The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


The Journal of Immunology, 1964, 93: 474-480.
Copyright © 1964 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shulman, S.
Right arrow Articles by Soanes, W. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Shulman, S.
Right arrow Articles by Soanes, W. A.

The Detection of Prostatic Acid Phosphatase by Antibody Reactions in Gel Diffusion1

Sidney Shulman2, Louise Mamrod, Maurice J. Gonder and Ward A. Soanes

From the Department of Bacteriology and Immunology, State University of New York at Buffalo, School of Medicine, and the Millard Fillmore Hospital Research Institute, Buffalo, New York

Abstract

Prostatic acid phosphatase was demonstrated in electrophoretic patterns of prostatic fluid in the region corresponding to the serum {alpha}2- and beta-globulins. In gel diffusion precipitation, this enzymatic activity was localized in two distinct bands of dense brown, speckled appearance. The titration end point of the major band varied with the sample of prostatic fluid; some were as high as 1:16000. In immunoelectrophoresis, the activity was again localized in two of the precipitin bands that were formed with the homologous antiserum. These bands were clearly of different electrophoretic mobility, suggesting that there are two different molecules having similar enzymatic properties. A number of organ extracts were tested for this phosphatase activity, namely, seminal vesicle, kidney, testicle, liver, lung and prostate gland. All of these were negative except for prostate extract, which did show one line of reaction. Normal serum was also negative. Serum from patients with carcinoma of the prostate were also positive, but only in some of the experiments. This is being further studied.

Footnotes

1 Supported in part by Research Grant CA-05499 from the National Cancer Institute, United States Public Health Service, Bethesda, Maryland.

2 Recipient of Research Career Award K6-AI-1377 from the United States Public Health Service.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Website Copyright © 1964 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.
All Contents Copyright © 1964 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.