The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


The Journal of Immunology, 1965, 94: 555-562.
Copyright © 1965 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Crowle, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hu, C. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Crowle, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hu, C. C.

Inhibition of the Development of Delayed Hypersensitivity by Treatment with Antiserum1

Alfred J. Crowle and C. C. Hu

From the Webb-Waring Institute for Medical Research and the Department of Microbiology, University of Colorado Medical Center, Denver, Colorado

Abstract

Daily i.p. injections in mice of homologous or heterologous antiserum to chicken ovalbumin performed during the period of initial sensitization specifically suppressed development and hastened waning of immediate and delayed hypersensitivities to this antigen. This suppressive effect was considerably more effective against delayed hypersensitivity than against immediate. Intensive antiserum treatments usually were employed to elicit this type of suppression, but it could be induced with as little as 1.2 µl of antiserum given in 12 daily equal aliquots, or by a single injection of nonisogenic immune lymphoid cells.

Immunologic suppression by antiserum treatments affects production of antibodies but does not interfere with the initial events of antigen recognition necessary for development of anamnestic responsiveness.

These findings indicate that although immediate and delayed hypersensitivities may be different mechanistically they cannot be considered independent of each other, for the presence or absence of one can influence development of the other. The implications of this conclusion for interpreting such general phenomena as antiseruminduced resistance to autoimmune diseases, immunologic enhancement, the pathogenesis of certain infectious diseases, tolerance and mechanisms of adjuvant activity are discussed.

Footnotes

1 This study was supported by United States Public Health Service Grant AI-02689.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Website Copyright © 1965 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.
All Contents Copyright © 1965 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.