|
|
||||||||
1,3-Gal Is Inhibited in Genetically Modified Porcine Cells1

* Department of Molecular Sciences, Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Cheshire, CT 06410; and
Laboratory of Immunogenetics, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD 20852
Delayed xenograft rejection is a major hurdle that needs to be
addressed to prolong graft survival in pig-to-primate
xenotransplantation. NK cell activation has been implicated in delayed
xenograft rejection. Both Ab-dependent and independent mechanisms are
responsible for the high susceptibility of porcine cells to human NK
cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Previous reports demonstrated a role of
Gal
1,3-Gal Ag in triggering the Ab-independent responses. We
hypothesize that expression of CD80 and/or CD86 on porcine cells may
also play a role in NK cell activation as human NK cells express a
variant of CD28. Our initial analysis showed that porcine endothelial
cells and fibroblasts express CD86, but not CD80. Genetic engineering
of these cells to express hCD152-hCD59, a chimeric molecule designed to
block CD86 in cis, was accompanied by a reduction in
susceptibility to human NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity. The use of a
specific anti-porcine CD86-blocking Ab and the NK92 and YTS cell
lines further confirmed the involvement of CD86 in triggering NK
cell-mediated lysis of porcine cells. Maximal protection was achieved
when hCD152-hCD59 was expressed in H transferase-transgenic cells,
which show reduced Gal
1,3-Gal expression. In this work, we describe
two mechanisms of human NK cell-mediated rejection of porcine cells and
demonstrate that genetically modified cells resist Ab-independent NK
cell-mediated cytotoxicity.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. C. Baumann, P. Forte, R. J. Hawley, R. Rieben, M. K. J. Schneider, and J. D. Seebach Lack of Galactose-{alpha}-1,3-Galactose Expression on Porcine Endothelial Cells Prevents Complement-Induced Lysis but Not Direct Xenogeneic NK Cytotoxicity J. Immunol., May 15, 2004; 172(10): 6460 - 6467. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |