The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


The Journal of Immunology, 1954, 72: 348-352.
Copyright © 1954 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Evans, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, W. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Evans, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, W. M.

Growth of Neurotropic Viruses in Extraneural Tissues

VI. ABSENCE OF IN VIVO MULTIPLICATION OF POLIOMYELITIS VIRUS, TYPES I AND II, AFTER INTRATESTICULAR INOCULATION OF MONKEYS AND OTHER LABORATORY ANIMALS1

C. A. Evans, Pamela H. Byatt2, Velma C. Chambers and Wayne M. Smith

From the Department of Microbiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington

Abstract

Cynomolgus and rhesus monkeys, mice, hamsters, guinea pigs, rabbits and dogs were inoculated intratesticularly with two strains of poliomyelitis virus, Hof of type I and Lansing of type II. Tests at 7, 10 and 14 days gave no evidence of multiplication of virus at the site of inoculation. In a second experiment inoculation of testes of cynomolgus monkeys was accomplished by placing virus in an area in which testicular tissue had been minced in situ, to expose cells inside tubules. Tests for virus at 3, 6, 7 and 10 days did not show increase of virus in local tissue.

It is concluded that negative findings in these experiments do not constitute substantial evidence against the concept of extraneural multiplication of poliomyelitis virus in natural infection and that this remains an unsettled problem. The striking contrast between rapid and abundant growth of poliomyelitis virus in suitable testicular tissue cultures and failure of the virus to multiply in injected testes in the present experiments remain unexplained.

Footnotes

1 Aided by a grant from the National Foundation for Infantile Paralysis.

2 Present address, Department of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Website Copyright © 1954 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.
All Contents Copyright © 1954 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.