The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


Published online October 19, 2009
The Journal of Immunology, 2009, 183, 6095 -6101
Copyright © 2009 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.
doi:10.4049/jimmunol.0803510

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jimmunol.0803510v1
183/10/6095    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zheng, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Powell, J. D.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zheng, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Powell, J. D.

Anergic T Cells Are Metabolically Anergic1

Yan Zheng,2 Greg M. Delgoffe,2 Christian F. Meyer,2 Waipan Chan, and Jonathan D. Powell3

The Sidney-Kimmel Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231

Full T cell activation requires TCR engagement (signal 1) in the context of costimulation (signal 2). Costimulation is required for maximal expression of effector cytokines and prevention of T cell anergy. It has become increasingly clear that another major function of costimulation is to up-regulate the metabolic machinery necessary for T cell function. In this report we demonstrate that anergic T cells are metabolically anergic, in that upon full stimulation (signals 1 plus 2) they fail to up-regulate the machinery necessary to support increased metabolism. These findings suggest that one mechanism responsible for the maintenance of T cell anergy is failure to up-regulate the metabolic machinery. Furthermore, we demonstrate that by blocking leucine, glucose, and energy metabolism, T cell activation is mitigated. Additionally, inhibition of these metabolic pathways during T cell activation leads to anergy in Th1-differentiated cells. Overall, our findings extend the role of T cell metabolism in regulating T cell function.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grants R01CA098109 and R01CA14227 and by an Ajinomoto Pilot Project grant.

2 Y.Z., G.M.D., and C.F.M. contributed equally to this manuscript.

3 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Jonathan D. Powell, The Sidney-Kimmel Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 1650 Orleans Street, Baltimore, MD 21231. E-mail address: poweljo{at}jhmi.edu

4 Abbreviations used in this paper: mTOR, mammalian target of rapamycin; NALA, N-acetyl-leucine amide; 2DG, 2-deoxyglucose; AICAR, 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribonucleoside; PCC, pigeon cytochrome c; AMPK, AMP-activated protein kinase.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Website Copyright © 2009 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.
All Contents Copyright © 2009 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.