The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


The Journal of Immunology, 1958, 80: 45-52.
Copyright © 1958 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hsiung, G. D.
Right arrow Articles by Melnick, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hsiung, G. D.
Right arrow Articles by Melnick, J. L.

Adsorption, Multiplication, and Cytopathogenicity of Enteroviruses (Poliomyelitis, Coxsackie, and Echo Groups) in Susceptible and Resistant Monkey Kidney Cells1

G. D. Hsiung and Joseph L. Melnick2

From the Section of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut

Abstract

Experiments with virus adsorption were designed in an attempt to elucidate the differences in susceptibility to the enteroviruses of patas and rhesus monkey kidney cells. This study indicates that the greater number of poliovirus plaques appearing on patas monolayer was due to cell susceptibility rather than to differences of adsorptive capacity among the virus particles.

All the poliomyelitis, Coxsackie, and ECHO viruses tested were adsorbed on both rhesus and patas cells regardless of degree of viral susceptibility of the cells. Thus, while the failure to induce plaques may in some instances be due to the failure to adsorb, as reported for poliovirus on South American capuchin monkey kidney cells, this study showed that other factors in the infection cycle may be involved.

Both Coxsackie A9 and ECHO-1, to which patas cells are apparently resistant, did multiply in patas cells to a limited extent when large inocula were used, although cytopathic changes were questionable or minimal. Coxsackie A9 virus could not be detected after its inoculation into patas cultures, even when the inoculum contained 500 rhesus PFU. The virus disappeared at the end of an hour and could not be detected in either the fluid phase or in cells thereafter. Neither virus produced plaques in patas cells under agar nor cytopathic changes in fluid medium when the inoculum was used in low concentration.

Footnotes

1 This investigation was aided by a grant from The National Foundation for Infantile Paralysis.

2 Present address: Virus Research Section, Division of Biologies Standards, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Website Copyright © 1958 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.
All Contents Copyright © 1958 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.