|
|
||||||||
National Centre for Cell Science, Pune, India
Establishment of host-protective memory T cells against tumors is the objective of an antitumor immunoprophylactic strategy such as reinforcing T cell costimulation via CD40-CD40L interaction. Previous CD40-targeted strategies assumed that T cell costimulation is an all-or-none phenomenon. It was unknown whether different levels of CD40L expression induce quantitatively and qualitatively different effector T cell responses. Using mice expressing different levels of CD40L, we demonstrated that the greater the T cell CD40L expression the less tumor growth occurred; the antitumor T cell response was host-protective. Lower levels of CD40L expression on T cells induced IL-10-mediated suppression of tumor-regressing effector CD8+ T cells and higher productions of IL-4 and IL-10. Using mice expressing different levels of CD40 or by administering different doses of anti-CD40 Ab, similar observations were recorded implying that the induction of protumor or antitumor T cell responses was a function of the extent of CD40 cross-linking. IL-10 neutralization during priming with tumor Ags resulted in a stronger tumor-regressing effector T cell response. Using IL-10/ DC for priming of mice expressing different levels of CD40L and subsequent transfer of the T cells from the primed mice to nu/nu mice, we demonstrated the protumor role of IL-10 in the induction of tumor-promoting T cells. Our results demonstrate that a dose-dependent cross-linking of a costimulatory molecule dictates the functional phenotype of the elicited effector T cell response. The T cell costimulation is a continuum of a function that induces not only graded T cell responses but also two counteracting responses at two extremes.
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
1 The work was supported by the Department of Biotechnology, Government of India, and Lady Tata Memorial Trust. R.A. is supported by an Indian Council of Medical Research fellowship.
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Bhaskar Saha, National Centre for Cell Science, Ganeshkhind, Pune 411 007, India. E-mail address: sahab{at}nccs.res.in
3 Abbreviation used in this paper: DC, dendritic cell.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Casati, C. Camisaschi, L. Novellino, A. Mazzocchi, F. Triebel, L. Rivoltini, G. Parmiani, and C. Castelli Human Lymphocyte Activation Gene-3 Molecules Expressed by Activated T Cells Deliver Costimulation Signal for Dendritic Cell Activation J. Immunol., March 15, 2008; 180(6): 3782 - 3788. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Hao, J. Yuan, and J. Xiang Nonspecific CD4+ T cells with uptake of antigen-specific dendritic cell-released exosomes stimulate antigen-specific CD8+ CTL responses and long-term T cell memory J. Leukoc. Biol., October 1, 2007; 82(4): 829 - 838. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. G. Elpek, C. Lacelle, N. P. Singh, E. S. Yolcu, and H. Shirwan CD4+CD25+ T Regulatory Cells Dominate Multiple Immune Evasion Mechanisms in Early but Not Late Phases of Tumor Development in a B Cell Lymphoma Model J. Immunol., June 1, 2007; 178(11): 6840 - 6848. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |