The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


Published online October 19, 2009
The Journal of Immunology, 2009, 183, 6432 -6441
Copyright © 2009 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.
doi:10.4049/jimmunol.0901617

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jimmunol.0901617v1
183/10/6432    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cusick, M. F.
Right arrow Articles by Eckels, D. D.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cusick, M. F.
Right arrow Articles by Eckels, D. D.

In Vitro Responses to Avian Influenza H5 by Human CD4 T Cells1

Matthew F. Cusick,2 Shuping Wang,2 and David D. Eckels3

Division of Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics, Department of Pathology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84132

To address the question of whether human T cells are capable of recognizing novel isolates of influenza virus, in vitro responses to recombinant Ags and synthetic peptides derived from the sequences of H1, H3, and H5 were examined in a cohort of 64 individuals selected from a healthy blood donor population. Humans respond in vitro to H1 and H3 following exposure through natural infection and vaccination. Responses to H5 were well correlated with those to H1 or H3, and thus, a significant repertoire of H5-responsive T cells is present in many individuals; clear nonresponders to H1, H3, and H5, however, do exist. Differences were observed in the cytokine responses to H1, H3, and H5, whereas both IL-2 and IFN-{gamma} production characteristic of memory responses were observed for H1 and H3, and H5-specific responses elicited primarily IL-2 and little or no IFN-{gamma}, consistent with a naive T cell phenotype. Responses to all influenza HA were restricted by HLA-DR molecules. To address the structural basis for T cell recognition of H1 and H5, overlapping synthetic peptides were used to identify epitopes and to determine whether recognition of H5 was limited to homologous sequences in H1, the most closely related HA phylogenetically. Although responses were generally correlated, no complete structural overlap was observed. These results suggest that helper T cell cross reactivity between different influenza strains may impart cross-protection to H5N1 strain of influenza.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 This work was supported by grant U19 AI062627 from the National Institute for Allergy and Immunology Diseases, National Institutes of Health.

2 Both authors contributed equally to this work.

3 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. David D. Eckels, Division of Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics, Department of Pathology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84132. E-mail address: david.eckels{at}path.utah.edu

4 Abbreviations used in this paper: HA, hemagglutinin; Io, ionomycin; SFC, spot-forming cell; SI, stimulation index.

5 The online version of this article contains supplemental material.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Website Copyright © 2009 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.
All Contents Copyright © 2009 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.