|
|
||||||||
,
* Department of Biological Structure and
Department of Immunology and
Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195
A widely held model of thymic epithelial differentiation is based on patterns of keratin expression, where a K8+K5+ progenitor gives rise to K8+K5/K14– cortical thymic epithelium (CTEC), and medullary thymic epithelium (MTEC) are K8–K5+K14+. The thymic phenotype of p63-deficient mice indicates that p63 is an important regulator of proximal stages of thymic epithelial differentiation. In this study, we have examined several features of the thymic medullary compartment in wild-type and Aire-deficient thymi in an effort to integrate the proapoptotic activity of Aire with these different perspectives of TE differentiation. Patterns of keratin and p63 expression by MTEC described here are difficult to reconcile with postmitotic MTEC that express a K8–K14+ phenotype and suggest that the patterns of p63 and keratin expression reflecting differentiation programs of other epithelial tissues provide a useful framework for revising models of TE differentiation. Alterations of the Aire–/– MTEC compartment included reduced expression of p63, increased frequency of MTEC expressing truncated Aire protein, and shifts in the pattern of keratin expression and epithelial morphology. These data suggest a scenario where cellular targets of Aire-mediated apoptosis are postmitotic MTEC that have not yet completed their terminal differentiation program. According to this view, the minor population of globular K8+K14–/low MTEC observed in the Aire+/+ thymus and significantly expanded in the Aire–/– thymic medulla represent end-stage, terminally differentiated MTEC. These Aire-dependent alterations of the MTEC compartment suggest that the activity of Aire is not neutral with respect to the program of MTEC differentiation.
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
1 This work was supported by Grant AI09575 from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health.
2 The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.
3 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Andrew Farr, Department of Biological Structure; Box 357420, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-7420. E-mail address: farr{at}u.washington.edu
4 Abbreviations used in this paper: TEC, thymic epithelial cell; CTEC, cortical TEC; MTEC, medullary TEC; TE, thymic epithelial; PE, prostatic epithelium.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Dooley, M. Erickson, and A. G. Farr Lessons from Thymic Epithelial Heterogeneity: FoxN1 and Tissue-Restricted Gene Expression by Extrathymic, Endodermally Derived Epithelium J. Immunol., October 15, 2009; 183(8): 5042 - 5049. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F.-X. Hubert, S. A. Kinkel, P. E. Crewther, P. Z. F. Cannon, K. E. Webster, M. Link, R. Uibo, M. K. O'Bryan, A. Meager, S. P. Forehan, et al. Aire-Deficient C57BL/6 Mice Mimicking the Common Human 13-Base Pair Deletion Mutation Present with Only a Mild Autoimmune Phenotype J. Immunol., March 15, 2009; 182(6): 3902 - 3918. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |