The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brown, I. E.
Right arrow Articles by Gajewski, T. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brown, I. E.
Right arrow Articles by Gajewski, T. F.
The Journal of Immunology, 2006, 177: 4521-4529.
Copyright © 2006 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

Homeostatic Proliferation as an Isolated Variable Reverses CD8+ T Cell Anergy and Promotes Tumor Rejection1

Ian E. Brown, Christian Blank, Justin Kline, Aalok K. Kacha and Thomas F. Gajewski2

Department of Pathology and Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637

Although recent work has suggested that lymphopenia-induced homeostatic proliferation may improve T cell-mediated tumor rejection, there is little direct evidence isolating homeostatic proliferation as an experimental variable, and the mechanism by which improved antitumor immunity occurs via homeostatic proliferation is poorly understood. An adoptive transfer model was developed in which tumor-specific 2C/RAG2–/– TCR transgenic CD8+ T cells were introduced either into the lymphopenic environment of RAG2–/– mice or into P14/RAG2–/– mice containing an irrelevant CD8+ TCR transgenic population. RAG2–/–, but not P14/RAG2–/– recipients supported homeostatic proliferation of transferred T cells as well as tumor rejection. Despite absence of tumor rejection in P14/RAG2–/– recipients, 2C cells did become activated, as reflected by CFSE dilution and CD44 up-regulation. However, these cells showed poor IFN-{gamma} and IL-2 production upon restimulation, consistent with T cell anergy and similar to the hyporesponsiveness induced by administration of soluble peptide Ag. To determine whether homeostatic proliferation could uncouple T cell anergy, anergic 2C cells were transferred into RAG–/– recipients, which resulted in vigorous homeostatic proliferation, recovery of IL-2 production, and acquisition of the ability to reject tumors. Taken together, our data suggest that a major mechanism by which homeostatic proliferation supports tumor rejection is by maintaining and/or re-establishing T cell responsiveness.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant P01CA97296 and a Burroughs Wellcome Fund Clinical Scientist Award in Translational Research. I.E.B. received support from Pediatric Growth and Development Training Grant HD007009. C.B. was supported by Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina Grant BMBF-LPD 9901/8-35 with funds from the Bundesministerium fuer Bildung und Forschung and by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Grant BL 786/1-1.

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Thomas F. Gajewski, University of Chicago, 5841 South Maryland Avenue, MC2115, Chicago, IL 60637. E-mail address: tgajewsk{at}medicine.bsd.uchicago.edu

3 Abbreviations used in this paper: TIL, tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte; Tg, transgenic.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BloodHome page
A. Shvets, R. Chakrabarti, R. Gonzalez-Quintial, R. Baccala, A. N. Theofilopoulos, and G. J. Prud'homme
Impaired negative regulation of homeostatically proliferating T cells
Blood, January 15, 2009; 113(3): 622 - 625.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
A. M. Tatum, L. M. Mylin, S. J. Bender, M. A. Fischer, B. A. Vigliotti, M. J. Tevethia, S. S. Tevethia, and T. D. Schell
CD8+ T Cells Targeting a Single Immunodominant Epitope are Sufficient for Elimination of Established SV40 T Antigen-Induced Brain Tumors
J. Immunol., September 15, 2008; 181(6): 4406 - 4417.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
X. Chang, P. Zheng, and Y. Liu
Homeostatic Proliferation in the Mice with Germline FoxP3 Mutation and its Contribution to Fatal Autoimmunity
J. Immunol., August 15, 2008; 181(4): 2399 - 2406.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
J. Kline, I. E. Brown, Y.-Y. Zha, C. Blank, J. Strickler, H. Wouters, L. Zhang, and T. F. Gajewski
Homeostatic Proliferation Plus Regulatory T-Cell Depletion Promotes Potent Rejection of B16 Melanoma
Clin. Cancer Res., May 15, 2008; 14(10): 3156 - 3167.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
T. Suzuki, S. Ogawa, K. Tanabe, H. Tahara, R. Abe, and H. Kishimoto
Induction of Antitumor Immune Response by Homeostatic Proliferation and CD28 Signaling
J. Immunol., April 1, 2008; 180(7): 4596 - 4605.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
V. Lukacs-Kornek, S. Burgdorf, L. Diehl, S. Specht, M. Kornek, and C. Kurts
The Kidney-Renal Lymph Node-System Contributes to Cross-Tolerance against Innocuous Circulating Antigen
J. Immunol., January 15, 2008; 180(2): 706 - 715.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
T. F. Gajewski
Failure at the Effector Phase: Immune Barriers at the Level of the Melanoma Tumor Microenvironment
Clin. Cancer Res., September 15, 2007; 13(18): 5256 - 5261.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Website Copyright © 2006 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.
All Contents Copyright © 2006 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.