The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yasumi, T.
Right arrow Articles by Nakahata, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yasumi, T.
Right arrow Articles by Nakahata, T.
The Journal of Immunology, 2005, 174: 1325-1331.
Copyright © 2005 by The American Association of Immunologists

Limited Ability of Antigen-Specific Th1 Responses to Inhibit Th2 Cell Development In Vivo1

Takahiro Yasumi, Kenji Katamura, Ikuo Okafuji, Takakazu Yoshioka, Taka-aki Meguro, Ryuta Nishikomori, Takashi Kusunoki, Toshio Heike and Tatsutoshi Nakahata2

Department of Pediatrics, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan

Th1 and Th2 cells mutually antagonize each other’s differentiation. Consequently, allergen-specific Th1 cells are believed to be able to suppress the development of Th2 cells and to prevent the development of atopic disorders. To determine whether a pre-existing Ag-specific Th1 response can affect the development of Th2 cells in vivo, we used an immunization model of Ag-pulsed murine dendritic cell (DC) transfer to induce distinct Th responses. When transferred into naive mice, Ag-pulsed CD8{alpha}+ DCs induced a Th1 response and the production of IgG2a, whereas CD8{alpha} DCs primed a Th2 response and the production of IgE. In the presence of a pre-existing Ag-specific Th2 environment due to Ag-pulsed CD8{alpha} DC transfer, CD8{alpha}+ DCs failed to prime Th1 cells. In contrast, CD8{alpha} DCs could prime a Th2 response in the presence of a pre-existing Ag-specific Th1 environment. Moreover, exogenous IL-4 abolished the Th1-inducing potential of CD8{alpha}+ DCs in vitro, but the addition of IFN-{gamma} did not effectively inhibit the potential of CD8{alpha} DCs to prime IL-4-producing cells. Thus, Th1 and Th2 cells differ in their potential to inhibit the development of the other. This suggests that the early induction of allergen-specific Th1 cells before allergy sensitization will not prevent the development of atopic disorders.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
H. Jin, Y. Kang, L. Zhao, C. Xiao, Y. Hu, R. She, Y. Yu, X. Du, G. Zhao, T. Ng, et al.
Induction of Adaptive T Regulatory Cells That Suppress the Allergic Response by Coimmunization of DNA and Protein Vaccines
J. Immunol., April 15, 2008; 180(8): 5360 - 5372.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CVIHome page
N. G. Cortes-Perez, S. Ah-Leung, L. G. Bermudez-Humaran, G. Corthier, J.-M. Wal, P. Langella, and K. Adel-Patient
Intranasal Coadministration of Live Lactococci Producing Interleukin-12 and a Major Cow's Milk Allergen Inhibits Allergic Reaction in Mice
Clin. Vaccine Immunol., March 1, 2007; 14(3): 226 - 233.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Website Copyright © 2005 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.
All Contents Copyright © 2005 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.