The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


The Journal of Immunology, 1958, 81: 150-154.
Copyright © 1958 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Makinodan, T.
Right arrow Articles by Gengozian, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Makinodan, T.
Right arrow Articles by Gengozian, N.

Primary Antibody Response to a Distantly Related Heterologous1 Antigen During Maximum Depression Period After Varying Doses of X Radiation Antigen During Maximum Depression Period After Varying Doses of X Radiation

Takashi Makinodan and Nazareth Gengozian

From the Biology Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory,2 Oak Ridge, Tenneszee

Abstract

1. Antigen administration by the intraperitoneal route stimulated greater antibody response than by the intravenous route in normal, adult mice.
2. The 30-day LD50 dose for (C3H x 101)F1 mice was 756.3 r (95% confidence limits of 728.1 and 786.5 r).
3. Antibody response for sheep red blood cells during the maximum depression period after varying doses of X radiation to the total body was measured in terms of a) inducation period, b) rate of antibody appearance in the circulation, c) mean peak titer and d) mean total titer. No quantitative relation between radiation dose and antibody response was apparent when mean peak titer was used as an index of antibody response. A curvilinear relation for the radiation dose and antibody response was obtained in terms of induction period, rate of antibody appearance, and mean total titer. The significance of these findings is discussed.

Footnotes

1 Heterologous denotes species differences between donor and recipient; isologous involves donors and recipients within a single inbred strain.

2 Operated by Union Carbide Corporation for the U. S. Atomic Energy Commission.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Website Copyright © 1958 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.
All Contents Copyright © 1958 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.