The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


The Journal of Immunology, 1962, 89: 136-144.
Copyright © 1962 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kroeger, A. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kroeger, A. V.

Evidence for the Absence of Anaphylactogenic Host Protein in Highly Purified PR8 Influenza Virus1

Arthur V. Kroeger

From the Department of Microbiology, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago Professional Colleges, Chicago, Illinois

Abstract

The anaphylactogenic properties of crude sedimented and highly purified PR8 influenza virus suspensions were investigated by the Schultz-Dale reaction with excised uterine muscle from sensitized guinea pigs. It was shown that the specificity of the in vitro anaphylactic reaction with crude sedimented virus is related to the host protein present in the virus suspensions and not to the specific viral antigen.

When PR8 influenza virus was concentrated from infected chorioallantoic fluid by one cycle of ultracentrifugation or by one cycle of adsorption and elution from chicken erythrocytes, the presence of host protein could readily be detected by Schultz-Dale reactions with uterine muscle taken from guinea pigs previously sensitized with normal chorioallantoic membrane antigen, but, when the first cycle eluates were further purified by a second cycle of adsorption and elution from guinea pig erythrocytes, host material could be detected in only trace amounts in two separate virus suspensions. Finally, sedimentation of the second cycle eluates in the ultracentrifuge yielded two preparations which contained no detectable amount of host protein.

The data presented in this investigation appear to be irreconcilable with the hypothesis that normal anaphylactogenic host protein is incorporated on the surface of the PR8 influenza virus elementary body during replication in the chorioallantois of the embryonated egg.

Footnotes

1 Financial support for this investigation was provided by the Graduate College Research Fund, University of Illinois, Chicago, Illinois.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Website Copyright © 1962 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.
All Contents Copyright © 1962 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.