The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


The Journal of Immunology, 1949, 62: 125-133.
Copyright © 1949 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Magoffin, R.
Right arrow Articles by Spink, W. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Magoffin, R.
Right arrow Articles by Spink, W. W.

Therapy of Experimental Brucella Infection in the Developing Chick Embryo1,2,

IV. Therapy with Aureomycin

Robert Magoffin, Dorothy Anderson and Wesley W. Spink

Abstract

Previous reports have described a method for the evaluation of therapeutic agents against experimental Brucella infection, utilizing the developing chick embryo (1, 2, 3). Data comparing the relative effectiveness of sulfadiazine and streptomycin, individually and in combination, against infections in the chick embryo with each of the three species of Brucella have shown a definite synergism of these two agents when administered together.

The early reports of Pulaski and Amspacher (4, 5), Eisele and McCullough (6), and those from this Clinic (7, 8), have demonstrated the marked advantage of combined therapy with streptomycin and sulfadiazine in human brucellosis over previous methods of therapy. But this form of treatment possesses certain disadvantages. Because streptomycin must be injected intramuscularly, and because the antibiotic is potentially toxic, hospitalization of patients is essential. In addition to the expense of treatment and the threat of toxic reactions, relapses have occurred following the cessation of treatment.

Footnotes

1 From the Division of Internal Medicine, University of Minnesota Hospitals, and Medical School, Minneapolis.

2 This investigation was supported by research grants from the Division of Research Grants and Fellowships of the National Institute of Health, U. S. Public Health Service; Committee on Scientific Research, American Medical Association; and the Lederle Laboratories.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
W. W. SPINK, W. H. HALL, and R. MAGOFFIN
FOLLOW-UP STUDY OF THERAPY IN FORTY-EIGHT CULTURALLY PROVED CASES OF BRUCELLOSIS: Streptomycin and Sulfadiazine, Aureomycin, and Chloramphenicol (Chloromycetin(R))
Arch Intern Med, October 1, 1951; 88(4): 419 - 432.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Website Copyright © 1949 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.
All Contents Copyright © 1949 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.