The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


The Journal of Immunology, 1949, 61: 251-257.
Copyright © 1949 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wolfe, H. R.
Right arrow Articles by Dilks, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wolfe, H. R.
Right arrow Articles by Dilks, E.

Precipitin Production in Chickens

IV. A Comparison of the Antibody Responses of Eight Avian Species1

Harold R. Wolfe and Eleanor Dilks2

Department of Zoology, University of Wisconsin

Abstract

1. The ability of eight species of birds to produce precipitins was studied.
2. Two species which responded weakly or failed to respond to the precipitinogen, were further injected in an attempt to produce agglutinins or antihormones.
3. The owl, pheasant and partridge were classified as good precipitin producers, but average and maximum titers were well below those given by the chicken which constantly yields excellent precipitating antisera.
4. A few individual owl and pheasant antisera showed definite in vitro titer increases similar to those regularly shown by chicken antisera upon standing under refrigeration. The majority of the antisera, however, failed to show changes in their original titers.
5. The ducks and turkeys yielded antisera with very low precipitin titers and several animals failed to respond at all. In addition, no antihormone activity could be shown in the turkeys injected with gonadotrophin hormone.
6. No precipitins could be demonstrated in any of the guinea fowl and pigeon antisera, but slightly enhanced agglutinating reactions over that of normal guinea fowl were secured by injection.
7. The implications of these results are discussed.

Footnotes

1 Supported in part by the research committee of the University of Wisconsin Graduate School from funds supplied by the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation.

2 Present address: Department of Biology, University of Buffalo, Buffalo, New York.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Website Copyright © 1949 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.
All Contents Copyright © 1949 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.