The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boissonnas, A.
Right arrow Articles by Combadiere, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boissonnas, A.
Right arrow Articles by Combadiere, B.
The Journal of Immunology, 2004, 173: 222-229.
Copyright © 2004 by The American Association of Immunologists

Antigen Distribution Drives Programmed Antitumor CD8 Cell Migration and Determines Its Efficiency 1

Alexandre Boissonnas, Christophe Combadiere, Elise Lavergne, Maud Maho, Catherine Blanc, Patrice Debré and Behazine Combadiere2

Laboratoire d’Immunologie Cellulaire, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Unité 543, Faculté de Médecine Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France

Understanding both the role of tumor Ag in CD8 cell differentiation and the reasons that CD8 cells may work inefficiently is crucial for therapeutic approaches in cancer. We studied OT-1 CD8 cell responses in vivo in a differential Ag-distribution model that used EG-7, the EL-4 thymoma transfected with OVA. On their initial Ag encounter, OT-1 CD8 cells underwent programmed expansion in the lymph nodes, where they acquired the ability to migrate to the encapsulated tumor site after ≥4 divisions, without continuous antigenic stimulation. This short antigenic stimulation was sufficient to induce the migration differentiation program, which included modulation of chemokine receptor mRNA expression and down-regulation of CD62L. Moreover, Ag quantity determined the behavior of the OT-1 CD8 cells, including their effector functions and sensitivity to apoptosis. Thus, the initial Ag encounter drives the programmed cell migration potencies, but neither effector functions nor cell death can occur without continuous TCR triggering.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
C. E. Rolle, R. Carrio, and T. R. Malek
Modeling the CD8+ T Effector to Memory Transition in Adoptive T-Cell Antitumor Immunotherapy
Cancer Res., April 15, 2008; 68(8): 2984 - 2992.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
J. M. Curtsinger, M. Y. Gerner, D. C. Lins, and M. F. Mescher
Signal 3 Availability Limits the CD8 T Cell Response to a Solid Tumor
J. Immunol., June 1, 2007; 178(11): 6752 - 6760.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Med.Home page
A. Boissonnas, L. Fetler, I. S. Zeelenberg, S. Hugues, and S. Amigorena
In vivo imaging of cytotoxic T cell infiltration and elimination of a solid tumor
J. Exp. Med., February 19, 2007; 204(2): 345 - 356.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
N. T. Joncker, J. Helft, A. Jacquet, V. Premel, and O. Lantz
Intratumor CD4 T-cell accumulation requires stronger priming than for expansion and lymphokine secretion.
Cancer Res., May 15, 2006; 66(10): 5443 - 5451.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
E. Lavergne, C. Combadiere, M. Iga, A. Boissonnas, O. Bonduelle, M. Maho, P. Debre, and B. Combadiere
Intratumoral CC Chemokine Ligand 5 Overexpression Delays Tumor Growth and Increases Tumor Cell Infiltration
J. Immunol., September 15, 2004; 173(6): 3755 - 3762.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Website Copyright © 2004 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.
All Contents Copyright © 2004 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.