The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


The Journal of Immunology, 1948, 60: 583-596.
Copyright © 1948 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by von Magnus, H.
Right arrow Articles by Melnick, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by von Magnus, H.
Right arrow Articles by Melnick, J. L.

Antibody Response in Monkeys Following Oral Administration of Poliomyelitis Virus1

Herdis von Magnus2 and Joseph L. Melnick

From the State Serum Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark, and the Section of Preventive Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven

Abstract

Following the oral administration of poliomyelitis virus to cynomolgus, rhesus and cercopithecus monkeys—some of which had been tonsillectomized to render them more susceptible to infection—tests for neutralizing antibodies were carried out on matched serum samples.

Of 44 monkeys used in these experiments, the sera collected prior to the feeding of virus, gave negative tests for antibodies in 43.

Of 17 monkeys developing the experimental disease, antibodies were found in 13 on the first day of paralysis.

Of 27 monkeys remaining apparently healthy after the virus feeding, antibodies were found in 10 in sera collected 4 to 5 weeks after exposure to virus. The medullas and spinal cords of such monkeys with positive sera were examined histologically and found to be free of poliomyelitic lesions.

The rapid antibody response following oral administration is different from the slow response observed in monkeys inoculated intracerebrally.

Antibodies which developed in the course of these feeding experiments appeared to be specific for poliomyelitis virus as they failed to react with lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus and influenza virus.

When monkeys were fed mouse encephalomyelitis virus (FA strain) which is non-pathogenic for primates, they failed to respond with antibodies to this virus. Together with the above data this suggests that early antibody production as well as antibody production in asymptomatic monkeys fed poliomyelitis virus is the result of infection of tissue outside the central nervous system.

Footnotes

1 Aided by a grant from the National Foundation for Infantile Paralysis, Inc.

2 Fellow of the Hans McKinney Møllers Mindefond til Bekaempelse af Børnclammelse (Denmark), and also Aurelia Henry Reinhardt International Fellow of the American Association of University Women for part of the time during which this work was carried out.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Website Copyright © 1948 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.
All Contents Copyright © 1948 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.