The JI PBL Intereron Source
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kemball, C. C.
Right arrow Articles by Lukacher, A. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kemball, C. C.
Right arrow Articles by Lukacher, A. E.
The Journal of Immunology, 2006, 176: 1814-1824.
Copyright © 2006 by The American Association of Immunologists

Costimulation Requirements for Antiviral CD8+ T Cells Differ for Acute and Persistent Phases of Polyoma Virus Infection1

Christopher C. Kemball2,*, Eun D. Han Lee2,{dagger}, Eva Szomolanyi-Tsuda{ddagger}, Thomas C. Pearson{dagger}, Christian P. Larsen{dagger} and Aron E. Lukacher3,*

* Department of Pathology and {dagger} Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322; and {ddagger} Department of Pathology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01655

The requirement for costimulation in antiviral CD8+ T cell responses has been actively investigated for acutely resolved viral infections, but it is less defined for CD8+ T cell responses to persistent virus infection. Using mouse polyoma virus (PyV) as a model of low-level persistent virus infection, we asked whether blockade of the CD40 ligand (CD40L) and CD28 costimulatory pathways impacts the magnitude and function of the PyV-specific CD8+ T response, as well as the humoral response and viral control during acute and persistent phases of infection. Costimulation blockade or gene knockout of either CD28 or CD40L substantially dampened the magnitude of the acute CD8+ T cell response; simultaneous CD28 and CD40L blockade severely depressed the acute T cell response, altered the cell surface phenotype of PyV-specific CD8+ T cells, decreased PyV VP1-specific serum IgG titers, and resulted in an increase in viral DNA levels in multiple organs. CD28 and CD40L costimulation blockade during acute infection also diminished the memory PyV-specific CD8+ T cell response and serum IgG titer, but control of viral persistence varied between mouse strains and among organs. Interestingly, we found that CD28 and CD40L costimulation is dispensable for generating and/or maintaining PyV-specific CD8+ T cells during persistent infection; however, blockade of CD27 and CD28 costimulation in persistently infected mice caused a reduction in PyV-specific CD8+ T cells. Taken together, these data indicate that CD8+ T cells primed within the distinct microenvironments of acute vs persistent virus infection differ in their costimulation requirements.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. L. Ford, M. E. Wagener, S. S. Hanna, T. C. Pearson, A. D. Kirk, and C. P. Larsen
A Critical Precursor Frequency of Donor-Reactive CD4+ T Cell Help Is Required for CD8+ T Cell-Mediated CD28/CD154-Independent Rejection
J. Immunol., June 1, 2008; 180(11): 7203 - 7211.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
C. C. Kemball, E. Szomolanyi-Tsuda, and A. E. Lukacher
Allogeneic Differences in the Dependence on CD4+ T-Cell Help for Virus-Specific CD8+ T-Cell Differentiation
J. Virol., December 15, 2007; 81(24): 13743 - 13753.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. Sun and P. J. Fink
A New Class of Reverse Signaling Costimulators Belongs to the TNF Family
J. Immunol., October 1, 2007; 179(7): 4307 - 4312.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
E. Sitati, E. E. McCandless, R. S. Klein, and M. S. Diamond
CD40-CD40 Ligand Interactions Promote Trafficking of CD8+ T Cells into the Brain and Protection against West Nile Virus Encephalitis
J. Virol., September 15, 2007; 81(18): 9801 - 9811.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
C. C. Kemball, C. D. Pack, H. M. Guay, Z.-N. Li, D. A. Steinhauer, E. Szomolanyi-Tsuda, and A. E. Lukacher
The Antiviral CD8+ T Cell Response Is Differentially Dependent on CD4+ T Cell Help Over the Course of Persistent Infection
J. Immunol., July 15, 2007; 179(2): 1113 - 1121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
N. P. Andrews, C. D. Pack, V. Vezys, G. N. Barber, and A. E. Lukacher
Early Virus-Associated Bystander Events Affect the Fitness of the CD8 T Cell Response to Persistent Virus Infection
J. Immunol., June 1, 2007; 178(11): 7267 - 7275.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
S. Fuse, S. Bellfy, H. Yagita, and E. J. Usherwood
CD8+ T Cell Dysfunction and Increase in Murine Gammaherpesvirus Latent Viral Burden in the Absence of 4-1BB Ligand
J. Immunol., April 15, 2007; 178(8): 5227 - 5236.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
S. Fuse, J. J. Obar, S. Bellfy, E. K. Leung, W. Zhang, and E. J. Usherwood
CD80 and CD86 Control Antiviral CD8+ T-Cell Function and Immune Surveillance of Murine Gammaherpesvirus 68.
J. Virol., September 1, 2006; 80(18): 9159 - 9170.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Website Copyright © 2006 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.
All Contents Copyright © 2006 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.