HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Related articles in The JI Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Schwarz, A. Articles by Schwarz, T. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Schwarz, A. Articles by Schwarz, T.

IL-18 Reduces Ultraviolet Radiation-Induced DNA Damage and Thereby Affects Photoimmunosuppression¹

Agatha Schwarz^*, Akira Maeda^*, Sonja Ständer, Harry van Steeg and Thomas Schwarz^2,*

^* Department of Dermatology, University Kiel, Kiel, Germany; Department of Dermatology, University Münster, Münster, Germany; and National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Laboratory of Toxicology, Pathology and Genetics, Bilthoven, The Netherlands

UV-induced DNA damage has been recognized as the major molecular trigger for photoimmunosuppression. IL-12 prevents UV-induced immunosuppression via its recently discovered capacity to reduce DNA damage presumably via induction of DNA repair. Because IL-18 shares some biological activities with IL-12 we studied the effect of IL-18 on UV-induced DNA damage and immunosuppression. IL-18 reduced UV-induced apoptosis of keratinocytes and supported long-term cell survival on UV exposure. Injection of IL-18 into mice that were exposed to UV radiation significantly lowered the number of apoptotic keratinocytes. Accordingly, radiation immunohistochemistry revealed reduced amounts of DNA damage in epidermal cells upon injection of IL-18. These effects were not observed in DNA repair-deficient (XpaKO) mice, indicating that IL-18 like IL-12 reduces DNA damage via DNA repair. UV-mediated suppression of the induction of contact hypersensitivity, which is known to be primarily triggered by DNA damage, was prevented upon injection of IL-18 before UV exposure in wild-type but not in XpaKO mice. In contrast to IL-12, IL-18 was not able either in wild-type or in XpaKO mice to break UV-induced immunotolerance that is mediated via regulatory T cells rather than in a DNA damage-dependent fashion. This result indicates that IL-12 is still unique in its capacity to restore immune responses because of its effect on regulatory T cells. Together, these data identify IL-18 as a further cytokine that exhibits the capacity to affect DNA repair. Though being primarily a proinflammatory cytokine through this capacity, IL-18 can also foster an immune response that is suppressed by UV radiation.

Related articles in The JI:

IN THIS ISSUE

The JI 2006 176: 2679-2680. [Full Text]