The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


Published online August 12, 2009
The Journal of Immunology, 2009, 183, 3364 -3372
Copyright © 2009 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.
doi:10.4049/jimmunol.0900641

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jimmunol.0900641v1
183/5/3364    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Related articles in The JI
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cheung, K. P.
Right arrow Articles by Goldrath, A. W.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cheung, K. P.
Right arrow Articles by Goldrath, A. W.

Memory-Like CD8+ T Cells Generated during Homeostatic Proliferation Defer to Antigen-Experienced Memory Cells1

Kitty P. Cheung, Edward Yang and Ananda W. Goldrath2

University of California, San Diego, Division of Biological Sciences, La Jolla, CA 92093

Naive T cells proliferate in response to lymphopenia and acquire the phenotypic and functional qualities of memory T cells, providing enhanced protection against infection. How well memory-like T cells generated during lymphopenia-induced homeostatic proliferation (HP)-memory differentiate into secondary memory cells and compete with Ag-experienced true-memory cells is unknown. We found that CD8+ HP-memory T cells generated robust responses upon infection and produced a secondary memory population comparable to true-memory cells in the absence of competition. However, when true-memory and HP-memory T cells competed during infection, HP-memory cells contributed less to the effector population, contracted earlier, and formed fewer secondary memory cells. Furthermore, HP- and true-memory cells demonstrated distinct chemokine receptor expression and localization within the spleen during infection, indicating differential access to signals necessary for secondary memory formation. Thus, HP-memory T cells provide protection without compromising the true-memory population. Differences in HP- and true-memory T cells may reveal the basis of competition for limited resources within the memory-T cell compartment.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (R01AI67545), Cancer Research Institute, and Pew Scholars Program (A.W.G.), the University of California, San Diego Cellular and Molecular Genetics Training Grant (K.P.C.) and the Chancellor’s Research Scholarship (E.Y.).

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Ananda W. Goldrath, University of California, San Diego, Division of Biological Sciences, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093-0377. E-mail address: agoldrath{at}ucsd.edu

3 Abbreviations used in this paper: HP, homeostatic proliferation; DC, dendritic cell; Lm.OVA, recombinant Listeria monocytogenes expressing ovalbumin; MZ, marginal zone; OVAp, peptide derived from OVA(257–264); PALS, periarteriolar lymphoid sheath; qPCR, quantitative PCR; RP, red pulp.

4 The online version of this article contains supplemental material.


Related articles in The JI:

IN THIS ISSUE

The JI 2009 183: 2889-2890. [Full Text]  






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Website Copyright © 2009 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.
All Contents Copyright © 2009 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.