|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

* Department of Immunohematology and Blood Transfusion and
Department of Clinical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
Therapeutic vaccination trials, in which patients with cancer were vaccinated with minimal CTL peptide in oil-in-water formulations, have met with limited success. Many of these studies were based on the promising data of mice studies, showing that vaccination with a short synthetic peptide in IFA results in protective CD8+ T cell immunity. By use of the highly immunogenic OVA CTL peptide in IFA as a model peptide-based vaccine, we investigated why minimal CTL peptide vaccines in IFA performed so inadequately to allow full optimization of peptide vaccination. Injection of the minimal MHC class I-binding OVA257–264 peptide in IFA transiently activated CD8+ effector T cells, which eventually failed to undergo secondary expansion or to kill target cells, as a result of a sustained and systemic presentation of the CTL peptides gradually leaking out of the IFA depot without systemic danger signals. Complementation of this vaccine with the MHC class II-binding Th peptide (OVA323–339) restored both secondary expansion and in vivo effector functions of CD8+ T cells. Simply extending the CTL peptide to a length of 30 aa also preserved these CD8+ T cell functions, independent of T cell help, because the longer CTL peptide was predominantly presented in the locally inflamed draining lymph node. Importantly, these functional differences were reproduced in two additional model Ag systems. Our data clearly show why priming of CTL with minimal peptide epitopes in IFA is suboptimal, and demonstrate that the use of longer versions of these CTL peptide epitopes ensures the induction of sustained effector CD8+ T cell reactivity in vivo.
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
1 This work was supported by Dutch Cancer Society Grant UL 2003-2817.
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Sjoerd H. van der Burg, Department of Clinical Oncology, Building 1, K1-P, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands. E-mail address: shvdburg{at}lumc.nl
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: Tg, transgenic; dLN, draining lymph node; HPV, human papillomavirus; LN, lymph node; ndLN, nondraining LN; TM, tetramer.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. G. Kenter, M. J.P. Welters, A.R. P.M. Valentijn, M. J.G. Lowik, D. M.A. Berends-van der Meer, A. P.G. Vloon, J. W. Drijfhout, A. R. Wafelman, J. Oostendorp, G. J. Fleuren, et al. Phase I Immunotherapeutic Trial with Long Peptides Spanning the E6 and E7 Sequences of High-Risk Human Papillomavirus 16 in End-Stage Cervical Cancer Patients Shows Low Toxicity and Robust Immunogenicity Clin. Cancer Res., January 1, 2008; 14(1): 169 - 177. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |