The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cascalho, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cascalho, M.
The Journal of Immunology, 2004, 172: 6513-6518.
Copyright © 2004 by The American Association of Immunologists


BRIEF REVIEWS

Advantages and Disadvantages of Cytidine Deamination1

Marilia Cascalho2

Transplantation Biology, and Departments of Immunology, Surgery, and Pediatrics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905

Cytidine deamination of nucleic acids underlies diversification of Ig genes and inhibition of retroviral infection, and thus, it would appear to be vital to host defense. The host defense properties of cytidine deamination require two distinct but homologous cytidine deaminases—activation-induced cytidine deaminase and apolipoprotein B-editing cytidine deaminase, subunit 3G. Although cytidine deamination has clear benefits, it might well have biological costs. Uncontrolled cytidine deamination might generate misfolded polypeptides, dominant-negative proteins, or mutations in tumor suppressor genes, and thus contribute to tumor formation. How cytidine deaminases target a given nucleic acid substrate at specific sequences is not understood, and what protects cells from uncontrolled mutagenesis is not known. In this paper, I shall review the functions and regulation of activation-induced cytidine deaminase and apolipoprotein B-editing cytidine deaminase, subunit 3G, and speculate about the basis for site specificity vis-à-vis generalized mutagenesis.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
M. F. Mehler and J. S. Mattick
Noncoding RNAs and RNA Editing in Brain Development, Functional Diversification, and Neurological Disease
Physiol Rev, July 1, 2007; 87(3): 799 - 823.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
M. OhAinle, J. A. Kerns, H. S. Malik, and M. Emerman
Adaptive Evolution and Antiviral Activity of the Conserved Mammalian Cytidine Deaminase APOBEC3H.
J. Virol., April 1, 2006; 80(8): 3853 - 3862.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Website Copyright © 2004 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.
All Contents Copyright © 2004 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.