|
|
||||||||

Departments of
*
Pediatrics and
Internal Medicine, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although epithelial cells are the primary target of RSV and the infection proceeds by cell-to-cell spread of the virus (6), viral Ag has been found surprisingly scanty in amount and patchy in distribution in autoptic samples from patients with RSV bronchiolitis (5). These findings suggest that pathogenetic mechanisms other than those associated with direct viral infection are responsible to a great extent for the damage of airway mucosa seen in RSV bronchiolitis. Indeed, peribronchial infiltration of mononuclear cells with edema of surrounding tissue (4), and presence of basophil- and eosinophil-specific inflammatory and cytotoxic mediators (7, 8, 9, 10, 11) have been shown by histologic studies and by analysis of nasopharyngeal secretions of RSV-infected infants. Eosinophils, in particular, seem to play an important role in RSV bronchiolitis. Along this line, we and others have shown that eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), a toxic protein contained in the granules of eosinophils, is released in the respiratory tract of children with naturally acquired RSV infection (9, 10, 11). Significantly higher levels of ECP were recovered from subjects affected by bronchiolitis compared with those with localized upper respiratory tract illness (9, 10). ECP has been shown also in bronchial submucosa of subjects with asthma, especially in areas of epithelial cell sloughing (12), and its cytotoxicity for the epithelium has been confirmed by in vitro studies (13, 14).
Despite the amount of information generated by human, animal, and in vitro studies about the contribution of eosinophil granule proteins to the pathophysiology of allergic and nonallergic inflammation, the mechanisms that trigger eosinophil activation and degranulation remain unclear. Recent observations suggest that adhesion mechanisms most likely play a critical role in eosinophil degranulation (15, 16, 17). Furthermore, a growing body of experimental evidence indicates that the airway epithelium can function both as the target and the initiator of the inflammatory response in RSV infection (18). Thus, since little is known about the interaction between epithelial cells and eosinophils, we investigated the effect of RSV infection on ECP release using a coculture model of purified human eosinophils and lung type II alveolar epithelial cells. The effect of purified RSV virions as well as the direct and modulatory effect of soluble factors produced by infected epithelial cells upon eosinophil degranulation were also studied in this experimental model. Implications for the pathogenesis of viral-induced airway mucosa damage are discussed.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The following Abs were used for flow cytometry: mAb anti-human CD11a (TS1.22, mouse IgG1) and anti-human CD11c (SHCL3, mouse IgG2b) from Dr. T. Springer (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA), PE-conjugated anti-human CD11b (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA), anti-human ICAM-1 (HA58; PharMingen, San Diego, CA), isotype-matched PE-conjugated mouse IgG2a (Becton Dickinson), mouse IgG2a and mouse IgG1 (Dako, Carpenteria, CA), and anti-mouse F(ab')2 FITC-conjugated Ab (Tago, Camarillo, CA). The following Abs were used in neutralization studies: anti-human CD18 clones MHM23 (mouse IgG1; Dako), TS1.18 (mouse IgG1; from Dr. T. Springer), and R15.7 (mouse IgG1) and its F(ab')2 fragment (both a generous gift from Dr. Michele Mariscalco, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX); anti-human ICAM-1 (RR1/1; first domain, mouse IgG1; Biosource, Camarillo, CA); and isotype-matched mouse IgG1 (Dako).
Eosinophil isolation
Heparinized (10 U/ml) venous blood was obtained from normal volunteers and sedimented with 6% dextran. The leukocyte-enriched buffy coats were harvested and overlaid onto Ficoll-Paque (Pharmacia, Piscataway, NY) and centrifuged at 400 x g for 20 min. The granulocyte-containing cell pellet was collected and washed with cold calcium- and magnesium-free HBSS. Erythrocytes were removed by hypotonic lysis. Eosinophils were negatively selected with anti-CD16 immunomagnetic beads to remove neutrophils using the MACS system (Miltenyi Biotec, Sunnyvale, CA) (19). The eosinophil purity was >99%, as determined by microscopic examination of Wright-stained cytospin preparations. Eosinophils were resuspended at 2 x 105 cells/ml in RPMI 1640 (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY) containing 2% FCS.
Culture of airway epithelial cells
A549 cells were purchased from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Rockville, MD). The cells were grown as monolayer in 24-well tissue culture plates (Becton Dickinson) in MEM supplemented with 10% FCS, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 0.1 mg/ml streptomycin (all from Life Technologies) at 37°C with 5% CO2 in humidified air. All experiments were performed when the cells reached confluence.
RSV purification
The human long strain of RSV (A2) was grown in Hep-2 cells
(ATCC) and purified by polyethylene glycol precipitation, followed by
centrifugation on 35 to 65% discontinuous sucrose gradients, as
described elsewhere (20). The virus was aliquoted, quick frozen on dry
ice with ethanol, and stored at -70°C until needed. The virus titer
of the purified RSV (pRSV) pools, as determined by a methylcellulose
plaque assay (21), was 7 x 108 plaque-forming
U/ml. No contaminating cytokines, including IL-1, IL-6, IL-8, TNF-
,
granulocyte-macrophage CSF (GM-CSF), and IFNs, were found in these
sucrose-purified viral preparations (22).
Preparation of supernatant from RSV-infected epithelial cells
Monolayers of A549 cells were infected with pRSV at multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 1 in MEM with 2% FCS. At 48 h, when the cells exhibited maximal cytopathic effect, the supernatant was collected, centrifuged at 300 x g, and finally exposed to a 245-nm UV light source for 5 min on ice to inactivate the virus. This RSV-conditioned medium (RSV-CM) was aliquoted and stored at -70°C until used. Control CM was collected from uninfected A549 cell cultures and treated as described for RSV-CM.
Eosinophil degranulation
To determine the role of epithelial cells in eosinophil degranulation, confluent monolayers of A549 cells were infected with pRSV at MOI of 1 or cultured in control medium (MEM with 2% FCS). At 24 h, medium was removed and 0.5 ml of eosinophil suspension (1 x 105 cells) was added to each well. In some experiments, anti-human CD18 mAb, anti-human ICAM-1 mAb, or mouse IgG isotype control, in concentration indicated in Results, was added to the wells at the beginning of the coculture. In other set of experiments, eosinophils were cocultured with epithelial cells in the presence of RSV-CM (50% v/v) with anti-CD18 mAb or mouse IgG isotype control (in concentration indicated in Results). Eosinophils and epithelial cells were then incubated for 16 h at 37°C in 5% CO2. At the end of the coculture period, supernatant was collected and stored at -70°C until ECP measurement was performed by a specific RIA (Pharmacia). Eosinophil viability at the end of culture period was assessed by the exclusion of trypan blue dye.
To determine the effect of purified RSV or supernatant from RSV-infected epithelial cells on eosinophil degranulation, equal number of eosinophils (1 x 105 cells/0.5 ml) was incubated with medium (RPMI 1640 with 2% FCS) or with pRSV (MOI = 10), or were treated with RSV-CM (50% v/v) for 16 h. For the measurement of the total content of ECP, eosinophils cultured in medium were lysed with 2% Triton X-100. Lysates were centrifuged at 300 x g, and supernatants were collected for ECP assay.
ICAM-1 expression by A549 cells
A549 cells were grown on 25-cm2 flasks in MEM containing 10% FCS. Confluent monolayers of epithelial cells were washed with PBS and were cultured with CM or with RSV-CM (50% v/v). After 16-h incubation, cells were harvested by 0.02% EDTA. Approximately 1 x 106 cells were stained with anti-human ICAM-1 mAb or irrelevant isotype control in 100 µl of FACS buffer (HBSS containing 1% BSA and 0.1% NaN3) for 40 min at 4°C. After two washes in FACS buffer, the cells were incubated with FITC-conjugated anti-mouse F(ab')2 Ab for 30 min at 4°C. The cells were finally washed and fixed in 1% paraformaldehyde, and 10,000 cells per condition were analyzed for fluorescence by single-color flow cytometry on a FACScan (Becton Dickinson).
Expression of CD11a, CD11b, and CD11c by eosinophils
Eosinophils (5 x 105 cells/ml) were incubated in control medium (RPMI with 2% FCS) or were exposed to CM, RSV-CM (50% v/v), or pRSV (MOI = 10). After 1.5 h of culture, eosinophils were stained with PE-conjugated anti-human CD11b or with an isotype control Ab in 100 µl of FACS buffer for 1 h at 4°C. To determine expression of CD11a and CD11c, eosinophils were stained with anti-CD11a, anti-CD11c, or irrelevant isotype Ab for 40 min at 4°C. After two washes, the cells were incubated with FITC-conjugated anti-mouse F(ab')2 Ab for 30 min at 4°C. The cells were washed in the FACS buffer and fixed with 1% paraformaldehyde. Expression of CD11a, CD11b, and CD11c was determined by flow cytometry using a FACScan analyzer (Becton Dickinson).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We have shown previously that RSV, by binding to eosinophil cell
membrane, directly stimulates superoxide production and primes them for
enhanced leukotriene C4 release in response to
subsequent challenge with calcium ionophore (23). Furthermore,
RSV-infected airway epithelial cells release several cytokines,
including TNF-
(24), GM-CSF (18, 25), RANTES (26, 27), and
macrophage-inflammatory protein-1
(18), which have been shown to
induce eosinophil degranulation (28). Thus, we initially examined
whether pRSV or cytokines and other soluble mediators present in RSV-CM
were able to induce eosinophil degranulation. As shown in Figure 1
, exposure of purified blood eosinophils
to pRSV or to RSV-CM for 16 h resulted in the release of small
amounts of ECP (7.3 ± 2.7 ng/ml and 10.1 ± 7.2 ng/ml,
respectively) that were comparable with those released spontaneously by
nonstimulated eosinophils (11.8 ± 2.9 ng/ml). Eosinophils that
had been lysed by treatment with Triton X-100 released 412 ± 39.5
ng/ml of ECP. Eosinophil viability after 16 h of culture was
consistently >90%, regardless of the treatment conditions. These
results indicate that eosinophils are not able to release ECP directly
in response to pRSV or to soluble mediators present in the supernatant
of RSV-infected epithelial cells.
|
Adhesion mechanisms initiate and regulate several eosinophil
effector functions, including superoxide production (17), leukotriene
C4 generation (29), and cell degranulation (15, 16, 17).
Therefore, we examined the role of RSV infection on ECP release in an
in vitro coculture system of eosinophils and lung epithelial cells. In
these experiments, we used the A549 cell line, which is derived from an
alveolar cell carcinoma of the lung, displays features of type II
epithelial cells (30), and is susceptible to RSV infection (31, 32). As
shown in Figure 2
, blood eosinophils
cocultured with uninfected A549 cells for 16 h released ECP in
concentrations similar to those released spontaneously by eosinophils
cultured in absence of epithelial cells (14 ± 2 ng/ml) (see also
Fig. 1
). However, when eosinophils were cocultured with 24-h
RSV-infected A549 cells, a significant fivefold enhancement in ECP
release was observed (56.4 ± 16.6 ng/ml; p <
0.01).
|
Expression of ICAM-1 on A549 cells and CD11b on eosinophils is up-regulated by the supernatant of RSV-infected epithelial cells
Integrins of the ß2 family (CD11b/CD18) play a
critical role in eosinophil degranulation induced by
platelet-activating factor or GM-CSF (17) and IgG (15). We and others
have shown that RSV infection induces the expression of ICAM-1, the
ligand for CD11b/CD18, on A549 cells via the autocrine effect of
IL-1
(24). Since the expression of ICAM-1 by noninfected epithelial
cells may also amplify eosinophil degranulation, we further examined by
flow cytometry the expression of ICAM-1 on A549 cells following
exposure to RSV-CM. As shown in Figure 3
,
exposure to RSV-CM induced ICAM-1 expression on A549 cells, while no
effect was observed when the cells were exposed to supernatant of
uninfected epithelial cells.
|
|
Since coculture of RSV-infected A549 cells with eosinophils
resulted in release of ECP- and RSV-CM-induced expression of ICAM-1 on
A549 cells and the up-regulation of CD11b on eosinophils, we examined
the specific role of these adhesion molecules in eosinophil
degranulation induced by RSV-infected epithelial cells. Neutralizing
anti-ICAM-1 mAb (10 µg/ml) had no significant effect on
eosinophil degranulation (data not shown). On the other hand, addition
of the anti-CD18 mAb MHM23 to the coculture of RSV-infected A549
cells and eosinophils significantly inhibited ECP release by 64.4%
(Fig. 5
A). Similarly,
the MHM23 mAb almost completely inhibited (84.7%) ECP release induced
by the coculture of uninfected A549 cells and eosinophils in the
presence of RSV-CM (Fig. 5
B). In other experiments,
the ability of various anti-CD18 mAbs to inhibit ECP release in
coculture of RSV-infected A549 cells and eosinophils was
compared. As shown in Figure 6
, virtually
complete inhibition of eosinophil degranulation was obtained with
the mAbs TS1.18 and MHM23 (used at fivefold higher concentration than
in the experiments presented in Fig. 5
). F(ab')2
fragment of the R15.7 mAb had almost identical inhibitory activity than
the parent Ab. Thus, these results suggest that a CD18-dependent
mechanism is involved in eosinophil degranulation mediated by
epithelial cells either directly infected by RSV or exposed to soluble
mediators released by other infected cells. The neutralizing
effect of anti-CD18, but not anti-ICAM-1 mAbs suggests
that non-ICAM-1 epithelial ligand(s) may be recognized by eosinophil
CD18 and is discussed further below.
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In recent years, it has become clear that respiratory epithelial cells, which represent the main target of eosinophil cytotoxic proteins, are able themselves to initiate and modulate local inflammatory responses by releasing a variety of bioactive mediators and cytokines (40). Since respiratory epithelial cells are also the primary site of replication for RSV (6), our experimental approach was designed to mimic the in vivo condition of interaction between RSV-infected epithelium and eosinophils within the airway mucosa. For this purpose, ECP release was investigated using cocultures of human lung type II alveolar epithelial cells (A549) and purified blood eosinophils. We show in this work that eosinophils released significant amount of ECP when cultured with RSV-infected A549 cells. On the other hand, uninfected A549 cells, which failed to induce eosinophil degranulation, were able to trigger ECP release if cultured with eosinophils in the presence of supernatant obtained from RSV-infected cells (RSV-CM). The release of ECP, in cultures of eosinophils with RSV-infected or uninfected A549 cells in the presence of RSV-CM, was inhibited significantly by anti-CD18 mAb, but not by anti-ICAM-1 mAb.
Based on these results, we asked the question concerning whether RSV,
in the form of purified virions, and RSV-CM were able to trigger the
process of eosinophil degranulation in the absence of epithelial cells.
We have shown in previous studies that RSV, by binding to eosinophil
cell membrane, is able to stimulate directly oxygen radical production
and to prime eosinophils for enhanced superoxide generation and
leukotriene C4 release (23). In addition, RSV-infected
respiratory epithelial cells release several cytokines and chemokines
with direct stimulatory activity on eosinophil degranulation (28),
including TNF-
(24), GM-CSF (18, 25), RANTES (26, 27), and
macrophage-inflammatory protein-1
(18). The results of these
experiments clearly show that neither purified RSV nor RSV-CM was able
to induce directly ECP release from eosinophils, indicating that the
presence of RSV-infected epithelial cells is necessary to induce
eosinophil degranulation. However, we demonstrate in this work that
RSV-CM, by providing an appropriate milieu of inflammatory mediators,
can activate eosinophils and uninfected epithelial cells and trigger
efficient eosinophil degranulation.
With regard to eosinophil activation, RSV-CM induced the up-regulation
of CD11b, the
-chain of the ß2 integrin Mac-1
(CD11b/CD18), on eosinophil membrane. Mac-1, which is involved in
specific adhesion of leukocytes to endothelial cells and extracellular
matrices, functions as a receptor for ICAM-1 (41) and is expressed in
similar density by normodense and hypodense eosinophils (33). Increased
adhesion avidity of ß2 integrins in eosinophils by the CC
chemokines RANTES and monocyte chemotactic protein 3 has been recently
reported (42). It is likely that RSV-CM, a rich source of CC
chemokines, modulates adhesion and other functions of eosinophils by
increasing both the number and the avidity of CD11b molecules on
eosinophils. Several lines of evidence suggest that RSV-mediated
up-regulation or activation of ß2 integrins on
eosinophils is a crucial event for the induction of eosinophil
degranulation. First, in the experimental model used in our studies,
the release of ECP by eosinophils was inhibited significantly by three
mAbs (with different epitope specificity) to CD18, the common ß-chain
of the ß2 integrin family. Although adhesion studies were
not performed, addition of neutralizing Ab anti-CD18 most likely
resulted in inhibition of eosinophil adhesion to A549 cells. Previous
studies have indeed shown that the process of eosinophil degranulation
in the presence of bronchial cells (16) and immobilized IgG (15), or in
response to GM-CSF and platelet-activating factor in albumin-coated
polystyrene plates (17) is preceded consistently by cell adhesion.
Second, neutrophil and eosinophil adhesion to respiratory epithelial
cells has been shown to be greatly enhanced by RSV infection, to
require prior activation of eosinophils, and to be reduced
significantly by Ab to CD18 (43). Third, we have shown in these studies
that uninfected A549 cells induced the release of significant amounts
of ECP by eosinophils when RSV-CM was added to the coculture, resulting
in the activation of epithelial cells and up-regulation of CD11b on
eosinophils.
It has been shown recently that in cocultures of eosinophils and human
bronchial epithelial cells, eosinophil degranulation occurred only if
both cells were activated by IL-5 and TNF-
, respectively (16). We
report in this work that A549 cells were induced to express high levels
of ICAM-1 following exposure to RSV-CM. However, we were unable to
block eosinophil degranulation using a well-characterized mAb to ICAM-1
(RR1/1), which has been shown previously, among other functions, to
inhibit the adhesion of eosinophils to endothelial cells (44). In
agreement with these findings, other investigators have shown that,
although IL-1
or TNF-
treatment of respiratory epithelial cells
induced enhanced expression of ICAM-1 and increased adherence of
activated eosinophils, cell adherence was blocked by neutralizing mAb
to ß2 integrins, but not to ICAM-1 (45). Moreover,
IL-5-stimulated eosinophil degranulation in the presence of bronchial
epithelial cells has been shown to be reduced significantly by mAbs to
CD18, but not to ICAM-1 (16). Thus, while ß2 integrins
seem to be key molecules for eosinophil adhesion to epithelial cells
and degranulation, ICAM-1 appears to play a relatively minor role. One
explanation for the different effect of anti-CD18 and
anti-ICAM-1 on eosinophil adherence and degranulation in the
presence of epithelial cells may be that ligands for the
ß2 integrins, other than ICAM-1, are expressed on airway
epithelial cells. Therefore, the induction of ICAM-1 that occurs as a
result of direct viral infection or, in uninfected cells, by exposure
to cytokines and soluble mediators released by neighbor-infected cells,
may represent a paradigm of in vivo epithelial cell activation
associated with the up-regulation of other adhesion molecules currently
unknown.
Migration and/or activation of eosinophils in the airway mucosa are not unique to RSV among respiratory viruses. In this regard, it has been shown that rhinovirus infection in patients with allergic rhinitis is associated with the recruitment of eosinophils to the airways (46). Other investigators have extended these observations by showing a significant increase in the number of eosinophils in bronchial biopsies from normal volunteers experimentally infected with rhinovirus (47). Increased lung resistance and eosinophil infiltration have been reported in parainfluenza-infected guinea pigs (48). In vitro studies have also shown that influenza virus-infected respiratory epithelial cells are able to generate RANTES, a potent chemoattractant and activator of eosinophils (49), and to express ICAM-1 following infection with parainfluenza (50) or adenovirus (51). Therefore, the major respiratory viruses that cause bronchiolitis in infancy and trigger asthma attacks in children and older individuals (52) are able to induce the recruitment and perhaps to activate eosinophils by mechanisms still largely unknown. The results presented in this work demonstrate that eosinophil degranulation can be induced effectively by coculture of eosinophils with RSV-infected epithelial cells, and that this process is CD18 dependent. This observation has important implication for the pathogenesis of inflammation driven by the initial viral infection of epithelial cells. Indeed, the killing and eradication of infected cells by immunologic mechanisms mediated by Ag-specific CTLs or, as shown in this study, by cytotoxic eosinophil products may positively impact the outcome of RSV infection. On the other hand, eosinophil-mediated cytotoxicity against bystander uninfected epithelial cells may greatly contribute to the enhanced pathology observed in RSV-induced airway disease. Old and new therapeutic strategies for RSV airway disease should take into account the delicate balance between immunopathology and immunoprotection that is characteristic of RSV infection.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Roberto P. Garofalo, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Immunology/Allergy/Rheumatology, 301 University Blvd., Galveston, TX 77555-0369. E-mail address: ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: RSV, respiratory syncytial virus; CM, conditioned medium of epithelial cells; ECP, eosinophil cationic protein; GM-CSF, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor; MOI, multiplicity of infection; PE, phycoerythrin; pRSV, sucrose gradient-purified respiratory syncytial virus; RANTES, regulated upon activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted; RSV-CM, conditioned medium of respiratory syncytial virus-infected epithelial cells. ![]()
Received for publication September 29, 1997. Accepted for publication January 26, 1998.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
mediates the enhanced expression of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 in pulmonary epithelial cells infected with respiratory syncytial virus. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 13:602.[Abstract]
and interferon-ß. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 152:1358.[Abstract]
. J. Immunol. 157:2506.[Abstract]
and CD11/CD18 receptor expression on normal and low density human eosinophils. Immunology 69:264.[Medline]
and interleukin-1ß. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 13:555.[Abstract]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. D. Dyer, C. M. Percopo, E. R. Fischer, S. J. Gabryszewski, and H. F. Rosenberg Pneumoviruses infect eosinophils and elicit MyD88-dependent release of chemoattractant cytokines and interleukin-6 Blood, September 24, 2009; 114(13): 2649 - 2656. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. B. Cook, J. L. Stahl, A. M. Brooks, F. M. Graziano, and N. P. Barney Allergic tears promote upregulation of eosinophil adhesion to conjunctival epithelial cells in an ex vivo model: inhibition with olopatadine treatment. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., August 1, 2006; 47(8): 3423 - 3429. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Decot, G. Woerly, M. Loyens, S. Loiseau, B. Quatannens, M. Capron, and D. Dombrowicz Heterogeneity of Expression of IgA Receptors by Human, Mouse, and Rat Eosinophils J. Immunol., January 15, 2005; 174(2): 628 - 635. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Rutigliano, T. R. Johnson, T. N. Hollinger, J. E. Fischer, S. Aung, and B. S. Graham Treatment with Anti-LFA-1 Delays the CD8+ Cytotoxic-T-Lymphocyte Response and Viral Clearance in Mice with Primary Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection J. Virol., March 15, 2004; 78(6): 3014 - 3023. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Adamko, A. D. Fryer, B. S. Bochner, and D. B. Jacoby CD8+ T Lymphocytes in Viral Hyperreactivity and M2 Muscarinic Receptor Dysfunction Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., February 15, 2003; 167(4): 550 - 556. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Cormier, S. Yuan, J. R. Crosby, C. A. Protheroe, D. M. Dimina, E. M. Hines, N. A. Lee, and J. J. Lee TH2-Mediated Pulmonary Inflammation Leads to the Differential Expression of Ribonuclease Genes by Alveolar Macrophages Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., December 1, 2002; 27(6): 678 - 687. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Tian, Y. Zhang, B. A. Luxon, R. P. Garofalo, A. Casola, M. Sinha, and A. R. Brasier Identification of NF-{kappa}B-Dependent Gene Networks in Respiratory Syncytial Virus-Infected Cells J. Virol., June 5, 2002; 76(13): 6800 - 6814. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Boix, E. Carreras, Z. Nikolovski, C. M. Cuchillo, and M. V. Nogues Identification and characterization of human eosinophil cationic protein by an epitope-specific antibody J. Leukoc. Biol., June 1, 2001; 69(6): 1027 - 1035. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. V. Hirschmann, T. F. Murphy, S. Sethi, and M. S. Niederman Bacteria and COPD Exacerbations Redux Chest, February 1, 2001; 119(2): 663 - 667. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. M. Smith, Y. Zhang, W. D. Grafton, S. R. Jennings, and D. J. O'Callaghan Severe Murine Lung Immunopathology Elicited by the Pathogenic Equine Herpesvirus 1 Strain RacL11 Correlates with Early Production of Macrophage Inflammatory Proteins 1alpha , 1beta , and 2 and Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha J. Virol., November 1, 2000; 74(21): 10034 - 10040. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
T. F. Murphy, S. Sethi, and M. S. Niederman The Role of Bacteria in Exacerbations of COPD : A Constructive View Chest, July 1, 2000; 118(1): 204 - 209. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Adamko, B. L. Yost, G. J. Gleich, A. D. Fryer, and D. B. Jacoby Ovalbumin Sensitization Changes the Inflammatory Response to Subsequent Parainfluenza Infection: Eosinophils Mediate Airway Hyperresponsiveness, M2 Muscarinic Receptor Dysfunction, and Antiviral Effects J. Exp. Med., November 15, 1999; 190(10): 1465 - 1478. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |