The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


Published online July 1, 2009
The Journal of Immunology, 2009, 183, 1514 -1517
Copyright © 2009 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.
doi:10.4049/jimmunol.0901524

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jimmunol.0901524v1
183/3/1514    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Segura, E.
Right arrow Articles by Villadangos, J. A.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Segura, E.
Right arrow Articles by Villadangos, J. A.

Cutting Edge: B220+CCR9 Dendritic Cells Are Not Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells but Are Precursors of Conventional Dendritic Cells1

Elodie Segura2,*,{dagger}, June Wong* and José A. Villadangos2,*

* Immunology Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; and {dagger} INSERM Unité 932, Institut Curie, Paris, France

Mouse lymphoid organs contain two major subsets of dendritic cells (DC) that differ in their phenotype and functions: conventional DC (cDC) and plasmacytoid DC (pDC). Recently, it has been proposed that differential expression of CCR9 could distinguish functionally distinct pDC subsets. We show that B220+CCR9 DC do not express classical pDC markers and have a developmental origin different from that of pDC. Furthermore, B220+CCR9 DC do not secrete IFN-{alpha} in response to CpG and, unlike pDC, can efficiently present exogenous Ags. Our results demonstrate that B220+CCR9 DC do not represent a subset of pDC. After in vivo transfer, these cells down-regulate B220 expression and convert into the two major cDC subsets, showing that they are a developmental stage of cDC differentiation.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 This work was supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (to J.A.V.), the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society (to J.A.V.), and Marie Curie Fellowships from the European Commission (to E.S.).

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. José A. Villadangos and Dr. Elodie Segura, Immunology Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, 1G Royal Parade, Parkville, Victoria 3050, Australia. E-mail addresses: villadangos{at}wehi.edu.au and segura{at}wehi.edu.au

3 Abbreviations used in this paper: DC, dendritic cell; cDC, conventional DC; Ftl3L, Fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 ligand; int, intermediate; pDC, plasmacytoid DC; Flt3L.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Website Copyright © 2009 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.
All Contents Copyright © 2009 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.