E. J. Peterson, L. A. Norian, S. L. Eliason, G. A. Koretzky. 1997. Regulation of CD95(Fas) ligand expression by TCR-mediated signaling events. J. Immunol. 158:4602.[Abstract]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
K. C. Chang, J. Unsinger, C. G. Davis, S. J. Schwulst, J. T. Muenzer, A. Strasser, and R. S. Hotchkiss
Multiple triggers of cell death in sepsis: death receptor and mitochondrial-mediated apoptosis
FASEB J, March 1, 2007; 21(3): 708 - 719.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
R. S. Hotchkiss, K. W. McConnell, K. Bullok, C. G. Davis, K. C. Chang, S. J. Schwulst, J. C. Dunne, G. P. H. Dietz, M. Bahr, J. E. McDunn, et al.
TAT-BH4 and TAT-Bcl-xL Peptides Protect against Sepsis-Induced Lymphocyte Apoptosis In Vivo
J. Immunol., May 1, 2006; 176(9): 5471 - 5477.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
I. Remy and S. W. Michnick
Regulation of Apoptosis by the Ft1 Protein, a New Modulator of Protein Kinase B/Akt
Mol. Cell. Biol., February 15, 2004; 24(4): 1493 - 1504.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Biomol ScreenHome page
A. Pol, F. Van Ruissen, and J. Schalkwijk
Development of a Keratinocyte-Based Screening Model for Antipsoriatic Drugs Using Green Fluorescent Protein Under the Control of an Endogenous Promoter
J Biomol Screen, August 1, 2002; 7(4): 325 - 332.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
A. Lacoste, A. Cueff, and S. A. Poulet
P35-sensitive caspases, MAP kinases and Rho modulate {beta}-adrenergic induction of apoptosis in mollusc immune cells
J. Cell Sci., February 15, 2002; 115(4): 761 - 768.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
G. De Panfilis, A. Caruso, P. Sansoni, G. Pasolini, D. Semenza, and C. Torresani
Identification of Fas-L-Expressing Apoptotic T Lymphocytes in Normal Human Peripheral Blood : In Vivo Suicide
Am. J. Pathol., February 1, 2001; 158(2): 387 - 391.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
L. A. Norian, K. M. Latinis, S. L. Eliason, K. Lyson, C. Yang, T. Ratliff, and G. A. Koretzky
The Regulation of CD95 (Fas) Ligand Expression in Primary T Cells: Induction of Promoter Activation in CD95LP-Luc Transgenic Mice
J. Immunol., May 1, 2000; 164(9): 4471 - 4480.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
D. R. Taupin, K. Kinoshita, and D. K. Podolsky
Intestinal trefoil factor confers colonic epithelial resistance to apoptosis
PNAS, January 18, 2000; 97(2): 799 - 804.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
R. S. Hotchkiss, K. W. Tinsley, P. E. Swanson, K. C. Chang, J. P. Cobb, T. G. Buchman, S. J. Korsmeyer, and I. E. Karl
Prevention of lymphocyte cell death in sepsis improves survival in mice
PNAS, December 7, 1999; 96(25): 14541 - 14546.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
M. Sturzl, C. Hohenadl, C. Zietz, E. Castanos-Velez, A. Wunderlich, G. Ascherl, P. Biberfeld, P. Monini, P. J. Browning, and B. Ensoli
Expression of K13/v-FLIP Gene of Human Herpesvirus 8 and Apoptosis in Kaposi's Sarcoma Spindle Cells
J Natl Cancer Inst, October 20, 1999; 91(20): 1725 - 1733.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
R. S. Hotchkiss, P. E. Swanson, C. M. Knudson, K. C. Chang, J. P. Cobb, D. F. Osborne, K. M. Zollner, T. G. Buchman, S. J. Korsmeyer, and I. E. Karl
Overexpression of Bcl-2 in Transgenic Mice Decreases Apoptosis and Improves Survival in Sepsis
J. Immunol., April 1, 1999; 162(7): 4148 - 4156.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Su, X.
Right arrow Articles by Mountz, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Su, X.
Right arrow Articles by Mountz, J. D.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS