The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


The Journal of Immunology, 2008, 180: 1405-1413.
Copyright © 2008 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hänig, J.
Right arrow Articles by Lutz, M. B.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hänig, J.
Right arrow Articles by Lutz, M. B.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Substance via MeSH

Suppression of Mature Dendritic Cell Function by Regulatory T Cells In Vivo Is Abrogated by CD40 Licensing1

Jens Hänig and Manfred B. Lutz2

Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen; and Institute for Virology and Immunobiology, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany

The priming of CD4+ effector T cells (Teff) in vivo is induced by mature dendritic cells (DC) and controlled by CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells (Treg). It remains unclear,however, how Teff priming vs Treg suppression are regulated during Ag presentation by DC in secondary lymphoid organs at the simultaneous presence of Teff and Treg. In this study, we used an peptide-specific DO11.10 TCR-transgenic adoptive transfer model to follow the Teff priming kinetics and the mechanisms of suppression by Treg. Treg activation was slower as compared with Teff and could not influence the early Teff expansion but limited the Teff response leading to lower Teff numbers in the memory phase. DC-Treg cell contacts remained unaltered during suppression by Treg and led to a down-regulation of the costimulatory molecules CD80, CD86, PD-L1, and PD-L2 but not MHC II, CD40, ICOS-L, or CD70 from the mature DC surface. This effect was observed only after DC maturation with TNF or LPS but not after additional CD40 licensing. Together, our data indicate that Treg suppression against nonself Ags in vivo occurs delayed due to the slower Treg response, is mediated to a large extent through DC modulation, but is controlled by the type of DC maturation.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft through the Research Training Group GK 592, the Collaborative Research Center SFB 643 in Erlangen, and the Institute of Virology and Immunobiology in Wuerzburg.

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Manfred B. Lutz, University of Wuerzburg, Versbacherstrasse 7, Wuerzburg 97987, Germany. E-mail address: m.lutz{at}vim.uni-wuerzburg.de

3 Abbreviations used in this paper: Treg, CD25+ regulatory T cell; BM, bone marrow; DC, dendritic cell; Teff, CD25 effector T cells; CMAC, Cell Tracker Blue; CMTMR, Cell Tracker Orange.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Website Copyright © 2008 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.
All Contents Copyright © 2008 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.