The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


The Journal of Immunology, 2009, 182, 6779 -6788
Copyright © 2009 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.
doi:10.4049/jimmunol.0900377

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow [Extended Methods] 
Right arrow [Data Supplement]
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Related articles in The JI
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Papadaki, O.
Right arrow Articles by Kontoyiannis, D. L.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Papadaki, O.
Right arrow Articles by Kontoyiannis, D. L.

Control of Thymic T Cell Maturation, Deletion and Egress by the RNA-Binding Protein HuR1

Olympia Papadaki*, Stavros Milatos*, Sofia Grammenoudi*, Neelanjan Mukherjee{dagger}, Jack D. Keene{dagger} and Dimitris L. Kontoyiannis2,*

* Institute of Immunology, Biomedical Sciences Research Centre "Alexander Fleming", Vari, Greece; and {dagger} Department of Molecular Genetics & Microbiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710

HuR emerged as a posttranscriptional regulator of mRNAs involved in cellular control, stress, and immunity but its role in governing such responses remains elusive. In this study, we assessed HuR’s role in the staged progression of thymic T cell differentiation by means of its genetic ablation. Mice with an early deletion of HuR in thymocytes possess enlarged thymi but display a substantial loss of peripheral T cells. We show that this discordant phenotype related to specific defects in thymic cellular processes, which demonstrated HuR’s involvement in: 1) intrinsic checkpoint signals suppressing the cell cycle of immature thymocyte progenitors, 2) TCR and antigenic signals promoting the activation and positive selection of mature thymocytes, 3) antigenic and death-receptor signals promoting thymocyte deletion, and 4) chemokine signals driving the egress of postselection thymocytes to the periphery. The cellular consequences of HuR’s dysfunction were underlined by the aberrant expression of selective cell cycle regulators, TCR, and death-receptor signaling components. Our studies reveal the signal-dependent context of HuR’s cellular activities in thymocytes and its importance in the generation of a physiological T cell pool.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 This work was supported by funding under the Sixth Research Framework Programme of the European Union, Project MUGEN NoE LSHG-CT-2005-005203 (www.mugen-noe.org) and the Hellenic Secretariat for Research and Technology Grants GSRT-PENED2003-394 and GSRT-PENED2003-264.

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Dimitris L. Kontoyiannis, Institute of Immunology, Biomedical Sciences Research Centre "Alexander Fleming", 34 Al. Fleming Street, 166 72 Vari, Greece. E-mail address: kontoyiannis{at}fleming.gr

3 Abbreviations used in this paper: DN, double negative; Cdk, cyclin-dependent kinase; DP, double positive; RBP, RNA-binding protein; R-IP, RNA-immunoprecipitation; RTE, recent thymic emigrant; SP, single positive.

4 The online version of this article contains supplemental material.


Related articles in The JI:

IN THIS ISSUE

The JI 2009 182: 6631-6632. [Full Text]  






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Website Copyright © 2009 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.
All Contents Copyright © 2009 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.