The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Williams, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Williams, M. J.
The Journal of Immunology, 2007, 178: 4711-4716.
Copyright © 2007 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.


BRIEF REVIEWS

Drosophila Hemopoiesis and Cellular Immunity

Michael J. Williams1

Umeå Centre for Molecular Pathogenesis, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden

In Drosophila melanogaster larvae, three classes of circulating cellular immune surveillance cells (hemocytes) can be identified: plasmatocytes, crystal cells, and lamellocytes. Plasmatocytes are professional phagocytes most similar to the mammalian monocyte/macrophage lineage and make up ~95% of circulating hemocytes. The other ~5% of circulating hemocytes consists of crystal cells, which secrete components necessary for the melanization of invading organisms, as well as for wound repair. A third cell type known as lamellocytes are rarely seen in healthy larvae and are involved in the encapsulation of invading pathogens. There are no obvious mammalian counterparts for crystal cells or lamellocytes, and there is no equivalent to the lymphoid lineage in insects. In this review, I will discuss what is currently known about Drosophila hemopoiesis and the cellular immune response and where possible compare it to vertebrate mechanisms.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Michael J. Williams, Umeå Centre for Molecular Pathogenesis, Umeå University, S-901 87, Umeå, Sweden. E-mail address: michael.williams{at}ucmp.umu.se

2 Abbreviations used in this paper: Srp, Serpent; Dscam, Down syndrome cell adhesion molecule; EGF, epidermal growth factor; Gcm, Glial cell missing; Gcm2, Glial cell missing-2; Hop, Hopscotch; Kn, Knot; Lz, Lozenge; lz, lozenge; PGRP-LC, peptidoglycan recognition protein LC; TEP, thio-ester containing complement-related protein; tsp68c, tetraspanin68c; ush, u-shaped; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
J. A. Martinez-Agosto, H. K.A. Mikkola, V. Hartenstein, and U. Banerjee
The hematopoietic stem cell and its niche: a comparative view
Genes & Dev., December 1, 2007; 21(23): 3044 - 3060.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
A. F. Rowley and A. Powell
Invertebrate Immune Systems Specific, Quasi-Specific, or Nonspecific?
J. Immunol., December 1, 2007; 179(11): 7209 - 7214.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Website Copyright © 2007 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.
All Contents Copyright © 2007 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.