The JI Acurri Cytometers
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zand, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Vo, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zand, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Vo, T.
The Journal of Immunology, 2004, 173: 3763-3772.
Copyright © 2004 by The American Association of Immunologists

Discrete Event Modeling of CD4+ Memory T Cell Generation1

Martin S. Zand2,*, Benjamin J. Briggs*, Anirban Bose* and Thuong Vo{dagger}

* Nephrology Unit and {dagger} Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642

Studies of memory T cell differentiation are hampered by a lack of quantitative models to test hypotheses in silico before in vivo experimentation. We created a stochastic computer model of CD4+ memory T cell generation that can simulate and track 101–108 individual lymphocytes over time. Parameters for the model were derived from experimental data using naive human CD4+ T cells stimulated in vitro. Using discrete event computer simulation, we identified two key variables that heavily influence effector burst size and the persistent memory pool size: the cell cycle dependent probability of apoptosis, and the postactivation mitosis at which memory T cells emerge. Multiple simulations were performed and varying critical parameters permitted estimates of how sensitive the model was to changes in all of the model parameters. We then compared two hypotheses of CD4+ memory T cell generation: maturation from activated naive to effector to memory cells (model I) vs direct progression from activated naive to memory cells (model II). We find that direct progression of naive to memory T cells does not explain published measurements of the memory cell mass unless postactivation expansion of the memory cell cohort occurs. We conclude that current models suggesting direct progression of activated naive cells to the persistent memory phenotype (model II) do not account for the experimentally measured size of the postactivation CD4+, Ag-specific, memory T cell cohort.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
V. V. Ganusov
Discriminating between Different Pathways of Memory CD8+ T Cell Differentiation
J. Immunol., October 15, 2007; 179(8): 5006 - 5013.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. Migliaccio, P. M. S. Alves, P. Romero, and N. Rufer
Distinct Mechanisms Control Human Naive and Antigen-Experienced CD8+ T Lymphocyte Proliferation
J. Immunol., February 15, 2006; 176(4): 2173 - 2182.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Website Copyright © 2004 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.
All Contents Copyright © 2004 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.