The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Su, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Strand, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Su, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Strand, S.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*Cancer
Hazardous Substances DB
*NITRIC OXIDE
The Journal of Immunology, 2006, 176: 3923-3930.
Copyright © 2006 by The American Association of Immunologists

Nitric Oxide Promotes Resistance to Tumor Suppression by CTLs1

Zhanhai Su*, Jürgen Kuball{dagger}, Ana-Paula Barreiros*, Daniela Gottfried*, Edite Antunes Ferreira{dagger}, Matthias Theobald{dagger}, Peter R. Galle*, Dennis Strand* and Susanne Strand2,*

* Department of Internal Medicine, Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany; and {dagger} Department of Hematology and Oncology, Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany

Many human tumors express inducible NO synthetase (NOS2), but the roles of NO in tumor development are not fully elucidated. An important step during tumor development is the acquisition of apoptosis resistance. We investigated the dose-dependent effects of endogenously produced NO on apoptosis using ecdysone-inducible NOS2 cell lines. Our results show that short-term NOS2 expression enhances CD95-mediated apoptosis and T cell cytotoxicity dose dependently. Furthermore, we could show that during chronic exposure to NO, besides the primary cytotoxic NO effect, there is selection of cell clones resistant to NO that show cross-resistance to CD95-induced apoptosis and the killing by CTLs. We propose that NO production could initially act as an autocrine suicide or paracrine killing mechanism in cells undergoing malignant transformation. However, once failed, the outcome is fatal. NO promotes tumor formation by enhancing the selection of cells that can evade immune attack by acquiring apoptosis resistance.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Website Copyright © 2006 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.
All Contents Copyright © 2006 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.