| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Department of Cell Biology and Physiology and University of New Mexico Cancer Research and Treatment Center, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM 87131
Adaptation, defined as the diminution of receptor signaling in the presence of continued or repeated stimulation, is critical to cellular function. G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) undergo multiple adaptive processes, including desensitization and internalization, through phosphorylation of cytoplasmic serine and threonine residues. However, the relative importance of individual and combined serine and threonine residues to these processes is not well understood. We examined this mechanism in the context of the N-formyl peptide receptor (FPR), a well-characterized member of the chemoattractant/chemokine family of GPCRs critical to neutrophil function. To evaluate the contributions of individual and combinatorial serine and threonine residues to internalization, desensitization, and arrestin2 binding, 30 mutant forms of the FPR, expressed in the human promyelocytic U937 cell line, were characterized. We found that residues Ser328, Ser332, and Ser338 are individually critical, and indeed sufficient, for internalization, desensitization, and arrestin2 binding, but that the presence of neighboring threonine residues can inhibit these processes. Additionally, we observed no absolute correlation between arrestin binding and either internalization or desensitization, suggesting the existence of arrestin-independent mechanisms for these processes. Our results suggest C-terminal serine and threonine residues of the FPR represent a combinatorial code, capable of both positively and negatively regulating signaling and trafficking. This study is among the first detailed analyses of a complex regulatory site in a GPCR, and provides insight into GPCR regulatory mechanisms.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. Pampillo, N. Camuso, J. E. Taylor, J. M. Szereszewski, M. R. Ahow, M. Zajac, R. P. Millar, M. Bhattacharya, and A. V. Babwah Regulation of GPR54 Signaling by GRK2 and {beta}-Arrestin Mol. Endocrinol., December 1, 2009; 23(12): 2060 - 2074. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. D. Ye, F. Boulay, J. M. Wang, C. Dahlgren, C. Gerard, M. Parmentier, C. N. Serhan, and P. M. Murphy International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. LXXIII. Nomenclature for the Formyl Peptide Receptor (FPR) Family Pharmacol. Rev., June 1, 2009; 61(2): 119 - 161. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. A. Babbin, A. J. Jesaitis, A. I. Ivanov, D. Kelly, M. Laukoetter, P. Nava, C. A. Parkos, and A. Nusrat Formyl Peptide Receptor-1 Activation Enhances Intestinal Epithelial Cell Restitution through Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase-Dependent Activation of Rac1 and Cdc42 J. Immunol., December 15, 2007; 179(12): 8112 - 8121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Riesselman, H. M. Miettinen, J. M. Gripentrog, C. I. Lord, B. Mumey, E. A. Dratz, J. Stie, R. M. Taylor, and A. J. Jesaitis C-Terminal Tail Phosphorylation of N-Formyl Peptide Receptor: Differential Recognition of Two Neutrophil Chemoattractant Receptors by Monoclonal Antibodies NFPR1 and NFPR2 J. Immunol., August 15, 2007; 179(4): 2520 - 2531. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. Pollok-Kopp, F. Huttenrauch, S. Rethorn, and M. Oppermann Dynamics of Protein Kinase C-mediated Phosphorylation of the Complement C5a Receptor on Serine 334 J. Biol. Chem., February 16, 2007; 282(7): 4345 - 4353. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
