The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


The Journal of Immunology, 2009, 182, 6121 -6128
Copyright © 2009 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.
doi:10.4049/jimmunol.0803646

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Collison, L. W.
Right arrow Articles by Vignali, D. A. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Collison, L. W.
Right arrow Articles by Vignali, D. A. A.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Gene*GEO Profiles
*HomoloGene*Protein
*UniGene
*Substance via MeSH

Regulatory T Cell Suppression Is Potentiated by Target T Cells in a Cell Contact, IL-35- and IL-10-Dependent Manner1

Lauren W. Collison, Meenu R. Pillai, Vandana Chaturvedi and Dario A. A. Vignali2

Department of Immunology, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105

Regulatory T cells (Treg) are believed to suppress conventional T cell (Tconv) proliferation in vitro in a contact-dependent, cytokine-independent manner, based in part on experiments in which Treg and Tconv are separated by a permeable membrane. We show that the production of IL-35, a novel inhibitory cytokine expressed by natural Treg, increases substantially following contact with Tconv. Surprisingly, Treg were able to mediate potent suppression of Tconv across a permeable membrane when placed in direct contact with Tconv in the upper chamber of a Transwell plate. Suppression was IL-35 and IL-10 dependent, and Tconv activation was required for maximal potentiation of Treg suppression. These data suggest that it is the induction of suppression, rather than the function of Treg that is obligatorily contact dependent.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant R01 AI39480, National Cancer Institute Comprehensive Cancer Center Support Center of Research Excellence Grant CA21765, the American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities (to D.A.A.V.), a St. Jude Gephardt postdoctoral fellowship, and Individual National Research Service Award F32 AI072816 (to L.W.C.).

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Dario A. A. Vignali, Department of Immunology, Mailstop #351, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place, Memphis, TN 38105-3678. E-mail address: vignali.lab{at}stjude.org

3 Abbreviations used in this paper: Treg, regulatory T cell; CT, cycle threshold; Tconv, conventional effector T cell; Tsup, suppressed target T cell.

4 The online version of this article contains supplemental material.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Website Copyright © 2009 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.
All Contents Copyright © 2009 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.