HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Holman, P. O. Articles by Hogquist, K. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Holman, P. O. Articles by Hogquist, K. A.

The Central Tolerance Response to Male Antigen in Normal Mice Is Deletion and Not Receptor Editing ¹

Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology and Center for Immunology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455

It is widely accepted that developing T cells can undergo clonal deletion in the thymus in response to a high affinity self-Ag. This is largely based on studies of TCR transgenics. However, encounter with high affinity self-Ag can also result in receptor editing in TCR transgenic models. Because all TCR transgenics display ectopic receptor expression, the tolerance mechanism that predominates in normal mice remains an open question. When self-Ag drives receptor editing during T cell development, one expects to find in-frame, self-reactive TCR joins on TCR excision circles (TRECs), which are the products of secondary V/J recombination in the TCR locus. Such joins are not expected if clonal deletion occurs, because the progenitor cell would be eliminated by apoptosis. To test the relative utilization of receptor editing vs clonal deletion, we determined the frequency of in-frame, male-specific joins on TRECs in male and female HY transgenic mice. In comparison with female HY transgenic mice, our analysis showed a lower frequency of TRECs with male-reactive V17J57 joins in male mice. Thus, it would appear that receptor editing is not a predominant tolerance mechanism for this self-Ag.