The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Singh, R. A. K.
Right arrow Articles by Barry, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Singh, R. A. K.
Right arrow Articles by Barry, M. A.
The Journal of Immunology, 2004, 173: 4387-4393.
Copyright © 2004 by The American Association of Immunologists

Repertoire and Immunofocusing of CD8 T Cell Responses Generated by HIV-1 gag-pol and Expression Library Immunization Vaccines1

Rana A. K. Singh* and Michael A. Barry2,*,{dagger},{ddagger}

* Center for Cell and Gene Therapy, {dagger} Departments of Molecular and Human Genetics, and Immunology, Baylor College of Medicine, and {ddagger} Department of Bioengineering, Rice University, Houston, TX 77251

Several gene-based vaccine approaches are being tested to drive multivalent cellular immune responses to control HIV-1 viral variants. To compare the utility of these approaches, HLA-A*0201 transgenic mice were genetically immunized with plasmids encoding wild-type (wt) gag-pol, codon-optimized (CO) gag-pol, and an expression library immunization (ELI) vaccine genetically re-engineered to express non-CO fragments of gag and pol fused to ubiquitin for proteasome targeting. Equimolar delivery of each vaccine into HLA-A*0201 transgenic mice generated CD8 T cell responses, with the ELI vaccine producing up to 10-fold higher responses than the wt or CO gag-pol plasmids against cognate and mutant epitopes. All three vaccines generated multivalent CD8 responses against varying numbers of epitopes after priming. However, when the animals were immunized again, the wt and CO gag-pol vaccines boosted only the responses against a subset of epitopes and attenuated the responses against all other Ags including epitopes from clade and drug-resistant viral variants. In contrast, the ELI vaccine boosted CD8 responses against all of the gag-pol Ags and against mutant epitopes from clade and drug-resistant variants. These data suggest that HIV-1 vaccines expressing structurally intact gag and pol proteins drive immunofocused CD8 responses that reduce the repertoire of T cell responses. In contrast, the genetically re-engineered ELI vaccine appears to better maintain the multivalent CD8 responses that may be required to control HIV-1 viral variants.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
G. Arrode, R. Hegde, A. Mani, Y. Jin, Y. Chebloune, and O. Narayan
Phenotypic and Functional Analysis of Immune CD8+ T Cell Responses Induced by a Single Injection of a HIV DNA Vaccine in Mice
J. Immunol., February 15, 2007; 178(4): 2318 - 2327.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
A. M. Talaat and K. Stemke-Hale
Expression Library Immunization: a Road Map for Discovery of Vaccines against Infectious Diseases
Infect. Immun., November 1, 2005; 73(11): 7089 - 7098.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Website Copyright © 2004 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.
All Contents Copyright © 2004 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.