The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


The Journal of Immunology, 1967, 98, 958 -964
Copyright © 1967 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rowlands, D. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Rowlands, D. T., Jr.

Precipitation and Neutralization of Bacteriophage f2 by Rabbit Antibodies1

David T. Rowlands, Jr.2

From The Rockfeller University, New York, New York

Abstract

Summary and Conclusion: Neutralization and precipitation of bacteriophage f2 by {gamma}G-immunoglobulin, 5S pepsinfragments and Fab' fragments were used to test the hypothesis that sterie hindrance is important in virus neutralization. There was no demonstrable difference in the capacity of intact {gamma}G-immunoglobulin and 5S pepsin fragments to precipitate bacteriophage.The zones of equivalence with {gamma}G-immunoglobulin and 5S pepsin fragments were broad. These results suggested that there was no differenee in the combining capacities of f2 for bivalent antibodies or for bivalent antibody fragments. As expected, the Fab' fragments did not precipitate with bacteriophage f2. The antibody to antigen ratios necessary to produce neutralization of bacteriophage correspond to points on the antibody excess end of the equivalence zone of the preeipitin curve. In all eases the kinetics of neutralization were first order. The {gamma}G-immunoglobulin was most active and the Fab' fragment was least active. The 5S pepsin fragments were intermediate in activity. However, the neutralization constants were not strictly proportional to molecular weights. This suggests that virus neutralization may not be entirely explicable on the basis of steric hindrance.

Footnotes

1 These studies were supported by Grants AM 09428 and AI 06985 from the United States PublicHealth Service, and by Grant GB 3920 from the National Science Foundation.

2 Present address: Department of Pathology,Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NorthCarolina.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Website Copyright © 1967 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.
All Contents Copyright © 1967 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.