The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


The Journal of Immunology, 1956, 76: 275-280.
Copyright © 1956 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Williamson, A. P.
Right arrow Articles by Simonsen, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Williamson, A. P.
Right arrow Articles by Simonsen, L.

Mechanism of the Teratogenic Action of Newcastle Disease Virus in the Chick Embryo1

Alice Polk Williamson, Russell J. Blattner and Lydia Simonsen

From the Department of Pediatrics, Baylor University College of Medicine, Houston, Texas

Abstract

Evidence has been presented indicating that defects in early chick embryos, after inoculation of allantoic fluid suspensions of Newcastle disease virus, resulted from the presence of the fully infective virus and probably were due to the proliferation of the virus since, in all circumstances observed, they were associated with this phenomena. Homologous immune globulin prevented the teratogenic action of the virus suspensions, and no teratogenic activity was found in suspensions from which the virus particles had been removed by ultracentrifugation. Virus inocula, inactivated by heat or ultraviolet irradiation, failed to produce defects. Inoculation of inactivated virus decreased somewhat the yield of abnormal embryos following subsequent inoculation of active virus.

There was no conclusive evidence that the rate of multiplication in organs, showing characteristic defects, was greater than that of tissues which appeared unaffected. It seemed clear, however, that virus proliferated in other tissues as well as those showing gross defects.

Microscopic studies showed that dilute virus inocula produced characteristic cell damage of a relatively mild type in comparison to the gross defects following concentrated virus inocula, but that the organ specificity was the same in either case.

Footnotes

1 This investigation was supported by research grant E-236 (C3) from the Microbiological Institute of the National Institutes of Health, Public Health Service.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Website Copyright © 1956 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.
All Contents Copyright © 1956 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.