HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Zöller, M. Articles by Christ, O. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Zöller, M. Articles by Christ, O.

Prophylactic Tumor Vaccination: Comparison of Effector Mechanisms Initiated by Protein Versus DNA Vaccination¹

Margot Zöller^2,*, and Oliver Christ^*

^* Department of Tumor Progression and Immune Defense, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; and Department of Applied Genetics, University of Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany

Clinical success in tumor vaccination frequently does not reach expectation. Since vaccination protocols are quite variable, we used the murine renal cell carcinoma line RENCA transfected with the lacZ gene (RENCA--gal) to compare the efficacy of two different vaccination strategies or their combination and to elaborate on the underlying mechanisms. BALB/c mice were vaccinated either with naked lacZ DNA or with attenuated Salmonella typhimurium transformed with lacZ DNA or with dendritic cells (DC) loaded with the -galactosidase protein or mice were vaccinated with both DNA and protein. Although all regimens led to a prolongation of survival time, oral vaccination with transfected S. typhimurium followed by i.v. transfer of protein-loaded DC provided the optimal schedule. In this setting, >50% of mice remained tumor free after challenge with 10 times the lethal tumor dose of RENCA--gal. As explored in transfer experiments, the superior efficacy of combining DNA and protein vaccination is due to the facts that 1) optimal protection depends on both activated CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ cells and 2) CD8⁺ CTL are most strongly activated by vaccination with transformed Salmonella, whereas vaccination with protein-loaded DC is superior for the activation of Th. The latter induced sustained activation of CTL and recruitment of nonadaptive defense mechanisms. The data demonstrate the strength of DNA vaccination, particularly by the oral route, and provide evidence that a combined treatment with protein-loaded DC can significantly increase the therapeutic efficacy.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. Zhang, L. Gao, L. Zhao, B. Guo, K. Ji, Y. Tian, J. Wang, H. Yu, J. Hu, D. V. Kalvakolanu, et al. Intratumoral Delivery and Suppression of Prostate Tumor Growth by Attenuated Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium Carrying Plasmid-Based Small Interfering RNAs Cancer Res., June 15, 2007; 67(12): 5859 - 5864. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Luhrs, W. Schmidt, R. Kutil, M. Buschle, S. N. Wagner, G. Stingl, and A. Schneeberger Induction of Specific Immune Responses by Polycation-Based Vaccines J. Immunol., November 1, 2002; 169(9): 5217 - 5226. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Haupt, M. Roggendorf, and K. Mann The Potential of DNA Vaccination against Tumor-Associated Antigens for Antitumor Therapy Experimental Biology and Medicine, April 1, 2002; 227(4): 227 - 237. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]