The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


The Journal of Immunology, 1946, 54: 163-177.
Copyright © 1946 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Straus, R.
Right arrow Articles by Runjavac, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Straus, R.
Right arrow Articles by Runjavac, M.

Studies on Antireticular Cytotoxic Serum1

III. Effect of ACS on the Healing of Experimentally Produced Fractures in Rabbits

Reuben Straus, Moris Horwitz, Daniel H. Levinthal, Arthur L. Cohen and Mildred Runjavac

From the Department of Pathology and Research of the Cedars of Lebanon Hospital, Los Angeles 27, California

Abstract

Following the technic described by the Soviet investigators, with but slight modifications, the effect of ACS on the healing of experimentally produced fractures in rabbits was studied.

The animals were separated into four groups, one being given "stimulating" doses of ACS, another "depressing" doses of ACS, a third give normal goat serum equivalent in volume to the "stimulating" dose of ACS and a fourth given normal goat serum in a volume equivalent to the "depressing" dose of ACS.

The extent of healing of the fractures was evaluated roentgenographically, by gross and microscopic examination of the tissue and by measuring the breaking strength of the line of union.

The results revealed striking differences between the "stimulated" and "depressed" groups of animals and their respective controls. The differences between the average values in each group were subjected to statistical analysis. Probability values for the roentgenographic evaluation failed to reveal significant differences except between the "stimulated" and "depressed" groups of animals on the tenth and fourteenth days of healing and between the "depressed" group of animals and their controls. Statistical evaluation of the breaking strength of the healed fractures, however, indicated highly significant differences between each of the groups and its control.

The experiment was repeated on two additional occasions with similar results.

Stimulation of the healing of experimentally produced fractures in rabbits was induced with small ("stimulating") doses of antireticular cytotoxic serum and depression of healing was produced with large ("depressing") doses as claimed by the Soviet investigators.

Footnotes

1 These studies were supported by funds established by Mr. Harry Warner, Mr. Harry F. Leveson, Mr. Sidney S. Kingsley, Miss Madge H. Evans, an anonymous donor, and many other donors.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Website Copyright © 1946 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.
All Contents Copyright © 1946 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.