|
|
||||||||

* Department of Microbiology and
Interdisciplinary Program in Immunology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242
Compared with wild-type (WT) mice, Listeria monocytogenes (LM)-vaccinated perforin-deficient (PKO) mice have elevated levels of CD8+ T cell memory, but exhibit reduced levels of protection against virulent LM. In this study, Ag-specific CD8+ T cells from LM-vaccinated WT and PKO mice were used in adoptive transfer assays to determine the contribution of perforin-dependent cytolysis in protective immunity to LM. Perforin deficiency resulted in an
5-fold reduction in the per-cell protective capacity of Ag-specific memory CD8+ T cells that was not caused by differences in memory cell quality as measured by CD62L/CD27 expression, TCR repertoire use, functional avidity, differences in expansion of Ag-specific cells upon infection, or maintenance of memory levels over time. However, perforin-deficient CD8+ T cells exhibited reduced in vivo cytotoxic function compared to WT CD8+ T cells. Consistent with the existence of perforin-independent effector pathways, double-vaccinated PKO mice were as resistant to challenge with LM as single-vaccinated WT mice. Thus, increasing the number of memory CD8+ T cells can overcome diminished per-cell protective immunity in the absence of perforin.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Narni-Mancinelli, L. Campisi, D. Bassand, J. Cazareth, P. Gounon, N. Glaichenhaus, and G. Lauvau Memory CD8+ T cells mediate antibacterial immunity via CCL3 activation of TNF/ROI+ phagocytes J. Exp. Med., September 3, 2007; 204(9): 2075 - 2087. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. A. N. Messingham, V. P. Badovinac, A. Jabbari, and J. T. Harty A Role for IFN-{gamma} from Antigen-Specific CD8+ T Cells in Protective Immunity to Listeria monocytogenes J. Immunol., August 15, 2007; 179(4): 2457 - 2466. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. E. Hamilton, V. P. Badovinac, A. Khanolkar, and J. T. Harty Listeriolysin O-Deficient Listeria monocytogenes as a Vaccine Delivery Vehicle: Antigen-Specific CD8 T Cell Priming and Protective Immunity J. Immunol., September 15, 2006; 177(6): 4012 - 4020. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Jabbari and J. T. Harty Secondary memory CD8+ T cells are more protective but slower to acquire a central-memory phenotype J. Exp. Med., April 17, 2006; 203(4): 919 - 932. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.-F. Pahl-Seibert, M. Juelch, J. Podlech, D. Thomas, P. Deegen, M. J. Reddehase, and R. Holtappels Highly Protective In Vivo Function of Cytomegalovirus IE1 Epitope-Specific Memory CD8 T Cells Purified by T-Cell Receptor-Based Cell Sorting J. Virol., May 1, 2005; 79(9): 5400 - 5413. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. K. Nussbaum and J. L. Whitton The Contraction Phase of Virus-Specific CD8+ T Cells Is Unaffected by a Pan-Caspase Inhibitor J. Immunol., December 1, 2004; 173(11): 6611 - 6618. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |