The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


The Journal of Immunology, 2007, 179: 4766-4774.
Copyright © 2007 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ohnmacht, C.
Right arrow Articles by Voehringer, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ohnmacht, C.
Right arrow Articles by Voehringer, D.

Analysis of Eosinophil Turnover In Vivo Reveals Their Active Recruitment to and Prolonged Survival in the Peritoneal Cavity1

Caspar Ohnmacht*, Andrea Pullner*, Nico van Rooijen{dagger} and David Voehringer2,*

* Institute for Immunology, University of Munich, Munich, Germany; and {dagger} Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Eosinophils are potent effector cells associated with allergic inflammation and parasite infections. However, limited information exists about their turnover, migration, and survival in vivo. To address these important questions, we determined murine eosinophil turnover under steady state and inflammatory conditions by flow cytometric analysis of BrdU incorporation and analyzed their migration pattern and survival in different tissues after adoptive transfer into recipient mice. In naive mice ~50% of bone marrow eosinophils were labeled with BrdU during a 15-h pulse, whereas only 10% of splenic eosinophils were labeled within this time frame. Unexpectedly, the rate of eosinophil production did not change during acute infection with the helminth parasite Nippostrongylus brasiliensis despite massive eosinophilia in several tissues. Eosinophils present in lung and peritoneum remained largely BrdU negative, indicating that eosinophilia in end organs was mainly caused by increased survival of already existing eosinophils rather than increased production of new eosinophils in the bone marrow. Adoptive transfer experiments revealed that eosinophils preferentially migrated to the peritoneum in a macrophage-independent and pertussis toxin-sensitive manner, where they survived for several days. Peritoneal eosinophils expressed high levels of the inhibitory receptor Siglec-F, released less eosinophil peroxidase compared with eosinophils from the spleen, and could recirculate to other organs. These results demonstrate that the peritoneum serves as reservoir for eosinophils.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 The work was supported by an Emmy Noether Grant (VO944/2-2) from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG).

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. David Voehringer, Institute for Immunology, University of Munich, Goethestrasse 31, Munich, Germany. E-mail address: david.voehringer{at}med.uni-muenchen.de

3 Abbreviations used in this paper: tg, transgenic; GPCR, G protein-coupled receptor; LT, leukotriene; EPO, eosinophil peroxidase.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Website Copyright © 2007 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.
All Contents Copyright © 2007 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.