The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clark, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by van Vlijmen, H. W. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Clark, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by van Vlijmen, H. W. T.
The Journal of Immunology, 2006, 177: 333-340.
Copyright © 2006 by The American Association of Immunologists

Trends in Antibody Sequence Changes during the Somatic Hypermutation Process

Louis A. Clark1, Skanth Ganesan, Sarah Papp and Herman W. T. van Vlijmen1

Biogen Idec Inc., Cambridge, MA 02142

Probable germline gene sequences from thousands of aligned mature Ab sequences are inferred using simple computational matching to known V(D)J genes. Comparison of the germline to mature sequences in a structural region-dependent fashion allows insights into the methods that nature uses to mature Abs during the somatic hypermutation process. Four factors determine the residue type mutation patterns: biases in the germline, accessibility from single base permutations, location of mutation hotspots, and functional pressures during selection. Germline repertoires at positions that commonly contact the Ag are biased with tyrosine, serine, and tryptophan. These residue types have a high tendency to be present in mutation hotspot motifs, and their abundance is decreased during maturation by a net conversion to other types. The heavy use of tyrosines on mature Ab interfaces is thus a reflection of the germline composition rather than being due to selection during maturation. Potentially stabilizing changes such as increased proline usage and a small number of double cysteine mutations capable of forming disulfide bonds are ascribed to somatic hypermutation. Histidine is the only residue type for which usage increases in each of the interface, core, and surface regions. The net overall effect is a conversion from residue types that could provide nonspecific initial binding into a diversity of types that improve affinity and stability. Average mutation probabilities are ~4% for core residues, ~5% for surface residues, and ~12% for residues in common Ag-contacting positions, excepting the those coded by the D gene.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BloodHome page
F. Murray, N. Darzentas, A. Hadzidimitriou, G. Tobin, M. Boudjogra, C. Scielzo, N. Laoutaris, K. Karlsson, F. Baran-Marzsak, A. Tsaftaris, et al.
Stereotyped patterns of somatic hypermutation in subsets of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia: implications for the role of antigen selection in leukemogenesis
Blood, February 1, 2008; 111(3): 1524 - 1533.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Website Copyright © 2006 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.
All Contents Copyright © 2006 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.