HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Dvorak, H. F. Articles by Flax, M. H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Dvorak, H. F. Articles by Flax, M. H.

Immunologic Unresponsiveness in the Adult Guinea Pig

II. The Kinetics of Unresponsiveness¹

From the James Homer Wright Pathology Laboratories of the Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts

Abstract

The degree and persistence of immunologic unresponsiveness, induced in the adult guinea pig with a single intravenous injection of protein antigen in saline, depended on the time relationships between administration of the suppressing and sensitizing injections. Unresponsiveness was maximal when suppressing and sensitizing injections were administered concurrently. As the interval between the suppressing and sensitizing injections was increased, progressively less unresponsiveness resulted. Animals receiving a "suppressing" intravenous antigen injection 6–12 weeks prior to sensitization developed increased 7 S₁ antibody titers, suggesting that the suppressing injection was itself potentially immunogenic. It was also possible to induce immunologic unresponsiveness as late as 10 days after administration of a sensitizing injection of antigen, at a time when the animal already manifested a weak immune response; however, larger doses of suppressing antigen were required.

Delayed skin reactivity was most readily suppressed by intravenous antigen and last to recover. Hemolytic antibody production followed an intermediate course, while 7 S₁ antibody production was most resistant to suppression and the first to recover. The differences in suppressibility of these immune functions may reflect differences in the sensitivity of the techniques used to measure them or may indicate that these immune functions arise independently, possibly from different cell lines.

Footnotes

¹ This work was supported by United States Public Health Service Grants 2TGM 19206 and AI-05550.

² Present address: Research Associate, National Institute of Arthritis and Metabolic Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.

³ Fellow of the Medical Foundation, Inc., Boston, Massachusetts.